On Wed, 11 Jan 2006, Dan Nicholson wrote:
On 1/11/06, Ken Moffat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
My gut feeling is that cleaning the toolchain might remove a lot of
differences (ar archives, and programs linked statically) which (at
least in lfs-svn) show up between the first and second builds,
pa
On 1/11/06, Ken Moffat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Certainly farce shows perl, vim, and nscd were compiled at different
> times - open farce-substitiutions in view to see what got replaced by
> tokens (and yes, 2.3.6 in nscd is probably a library version although it
> got matched to regex KV02).
On Mon, 9 Jan 2006, Dan Nicholson wrote:
http://students.washington.edu/dbnichol/lfs/lfs-alpha-20060108-reports/ica/REPORT.1V2
http://students.washington.edu/dbnichol/lfs/lfs-alpha-20060108-reports/farce/1v2/farce-differ
http://students.washington.edu/dbnichol/lfs/lfs-alpha-20060108-reports/farc
On Tue, 10 Jan 2006, Ken Moffat wrote:
No, I'm seeing differences specific to groff-1.18.1, but actually these
aren't to do with date/time (unlike the 3 regexps I put into 001-6 for this
version of groff). Stuff like
failure in /usr/share/doc/groff/1.18.1/meintro.ps...
1590,1592c1590,1592
< (
On Tue, 10 Jan 2006, Dan Nicholson wrote:
Ken, the same thing has happened to me with perl. Sometimes a
difference is reported. sometimes not. For both farce and ICA, IIRC.
It's the single reason why I keep moving gettext around in my builds
even though it comes after perl in both cases. I th
On Tue, 10 Jan 2006, Dan Nicholson wrote:
Seems OK to me. Is this what you're seeing?
No, I'm seeing differences specific to groff-1.18.1, but actually these
aren't to do with date/time (unlike the 3 regexps I put into 001-6 for
this version of groff). Stuff like
failure in /usr/share/do
On 1/10/06, Ken Moffat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Jan 2006, Ken Moffat wrote:
>
> > So, at the moment I have
> > an aberrant build of perl in the first run of the fourth cycle, and at the
> > moment I can't replicate it.
>
> Latest attempt to build this was fine, so I'll have to mar
On 1/10/06, Jeremy Huntwork <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 06:17:41AM -0800, Dan Nicholson wrote:
> > diff -ur iter1/usr/share/doc/groff/1.19.2/examples/grnexmpl.ps
> > iter2/usr/share/doc/groff/1.19.2/examples/grnexmpl.ps
>
> Um. You're using groff 1.19.2. Is that causing any
On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 06:17:41AM -0800, Dan Nicholson wrote:
> diff -ur iter1/usr/share/doc/groff/1.19.2/examples/grnexmpl.ps
> iter2/usr/share/doc/groff/1.19.2/examples/grnexmpl.ps
Um. You're using groff 1.19.2. Is that causing any differences?
Did I miss a note about that somewhere?
--
JH
--
On 1/10/06, Ken Moffat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Jan 2006, Ken Moffat wrote:
>
> > So, at the moment I have
> > an aberrant build of perl in the first run of the fourth cycle, and at the
> > moment I can't replicate it.
>
> Latest attempt to build this was fine, so I'll have to mar
On Tue, 10 Jan 2006, Ken Moffat wrote:
So, at the moment I have
an aberrant build of perl in the first run of the fourth cycle, and at the
moment I can't replicate it.
Latest attempt to build this was fine, so I'll have to mark my problem
as "unconfirmed". Looks as if I've still got issue
On Tue, 10 Jan 2006, Ken Moffat wrote:
On Mon, 9 Jan 2006, Dan Nicholson wrote:
I'm pretty sure the perl, vim and nscd differences are time stamp
related.
What you could also do is copy one of the filelist- files, edit it to
*only* reference these three files (and give it a second name, by
On Mon, 9 Jan 2006, Dan Nicholson wrote:
I'm pretty sure the perl, vim and nscd differences are time stamp
related. Ken, farce does quite a bit more analysis than Greg's ICA
functions. Would you mind looking at these results and commenting on
differences between the ICA report and the farce re
On 1/9/06, Jeremy Huntwork <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Alright. Let me see if I'm parsing you correctly. ;) This file
> represents the order you've been testing, correct?
>
> http://students.washington.edu/dbnichol/lfs/lfs-alpha-20060108-reports/scripts.list
>
> And from your ICA on the above li
Dan Nicholson wrote:
ICA is done, and there are no differences. Groff is not a dependency
of perl AFAICT. Jeremy, what do you think about this? I'll have the
reports up at http://students.washington.edu/lfs/lfs-alpha-20060108
soon.
Alright. Let me see if I'm parsing you correctly. ;) This fi
On 1/9/06, Dan Nicholson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> ICA is done, and there are no differences. Groff is not a dependency
> of perl AFAICT. Jeremy, what do you think about this? I'll have the
> reports up at http://students.washington.edu/lfs/lfs-alpha-20060108
> soon.
>
Typo. Try
http://s
On 1/8/06, Dan Nicholson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> As I said above, you can get around this by changing the configure statement
> to
>
> ./configure.gnu --prefix=/usr \
> -Dman1dir=/usr/share/man/man1 \
> -Dman3dir=/usr/share/man/man3 \
> -Dpager="/usr/bin/less -isR"
> A full I
On 12/22/05, Archaic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I say if using switches versus moving groff both result in identical
> binaries, then switches are probably easier and better in that the
> explanation of the switch is the perfect forum to mention that perl is
> looking for groff but doesn't actual
On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 12:47:46PM +0100, Nico R. wrote:
>
> What say the others?
I say if using switches versus moving groff both result in identical
binaries, then switches are probably easier and better in that the
explanation of the switch is the perfect forum to mention that perl is
looking
On 12/22/05, Alexander E. Patrakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nico R. wrote:
>
> > I haven't actually built a system from the alphabetical branch, but in
> > situations like this one, I usually prefer using some configure
> > switches. But that may be due to the fact that I like to have more
> >
Nico R. wrote:
I haven't actually built a system from the alphabetical branch, but in
situations like this one, I usually prefer using some configure
switches. But that may be due to the fact that I like to have more
control and dislike badly written configure scripts which have broken
tests, pr
Dan Nicholson wrote:
Who hates the perl build system? I do, I do.
Me too. %-|
I can't tell you how long it took
to figure this out since it appears the perl build system was written
by a high school student.
??? ;-)
Now, we could just add some mandir= type statements to configure.gnu,
bu
Who hates the perl build system? I do, I do.
OK, so this is very strange and may not be necessary and others don't
seem to have this issue, but...
When building perl in Ch. 6 of the LFS ALPHABETICAL-20051216, I kept
getting the man pages installed in the root directory. This was very
obnoxious,
23 matches
Mail list logo
