Sherry,
You wrote:
Ann
In the LUG Etiquette Guidelines (link at the bottom of every email) is a
link to the Rootsweb site which explains how to turn off HTML in various
email program. The link is
http://helpdesk.rootsweb.com/listadmins/plaintext.html
Thanks for using Legacy.
Sherry
Customer
Ann,
In msn.com clikc NewTools in the drop down box youw will see set rtf OFF
(or something like that) click it and click OK in the pop-up. This sets
*all* you msn emails to plain text.
Ron Ferguson
_
For Genealogy,
Sorry, Ann,
I should have said that you can do this in replies, again by clicking tools.
So you can individualise each reply.
Ron Ferguson
_
For Genealogy, Software and Social visit:
http://www.fergys.co.uk
*New Site, New
Valerie,
Please see http://www.legacyfamilytree.com/helpDLL-OCXerrors.asp
However, basically I am afraid you need to uninstall and reinstall from the
Legacy site and not by using the updates. This should not affect your data
files but if it does worry you, then copy C:\Legacy\Data to My
Ann,
Those aren't our instructions - the link is to a Rootsweb site.
Before we switched servers some time ago, the LUG list deleted messages that
were in HTML. Any messages sent in HTML would have never made it to the
list. Unfortunately, our new program that we switched to doesn't have this
I bought Vs. 5 first then when vs. 6 came out, I bought it, but in my opinion,
there was very little difference. I actually imported one of my family files
back into FTM recently just because of the charts, and reports, I think Legacy
could do a much better job on this. I loved the Events
Thanks Ron, MSN didn't mention about replies, but...I didn't ask.
Best,
Ann
- Original Message -
From: ronald ferguson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2007 5:33 AM
Subject: Re: It is possible to send in plain text in MSN formerly
Jim,
Sorry it has taken me a couple of days to get round to it but I have now
checked your work having tested pretty well all the Gedcom formats with
sources attached and can confirm that in all the cases I tested a source was
added to the name Living on all the Gedcoms I tested.
In some
Just like the vast majority of us have embraced the change from black
white TV to colour TV and then to flat screen TV, from LP's to 8 track to
cassette to CD, from film to Beta to VHS to DVD, from film to digital photo,
from mail by post to email, etc ... I believe we should simply embrace the
C.G. Ouimet wrote:
Just like the vast majority of us have embraced the change from black
white TV to colour TV and then to flat screen TV, from LP's to 8 track to
cassette to CD, from film to Beta to VHS to DVD, from film to digital photo,
from mail by post to email, etc ... I believe we should
AMEN!!!
Paul Abell
What a glorious world God Almighty has given us. How thankless and
ungrateful we are, and how we labor to mar His gifts. ~ Gen. Robert E. Lee,
CSA
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of C.G. Ouimet
Phil,
Neither Quimet's nor Abel's messages had an attachment when they arrived in
my inbox.
Kay Fordham
- Original Message -
From: Phil Hawkins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2007 4:30 PM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Embracing Change
The email from CQ Quimet aka CG Ouimet did not include an attachment.
C.G. Ouimet
Kingston, ON
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Phil
Hawkins
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2007 19:30
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re:
Phil,
It's not a virus but a problem with the way the email was sent in the
first place. It only occurs with senders who use Outlook and who have
their Outlook set in certain ways.
The sort answer is that winmail.dat contains formatting information. My
guess is that you aren't using Outlook
Phil wrote:
When CQ Quimet sent his message on the above topic it came with
an
attachement WINMAIL.DAT
So did Paul Abel's response. . . . . . . . . .
hm, there were NO attachments when mine came in.
And my thoughts on HTML . . . . . . I use html myself on
everything but this list. I like
Not withstanding my earlier comments/preferences, I am set-up in Outlook to
send as plain text to this group because of the outrage members of this
group often have toward non-plain-text.
I am trying to comply to something I don't even believe in ...
C.G. Ouimet
Kingston, ON
-Original
The file winmail.dat often appears when sending e-mail between Microsoft
Outlook and other e-mail readers. See this link on answer.com for more
details on what it is and how to fix it.
http://email.about.com/od/outlooktips/qt/et121705.htm
It is not a virus.
Ann
-Original Message-
Thanks Jackie
I can rest easy knowing it is not a virus (my AV system is updated
daily so I was surprised something suspicious got through) and the
article you referred to explains it all
Regards
Phil
Jackie King wrote:
Phil,
It's not a virus but a problem with the way the email was sent
It, and Pauls, included an adverisement, which perfectly illustrates the
dangers of using html in posts, Though to be fair to Paul that was probably
the original one.
Ron Ferguson
_
For Genealogy, Software and Social
I'm rather new using Legacy and I have the same problem. I often want to refer
to info on the persons screen but cant do so while in the research mode.
- Original Message -
From: Pat H
To: LegacyUserGroup
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2007 8:37 PM
Subject: [LegacyUG] Entering info
I often question the validity of it (Familysearch.org) as well.are we
wasting valuable time on something that may not have much integrity anyway?
Not to knock it as an invaluable start - but I do have a very busy life and my
research time is VERY valuable to me...I somehow don't feel
FamilySearch has some good solid info - but the ANCESTRAL FILE withing
Family Search (and also the Pedigree Resource File in it) is just submitted
trees from other researchers. The quality will vary greatly depending on
who did the research, and everything needs to be taken with a very big grain
Thanks Ron,
I came to the same conclusion. I've spent the better part of a day reading
and re-reading the help files, the Tips and Troubleshooting pages in the
Legacy web pages and searching the LUG archives until I'm pretty well blind
and sick of the whole thing. Didn't find anything of any
Ahh, here comes my two cents and a question. I use LDS data knowing full
well that it is the result of many inputs from many persons. I also use
www.donnorman.com family files the same way, knowing it too comes from many
sources and I am hoping to learn the best way to enter these two iffy
Everything I get from any LDS website I use a Source
named 'IGI', which tells me that I NEED to reverify
it, but gives me clues where to look.
Rich in LA CA
--- Pat H [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In using Research Guidance, I am immediately taking
to Family Tree, which I think is and LDS site. It
Where you do access family files at www.donnorman.com? Looked like
everything but family files to me.
Ruth A. (Sconza Testa) Nerud
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: Sandra Tyler Duncan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2007
To set default Surety level, click Options from Main Menu, then
choose Choose Customize, then Sources tab, then under Source Surety,
the default is probably set to 3. You can change it anything from 4
(convincing evidence) to 0 (Have not decided yet). 3 is Almost certain
conclusion. A safer
27 matches
Mail list logo
