Hello,
I am using the older LRP 2.9.4 and now after creating my Router
image for an analog modem it does not work correctly:
Config:
eth0NW 192.168.1.64
IP 192.168.1.65
BC 192.168.1.95
NM 255.255.255.224
IP-Masquerading active
ppp0
On Tue, 15 Jul 2003, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am using the older LRP 2.9.4 and now after creating my Router
> image for an analog modem it does not work correctly:
>
> Config:
>
> eth0NW 192.168.1.64
> IP 192.168.1.65
> BC 192.168.1.95
>
Hello Jeff,
Am 10:18 2003-07-15 -0700 hat Jeff Newmiller geschrieben:
>I suspect this means you need:
>
>echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_dynaddr
It is already set to '1'
>> Problem 2: The idle tome is ignored !!! grrr !!! - quiet expensive !
>
>This may be due to activity in your network..
. Juli 2003 00:39
Betreff: [leaf-user] Now On-Line but big trouble...
>Hello,
>
>I am using the older LRP 2.9.4 and now after creating my Router
>image for an analog modem it does not work correctly:
>
>Config:
>
>eth0NW 192.168.1.64
>IP 192.168.1.
Am 15:16 2003-07-17 +0200 hat eric wolzak geschrieben:
>
>Hello Michelle
>
>Don't mix up
>demand has something to do with connecting
>idle with disconnecting
>
>demand does function correctly, not dialing in untill you do a ping or want
>to get a webpage and so on.
>demand doesno
Hello All,
Am 15:16 2003-07-17 +0200 hat eric wolzak geschrieben:
>
>Hello Michelle
>
>Don't mix up
>demand has something to do with connecting
>idle with disconnecting
>idle xxx will hangup the modem after an inactivity intervall of xxx
seconds
>soinclude idle in the ppp op
Have you tried running tcpdump or something similar to see where they are
originating from, where they are going and what ports are involved?
Tony
>
> But what can make this traffic !!!
>
> All 90-150 seconds I have around 5-12 packages TX and 2-4 packages RX
>
--
Am 12:52 2003-07-20 -0400 hat Tony geschrieben:
>
>Have you tried running tcpdump or something similar to see where they are
>originating from, where they are going and what ports are involved?
>
>Tony
No I have not...
because I curently no running SLINK-System (HD crash)
and can not build new L
ent: Sunday, July 20, 2003 6:49 PM
> To: leaf-user
> Subject: RE: [leaf-user] Now On-Line but big trouble...
>
>
> Am 12:52 2003-07-20 -0400 hat Tony geschrieben:
> >
> >Have you tried running tcpdump or something similar to see where they are
> >originating f
Michelle Konzack wrote:
No I have not...
because I curently no running SLINK-System (HD crash)
and can not build new LRP 2.9.4 Packages...
You could try the windows port of it, WinDump. It runs on
Win9x/ME/NT/2K/XP, and only requires a (freely available) single file
in addition to itself.
Arg
Am 02:44 2003-07-21 -0400 hat George Metz geschrieben:
>You could try the windows port of it, WinDump. It runs on
>Win9x/ME/NT/2K/XP, and only requires a (freely available) single file
>in addition to itself.
Cry, howl... I don't want to install 32-Bit-Windows !!!
>http://windump.
-
> From: Michelle Konzack [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, July 20, 2003 1:07 PM
> To: Tony
> Subject: RE: [leaf-user] Now On-Line but big trouble...
>
>
> Am 12:52 2003-07-20 -0400 hat Tony geschrieben:
> >
> >Have you tried running tcpdump or something similar
ut I can't remember which one. Same
rules apply though. I'd install it and see what it complains about not
being installed, then grab that.
Tony
> -Original Message-
> From: Michelle Konzack [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, July 20, 2003 1:07 PM
> To: Tony
&
Hello Michelle
>
>I have disconnected all 5 Switches from the router and it continue to
>log alone... So there is no problem with my Network which is working
>for years...
>
>But what can make this traffic !!!
>
>All 90-150 seconds I have around 5-12 packages TX and 2-4 packages RX
>
So the reques
Michelle Konzack wrote:
>...
and can not build new LRP 2.9.4 Packages...
Michelle
Mich, if you have 2.9.4, that means ipfwadm.
Just log the packets with that.
I think all you need are these as your first
firewall rules.
FW="/sbin/ipfwadm"
$FW -I -a accept -W eth0 -P tcp -o
$FW -I -a accept -
Hello All,
Am 22:32 2003-07-21 -0700 hat Matt Schalit geschrieben:
>I think all you need are these as your first
>firewall rules.
>
>FW="/sbin/ipfwadm"
>
>$FW -I -a accept -W eth0 -P tcp -o
>$FW -I -a accept -W eth0 -P udp -o
>$FW -O -a accept -W eth0 -P tcp -o
>$FW -O -a accept -W eth0 -P udp -
Am 22:32 2003-07-21 -0700 hat Matt Schalit geschrieben:
>FW="/sbin/ipfwadm"
>
>$FW -I -a accept -W eth0 -P tcp -o
>$FW -I -a accept -W eth0 -P udp -o
>$FW -O -a accept -W eth0 -P tcp -o
>$FW -O -a accept -W eth0 -P udp -o
YES - IT WORKS, - but too heavy !!!
Now I was 10 hour online and I have 5
Am 22:32 2003-07-21 -0700 hat Matt Schalit geschrieben:
>FW="/sbin/ipfwadm"
>
>$FW -I -a accept -W eth0 -P tcp -o
>$FW -I -a accept -W eth0 -P udp -o
>$FW -O -a accept -W eth0 -P tcp -o
>$FW -O -a accept -W eth0 -P udp -o
OK, becaus this is working fine and I still have the same error...
$FW -I
Michelle Konzack wrote:
...
= has no hosthame
12) IP fw-in62.29.118.8:102780.9.196.110:137
= has no hosthame
13) IP fw-in218.6.129.87:1029 80.9.196.110:137
= has no hosthame (ping timed out)
...
PORT 137 are Netbios !
Michelle Konzack wrote:
Am 22:32 2003-07-21 -0700 hat Matt Schalit geschrieben:
FW="/sbin/ipfwadm"
$FW -I -a accept -W eth0 -P tcp -o
$FW -I -a accept -W eth0 -P udp -o
$FW -O -a accept -W eth0 -P tcp -o
$FW -O -a accept -W eth0 -P udp -o
YES - IT WORKS, - but too heavy !!!
You should know
Michelle Konzack wrote:
$FW -I -a accept -W eth2 -P tcp -o
$FW -I -a accept -W eth2 -P udp -o
$FW -O -a accept -W eth2 -P tcp -o
$FW -O -a accept -W eth2 -P udp -o
OK, it is working...
But Now ther is another problem...
The TX of ppp0 is increasing all 15-20 seconds but there is nothing
in
Hello Matt,
Am 23:00 2003-07-22 -0700 hat Matt Schalit geschrieben:
>
>Michelle Konzack wrote:
>> YES - IT WORKS, - but too heavy !!!
>You should know, we like it *big* in the USA. I don't
>know how ya'll like it over in Germany, but, um 10 hours
>of sampling qualifies you for dual citizen
Michelle Konzack wrote:
and Do not like very much the USA even if I have american friends...
You don't like the USA? Fine. I'm through
with this thread.
---
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including
Data Repor
Am 10:06 2003-07-23 -0700 hat Matt Schalit geschrieben:
>
>Michelle Konzack wrote:
>> and Do not like very much the USA even if I have american friends...
>
>You don't like the USA? Fine. I'm through
>with this thread.
I was working for the french gov and I have very good access to some
non-pu
Hello Matt,
Am 23:05 2003-07-22 -0700 hat Matt Schalit geschrieben:
>If you put my rules in to far down, then the packets
>might match a rule of higher precedence and not get caught
>by my logging rules.
>
>If you fail to flush your ruleset and load all your
>rules from scratch each time you mak
As a start, I'd like to say, please take the politics off this list.
Matt did. You can too. Furthermore:
I was working for the french gov and I have very good access to some
non-public informations... The European had scanned by satelit the
Near-East (from Syria to Iran) for Radioactivity...
26 matches
Mail list logo
