mailto:LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
*Subject:* Re: [LegacyUG] problem with unmarried
Brian,
Let's start with a fact, a fact of life in the real world.
In the real world we have many unwed mothers
and unwed fathers.
I have a similar issue as Pat's.
I have a man and a women who had a child
On 2012/09/29 18:20, Karen and Jim wrote:
First off there is not a bug!
I disagree. Reasons to follow.
No bug. Missing feature maybe.
Did you mark this couple an not married on the marriage info screen?
Originally I marked their marriage status as unmarried.
If you did then the labels
the case, upgrading to V7 is the solution.
Paul Gray
-Original Message-
From: Mike Fry [mailto:emjay...@gmail.com]
Sent: September-29-12 11:11 AM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] problem with unmarried
On 2012/09/29 18:20, Karen and Jim wrote:
First off
The ability to change wording for marriages is a new feature in
Version 7. It does not exist in versions before that so any discussion
of labels for unmarried couples and the wording of sentences for
unmarried couples will only apply to Version 7. Karen and Jim indicate
they are using Version 5.0
Brian,
This is good to know. Thanks Brian.
I'll tag your email as a keeper.
For now I can live with this issue.
As y'all know now, I'm still using v.5 Deluxe
on an old PC that would be retired in business.
This pc does only Legacy. No Internet connection.
I've cleaned up M$ Windoz XP for
The request to have two separate settings, one for never married and
another for had no children has been argued on our tester email list. So
far the programmers have not elected to separate the setting.
In Legacy 4.0 and 5.0 the setting was just This individual never
married, no mention of
Brian wrote, there must have been a relationship between a man and a woman
to have a child.
But with *in vitro* fertilization I don't think there has to be a
relationship.
Not what I would call a relationship anyway.
Pat
Legacy User Group guidelines:
Biology 101: In human reproduction there is always an egg
and a sperm! Whether the contributors were married,
cohabited outside of marriage, had consensual sex, used
artificial insemination, or any other means of bringing the
egg and sperm together, there was still a female who
contributed the
, Bristow, Haines, Hill, Hollowell, Jeffs, Lewis, Marsh, Reid,
Shand, Tink, Wadsworth, Warner Families.
From: hwedh...@cox.net
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] problem with unmarried
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 11:56:46 -0700
Biology 101
Amen.
- Original Message -
From: Terry L. nemesi...@hotmail.com
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Sent: Friday, September 28, 2012 3:30:25 PM
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] problem with unmarried
One of the reasons I left this group before was peoples attitudes on here. Pat
had a legitimate
Well said Terry, and the main reason I seldom participate.
Bob
-Original Message-
From: Terry L. [mailto:nemesi...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Friday, September 28, 2012 12:30 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] problem with unmarried
One of the reasons I left
Brian,
Let's start with a fact, a fact of life in the real world.
In the real world we have many unwed mothers
and unwed fathers.
I have a similar issue as Pat's.
I have a man and a women who had a child.
The couple did not marry each other.
But Legacy labels them Husband and Wife.
Unlinking
Yes, I hadn't even noticed the date, Jenny, which is when she wrote her
will -- she was never married. I just don't want Legacy telling us that
she was unmarried AND that she married someone! It does that even when
there's no date involved.
Pat
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 4:14 PM, Jenny M Benson
Since you have made an entry in the marriage info for this person Legacy
has linked her to an unknown husband (The married someone comes from
that link). If she truly never married and had no children then you
should indicate that on the person's individual information screen not
by setting a
Thanks, Brian,
I knew that option was somewhere but couldn't find it.
However that brings up another matter, especially for men -- I may pretty
well know that he never married, but he could certainly have fathered
children that I know nothing about. I wish the option simply said He
never
On 25/09/2012 19:55, Pat Hickin wrote:
How can I get Legacy not to do this in reports?
In Jane's marriage info, I have her marriage status marked as unmarried.
Here is what Legacy has to say about her in a report:
Jane married someone. Marriage status: unmarried in 1824.
I presume you put a
16 matches
Mail list logo
