Re: [Bulk] RE: [LegacyUG] Same Sex Relationship Entries

2009-08-11 Thread Kirstin
Alternate Names. It will only say. Emily is usually called Emmy - no coding. I'm just wondering if it will ever be fixed. Ruth - Original Message - From: "Robert Carneal USA" < carnea...@adelphia.net> To: Sent: Monday, August 10, 2009 2:13 PM Subject: Re: [Bulk] RE: [

Re: [Bulk] RE: [LegacyUG] Same Sex Relationship Entries

2009-08-10 Thread Pauline B. Cramer
[mailto:k...@legacyfamilytree.com] On Behalf Of Beverly Walker Sent: Monday, August 10, 2009 9:38 AM To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com Subject: RE: [Bulk] RE: [LegacyUG] Same Sex Relationship Entries We've discussed this in the past and Legacy told us that they were not going to accom

RE: [Bulk] RE: [LegacyUG] Same Sex Relationship Entries

2009-08-10 Thread RICHARD SCHULTHIES
LA CA --- On Mon, 8/10/09, Ron Bernier wrote: > From: Ron Bernier > Subject: RE: [Bulk] RE: [LegacyUG] Same Sex Relationship Entries > To: "LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com" > > Date: Monday, August 10, 2009, 12:26 PM > Her responses always give the > impres

Re: [Bulk] RE: [LegacyUG] Same Sex Relationship Entries

2009-08-10 Thread Patti Wyble
Sorry, meant to address to Walter, not Ron - Original Message > From: Patti Wyble > To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com > Sent: Monday, August 10, 2009 4:42:41 PM > Subject: Re: [Bulk] RE: [LegacyUG] Same Sex Relationship Entries > > Well, Ron, I certainly

Re: [Bulk] RE: [LegacyUG] Same Sex Relationship Entries

2009-08-10 Thread Patti Wyble
ay, August 10, 2009 2:56:34 PM > Subject: Re: [Bulk] RE: [LegacyUG] Same Sex Relationship Entries > > Ron, > > I only drop in for a couple of days every 6 months and this fuss about > nothing > is one reason. While the quote you mention may not mean anything to you, &g

Re: [Bulk] RE: [LegacyUG] Same Sex Relationship Entries

2009-08-10 Thread Dennis M . Kowallek
On Mon, 10 Aug 2009 13:26:15 -0500, "Ruth Nerud" wrote: >Do you know if allowing Alternate Names to be included in the Name Index is >still on the wish list for Descendent Book Reports in Word? Ruth: It probably would have been a good idea to start a new thread (subject line) for this topic.

Re: [Bulk] RE: [LegacyUG] Same Sex Relationship Entries

2009-08-10 Thread WALTER D. CONNER
Ron, I only drop in for a couple of days every 6 months and this fuss about nothing is one reason. While the quote you mention may not mean anything to you, neither does your fuss mean anything to me. "Same sex marriages have been legal in other countries for many years before they were legal

RE: [Bulk] RE: [LegacyUG] Same Sex Relationship Entries

2009-08-10 Thread CE Wood
-Original Message- From: k...@legacyfamilytree.com [mailto:k...@legacyfamilytree.com] On Behalf Of Ruth Nerud Sent: Monday, August 10, 2009 12:23 PM To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com Subject: Re: [Bulk] RE: [LegacyUG] Same Sex Relationship Entries Robert, I have BOTH checked. This has

RE: [Bulk] RE: [LegacyUG] Same Sex Relationship Entries

2009-08-10 Thread Ron Bernier
alue. Ron Bernier Woonsocket, RI -Original Message- From: k...@legacyfamilytree.com [mailto:k...@legacyfamilytree.com] On Behalf Of WALTER D. CONNER Sent: Monday, August 10, 2009 4:09 PM To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com Subject: Re: [Bulk] RE: [LegacyUG] Same Sex Relationship Entries

Re: [Bulk] RE: [LegacyUG] Same Sex Relationship Entries

2009-08-10 Thread Bob
Millennia markets Legacy as suitable for both genealogy and family history. And it's not as though people in this thread are requesting a new feature in the program (such as witnesses or Unicode), which may or may not ever happen. People here are requesting the fixing of an existing bug. Sam

Re: [Bulk] RE: [LegacyUG] Same Sex Relationship Entries

2009-08-10 Thread Leonard Johnson Sweden
l USA" < > carnea...@adelphia.net> > To: > Sent: Monday, August 10, 2009 2:13 PM > > Subject: Re: [Bulk] RE: [LegacyUG] Same Sex Relationship Entries > > > Ruth- > > Do you have the deluxe version? Alternate names > in the name index shows up in my Lega

Re: [Bulk] RE: [LegacyUG] Same Sex Relationship Entries

2009-08-10 Thread Ruth Nerud
I just realized that myself - I should have changed the subject. Sorry. Ruth - Original Message - From: Leonard Johnson Sweden To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com Sent: Monday, August 10, 2009 2:38 PM Subject: Re: [Bulk] RE: [LegacyUG] Same Sex Relationship Entries I

Re: [Bulk] RE: [LegacyUG] Same Sex Relationship Entries

2009-08-10 Thread WALTER D. CONNER
Ron, It took from Legacy 2 to Legacy 7 to get Drop Down Box Charts which did not require a complete re-write, seems to me you are being a might impatient, why all the fuss especially since there is a work around. Walt Conner " stop making excuses" Legacy User Group guidelines: http

Re: [Bulk] RE: [LegacyUG] Same Sex Relationship Entries

2009-08-10 Thread Leonard Johnson Sweden
>>> >>> We are changing the world of genealogy! >>> >>> When replying to this message, please include all previous >>> correspondence. >>> Thanks. >>> >>> >>> -Original Message- >>> From: k...@legacyfamilytre

RE: [Bulk] RE: [LegacyUG] Same Sex Relationship Entries

2009-08-10 Thread Ron Bernier
...@legacyfamilytree.com] On Behalf Of gtemplem...@comcast.net Sent: Monday, August 10, 2009 3:14 PM To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com Subject: Re: [Bulk] RE: [LegacyUG] Same Sex Relationship Entries Ron, Where are you reading into her response ANYTHING to indicate such a re-write was either promised

Re: [Bulk] RE: [LegacyUG] Same Sex Relationship Entries

2009-08-10 Thread Ruth Nerud
bert Carneal USA" To: Sent: Monday, August 10, 2009 2:13 PM Subject: Re: [Bulk] RE: [LegacyUG] Same Sex Relationship Entries Ruth- Do you have the deluxe version? Alternate names in the name index shows up in my Legacy. I went to: Reports » Reports Menu » Books/Other » Descendants button.

Re: [Bulk] RE: [LegacyUG] Same Sex Relationship Entries

2009-08-10 Thread WALTER D. CONNER
Seems to me there is ample way to handle such things, if desired, in existing program, no call for it in Geneology and there are plenty of ways to handle it for Family History. Walt Conner Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages:

Re: [Bulk] RE: [LegacyUG] Same Sex Relationship Entries

2009-08-10 Thread Robert Carneal USA
baber...@worldnet.att.net - Original Message - From: "Sherry/Support" To: Sent: Monday, August 10, 2009 1:22 PM Subject: RE: [Bulk] RE: [LegacyUG] Same Sex Relationship Entries There are only two that I know of - the same sex relationships and Unicode. Thanks for using Lega

Re: [Bulk] RE: [LegacyUG] Same Sex Relationship Entries

2009-08-10 Thread gtempleman1
GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific Subject: Re: [Bulk] RE: [LegacyUG] Same Sex Relationship Entries Sherry, Is this database re-write ever going to happen?  We have been hearing this same response for at least three years now.  I think Millennia needs to be honest with their users.  Either this r

Re: [Bulk] RE: [LegacyUG] Same Sex Relationship Entries

2009-08-10 Thread Ruth Nerud
to get them into the Names Index. Ruth - Original Message - From: "CE Wood" To: Sent: Monday, August 10, 2009 2:06 PM Subject: RE: [Bulk] RE: [LegacyUG] Same Sex Relationship Entries Legacy has coded the names so that Word can create the Name Index. In the RTF Desce

RE: [Bulk] RE: [LegacyUG] Same Sex Relationship Entries

2009-08-10 Thread CE Wood
Group@legacyfamilytree.com Subject: Re: [Bulk] RE: [LegacyUG] Same Sex Relationship Entries Do you know if allowing Alternate Names to be included in the Name Index is still on the wish list for Descendent Book Reports in Word? Ruth Nerud baber...@worldnet.att.net - Original Message - From: &q

RE: [Bulk] RE: [LegacyUG] Same Sex Relationship Entries

2009-08-10 Thread Ron Bernier
ry/Support Sent: Monday, August 10, 2009 2:22 PM To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com Subject: RE: [Bulk] RE: [LegacyUG] Same Sex Relationship Entries There are only two that I know of - the same sex relationships and Unicode. Thanks for using Legacy. Sherry Customer Support Millennia Corpor

Re: [Bulk] RE: [LegacyUG] Same Sex Relationship Entries

2009-08-10 Thread Ruth Nerud
[Bulk] RE: [LegacyUG] Same Sex Relationship Entries There are only two that I know of - the same sex relationships and Unicode. Thanks for using Legacy. Sherry Customer Support Millennia Corporation supp...@legacyfamilytree.com http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com We are changing the world of geneal

RE: [Bulk] RE: [LegacyUG] Same Sex Relationship Entries

2009-08-10 Thread Sherry/Support
all previous correspondence. Thanks. -Original Message- From: k...@legacyfamilytree.com [mailto:k...@legacyfamilytree.com] On Behalf Of Bob Sent: Monday, August 10, 2009 10:24 AM To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com Subject: Re: [Bulk] RE: [LegacyUG] Same Sex Relationship Entries For

Re: [Bulk] RE: [LegacyUG] Same Sex Relationship Entries

2009-08-10 Thread Bob
For years we have been hearing that many often requested features would require a complete rewrite. There must be quite a list by now. The only thing we've never heard is just when this complete rewrite will be happening. Or even when it will get started. I doubt very much that it will be L

Re: [Bulk] RE: [LegacyUG] Same Sex Relationship Entries

2009-08-10 Thread Ron Bernier
rnier, sent from my Verizon Blackberry Storm - Original Message - From: k...@legacyfamilytree.com To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com Sent: Mon Aug 10 12:52:59 2009 Subject: RE: [Bulk] RE: [LegacyUG] Same Sex Relationship Entries It's not a matter that we're *not* going to

RE: [Bulk] RE: [LegacyUG] Same Sex Relationship Entries

2009-08-10 Thread Dick Davis
[mailto:k...@legacyfamilytree.com] On > Behalf Of Jack Earnshaw > Sent: Monday, August 10, 2009 5:19 AM > To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com > Subject: RE: [Bulk] RE: [LegacyUG] Same Sex Relationship Entries > > No it doesn't work. If you are adding a new person

RE: [Bulk] RE: [LegacyUG] Same Sex Relationship Entries

2009-08-10 Thread Sherry/Support
Thanks. -Original Message- From: k...@legacyfamilytree.com [mailto:k...@legacyfamilytree.com] On Behalf Of Beverly Walker Sent: Monday, August 10, 2009 9:38 AM To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com Subject: RE: [Bulk] RE: [LegacyUG] Same Sex Relationship Entries We've discussed this in the p

RE: [Bulk] RE: [LegacyUG] Same Sex Relationship Entries

2009-08-10 Thread Beverly Walker
add it as an alternate setting. Beverly -Original Message- From: k...@legacyfamilytree.com [mailto:k...@legacyfamilytree.com] On Behalf Of Jack Earnshaw Sent: Monday, August 10, 2009 5:19 AM To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com Subject: RE: [Bulk] RE: [LegacyUG] Same Sex Relationsh

RE: [Bulk] RE: [LegacyUG] Same Sex Relationship Entries

2009-08-10 Thread Jack Earnshaw
11 To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com Subject: [Bulk] RE: [LegacyUG] Same Sex Relationship Entries What happens if, rather than checking "M" or "F", you check "?" for the sex of each partner? Not ideal, obviously, but does it work? CE From: