Hello all,
I have posted earlier regarding setting up an IPSEC gateway with Bering
UCLIBC 2.0.
I am happy to report that I have successfully setup an IPSEC tunnel between
two routers (External interface only).
The next step is to setup IPSEC so that I can communicate from router A's
internal
On Tue, 25 Nov 2003, Troy Aden wrote:
The next step is to setup IPSEC so that I can communicate from router A's
internal subnet to Router B's internal subnet.
ROUTER A Eth0 = 24.78.140.* -- Eth1 = 172.16.0.0/16
I want 172.16.0.0/16 network to be able to communicate with 192.168.1.0/24
kp
Thanks, I have a copy of your message. The thing I'd like to improve is the
recovery mechanism. I somehow hate having to run a cron job to check if a
connection was broken due to IP change. I believe there must be a way for
IpSec to detect that the other endpoint is not reachable and to
Hi
Has anyone successfully set up an IPSec tunnel with 2 dynamic endpoints.
Would you mind to share the shorewall and up/down scripts.
I seem to have a problem setting it up because
1) shorewall needs to be up to get the IP address of the remote gateway
and
2) shorewall needs the address
On Tue, 2003-09-30 at 10:40, Erich Titl wrote:
Hi
Has anyone successfully set up an IPSec tunnel with 2 dynamic endpoints.
Would you mind to share the shorewall and up/down scripts.
I seem to have a problem setting it up because
1) shorewall needs to be up to get the IP address of the
Erich;
pls search mailinglist - I described a solution for ipsec between two dynamic
leaf routers 12/2002 or 1/2003.
It seems to work, anyway comments and improvements are welcome
kp
Am Dienstag, 30. September 2003 19:40 schrieb Erich Titl:
Hi
Has anyone successfully set up an IPSec tunnel
PROTECTED]
Subject: [leaf-user] IPSEC/shorewall with 2 dynamic IP's
Hi
Has anyone successfully set up an IPSec tunnel with 2 dynamic endpoints.
Would you mind to share the shorewall and up/down scripts.
I seem to have a problem setting it up because
1) shorewall needs to be up to get the IP address
Hi
I have 2 Bering 1.0_stable stations with FreeSwan 1.99 running over a
wireless link. Occasionally (especially on rainy and stormy days) the
tunnel breaks down. If I stop ipsec on one end and ping the remote ipsec
gateway I get good results. Starting the tunnel again removes the
capability
]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Huy Bui [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, August 23, 2003 8:44 PM
Subject: RE: [leaf-user] Ipsec on bering 1.2
Sorry, but I have changed my ISP without changing my mailing list
subscription, and, of course, my provious mail was rejected...
Normal
Hello all,
I use an IPSEC client (SafeNet SoftRemote 9) to connect to Bering (v 1.2)
FreeSWAN and got a lot of warnings like that in the auth.log file on the
router:
Aug 12 12:06:53 router pluto[14353]: packet from 209.139.216.225:4500: not
enough room in input packet for ISAKMP Message
Aug 12
Hello,
I'm a longtime user of Charles Steinkuehler's distributions, thanks Charles
for the 3 years of great firewalls for me! I just got Dachstein-CD Version
1.0.2 working for me and now have ssh access to the firewall. As an aside I
had problems with using a 1680k image with the Dachstein CD,
I checked the packages for Bering 1.2. Only one IPSec package called
ipsec.lrp exists while in 1.0, we had ipsec.lrp and ipsec509.lrp. Does the
ipsec.lrp for bering 1.2 support X509 certificates?
Mohan
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
Le Lundi 21 Juillet 2003 06:58, S Mohan a écrit :
I checked the packages for Bering 1.2. Only one IPSec package called
ipsec.lrp exists while in 1.0, we had ipsec.lrp and ipsec509.lrp. Does the
ipsec.lrp for bering 1.2 support X509 certificates?
Mohan
Among other things, yes.
IPSEC used by
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
We thought that we had a successful tunnel between our side, with DCD
gateway and freeswan v1.91, and a client with a cisco router. Both
sides successfully ping each other; but, the application on our side
cannot establish a tcp connection to the
Hi
We are considering using a Bering firewall to connect two networks via the
internet. Both these networks will have a windows 2000 server which will
need to communicate with each other.
I have got to grips with installing Bering and Shorewall, but I am
struggling with ipsec
I have several
Simon Chalk wrote:
Hi
We are considering using a Bering firewall to connect two networks via the
internet. Both these networks will have a windows 2000 server which will
need to communicate with each other.
I have got to grips with installing Bering and Shorewall, but I am
struggling with ipsec
I
PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 1:01 PM
To: Simon Chalk
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [leaf-user] Ipsec Setup with Bering LEAF
Simon Chalk wrote:
Hi
We are considering using a Bering firewall to connect two networks via
the internet. Both these networks will have a windows 2000
On Thursday 27 March 2003 04:10 am, Simon Chalk wrote:
1) Do I need ipsec or ipsec509 for use with windows 2000 servers located on
each network.
As CS noted, this doesn't matter as long as both are gateways.
x509 certs are much more difficult than RSA-keys IMHO.
2) If I do need ipsec509,
that it was necessary.
Regards,
Simon.
-Original Message-
From: Charles Steinkuehler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 27 March 2003 13:01
To: Simon Chalk
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [leaf-user] Ipsec Setup with Bering LEAF
Simon Chalk wrote:
Hi
We are considering using a Bering firewall
Simon Chalk wrote:
Hi Charles,
Are you saying that windows 2000 is quite happy with RSA keys, and will
still offer a secure path connecting two networks. I am a little confused
about the whole concept of which method to use, and the relevance of X509. I
had assumed that since it gets mentioned
and sql
1433.
Regards,
Simon.
-Original Message-
From: Charles Steinkuehler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 27 March 2003 13:27
To: Simon Chalk
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [leaf-user] Ipsec Setup with Bering LEAF
Simon Chalk wrote:
Hi Charles,
Are you saying that windows
Hi all,
i have setup a Bering-uClibc 1.1 version with ipsec.lrp and shorewall. I
have some tunnels running with out a problem. No i like to setup some Road
Warrior users.
I follow the settings under http://www.shorewall.net/IPSEC.htm.
In /etc/shorewall/zones i put:
ZONEDISPLAY COMMENTS
On Thu, 27 Mar 2003, Guillermo Kunst wrote:
I need to setup dif. rules for each mobile user. So i was thinking to
control this over the zone name (eg. mvpn1 - loc, mvpn2 only port 80 to
loc etc)
But how is shorewall seeing that this user is now aktiv??
You will need to use Shorewall's
Dear Tom,
yes you are right. I follow the dynamic zone descr. But i´m noch sure where
to put the /sbin/shorewall add ipsec0:134.28.54.2 vpn2 command in freeswan.
Can you give me a direction?
Thanks for your help
Guillermo
--On Donnerstag, 27. März 2003 09:20 -0800 Tom Eastep
[EMAIL
On Thu, 27 Mar 2003, Guillermo Kunst wrote:
Dear Tom,
yes you are right. I follow the dynamic zone descr. But i´m noch sure where
to put the /sbin/shorewall add ipsec0:134.28.54.2 vpn2 command in freeswan.
Can you give me a direction?
You put it in the updown' script that you specify
Hi all folks,
I am jumping into IPSec with my two feet.
I am using Bering 1.1.
I am surprised to see that our friend Jacques NILO has stored minus files for Bering
1.1 than the previous 1.0.
I have trieved the IPSEC.LRP, but not IPSEC509.LRP and not MAWK.LRP in his current
directories
On Monday 10 March 2003 03:07 pm, Francois BERGERET wrote:
Hi all folks,
I am jumping into IPSec with my two feet.
I am using Bering 1.1.
I am surprised to see that our friend Jacques NILO has stored minus files
for Bering 1.1 than the previous 1.0. I have trieved the IPSEC.LRP, but not
]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] la part de Lynn Avants
Envoyé : lundi 10 mars 2003 22:36
À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : Re: [leaf-user] IPsec with Bering 1.1 without MAWK.LRP and
IPSEC509.LRP ?
On Monday 10 March 2003 03:07 pm, Francois BERGERET wrote:
Hi all folks,
I am jumping into IPSec
On Monday 10 March 2003 22:07, Francois BERGERET wrote:
Hi all folks,
I am jumping into IPSec with my two feet.
I am using Bering 1.1.
I am surprised to see that our friend Jacques NILO has stored minus files
for Bering 1.1 than the previous 1.0. I have trieved the IPSEC.LRP, but not
Hi
I am planning ro route a remote location on a wireless link through a ipsec
tunnel to the internet. The set up specifies a
0.0.0.0/0 subnet behind the tunnel, but this is what I get in the route
after issuing ipsec start.
This is on Bering 1_0.stable 2.4.18
before ipsec start
# ip route
Erich Titl wrote:
Hi
I am planning ro route a remote location on a wireless link through a ipsec
tunnel to the internet. The set up specifies a
0.0.0.0/0 subnet behind the tunnel, but this is what I get in the route
after issuing ipsec start.
This is on Bering 1_0.stable 2.4.18
before ipsec
Charles
Charles Steinkuehler wrote the following at 22:56 11.02.2003:
The routes might puzzle you, but they are correct.
Bingo, thanks, sometimes it helps if someone explains netmasks... :-(
Erich
THINK
Püntenstrasse 39
8143 Stallikon
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP Fingerprint: BC9A 25BC
Thanks
It seems that the ipsec module is needed. Do you know, if the actual
kernel is patched for freeswan or if we need a dedicated kernel?
Vladimir I. wrote:
Bering packages for 2.4.20 kernels may do. Although I'm not sure if
ipsec support is compiled in or it's in modules in Bering.
The kernel source is not patched for FreeSWAN. Actually if you just
copy kernel image (linux) from Bering IPSEC over standard
WISP-Dist's image, as well as ipsec modules, it might work. However
you will loose patches which are integrated into WISP-Dist kernel.
Nicolas Cedraschi wrote:
Thanks
On Monday 20 January 2003 11:51 pm, Darren Schell wrote:
Lynn,
I have read your Basic IPSec VPN HowTo at
http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/guitarlynn/ipsec.txt and have set out
to set up a subnet to subnet scenario. If you have the time to help me
sort out why the VPN doesn't seem to work,
Hi everybody,
Thanks for your competent help so far (Special thanks to Vladimir), we
really profited of your knowledge.
Here rolls in the next question
Is there a dedicated ipsec module and package around for wisp?
Or will any bering module/package do?
All the best
Daniel Nicloas
Bering packages for 2.4.20 kernels may do. Although I'm not sure if
ipsec support is compiled in or it's in modules in Bering.
Nicolas Cedraschi wrote:
Hi everybody,
Thanks for your competent help so far (Special thanks to Vladimir), we
really profited of your knowledge.
Here rolls in the
I know historically you could not have a Linux router act as an ipsec gateway endpoint
and support ipsec pass through. Is that still the case?
Basically, if I have a freswan-freeswan lan to lan VPN in place can a user behind on
of those routers with SSH Sentinel or Windoze ipsec masq thru the
On Monday 20 January 2003 11:30 am, Todd Pearsall wrote:
I know historically you could not have a Linux router act as an ipsec
gateway endpoint and support ipsec pass through. Is that still the case?
The same port is being used and the router cannot answer and forward on
the same port, so this
Le Lundi 20 Janvier 2003 17:36, Vladimir I. a écrit :
Bering packages for 2.4.20 kernels may do. Although I'm not sure if
ipsec support is compiled in or it's in modules in Bering.
It's available as a module (comes from freeswan 1.99)
It's here:
Hy
I´m setting up a VPN conection with ipsec.lrp. I also seen a ipsec509.lrp
module. In few words, what is the main difference between ipsec.lrp and
ipsec509.lrp?
Regards
Heriberto
Ahora podés usar Yahoo! Messenger desde tu celular. Aprendé cómo hacerlo en Yahoo!
Móvil:
Hello Heriberto
Hy
I´m setting up a VPN conection with ipsec.lrp. I also seen a ipsec509.lrp
module. In few words, what is the main difference between ipsec.lrp and
ipsec509.lrp?
The ipsec.lrp is the freeswan package.
The ipsec509 is the same package patched for the use of
certificates to
Chad has made Win2K configuration using IPSec look simple in his
documentation. It does not seem as if the description is enough to get it to
work well first shot. I've had a horrid time going thro' a Win2K
configuration. I've been in the Windows world for over 12 years and Win2K
IPSec
S Mohan wrote:
I'm trying to setup a VPN connection between a Win2K box and LEAF using a preshared key setup.
I went as per the steps given inthe Microsoft site tosetup IPSec negotiations from IP to IP. The
URL is
I'm trying to generate keys using ipsec on Bering. It seems to take for
ever. Do not know if I've not given all arguments and hence program is
waiting or it is just taking time. Any help please.
Chad's chapter talks of using another machine for generating the
certificates etc. Are these utilities
-Original Message-
From: S Mohan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2002 9:06 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [leaf-user] ipsec in bering
I'm trying to generate keys using ipsec on Bering. It seems to take for
ever. Do not know if I've not given all arguments and hence
Ok, my fears were correct :( I have a problem with a race condition the
involves IPSec and Shorewall with Bering 1rc3... Here's the bad ASCII art
again:
10.0.0.0/24firewall 192.168.0.0/24
| |
firewall - Internet
|
Hi Lynn
I got it up and running after some debugging, finally it seems to boil down
to the fact that the zywall supports ranges on the ip addresses whereas
freeSwan only supports entire subnets. For ipsec a range from 0 to 255 is
_NOT_ a subnet.
I have now a tunnel between a Zywall10 and a
Just have to say many thanks Lynn for your explanation and your patience
I'm going to try to connect with another ISP, giving away the
firewall=yes and trace packets with tcpdump.
Ill' inform the list with my investigation.
Thanks a lot
Stephane
guitarlynn wrote:
OK, now that we have a lot
Hi everyone
I am finally attacking the ipsec connection planned for months,
unfortunately whithout much success, here is what I am trying:
internal C class network 194.124.158.0/24
|
Bering rc3
217.162.140.106
|
Internet through cable modem on both ends
actually hooked on the same switch which
On Sunday 17 November 2002 09:03, Erich Titl wrote:
+ sed -n 17,$p /var/log/messages
+ egrep -i ipsec|klips|pluto
+ cat
Nov 17 14:58:17 gatekeeper kernel: klips_info:pfkey_cleanup: shutting
down PF_KEY domain sockets.
Nov 17 15:07:26 gatekeeper kernel: klips_info:pfkey_cleanup: shutting
As you ask me, i put below the output of ipsec barf and the output of auth.log :
The ipsec barf command was launch after i try to initiate the tunnel from my
road-warrior (using a RAS connection to an ISP).
The problem seems to come from the 3 lines from auth.log :
Nov 16 13:39:21 firewall
Hi,
I'm trying to create a host subnet connection from an XP box to a subnet
behind a Bering V1 rc4 NAT firewall.
When the XP client pings an interface on the firewalled subnet, it returns
one Negotiating IP security response followed by Request timed out for
its other ping packets. Judging
OK, now that we have a lot of information, let's go through what's here.
# defaults for subsequent connection descriptions
conn %default
# How persistent to be in (re)keying negotiations (0 means very).
keyingtries=0
# RSA authentication with keys from DNS.
#
On Saturday 16 November 2002 15:49, Lee Kimber wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to create a host subnet connection from an XP box to a
subnet behind a Bering V1 rc4 NAT firewall.
When the XP client pings an interface on the firewalled subnet, it
returns one Negotiating IP security response followed by
Likely this is a incorrect option set up on the WinXP client. The Bering
Users manual
( http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/jnilo/buipsec.html#AEN1436 )
has instructions for Win2K, if they help. Possibly Chad Carr or someone
else that has connected with WinXP could help here.
Yeah, I have been
Homer Parker wrote:
Firewall A
3: eth0: BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 100
link/ether 00:30:1b:09:d3:ee brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet 64.216.xxx.xxx/xx brd 64.216.105.127 scope global eth0
4: eth1: BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 100
Hi all,
I have a problem with the last distro Bering-rc4 and ipsec.lrp package.
I try to conect with a road-warrior and every seems ok (SA established)
except that the /var/log/auth.log mention a problem with the
impossibility to write the route add for the IP of my road warrior.
I follow all
On Fri, 15 Nov 2002 11:00:55 -0600 Charles Steinkuehler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
Um...there should be no race condition in the assignment of ipsecN
interface numbering. This is done by the ipsec software. Normally,
Ok, maybe I don't understand the tunneling as well as I thought
On Friday 15 November 2002 16:55, Stef wrote:
Hi all,
I have a problem with the last distro Bering-rc4 and ipsec.lrp
package.
I try to conect with a road-warrior and every seems ok (SA
established) except that the /var/log/auth.log mention a problem with
the impossibility to write the
I'm having a bit of fun with a kinda unique setup... Let's see if I can
explain this where someone besides me understands what I'm talking about:
Firewall A
64.216.xxx.xxx eth0 Public
10.0.0.0/24 eth1Private
10.0.1.0/24 eth2Secret
Firewall B
192.168.1.0/24
]
Subject: Re: [leaf-user] ipsec connect to this?
Correct me if I am wrong; but, isn't transport mode solely for
host-to-host vpn's?
Everything seems to be OK in auth.log and ipsec look appears OK, when I
use tunnel mode -- however, we cannot ping nor telnet nor ftp to the
other side. tcpdump
Received following set of requirements for one of our DCD's to connect
to a remote non-DCD site:
ISAKMP Policy:
Encryption: 3DES
Hash: MD5
Authentication: pre shared keys
Diffie Helman group 1 or 2
Use the following key:
IPSec
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:leaf-user-admin;lists.sourceforge.net]On Behalf Of Michael D.
Schleif
Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 3:30 PM
To: LEAF
Subject: [leaf-user] ipsec connect to this?
Received following set of requirements for one of our DCD's to connect
to a remote
--On Wednesday, November 06, 2002 3:38 PM -0600 Joey Officer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you are questioning can IPSec be setup with DCD sure, you can use a
floppy, and with my limited experience, it looks like there is enough
information here to setup your ipsec.conf file, but I don't see a
Charles Steinkuehler
Thank you for your replay to my letter, as you wrote the problem was that
the two VPN gateways WILL NOT be able to ping each.
I am just now looking at five different Vmware-windows on my screen and the
workstations in each end have contact with each other over an
And now to my question
--
IPSEC SECRETS MORE THAN ONE TUNNEL
Configuration of Ipsec secrets
We have one head office, two shops, two employees with cable modems
with
DHCP but known IP addresses for the local nets and two Roadwarriors.
If
possible I would like to keep
Hello,
I have setup an IPSec vpn for our office network. Our firewall is a Debian Woody
box with shorewall 1.2. It shares our DSL connection. Following the
documentation, I have enabled a roadwarrior type tunnel like this:
# TYPE ZONEGATEWAY GATEWAY ZONE
On Monday 28 October 2002 13:11, Mathieu Gauthier-Pilote wrote:
The exact problem with this one Win2k box is that the firewall drops
packets arriving on UDP port 500. Do I need to setup the tunnel
differently with Shorewall? I guess I could just apply global rules
to let all IPSec traffic in,
I have a Bering RC3 firewall with an IPSec tunnel to a SonicWall that
works fine... Until the Bering box gets a new IP... Here's what I have in
ipsec.secrets:
64.216.xxx.xxx 208.189.yyy.yyy 0040100F1311 : PSK PreSharedKey
Of course, the first IP is Bering, the second SonicWall..
On Tue, 1 Oct 2002 13:09:36 +0200
Tomaso Scarsi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
anyone can help me?
Please post your ipsec.conf and ipsec.secrets files. Also send the output
of ip addr and ip route. We will get into barf if we have to.
--
Hi folks,
I want to set up SSH on my currently working great Bering CD, so I added
the libz, sshd, and sshkey .lrp packages to my existing CD, and
apparently declared them O.K., because they seem to load upon start-up.
But...I get this error message that is new-
ipsec_setup...unable to create
Hi folks,
This is strange. For some reason the dhcpd service isn't starting on my
new CD with the ssh stuff. When I type ps ax, I don't see the
/usr/bin/dhcpd eth1 that I normally see. Any suggestions? Thank you.
Craig
---
This sf.net email
Hi Erich,
Here's the results of df-
Filesystem 1k-blocks UsedAvailable
Use%Mounted On
/dev/root 614461440
100%/
Tmpfs 15292 4 15288
0% /tmp
Tmpfs 2048
Craig,
On Mon, 26 Aug 2002 07:51:57 MST Craig wrote:
Hi folks,
I want to set up SSH on my currently working great Bering CD, so I added
the libz, sshd, and sshkey .lrp packages to my existing CD, and
apparently declared them O.K., because they seem to load upon start-up.
But...I get this
Hi Craig,
--- Craig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi folks,
This is strange. For some reason the dhcpd service isn't starting on my
new CD with the ssh stuff. When I type ps ax, I don't see the
/usr/bin/dhcpd eth1 that I normally see. Any suggestions? Thank you.
I'm gonna guess that when you
At 17:22 26.08.2002, you wrote:
Hi Erich,
Here's the results of df-
Filesystem 1k-blocks UsedAvailable
Use%Mounted On
/dev/root 614461440
now what about this available 0
too many packages or too small root partition.
Hey thanks guys,
I have 32 Mb in this box, should I just make the syst_size twice as
big, for example, by adding the entry syst_size=12M after the
log_size=4M ? Will that work do you think? Thank you.
Craig
---
This sf.net email is
Hi Craig,
--- Craig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey thanks guys,
I have 32 Mb in this box, should I just make the syst_size twice as
big, for example, by adding the entry syst_size=12M after the
log_size=4M ? Will that work do you think? Thank you.
I'd suggest allocating the minimum amount of
Hi Cass,
Hey, that's a pretty cool idea. Since I'm creating my cd's on CD-RW's
and I'm not burning (no pun intended) through oodles of CD's, should I
just experiment and incrementally increase the syst_size= comment by,
say, 1Mb at a time until it works? Is there anything wrong with doing it
that
I want to turn on an LED if any vpn connection is up.
I'd like to minitor every couple seconds, 5 at most.
I can:ipsec auto --status and grep for an up connection
but that's a lot of overhead every few seconds.
Does anyone know if IPSec puts anything in /proc that signifies the status
Hi Craig,
--- Craig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Cass,
Hey, that's a pretty cool idea. Since I'm creating my cd's on CD-RW's
and I'm not burning (no pun intended) through oodles of CD's, should I
just experiment and incrementally increase the syst_size= comment by,
say, 1Mb at a time until
to know if this is reported in the FAQ. Have not checked myself.
Mohan
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Brad Fritz
Sent: 26 August 2002 21:00
To: Craig
Cc: LEAF
Subject: Re: [leaf-user] IPSec-SSH conflict?
Craig,
On Mon, 26 Aug 2002 07:51:57
Hi Chad,
Thanks for your corrected /usr/lib/ipsec/_startklips file.
It is ok now.
But I have another error, may be a bad parameter in my IPSec config files.
I have not the time this days to check it more...
I will start another request thread whan I will seen what is the problem.
Thanks for
On Sun, 11 Aug 2002 13:47:20 +0200
Francois BERGERET [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Chad,
Thanks to spend your time to help me (and others).
I have understood that you have trieve a bug in the IPSec package,
but I don't know how correct it by myself, due to my lack of competence
with
anything in it.
Thanks again.
Best Regards,
Francois BERGERET,
France.
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de Chad Carr
Envoye : dimanche 11 aout 2002 16:47
A : [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : Re: [leaf-user] IPSec doesn't found public
2002 23:38
À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : RE: [leaf-user] IPSec doesn't found public interface
Salut François
François BERGERET wrote the following at 23:15 05.08.2002:
Hi Chad !
Thanks in advance for your wondefull job.
Is it possible to modify your actual cd image to increase the capacity
I'm using Dachstein 1.0.2. How do I know which Ipsec.lrp (or
Ipsec509.lrp) to use to set up my VPN? I will likely be using the
Ipsec
capabilities built into my Windows clients and not Sentinel. I found
what looks to be a good tutorial at
--On Thursday, July 25, 2002 11:05:24 -0700 Dragon Wood
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
initiating Quick
Mode RSASIG+ENCRYPT+TUNNEL+PFS+DISABLEARRIVALCHECK to
replace #290
Any suggestion what might be the issue here? One of
the locations has a T1 connection and the other has a
ADSL
I am curious what version of FreeSWAN you are running.
I am on 1.97 and haven't seen any drops.
thanks
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by: Jabber - The world's fastest growing
real-time communications platform! Don't just IM. Build it
What is the url for the ipsec.o module?
Thanks
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by: Jabber - The world's fastest growing
real-time communications platform! Don't just IM. Build it in!
http://www.jabber.com/osdn/xim
Le Mardi 16 Juillet 2002 22:01, Godfried Duodu a écrit :
What is the url for the ipsec.o module?
Original (i.e. 1.97 version) for Bering 3:
http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/jnilo/bering/rc3/modules/net/ipsec/
New beta (1.98b version) for Bering 3:
What is the URL for ipsec.o modules, please?
Thanks!
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by: Jabber - The world's fastest growing
real-time communications platform! Don't just IM. Build it in!
http://www.jabber.com/osdn/xim
On Tuesday 16 July 2002 15:01, Godfried Duodu wrote:
What is the url for the ipsec.o module?
Thanks
What LEAF release and how would you like to setup ipsec?
Are you looking to use LEAF as an ipsec gateway or just
pass-through the firewall with a computer to use a remote network?
~Lynn Avants
This is it, thanks to all who answered!
Wonderful work guys and girls. Lynn's howto with Chad's windows setup info
makes a great combo.
IPSEC Its working!!
Thanks heaps,
Matt
I think the doc you are talking about is this ipsec howto, courtesy of
Lynn Avants, which describes four different
A while ago I saw a HOWTO on implementing IPSEC on LRP with 4 different
scenario's, may have been on Jacques' web site on sourceforge.
Now I cannot find it for the life of me, there is plenty of other
documentation around but it was the easiest read. I have IPSEC up and going
sort of, but I want
Le Mardi 9 Juillet 2002 14:42, Matthew Pozzi a écrit :
A while ago I saw a HOWTO on implementing IPSEC on LRP with 4 different
scenario's, may have been on Jacques' web site on sourceforge.
Now I cannot find it for the life of me, there is plenty of other
documentation around but it was the
Hi Matt,
It's not the source you requested, but I've found what I think is a
pretty well described and simple to follow explanation of IPSEC using
the FreeS/WAN project in a book called Red Hat Linux Security and
Optimization
by Mohammed J. Kabir. He describes setting up the road warrior
Here's an article I ran across (from a link in this mailing list, I
believe). It references duckling and LRP.
http://www.linuxjournal.com/article.php?sid=4772
And also another from seawall: http://seawall.sourceforge.net/IPSEC.html
or more recently, shorewall:
On Tue, 9 Jul 2002 22:42:47 +1000
Matthew Pozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A while ago I saw a HOWTO on implementing IPSEC on LRP with 4 different
scenario's, may have been on Jacques' web site on sourceforge.
Now I cannot find it for the life of me, there is plenty of other
documentation
101 - 200 of 261 matches
Mail list logo
