Thanks Chris and Cathy, I now have a clearer understanding of the settings, I
have reset my settings.
From: LegacyUserGroup on behalf of
Chris Hill
Sent: March 14, 2021 7:53 AM
To: Legacy User Group
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Relationships
I think that I
t.
Regards
Chris
-- Original Message --
From: "Cathy Pinner"
To: "Legacy User Group"
Sent: 14/03/2021 06:44:12
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Relationships
The default is 5. That's fine for my file of about 20,000 people. I
don't have much pedigree collapse, no endogamy
The default is 5. That's fine for my file of about 20,000 people. I
don't have much pedigree collapse, no endogamy and I'm not back into
royal genealogies.
In my friend's file where there are many aristocratic/royal lines
entered, I found I stopped getting more relationships between two people
The usual recommendation seems to be set it to 10 - 20, on the basis that
your family tree will not be that complex in terms of the number of
generations that it needs to work through looking for a common ancestor. My
largest line is about 14 generations.
That said, I always run with 999 blood and
You can choose between
Show the closest relationship, which would display for example, 3rd Great-Grand
Uncle before it would show 4th Great-Grandfather,
or
Show the closest direct-line relationship (if any), which would show 4th
Great-Grandfather before 3rd Great-Grand Uncle.
Someone familia
Is Legacy offering DNA test that you can take at the present time?
Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 6:11 PM, Betty Graham via
LegacyUserGroup wrote: --
LegacyUserGroup mailing list
LegacyUserGroup@legacyusers.com
To manage your subscription and unsubscribe
http://
How can you find out this information?
Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 5:58 PM, Brian Kelly wrote:
Actually a cousin relationship, because it is via blood connections, is
closer in genealogical terms than a spouse because a wife or husband is
a legal relationship
Actually a cousin relationship, because it is via blood connections, is
closer in genealogical terms than a spouse because a wife or husband is
a legal relationship created by a marriage.
You should see a + sign beside that Half-3rd Cousin Once Removed which
indicates that there a multiple lin
Trevor,
Don't automatically assume something is wrong. My brothers are shown as
my 4th cousins, once-removed. Turns out that my great-great
grandparents were 1st cousins.
Christopher
On 10/15/2019 4:23 PM, Trevor Good wrote:
Hi Everyone
I set "My Relationship" to me and ran process, to m
Thank you, Graham,
Must have been all those marriages within one family.
Susan
-Original Message-
From: Graham Love [mailto:love-fam...@blueyonder.co.uk]
Sent: Saturday, 15 March 2014 5:43 PM
To: legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Relationships
Hi Susan
If it
: RE: [LegacyUG] Relationships
Hi Susan
If it's working as it should it would mean there is more than one relationship.
Graham
-Original Message-
From: Susan Jones [mailto:scjo...@optusnet.com.au]
Sent: 15 March 2014 06:33
To: legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: RE: [Leg
sy fix :)
Mary
On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 12:06 AM, Graham Love
wrote:
Thanks Mary that fixed it for me too.
>G
>
>From:Mary Moyer [mailto:mgmo...@gmail.com]
>Sent: 15 March 2014 07:02
>To: legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com
>Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Relationships
>
>Gra
At least it's an easy fix :)
Mary
On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 12:06 AM, Graham Love
wrote:
> Thanks Mary that fixed it for me too.
>
> G
>
>
>
> *From:* Mary Moyer [mailto:mgmo...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* 15 March 2014 07:02
> *To:* legacyusergroup@LegacyUser
Thanks Mary that fixed it for me too.
G
From: Mary Moyer [mailto:mgmo...@gmail.com]
Sent: 15 March 2014 07:02
To: legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Relationships
Graham
I had this happen a few days ago. Even though I never change the root person
(me), my husband
Graham
I had this happen a few days ago. Even though I never change the root
person (me), my husband was showing as my grandfather, my children were
various other relationships. All relationships were garbled and made no
sense. However, when I changed the root person back to me, all the
relationsh
... and I should have added that if you right-click on the relationship you can
choose 'View additional relationships'.
G
-Original Message-
From: Susan Jones [mailto:scjo...@optusnet.com.au]
Sent: 15 March 2014 06:33
To: legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: RE:
Hi Susan
If it's working as it should it would mean there is more than one relationship.
Graham
-Original Message-
From: Susan Jones [mailto:scjo...@optusnet.com.au]
Sent: 15 March 2014 06:33
To: legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Relationships
Hi Graham,
I ha
Hi Graham,
I haven't noticed that but when I look at my 7th and 8th great grandparents,
their relationship is mark 7th great grandfather+
I am unsure what the + indicates.
Susan
I've reported a number of issues/errors about how Legacy handles relationships
but have just come across another str
release? Maybe one of
the "misc fixed".
Bobby
-Original Message-
From: Gene Young [mailto:n2...@cfl.rr.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2014 11:39 AM
To: legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Relationships
On 1/28/2014 11:26 AM, Graham Love wrote:
> Now I
I don't doubt this is what is happening, I'm just challenging the logic of it.
I don't know the birth times of any of the twins in my family so they appear in
the list alphabetically. In my view both twins should have the same PP flag
although I appreciate this is an isolated and possibly comple
port [mailto:br...@legacyfamilytree.com]
Sent: 28 January 2014 13:09
To: legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Relationships
Yes, It does not apply to the second twin because the child dates are checked
against the previous child in the list. That previous child (the first twin
On 1/28/2014 11:26 AM, Graham Love wrote:
> Now I'm more confused than when I started :) - perhaps I didn't explain it
> well enough. The first twin in the list has a correct PP ( birth too long
> after prev child) being born some while after the previous child. The second
> twin born the same d
On 1/28/2014 8:08 AM, Brian/Support wrote:
> Yes, It does not apply to the second twin because the child dates are
> checked against the previous child in the list. That previous child (the
> first twin) has the same birthday so it is not too long after previous
> child. There is no check for birth
gacyfamilytree.com
>>> http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com
>>>
>>>
>>>> On 27 Jan 2014 10:04 AM, Graham Love wrote:
>>>> Still no answer to this - I've unlinked and relinked and run file
>>>> maintenenace. The only other observation is
o have both flagged.
>> G
>>
>> -Original Message-----
>> From: Brian/Support [mailto:br...@legacyfamilytree.com]
>> Sent: 27 January 2014 15:21
>> To: legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com
>> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Relationships
>>
>> One thi
x27; option of course would be to have both flagged.
> G
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Brian/Support [mailto:br...@legacyfamilytree.com]
> Sent: 27 January 2014 15:21
> To: legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com
> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Relationships
>
> One thing you do
e.com]
Sent: 27 January 2014 15:21
To: legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Relationships
One thing you do not report doing is running set relationships after adding all
these people. Do that then report how the relationships show.
Brian
Customer Support
Millennia
aham Love [mailto:love-fam...@blueyonder.co.uk]
> Sent: 26 January 2014 19:19
> To: legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com
> Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Relationships
>
> Good call but not the case. Only one marriage and all children show under the
> same two parents. Things have go
e-fam...@blueyonder.co.uk]
Sent: 26 January 2014 19:19
To: legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Relationships
Good call but not the case. Only one marriage and all children show under the
same two parents. Things have got slightly more confusing since I discovered
another child - a
ssage-
From: Jack Earnshaw [mailto:j...@jearnshaw.me.uk]
Sent: 26 January 2014 12:53
To: legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Relationships
It sounds as though you have two separate marriages for that daughter - one
having 2 children and the other having the second two. You
It sounds as though you have two separate marriages for that daughter - one
having 2 children and the other having the second two. You will need to unlink
the last two children from the spurious marriage and link them to the correct
one - then deal with getting rid of the second marriage
Jack
'll look again tomorrow morning when my
> mind is clear!
>
> Nannette
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Brian/Support [mailto:br...@legacyfamilytree.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 07, 2013 4:18 PM
> To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Re
rom: Brian/Support [mailto:br...@legacyfamilytree.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 07, 2013 4:18 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Relationships
Are there multiple links to those people from the starting person. In those
cases it is entirely possible that they are 8th Great Gr
Are there multiple links to those people from the starting person. In
those cases it is entirely possible that they are 8th Great Grandparents
but on two different paths. The second set are 8th Great GrParents on
one path but also 9th on the path you are following. Legacy always
reports the shortes
Have you tried unlinking the 8th GGP and then run the report again BEFORE
relinking them to see if any potential error is noticable?
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 1:31 PM, Nannette-Gmail wrote:
> I have one family file that is not calculating the family relationships
> correctly. I have run the che
On 10/11/2012 11:15 AM, Sherry/Support wrote:
> Not everyone has newer computers with dual-core processors or even
> Windows Vista or Win7- we have a lot of users still on older XP
> computers.
XP, Single Core, 1.2 Ghz, 40GIG Hard drive, Junky video card, 15"
Monitor, 6 years old. Legacy Loads slo
can't it be changed back to an automatic real-time calculation?
>
>Brian in CA
>
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Sherry/Support [mailto:she...@legacyfamilytree.com]
>Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2012 8:11 AM
>To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
>Subject: Re: [Lega
Because the calculation with the additon of non-blood relationships
was more complex and takes a lot longer. The programmers felt it would
be disruptive to data entry - and better to run the Set Relationships
after entering the new individuals.
Not everyone has newer computers with dual-core proce
wer found in today's processors, why can't it be changed
back to an automatic real-time calculation?
Brian in CA
-Original Message-
From: Sherry/Support [mailto:she...@legacyfamilytree.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2012 8:11 AM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re
To see relationships between two individuals go to Tools >
Relationship Calculator.
This is independent of who you have set as the basis when you go to
Tools > Set Relationships.
Sincerely,
Sherry
Technical Support
Legacy Family Tree
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 4:15 PM, Marilyn LYLE wrote:
> I am
Select your person, e.g. yourself, go to Tools - Set Relationship,
then everyone in your database will have how they are related to you
in the gap between yourself and your parents. There is a little
window for you to make certain selections.
At 10:15 AM 11/10/2012, you wrote:
>I am trying to find
Tools > Set Relationships
Note that you can change the starting person, you don't have to navigate
to that person first.
Consider the options available, then click on Set Relationships and wait
while it does its thing.
When it's done, the relationship of the husband and wife to the starting
pers
Thanks Sherry,
I've been using "Event" in Events/Facts
and that has worked well. It may not
be the correct use of "Event", but
I couldn't find anything else. It is labor
intensive as I have to do one person
at a time. Using the REPEAT button helps.
I don't use Event clipboard for just 2 lines
p
There isn't a gedcom tag for Relationships between individuals, just
Relationship to Father (FREL) and Relationship to Mother (MREL) - used
to indicate whether the child is biological, adopted, foster, etc.
Sincerely,
Sherry
Technical Support
Legacy Family Tree
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 4:44 PM, K
Goodale Gordon Gump Harbaugh Hopkins Hughes Jones Koyle Laswell McDonald Misner
Passwaters Pelton Roberts Roche Ryburn Sullivan Williams
From: Brian/Support
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Sent: Tue, July 19, 2011 8:38:11 AM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Relationships
If I am reading this thread correctly the comments you refer to are
comments on a source or source detail. Those will only appear, if they
are set to be included in reports, with the source citation which can be
included:
As a footnote on the page
As a citation at the end of a Generation (if the r
ones Koyle Laswell McDonald Misner
Passwaters Pelton Roberts Roche Ryburn Sullivan Williams
From: Luis Salreta
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Sent: Sun, June 26, 2011 12:25:45 PM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Relationships surety level
Sorry but i'm not receivi
Laswell McDonald Misner
Passwaters Pelton Roberts Roche Ryburn Sullivan Williams
From: Brett McL Robinson
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Cc: Kirsten Bowman
Sent: Mon, June 27, 2011 4:01:26 AM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Relationships surety level
Hi Kirsten
I
OK let’s see if I can make myself clear
Let's use a very simple military example:
I have several source of intelligence that gives me some information.
I collect the information about related subjects and build one conclusion.
This conclusion is weighted based on the credibility of the sources and
I missed the original post because it was not plain text. But this topic
interests me as an analyst/programmer so I thought I would add my
$0.02...
***
The OP makes a good point. If you look at the GENTECH Genealogical Data
Model (GDM)...
http://members.ngsgenealogy.org/GENTECH_Data_Model/Diagra
Thank you all for the various solutions proposed.
I still believe that this needs a real program solution.
All the solutions are, as we say in Portugal, "desenrascanços" (see in google) or "MacGyverism" (we use what we have at hand to resolve the problem)
Thanks
L.Salreta
Legacy User Group gu
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
> Cc: Luis Salreta
> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Relationships surety level
>
>
> Hi Luis
>
> I use the Comments about this Citation (in the Source Detail) to explain why
> things may not be as they seem - usually relating to the reliability or
>
sted lately), but thought I'd mention it.
Kirsten
-Original Message-
From: Brett McL Robinson [mailto:b...@vodafone.co.nz]
Sent: Sunday, June 26, 2011 7:20 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Cc: Luis Salreta
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Relationships surety level
Hi Luis
I use th
26, 2011 12:01:29 PM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Relationships surety level
Terri,
Is that not the wrong description? I would suggest that in the case quoted it
should be “Not Proven” rather than “Challenged”, the l,latter meaning that
somebody has questioned the relationship.
Ron Ferguson
htt
Hi Luis
I use the Comments about this Citation (in the Source Detail) to explain
why things may not be as they seem - usually relating to the reliability
or accuracy of the citation. The Comment is specific to the detail of
the citation, so you can comment about the source being used in support
of
I don't believe in assigning numeric surety levels to anything! What I think
is a 2 you may think is a 3, and what I think today is a 2, next month I may
think is a 1. It's all too subjective.
I discuss conflicting evidence, indirect evidence, etc. in Notes so it is clear
to me, and hopefully
work on?
Sandy K Keas
From: luisalr...@clix.pt
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Relationships surety level
Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2011 18:25:45 +0100
Sorry but i'm not receiving the mails so I can´t answer directly
Thanks for ll the opinions.
I use notes but they ar
Sorry but i'm not receiving the mails so I can´t answer directly
Thanks for ll the opinions.
I use notes but they are all mixed in the same place.
The example I gave is the simplest (and is an example not a real case).
I have lots of cases where the missing "link" is to the grandparents that onl
I put "Maybe Not" in the name field, it stands out like a bright light
But then I use a lot of ??? and then in my events I might say
"this looks right" or "this may be he". I like things I can spot from
afar.
I also have a tree that includes all the people I find in Cleveland
Ohio from the Malmes
om:* Terri Brown
> *Sent:* Sunday, June 26, 2011 4:04 PM
> *To:* LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
> *Subject:* Re: [LegacyUG] Relationships surety level
>
> Luis,
>
> I have added a child status of "Challenged". I use the Research Notes of
> the child to present my
On 2011/06/26 14:31, Luis Salreta wrote:
> For instance I have a Jake son of John Salreta and Maryann. Later on I have
> the
> marriage of Jake (son of John Salreta and Marylu). I believe in the documents
> and the information within but are those 2 Jakes the same? If I could I would
> put only 3
PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Relationships surety level
Luis,
I have added a child status of "Challenged". I use the Research Notes of the
child to present my arguements. The child status can be set to show on the
Family view by going to the View tab
lationship to Mother
(or Father) status of "Challenged". Unfortunately the relationship status does
not show on the Family view.
Terri
From: "cranberryf...@cobridge.tv"
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Sent: Sun, June 26, 2011 9:08:16 AM
Subj
Luis,
Your English is very good! When I am sure of a parent-child relationship but I
just can’t prove it, I go ahead and link them in legacy and then in the notes I
explain all of my circumstantial evidence [evidências circunstanciais]
explaining why I think I am right. This is how I do it.
M
I enter such families as husband and wife initially, then click the check
box for "This couple did not marry" on the marriage information screen.
Then on the wording options screen I either use the Legacy default wording or
change it to something I like better.
Emily
In a message dated 2/27/201
Hi Thomas,
> What is the prefered way to enter two people who live together and
> have children, but are not married?
> Is there a way to enter such a relationship beyond of marriage?
> With the children getting the last name of the mother?
In the Marriage Information you can tick the box "This c
"
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Sent: Wed, December 16, 2009 10:10:11 AM
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Relationships Incorrect
Rich in LA CA,
Can you tell me how this Legacy User Group works, I just signed on to it, and
am getting all kinds of emails.
Bobbie
___
br...@the-lightfoots.com wrote:
> No, no need to show me your work. As I said in the message, congrats on
> getting back that far. Many hit that brick wall after 4 or 5 generations.
Then again, many of us prefer not to trust the medieval attempts at trying to
legitimise undeserved notions of nobi
Reply sent off-line.
Brian in CA
-
From: yt...@hotmail.com [mailto:yt...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2009 10:10 AM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Relationships Incorrect
Rich in LA CA,
Can you tell me how this Legacy User
: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Relationships Incorrect
I just re-ran my son's line. He was born in the 1970's.Using Blood = 10,
Non-blood = 0. His great grandfather, Charlemange is 36th gr 1, 37th 10 times;
born 0747 AD. He was born abt 1040 years before descendan
Rich in LA CA,
Can you tell me how this Legacy User Group works, I just signed on to it, and
am getting all kinds of emails.
Bobbie
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 10:05:26 -0800
From: fourpa...@verizon.net
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Relationships Incorrect
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
lly exist until the great
grandchildren married.
Rich in LA CA
From: "hstov...@gmail.com"
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Sent: Wed, December 16, 2009 8:48:46 AM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Relationships Incorrect
The person was related in more than
The one that I felt kind of weird about was when I discovered my parents were
3rd Cousins, 8 times removed. :)
Todd
- Original Message -
From: hstov...@gmail.com
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2009 11:48 AM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG
gets to Roman Senators, with descendants becoming Kings of the Franks.
Rich in LA CA
- Original Message
From: "br...@the-lightfoots.com"
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Sent: Tue, December 15, 2009 6:41:45 PM
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Relationships Incorrect
My thoughts exac
:49 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Relationships Incorrect
The person was related in more than one way - she was a 24th GG-Aunt, and a
27th GGM. I have lots of people related in more than one way to me.
My 4th GG-Aunt was also married (as a 2nd wife) to my 5th
- Original Message
From: "wood...@msn.com"
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Sent: Tue, December 15, 2009 5:44:14 PM
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Relationships Incorrect
But, as Sherry told me, being a direct ancestor, she should be shown as such.
Also, limiting to the closest 150
The person was related in more than one way - she was a 24th GG-Aunt, and a
27th GGM. I have lots of people related in more than one way to me.
My 4th GG-Aunt was also married (as a 2nd wife) to my 5th GGF and the
Daughter of my 5th GGF married my 4th GGF.
(ie, Thomas M had a Sister Ellen M
> [mailto:william.murray.ander...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 2:30 PM
> To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
> Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Relationships Incorrect
>
> As a matter of interest, what relationship would you expect to see?
>
> I'd have thought that
: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Relationships Incorrect
As the wife of my 27th GGF and the mother of my 26th GGM, she is my 27th GGM.
BUT, as daughter of my 25th GGF and 25th GGM, Legacy wants to make her my 24th
SOMETHING, and it picks 24th GGA rather than 24th GGM.
For
@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Relationships Incorrect
My thoughts exactly. But I might also add that starting in version 7.0, the
relationship calculations must be redone whenever new people are added. It no
longer does it on the fly as in previous versions. I would suggest to the OP
individuals as I have. Legacy freezes, as has been reported
before.
CE
-Original Message-
From: she...@legacyfamilytree.com [mailto:she...@legacyfamilytree.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 6:44 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Relationships Incorrect
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Relationships Incorrect
But, as Sherry told me, being a direct ancestor, she should be shown as such.
Also, limiting to the closest 150 blood relationships STILL doesn't show her as
a direct ancestor.
CE
-Original Message-
F
Just wondering.
Brian in CA
-Original Message-
From: william.murray.ander...@gmail.com
[mailto:william.murray.ander...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 2:30 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Relationships Incorrect
As a matter of interest, what relatio
er 15, 2009 5:37 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Relationships Incorrect
I believe there are a few issues here:
1) The relationship is not "incorrect" -- she is your 24th
great-grandaunt, as you have stated yourself. She also happens to be
your 27th GGM, and
I believe there are a few issues here:
1) The relationship is not "incorrect" -- she is your 24th
great-grandaunt, as you have stated yourself. She also happens to be
your 27th GGM, and the problem is that you would prefer that the
program to always select direct lines instead of side-relations in
the programming knowledge to solve
this one.
CE
-Original Message-
From: kowal...@iglou.com [mailto:kowal...@iglou.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 5:19 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Relationships Incorrect
On Tue, 15 Dec 2009 17:10:27 -0800, wood
On Tue, 15 Dec 2009 17:10:27 -0800, wood...@msn.com wrote:
>Some acknowledgement of this limitation needs to be made.
I assume you have reported it to support. Usually they will try to
duplicate the problem and will get back to you one way or the other.
Have they not done so?
--
Dennis Kowallek
om
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Relationships Incorrect
Are each of the various 'numbers' accurate, if not the one you would guess is
the 'first' choice; Check out Relationship Calculator to get the many multiple
pathways.
You are related to my kids, so I deal witht the same stuff
ssage-
From: william.murray.ander...@gmail.com
[mailto:william.murray.ander...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 2:30 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Relationships Incorrect
As a matter of interest, what relationship would you expect to see?
I'd have th
Are each of the various 'numbers' accurate, if not the one you would guess is
the 'first' choice; Check out Relationship Calculator to get the many multiple
pathways.
You are related to my kids, so I deal witht the same stuff. It seems the
calculation is 'male' checking first and this has been d
As a matter of interest, what relationship would you expect to see?
I'd have thought that the sister of your nth GGF would show as your nth GGA,
that being her state at time of birth. (but then again I've been wrong before
and I'm sure I'll be wrong again!).
Bill
-Original Message-
Fr
91 matches
Mail list logo