://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/
_
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
> Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Legacy bugs - For Ron
> Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2008 12:15:36 -0700
>
> Ron:
>
> So
@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Legacy bugs - For Ron
Thanks, Geoff, also Dave
Ron Ferguson
_
*New* Insert Pictures Into your Web Pages - Blogs
http://www.fergys.co.uk
View the Grimshaw Family Tree at:
http
://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/
_
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
> Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Legacy bugs - For Ron
> Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2008 06:00:53 -0700
>
> Ron,
>
> D
: legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Legacy bugs - For Ron
Kirsten,
Eureka! subject to this being the same in Word as in OOo.
I changed the Footnote reference number in OOo to Roman Numerals. The only
references which appeared in the footnotes were those relating to
bject: RE: [LegacyUG] Legacy bugs - For Ron
> Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2008 10:34:00 -0700
>
> Ron:
>
> I'm sorry to hear about this new issue but it's probably well that you
> discovered it early on, and perhaps it will be corrected in the update Geoff
> mentioned. Good luck, a
thanks.
>
> Kirsten
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of ronald
> ferguson
> Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2008 1:35 AM
> To: legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com
> Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Legacy bugs - For M
Ditto!
Kirsten
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ruth
Nerud
Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2008 9:21 AM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Legacy bugs
Bless you, Elizabeth!
Ruth
- Original Message
Marie:
Thanks for trying. Guess now we just wait and see.
Kirsten
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Marie
Connelly
Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2008 7:14 AM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Legacy bugs - For
Of ronald
ferguson
Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2008 1:35 AM
To: legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Legacy bugs - For Marie
Kirsten,
I have tried this in OOo and whilst the footnotes transfer fine to the end
of the report the references are still incorrect.
There is a p
Bless you, Elizabeth!
Ruth
- Original Message -
From: "Elizabeth Richardson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2008 10:41 AM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Legacy bugs - JL & Art
Michele - I didn't get it either when Ruth and Kirsten firs
chele Lewis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2008 3:43 AM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Legacy bugs - JL & Art
I am just so perplexed. I am entering data with no problems. Bug fixes
are on the way. Can y'all not print reports for a time until the report
bu
L PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Thomas
Herson
Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2008 7:50 AM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Legacy bugs
Sherry,
Have they fixed the source template used for the Application for Social
Security Acoount ?
- Original Message -
From:
, September 02, 2008 11:19 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Legacy bugs
Sorry, it's late. I'm concentrating on cleaning my teeth. Yes, you can
bring a v.6 database into v.7 I believe. It will just convert it to v.7
format which is what happened when we al
Sherry,
Have they fixed the source template used for the Application for Social
Security Acoount ?
- Original Message -
From: "Sherry/Support" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2008 10:57 AM
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Legacy bugs
Ruth,
The
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ruth Nerud
Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2008 9:45 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Legacy bugs
Wouldn't it be a kick in the head if I went thru all this grief to go back
to Ver 6 only to fi
f JLB
Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2008 10:15 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Legacy bugs
Ruth,
If you're deviating from the script, I am going to close my eyes and
pretend I never met you. You can't restore your backup files from v.6
into your inst
book for Christmas presents. Hopefully, the new update
will correct this.
Marie
--- On Wed, 9/3/08, Kirsten Bowman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
From: Kirsten Bowman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Legacy bugs - For Marie
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.co
EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2008 7:46 AM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Legacy bugs - JL & Art
What are you basing these hand-typed reports on?
- Original Message -
From: "Michele Lewis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 20
Ruth,
If you backup your current L.7 database - you will not lose the 3
months! When the upgrade shows up - you can then make your choice -
use the v.7 backup or the v6 data you are talking about creating. If
you are not adding too much - ADD the data to both v7 and v6 (I recall
quite a few ru
gt; -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kirsten
> Bowman
> Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2008 9:54 PM
> To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
> Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Legacy bugs
>
> Marie:
>
> Thanks so
Group@legacyfamilytree.com<mailto:LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com>
Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2008 9:16 AM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Legacy bugs
Ron, I agree with Dan -- you are *very* much appreciated on this list.
I find your comments thoughtful, tactful and thorough. I learn a lo
On Mon, 1 Sep 2008 22:52:14 -0400, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>A number of software programs maintain a website where known bugs are listed
>and the dates they are rresolved. Does anyone know if Legacy does anything
>like that?
I suppose someone could maintain (and publish
What are you basing these hand-typed reports on?
- Original Message -
From: "Michele Lewis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2008 7:43 AM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Legacy bugs - JL & Art
I am just so perplexed. I am entering data with no
t to hand type reports of this size.
No, not a business, just trying to share the work I've done.
Ruth
- Original Message -
From: "Michele Lewis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2008 6:43 AM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Legacy bugs - JL & Art
I
ECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2008 7:36 AM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Legacy bugs - JL & Art
I decided to go to bed but I'm up now. Well, sounds like I should wait a
few days and see if an upgrade is released. I know I'll lose anything I've
added in these last 3 mon
will be trashed and there
goes all my family history, but if it's in hard copy on a shelf, someone may
pick it up and say - gosh, look what Ruth did, how kind of her!
Ruth
- Original Message -
From: "JLB" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2008
No, No, I will uninstall Ver. 7 and download Ver. 6 and restore my backup
file from my external backup hard drive into Ver. 6.
Ruth
- Original Message -
From: "JLB" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2008 12:14 AM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Legacy b
Fergusons of N.W. England See:
http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/
_
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
> Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Legacy bugs - For Marie
> Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2008 22
news.
Kirsten
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Geoff
Rasmussen
Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2008 10:49 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Legacy bugs
Guess what? I saw the new option today that Dave added that
;
To:
Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2008 11:10 PM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Legacy bugs
On second thoughts, Ruth, you're making me nervous. If I followed my own
instructions and got lost, I could dig myself out. You I'm not so sure
about. Sherry offered instructions for going back
It's gotten a little too quiet over at Ruth's house. There's no point
restoring the version 6 backup at all since she'd lose all the work
she's added to version 7. She has to install v.6 and she has to make a
gedcom from v.7. I think it's the latter she's trying to avoid. (NO,
don't cut the
n
Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2008 9:54 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Legacy bugs
Marie:
Thanks so much for checking this out. Your results are a little different
from mine but sound vaguely like what Ruth is experiencing. If you can get
a decent RTF report
. 6 if I installed Ver. 7 in
>> June. I should be able to do a Restore from my external backup drive so I
>> don't have to do a gedcom. You have no idea how scared I am, though.
>>
>> Ruth
>> - Original Message ----- From: "JLB" <[EMAIL PROT
sage - From: "JLB" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2008 11:10 PM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Legacy bugs
On second thoughts, Ruth, you're making me nervous. If I followed
my own instructions and got lost, I could dig myself out. You I'm
not so sur
sday, September 02, 2008 1:00 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Legacy bugs
Kirsten,
I just tried my first Descendant Report, 2 generation, RTF, opened with Word
2000. First time checked sources as footnotes. Beautiful, perfect.
Second time I checked sources as endnote
do a gedcom. You have no idea how scared I
am, though.
Ruth
- Original Message - From: "JLB" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2008 11:10 PM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Legacy bugs
On second thoughts, Ruth, you're making me nervous. If I followed my
I feel like I'm in one of those high-tension dramas where the hero, in
this case heroine, is defusing a bomb and in less than 4 seconds the
whole city could blow to smithereens.
-
JL
JLiki - creating your own genealogy wiki
http://www3.telus.net/Jgen/jliki.html
Gary Templeman wrote:
Sligh
only to find out the next day an update is available
that would correct the Descendent Report?
Ruth
- Original Message - From: "JLB" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2008 11:10 PM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Legacy bugs
On second thoughts, Ruth, you're
ent: Tuesday, September 02, 2008 1:00 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Legacy bugs
Kirsten,
I just tried my first Descendant Report, 2 generation, RTF, opened with Word
2000. First time checked sources as footnotes. Beautiful, perfect.
Second time I checked so
ber 02, 2008 11:10 PM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Legacy bugs
On second thoughts, Ruth, you're making me nervous. If I followed my own
instructions and got lost, I could dig myself out. You I'm not so sure
about. Sherry offered instructions for going back to v.6. Ask her for
them.
Slight correction, I didn't say "can't", I said it is not a good idea.
Gary
- Original Message -
From: "JLB" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Now, some-one just wrote to say that you can't have both versions unless
you install them chronologically. ie. v.6, then v.7. Otherwise you
risk overwr
Sue seemsto me that alot of people on this list sure love b--ch.
How about drying up and let the useful messages dominate for a while?
Art Seddon
Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergr
I am, though.
Ruth
- Original Message -
From: "JLB" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2008 11:10 PM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Legacy bugs
On second thoughts, Ruth, you're making me nervous. If I followed my own
instructions and got lost, I c
d" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2008 8:26 PM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Legacy bugs
This gets stranger and stranger. Preparing to move from Ver.7 to Ver. 6
(have you ever heard of such a dumb thing, going backwards?) I am printing
every report I can think of just
to bite.
Gary
- Original Message -
From: "JLB" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2008 7:54 PM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Legacy bugs
Do we know if the dll's have the same names or different ones? It is true
that I installed v.7 after v.6 and had no proble
t;Thomas Herson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2008 7:25 PM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Legacy bugs
Okay, you've answered my question. Legacy has so many bugs and unfinished
features that it's ashamed to provide a list. That's exactly what I
t
On second thoughts, Ruth, you're making me nervous. If I followed my
own instructions and got lost, I could dig myself out. You I'm not so
sure about. Sherry offered instructions for going back to v.6. Ask her
for them. They probably know things about this I don't.
-
JL
JLog - simple c
If you are seriously thinking of going back to v.6 making reports of
every kind is a hard way of going about it. Make a copy of your entire
Legacy7 folder on another drive, even if it's just a flash-drive. Make
two backups if you have somewhere to put them. Just right click on the
Legacy fol
sday, September 02, 2008 10:25 PM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Legacy bugs
Okay, you've answered my question. Legacy has so many bugs and unfinished
features that it's ashamed to provide a list. That's exactly what I
thought. So you worry more about what your competitors think than
This gets stranger and stranger. Preparing to move from Ver.7 to Ver. 6
(have you ever heard of such a dumb thing, going backwards?) I am printing
every report I can think of just in case I lose my data files. I created an
Event Report in .pdf. Some of my Events say Harold's Marriage Notes, etc.
Do we know if the dll's have the same names or different ones? It is
true that I installed v.7 after v.6 and had no problem so possibly what
you're saying is true. I can't argue it from a place of knowing or not.
-
JL
JLog - simple computer technology for genealogists
http://www3.telus.net
es, just
correcting the bugs.
Ruth
- Original Message -
From: "Thomas Herson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2008 9:25 PM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Legacy bugs
Okay, you've answered my question. Legacy has so many bugs and unfinished
fea
I suspect that the problem with gedcoms lies not with their creation
so much ...more than likely the way the gedcoms are imported into the
intended application. That said, exporting from one legacy
application to the other should not pose a problem.. If I recall
correctly, the problem was that
"Gary Templeman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2008 9:55 PM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Legacy bugs
Although I think you would agree that open source software is *supposed*
to be a whole different animal. The code is made available so anyone can
work with it
-
From: "JLB" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2008 12:08 PM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Legacy bugs
It sounds like Sherry got her version numbers mixed up in what she wrote.
If you make a ged in v.7 then import it into v.6 that should work. I
think she'
esday, September 02, 2008 11:55 AM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Legacy bugs
Firefox is one among many other that permit access to their bug list and
where they are in resolving them.
Jeff
- Original Message -
From: "Sherry/Support" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tues
LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Legacy bugs>
Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2008 14:55:04 -0400> > It doesn't matter whether other
programs make their bug lists available to > the public or not and, by the way,
we're you're customers (the people who > p
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Legacy bugs
> Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2008 14:51:12 -0400
>
> On Tue, 2 Sep 2008 09:50:15 -0700, "Sherry/Support"
> wrote:
>
>>In order to go back to Legacy v6 y
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michele Lewis
Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2008 9:50 AM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Legacy bugs
All I know is Legacy is still 100 times better than FTM bugs or no bugs.
Part of the problem is that Legacy had hundreds of peop
rry/Support
Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2008 9:50 AM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Legacy bugs
We have an internal listing, not available to the public. I don't know of
any program that "advertises" their bug list!
In order to go back to Legacy v6 y
"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, September 01, 2008 11:59 PM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Legacy bugs
- Original Message - Jeff wrote:-
:
: Someone else suggested going back to version 6, but in moving to
version 7
: the database was modified and I am not sure it is p
ue, 9/2/08, Kirsten Bowman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
From: Kirsten Bowman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Legacy bugs
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Date: Tuesday, September 2, 2008, 1:28 PM
Ron:
Yes, I'm using the Descendant Report produced as an rtf but viewed
;
> When replying to this message, please include all previous correspondence.
> Thanks.
>
>
> Original Message-
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: M
9:38
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Legacy bugs
Ruth and JL:
This makes it sound impossible to go back except with a v6 gedcom--which
would mean losing 3 months' worth of work. Very discouraging.
Kirsten
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf O
Apparently not because one of the version 7 bugs involves the export of
gedcoms.
Jeff
- Original Message -
From: "Rachel Alliston" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, September 01, 2008 11:59 PM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Legacy bugs
- Original Message -
Firefox is one among many other that permit access to their bug list and
where they are in resolving them.
Jeff
- Original Message -
From: "Sherry/Support" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2008 12:50 PM
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Legacy bugs
We
;
To: ; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2008 12:25 PM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Legacy bugs
Ruth,
1. Marriage wording options "Married someone" for an unknown spouse. I
have entered a problem report on this issue. Legacy will not let you
delete the "someone" fr
ge-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Sherry/Support
Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2008 9:50 AM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Legacy bugs
We have an internal listing, not available to the public. I don't know of
any program that &q
t;
To:
Sent: Monday, September 01, 2008 10:49 PM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Legacy bugs
Advice or help is appreciated. Belittling others shows your own
insecurity or lack of social training. Lets stick to questions and
possible solutions.
Thanks
Keith
On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 9:16 PM, Thomas Her
ve it be private I'd uncheck it, but I can
live with it this way.
Ruth
- Original Message -
From: "Brian/Support" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: ; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2008 11:25 AM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Legacy bugs
Ruth,
1. Ma
"Sherry/Support" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2008 12:50 PM
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Legacy bugs
We have an internal listing, not available to the public. I don't know of
any program that "advertises" their bug list!
In order to go bac
On Tue, 2 Sep 2008 09:50:15 -0700, "Sherry/Support"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>In order to go back to Legacy v6 you first must make a gedcom in Legacy v6,
>uninstall the program and then delete several files from the main Legacy
>folder before reinstalling Legacy v7. Then import the gedcom into
B" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2008 2:21 AM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Legacy bugs
I myself am not a rocket scientist, so take heart. People were
installing 7 in their 6 directories and all that kind of stuff.
There was a mix up with where Legacy Charting wa
it.
Thanks for your response, Ron, and I do hope you don't find a mess with the
event sources on your web site.
Kirsten
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of ronald
ferguson
Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2008 3:11 AM
To: legacyusergroup@le
On Tue, 2 Sep 2008 09:50:15 -0700, "Sherry/Support"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I don't know of any program that "advertises" their bug list!
http://www.cyberspyder.com/cslnkts6.html
--
Dennis Kowallek
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.kowallekfamily.com
www.leedna.com
P.S. Emails not of Content-Type: t
008 9:50 AM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Legacy bugs
We have an internal listing, not available to the public. I don't know of
any program that "advertises" their bug list!
In order to go back to Legacy v6 you first must make a gedcom in Lega
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Legacy bugs
I agree with you Kate. That is not asking too much.
A number of software programs maintain a website where known bugs are listed
and the dates they are rresolved. Does anyone know if Legacy does anything
like
Group@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: [LegacyUG] Legacy bugs
I have been such an advocate for Legacy in the past, but find its problems
with Ver. 7 and no knowledge of when they will be fixed makes me wonder -
has Legacy gotten so far ahead of itself that it's lost sight of what its
use is? If I can
vious correspondence.
Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of JLB
Sent: Monday, September 01, 2008 5:00 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Legacy bugs
It's hard to know what's going on over there (
the Gedcom's of my files,
delete Ver. 7 and download Ver. 6 and know that all my data will download
into Ver. 6 correctly and fully. What to do? I'm an unhappy camper.
Ruth
- Original Message -
From: "ronald ferguson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, Sep
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Legacy bugs
JL, thank you for what looks like a workable solution for me. I have to ask,
is my Registration Number the same as my Customer Number? Do I uninstall
Ver. 7 before I install Ver. 6? or because I'm installing Ver. 6 to
cyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com
> Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Legacy bugs
> Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2008 11:10:58 +0100
>
>
> Kirsten,
>
> I have largely left comments in written reports to others as I am not a
> regular user of them. However, I have had a look at the Descendant Report
gt; In the mean, I'm sure the folks at Millennia are busy working on things for
> us all.
>
> Highest regards,
> Dan Bateham
>
> - Original Message - From: "Thomas Herson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Monday, September 01, 2008 6:16 PM
>
this? going back to Ver. 6?
Ruth
- Original Message -
From: "JLB" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2008 2:21 AM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Legacy bugs
I myself am not a rocket scientist, so take heart. People were installing
7 in their 6 directories and a
I should have been more specific - I am doing Descendent Reports from within
Publishing Center. I have 17 chapters in this report. This is what it looks
like:
Nicola married Fortunata Pagnotta.1
. Relationship to Ann Perri (paternal): 3rd Great-Grandmother.
The child from this marriage w
- Original Message -
From: "Michele Lewis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2008 8:50 AM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Legacy bugs
All I know is Legacy is still 100 times better than FTM bugs or no bugs.
Part of the problem is that Legacy had hundreds of peop
PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2008 9:25 AM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Legacy bugs
Well, I thank you so much, Linda, for helping me understand how to use the
Private button. I should have mentioned this sooner and it would have
saved me a lot of time. I appreciate your help.
R
:
Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2008 12:01 AM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Legacy bugs
Ruth
Your problem with Event Defination "private" button not sticking might
be a misunderstanding on your part. I have a particular event marked
private through the Master Event List but on each individual e
EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
> Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Legacy bugs
> Date: Mon, 1 Sep 2008 18:54:50 -0700
>
> Ron:
>
> I know your main focus with Legacy is in maintaining your web page, but just
> imagine how frustrated you would be if you hadn&
I was recently persuaded by a friend to switch to Legacy, and so my only
experience of the programmes is confined to Version 7. After a month or so I
must confess, for all the reasons given previously, to now being less than
taken with it. I feel there is a very good programme in there, but it's
I myself am not a rocket scientist, so take heart. People were
installing 7 in their 6 directories and all that kind of stuff. There
was a mix up with where Legacy Charting was. I remember.
Installing Legacy 6 is like installing any other software. You just do
it. Install Legacy 6 in a lo
eptember 01, 2008 10:37 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Legacy bugs
Well, now somebody says it will. I'd say the best option would be to
simply try it. Probably it's still possible to get an installer for
v.6. and if you still have your v.6 deluxe regis
ECTED] Behalf Of JLB
Sent: Monday, September 01, 2008 7:57 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Legacy bugs
Not Ron here, but in regards to expertise to go back to v.6. I saw
some-one write today that geds don't export properly so that might not
work. My idea
Ruth
Your problem with Event Defination "private" button not sticking might
be a misunderstanding on your part. I have a particular event marked
private through the Master Event List but on each individual event the
Private button is not checked. The event is correctly omitted from
reports. I be
files,
delete Ver. 7 and download Ver. 6 and know that all my data will download
into Ver. 6 correctly and fully. What to do? I'm an unhappy camper.
Ruth
- Original Message -
From: "ronald ferguson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, September 01, 2008 7:07 PM
S
08 7:57 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Legacy bugs
Not Ron here, but in regards to expertise to go back to v.6. I saw
some-one write today that geds don't export properly so that might not
work. My idea was to export my database as a ged and import i
- Original Message -
Jeff wrote:-
:
: Someone else suggested going back to version 6, but in moving to version 7
: the database was modified and I am not sure it is possible to now go back
to
: 6 except by using an older v6 backup.
:
: Jeff
Wouldn't creating a GEDCOM get you back?
Ra
o:
Sent: Monday, September 01, 2008 9:18 PM
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Legacy bugs
Ron,
I appreciate your calm and logical approach for dealing with a new
program.
Your words proceeding with caution and in small increments are very
wise. If I remember correctly it took time, studying user m
From: "JLB" <
: Not Ron here, but in regards to expertise to go back to v.6. I saw
: some-one write today that geds don't export properly so that might not
: work. My idea was to export my database as a ged and import it back
: into v.6. That's very simple (if it works).
: -
: JL
: JLog - s
- Original Message -
Jeff wrote:-
:
: Someone else suggested going back to version 6, but in moving to version 7
: the database was modified and I am not sure it is possible to now go back
to
: 6 except by using an older v6 backup.
:
: Jeff
Pardon my ignorance, but wouldn't creating a
1 - 100 of 112 matches
Mail list logo
