Brian,
This is good to know. Thanks Brian.
I'll tag your email as a keeper.
For now I can live with this issue.
As y'all know now, I'm still using v.5 Deluxe
on an old PC that would be retired in business.
This pc does only Legacy. No Internet connection.
I've cleaned up M$ Windoz XP for speed.
The ability to change wording for "marriages" is a new feature in
Version 7. It does not exist in versions before that so any discussion
of labels for unmarried couples and the wording of sentences for
unmarried couples will only apply to Version 7. Karen and Jim indicate
they are using Version 5.0
x27;s the case, upgrading to V7 is the solution.
Paul Gray
-Original Message-
From: Mike Fry [mailto:emjay...@gmail.com]
Sent: September-29-12 11:11 AM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] problem with unmarried
On 2012/09/29 18:20, Karen and Jim wrote:
>>
On 2012/09/29 18:20, Karen and Jim wrote:
>> First off there is not a bug!
> I disagree. Reasons to follow.
No bug. Missing feature maybe.
>> Did you mark this couple an not married on the marriage info screen?
> Originally I marked their marriage status as "unmarried".
>> If you did then the
> *Sent:* Thursday, September 27, 2012 1:25 PM
> *To:* LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
> <mailto:LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com>
> *Subject:* Re: [LegacyUG] problem with unmarried
>
> Brian,
>
> Let's start with a fact, a fact of life in the real world.
> "In the re
Well said Terry, and the main reason I seldom participate.
Bob
-Original Message-
From: Terry L. [mailto:nemesi...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Friday, September 28, 2012 12:30 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] problem with unmarried
One of the reasons I left this
Amen.
- Original Message -
From: "Terry L."
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Sent: Friday, September 28, 2012 3:30:25 PM
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] problem with unmarried
One of the reasons I left this group before was peoples attitudes on here. Pat
had a legitimate question.
xcell, Bashford, Bristow, Haines, Hill, Hollowell, Jeffs, Lewis, Marsh, Reid,
Shand, Tink, Wadsworth, Warner Families.
> From: hwedh...@cox.net
> To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] problem with unmarried
> Date: Fri,
Biology 101: In human reproduction there is always an egg
and a sperm! Whether the contributors were married,
cohabited outside of marriage, had consensual sex, used
artificial insemination, or any other means of bringing the
egg and sperm together, there was still a female who
contributed the eg
Brian wrote, "there must have been a relationship between a man and a woman
to have a child."
But with *in vitro* fertilization I don't think there has to be a
relationship.
Not what I would call a relationship anyway.
Pat
Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquett
The request to have two separate settings, one for never married and
another for had no children has been argued on our tester email list. So
far the programmers have not elected to separate the setting.
In Legacy 4.0 and 5.0 the setting was just "This individual never
married", no mention of chil
Brian,
Let's start with a fact, a fact of life in the real world.
"In the real world we have many unwed mothers
and unwed fathers."
I have a similar issue as Pat's.
I have a man and a women who had a child.
The couple did not marry each other.
But Legacy labels them Husband and Wife.
Unlinking H
Thanks, Brian,
I knew that option was somewhere but couldn't find it.
However that brings up another matter, especially for men -- I may pretty
well know that he never married, but he could certainly have fathered
children that I know nothing about. I wish the option simply said "He
never marrie
Since you have made an entry in the marriage info for this person Legacy
has linked her to an unknown husband (The "married someone" comes from
that link). If she truly never married and had no children then you
should indicate that on the person's individual information screen not
by setting a mar
Yes, I hadn't even noticed the date, Jenny, which is when she wrote her
will -- she was never married. I just don't want Legacy telling us that
she was unmarried AND that she married "someone"! It does that even when
there's no date involved.
Pat
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 4:14 PM, Jenny M Benson
On 25/09/2012 19:55, Pat Hickin wrote:
> How can I get Legacy not to do this in reports?>
>
> In Jane's marriage info, I have her marriage status marked as "unmarried."
>
> Here is what Legacy has to say about her in a report:
> "Jane married someone. Marriage status: unmarried in 1824."
I presume
How can I get Legacy not to do this in reports?>
In Jane's marriage info, I have her marriage status marked as "unmarried."
Here is what Legacy has to say about her in a report:
"Jane married someone. Marriage status: unmarried in 1824."
Thanks,
Pat
Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.Le
17 matches
Mail list logo