Re: [lfs-support] LFS translation to Ancient Greek completed

On Thu, Apr 01, 2021 at 12:01:14PM +0200, Tim Tassonis wrote: > Hi all > > It took me a while, but I now finally completed my translation of the LFS > book into Ancient Greek. It is based on LFS 10.0, and only the sysv version > is done yet, Systemd is still pending due to ancient greek only

Re: [lfs-support] ssh connect fails at kexinit msg 20 preauth

On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 04:18:06PM +0200, Thomas Seeling wrote: > Hallo dear list, > > > > It was in the development book, but was deleted when updating to > > OpenSSH-8.5p1. I'll file an errata for it at my next commit, but here's > > what you need to do: > > looks like I could have simply

Re: [lfs-support] Issues with /lib64 .....

On Sat, Mar 27, 2021 at 11:00:06PM +0100, Patrick Frisch wrote: > Hello again, > >  now I completed the lfs build, and I had a very nasty problem with your > handling of /lib64 and the new approach, that the toolchain is no longer > isolated in /tools. > > After solving my problem in the

Re: [lfs-support] Libstdc++ in chapter 7 seems to depend on Flex

On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 01:39:17PM +0100, Daniel Mowitz wrote: > On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 09:47:09PM +0000, Ken Moffat wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 10:14:23PM +0100, Daniel Mowitz wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > This is more of an information than a

Re: [lfs-support] binutils pass 1 troubles ...

On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 03:37:58PM -0500, Keith M. Bradley wrote: > Good day all! > > > Got to: > >         su lfs > > then ran: > >         mkdir -v build > > ... and got access denied? > I think you are doing things out of order. In 4.3 'Adding the LFS User' the lfs user is created and

Re: [lfs-support] Libstdc++ in chapter 7 seems to depend on Flex

On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 10:14:23PM +0100, Daniel Mowitz wrote: > Hello, > > This is more of an information than a call for supoort > as I managed to solve my problem myself. > > I built lfs 10.1 last week. > While compiling "7.7. Libstdc++ from GCC-10.2.0, Pass 2" > I got errors pointing out

Re: [lfs-support] Issue configuring gettext in chroot

On Sat, Feb 20, 2021 at 11:14:20PM +, Ken Moffat wrote: > > This part looks good, until the final test which it rain fails > (previous test(s) failed, that is normal). > s/rain/ran/ -- When someone told me I lived in a fantasy land I nearly fell of

Re: [lfs-support] Issue configuring gettext in chroot

On Sat, Feb 20, 2021 at 04:30:46PM -0500, Stefan Vincec wrote: > Hi, > > I'm getting an issue while configuring the gettext source in the LFS chroot > environment > I was going to ask you to confirm that this is LFS-10.0, and whether this is gettext in chapter 7 or in chapter 8 ? But the

Re: [lfs-support] Compile error glibc2.33 -> binutils-2.36.1

On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 12:01:12PM -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > On 2/11/21 8:38 AM, Ken Moffat wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 11:17:27AM +0100, Pierre Labastie wrote: > > > > I've now applied that to 5.10.15-rc1 and confirmed it builds and > > boots. Gotta go o

Re: [lfs-support] Compile error glibc2.33 -> binutils-2.36.1

oyao wrote: > > > > On 2021-02-10 22:47 +0100, Pierre Labastie wrote: > > > > > On Wed, 2021-02-10 at 21:03 +, Ken Moffat wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 08:49:56PM +, Ken Moffat wrote: > > > > > > > > >

Re: [lfs-support] segfault building kernel (was: Compile error glibc2.33 -> binutils-2.36.1)

On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 10:06:22PM +, Roger wrote: > On Wed, 10 Feb 2021 20:04:10 +0000, Ken Moffat > wrote: > > >The segfault is in objtool (see my reply to Pierre) and the output > >object file got deleted. I was using 5.14.1, my gzipped config, > >objtool and c

Re: [lfs-support] segfault building kernel (was: Compile error glibc2.33 -> binutils-2.36.1)

On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 09:58:54PM +0100, Pierre Labastie wrote: > On Wed, 2021-02-10 at 20:04 +0000, Ken Moffat wrote: > > The segfault is in objtool (see my reply to Pierre) and the output > > object file got deleted.  I was using 5.14.1, my gzipped config, > > objtool

Re: [lfs-support] Compile error glibc2.33 -> binutils-2.36.1

On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 08:49:56PM +, Ken Moffat wrote: > > > > Looks like I need to change the Frame pointer unwinder to the > > ORC unwinder to have the same config as you. > > > > The benefits of the ORC unwinder are mentioned at > https://www.k

Re: [lfs-support] Compile error glibc2.33 -> binutils-2.36.1

On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 09:39:20PM +0100, Pierre Labastie wrote: > On Wed, 2021-02-10 at 16:32 +0000, Ken Moffat wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 10:44:31AM +0100, Pierre Labastie wrote: > > > On Tue, 2021-02-09 at 17:14 -0500, Jean-Marc Pigeon wrote: > > > >

Re: [lfs-support] segfault building kernel (was: Compile error glibc2.33 -> binutils-2.36.1)

O Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 11:43:24PM +0800, Xi Ruoyao wrote: > On 2021-02-10 10:05 -0500, Jean-Marc Pigeon wrote: > > Hello, > > On Wed, 2021-02-10 at 09:52 +0100, Frans de Boer wrote: > > On 10/02/2021 02:49, Ken Moffat wrote: Even objtool (792K) is too big an attachment for

Re: [lfs-support] Compile error glibc2.33 -> binutils-2.36.1

On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 10:44:31AM +0100, Pierre Labastie wrote: > On Tue, 2021-02-09 at 17:14 -0500, Jean-Marc Pigeon wrote: > > Hello, > > On Tue, 2021-02-09 at 18:27 +0000, Ken Moffat wrote: > > > On Tue, Feb 09, 2021 at 12:29:14AM +, Ken Moffat wrote: > > >

Re: [lfs-support] Building Python3

On Tue, Feb 09, 2021 at 03:24:53PM -0500, Baho Utot wrote: > A note should be placed in the book about --with-ensurepip=yes. > > It will not build pip, setuptools and wheel if they are already installed on > the system. > > Rebuilding python3 will not rebuild pip, setuptools and wheel as it

Re: [lfs-support] Compile error glibc2.33 -> binutils-2.36.1

On Tue, Feb 09, 2021 at 05:14:09PM -0500, Jean-Marc Pigeon wrote: > Hello, > On Tue, 2021-02-09 at 18:27 +0000, Ken Moffat wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 09, 2021 at 12:29:14AM +, Ken Moffat wrote: > > > On Mon, Feb 08, 2021 at 03:52:35AM +, Ken Moffat wrote: > > > &g

Re: [lfs-support] Compile error glibc2.33

On Tue, Feb 09, 2021 at 12:29:14AM +, Ken Moffat wrote: > On Mon, Feb 08, 2021 at 03:52:35AM +0000, Ken Moffat wrote: > > > > ../configure --prefix=/usr\ > > --disable-werror \ > >

Re: [lfs-support] Compile error glibc2.33

On Mon, Feb 08, 2021 at 03:52:35AM +, Ken Moffat wrote: > > ../configure --prefix=/usr\ > --disable-werror \ > --enable-kernel=3.2 \ > --enable-stack-p

Re: [lfs-support] Compile error glibc2.33

On Mon, Feb 08, 2021 at 11:14:22AM +0800, xry...@mengyan1223.wang wrote: >Please help me to test my glibc workaround in this thread. If it works, >crt1.o should have no "needed" ISA markers (even x86-64-baseline should >not be there). Then we can add it as a note in the book.  >If

Re: [lfs-support] Compile error glibc2.33

On Mon, Feb 08, 2021 at 10:25:27AM +0800, Xi Ruoyao wrote: > On 2021-02-07 18:43 +0000, Ken Moffat wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 06, 2021 at 10:46:18PM +0800, Xi Ruoyao wrote: > > > On 2021-02-06 14:56 +0100, Frans de Boer wrote: > > > > > > No, the tests do not sto

Re: [lfs-support] Compile error glibc2.33

On Sat, Feb 06, 2021 at 10:46:18PM +0800, Xi Ruoyao wrote: > On 2021-02-06 14:56 +0100, Frans de Boer wrote: > > No, the tests do not stop because I use the 'make -k' option. But can't > > run anything afterwards because of this error. > > BTW, I just tried the --with-cpu=amdfam10 to configure.

[lfs-support] Security Advisories now live

The new pages for Security Advisories are now live. To see the LFS advisories, go to http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/read.html and follow the links in the Current Stable paragraphs (svn, systemd). There are similar pages for blfs, linked from http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/read.html

Re: [lfs-support] Error when running command as tester in gcc 8.26

On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 03:24:25PM +0100, Jakub Drozd wrote: > Hi, I appreciate for the help received and I rebuilt ncurses and now the > symlink works. I built everything up to 8.26. When I run su tester -c > PATH=$PATH make -k check, I recieve su: Cannot drop the > controlling terminal Is

Re: [lfs-support] Compile error glibc2.33

On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 08:36:45PM +0100, Frans de Boer wrote: > On 05/02/2021 20:16, Frans de Boer wrote: > > On 05/02/2021 16:25, xry...@mengyan1223.wang wrote: > > > Hi Frans, > > > > > > Could you send the result of > > > > > > $LFS_TGT-readelf -a $LFS/lib/libc.so.6 | grep ISA > > > > > >

Re: [lfs-support] Compile error glibc2.33

On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 12:31:56PM +0100, Frans de Boer wrote: > On 05/02/2021 12:29, Frans de Boer wrote: > > After the 'file' issue, I started rebuilding LFS. Just to find out that > > it stops with the message > > '/lib/libc.so.6: CPU ISA level is lower than required' > > > > I use a Phenom II

[lfs-support] Security Advisories

I'm posting this to both lfs-support and blfs-support. When I started here, things were a lot simpler - far fewer packages, a much more limited desktop, and not many security vulnerabilities were getting disclosed. In those days we had the lfs-security list for mentioning new vulnerabilities,

Re: [lfs-support] Running make in 7.13 error

On Tue, Feb 02, 2021 at 10:22:45PM +0100, Jakub Drozd wrote: > Hi, I thank you for help and I tried to do the things, but still the symlink > does not work. I want to rebuild ncurses in section 6.3. How to do this > without redoing chapter 5? Because I still can restart from chapter 6 but not >

Re: [lfs-support] Running make in 7.13 error

On Sun, Jan 31, 2021 at 11:41:21PM +0100, Jakub Drozd wrote: > Hi, I thank you for support, and I tried to do all these things, symlinks, > etc. and I even rebuilt ncurses, but I have still the same problem, and I > dont know what to do. I want to repair the problem without starting from >

Re: [lfs-support] Error when running make in 7.13

On Sat, Jan 30, 2021 at 08:16:49PM +0100, Jakub Drozd wrote: > Hi, I thank you for all the help that you sent to me, and I started, as You > said, from chapter 5, and I done many sections up to 7.13. All the required > information is are this WeTransfer link: we.tl we.tl   In this message.txt

Re: [lfs-support] Error with gcc pass 1 compiling

On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 07:20:17PM +0100, Jakub Drozd wrote: Hi, you are still posting things which are impossible to read, or to sensibly quote. In this case I've reformatted your one-line post so that I can cut it down to reply to the important part. Beyond that, you are top-posting, and

Re: [lfs-support] Problem with gcc pass 1 compiling

On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 08:41:49PM +0100, Jakub Drozd wrote: > Hi, I have a serious problem when running make install in gcc pass > 1. Here are the required information about this: Book version: 10.0 Host > distribution and version: Ubuntu 20.4.1 LTS Focal Fossa System > specifications:

Re: [lfs-support] Cannot rebuild GMP-6.1.2

On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 08:30:08PM +0100, Pol Vangheluwe wrote: > > > > Op 21 jan. 2021, om 18:32 heeft Ken Moffat het > > volgende geschreven: > > > > On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 01:21:15PM +0100, Pol Vangheluwe wrote: > >> (…) > > (I missed

Re: [lfs-support] Cannot rebuild GMP-6.1.2

On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 01:21:15PM +0100, Pol Vangheluwe wrote: > (first some context, my question follows at the end of this mail) > A few weeks ago, there was a (animated) discussion on one of the mailing > lists (don’t remember exactly which one)) about howto transfer LFS from one > machine

Re: [lfs-support] Ncurses install 6.3.1 error in "tic" program build

On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 04:53:43PM +0100, coolnodje wrote: >I'm bumping into the following issue while following 6.3.1 Installation of >Ncurses: > >after > > sed -i s/mawk// configure > > and > > mkdir build > pushd build > ../configure > > >> >

Re: [lfs-support] [LFS 10.0] Unexpected failures (filesystem) when testing GCC-10.2.0 in Chapter 8.26

On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 11:52:44PM +1030, S. Reka wrote: > On Thu, 7 Jan 2021 at 22:41, S. Reka wrote: > > However, in Chapter 8.26. GCC-10.2.0, I meet multiple unexpected > > failure regarding libstdc++ and file system, the log is fellow: > > Furthermore, I attempt to continue, and faced

Re: [lfs-support] first boot on 9.1

On Thu, Dec 31, 2020 at 05:55:57PM -0600, Brian Hagen wrote: > Hello, > >     Re the comments from Ken and Bruce, first, thank you for them. I > will quote here from LFS 9.1, section 2.4.1.4 comments on partitioning: > > === > > /boot – Highly recommended. Use this partition

Re: [lfs-support] first boot on LFS 9.1

On Wed, Dec 30, 2020 at 03:07:11PM -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > On 12/30/20 12:50 PM, Ken Moffat wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 29, 2020 at 10:04:19PM -0600, Brian Hagen wrote: > > > Hello: > > > > > >     After numerous passes to reach the finish line on LFS 9.1, I

Re: [lfs-support] first boot on LFS 9.1

On Tue, Dec 29, 2020 at 10:04:19PM -0600, Brian Hagen wrote: > Hello: > >     After numerous passes to reach the finish line on LFS 9.1, I got a > working system installed. The prompt reads "-bash-5.0#". However, the > grub installer did not go well. It presents a message "WELCOME TO > GRUB!",

Re: [lfs-support] all the way OK until reboot

On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 11:21:17PM -0600, Brian Hagen wrote: > Hello: > >     I got all the through LFS 9.1 without a hitch, got ready to boot > into the new system, and ... boot failure. Here is what I have: > Only commenting on part of this - > bootup screen: > > GNU GRUB version 2.04 > >

Re: [lfs-support] When I built LFS in chapter 8.8, I met extra fails.

On Sun, Dec 20, 2020 at 09:11:27PM +0800, FledgeShiu wrote: > Description: > > When I built LFS 10 in chapter 8.8, I met some extra fails which not > mentioned in book. Thus, I would like to know if this is harmless. > > Host Info: > Linux LFSHost 4.19.0-13-686-pae #1 SMP Debian 4.19.160-2

Re: [lfs-support] LFS 9.1 error with 6.30.1, "psmisc"

On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 01:34:11PM -0600, Brian Hagen wrote: > I have run into a compiling error that I cannot solve so far. The system: > > Host:    32-bit CPU, 4GB RAM, OS=Ubuntu Studio 18.04, fully updated. > > LFS distro: 9.1 > > The status: all A-ok until reaching section 6.30.1, titled

Re: [lfs-support] combination of OS and LFS versions

On Sat, Nov 21, 2020 at 06:09:52PM -0600, Brian Hagen wrote: > Hello: > >     I have gotten most of the way through a build of LFS numerous times, > processing and resolving error messages. I have yet to reach the finish > line. Most of the time it ends with messages such as "recipe content" or >

Re: [lfs-support] LFS 9.1 sticking point at section 8.3 -- first steps in kernel build

On Sun, Nov 15, 2020 at 11:02:22PM -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > On 11/15/20 10:42 PM, Brian Hagen wrote: > > Hello: > > > > I have progressed all the way to the kernel-build stage (8.3) in LFS > > 9.1. All went well to this point. The document states that > > the first step is to run "make

Re: [lfs-support] error while building building diffutils-3.7 inside chroot

On Sat, Oct 31, 2020 at 05:41:13AM +0530, Rahil Kabani wrote: > PS: you can find the code here: > > https://github.com/alias-rahil/lfs > For some reason I haven't received the message you are replying to, but I don't have any real interest in debugging someone else's scripts, I get enough

Re: [lfs-support] make -k check failure for binutils ch 8.18

On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 11:46:23AM -0600, Alexander Brassel wrote: > When running the check, I see errors reported about missing libgcc_s.so.1 > > ``` > make[5]: *** [Makefile:9399: gdb_index_test_1] Error 1 > make[5]: Target 'gdb_index_test_1.stdout' not remade because of errors. > `echo g++ -W

Re: [lfs-support] LFS 10.0 make -j8 ko

On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 05:46:17PM +0200, pisur5 wrote: > Hello, > lfs 10.0 works on a dell core i7 > The make -j8 command has no effect > The compilation remains in mono processor > I built lfs 10.0 from lfs 9.1 > On this lfs 9.1 environment. make -j8 is correctly executed in multi > processor. >

Re: [lfs-support] LFS-BOOK-10.0-systemd

On Thu, Sep 03, 2020 at 05:16:28PM -0500, jam wrote: > Hi > > I'm attempting an LFS 10.0 systemd build. > > I am building on an X86_64 system running Fedora32 (kernel > 5.8.4-200.fc32.x86_64) > > version-check.sh output: > > bash, version 5.0.17(1)-release > /bin/sh -> /usr/bin/bash >

Re: [lfs-support] getting stuck building gcc lfs version 9.1

On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 06:07:31PM -0600, Julio ordoñez wrote: > Hi, > I'm having issues in chapter 5 lfs with systemd. building gcc Pass 1. when > I try to execute the script with sed to substitute the linux.h > configuration with the tools path and to add STANDARD_STARTFILE_PREFIX_1 & > 2 the

Re: [lfs-support] Suggestion: note regarding patches in the toolchain

On Thu, Aug 06, 2020 at 05:34:39PM -0300, Marcelo Queiroz wrote: > Hi! > > When following instructions in Section 5.7 (Glibc) > of > the LFS Book (version 9.1) I realized I had downloaded the patch (fhs) for > glibc and was

Re: [lfs-support] Missing note in Section 5.11 of the LFS Book?

On Thu, Aug 06, 2020 at 05:36:41PM -0300, Marcelo Queiroz wrote: > In Section 5.11 (Tcl) > of the > LFS Book (v. 9.1) a final note is apparently missing, regarding the > necessity of keeping the directory

Re: [lfs-support] meson build failure

On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 11:48:05PM +0200, Alexey Orishko wrote: > On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 10:24 PM Ken Moffat wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 07:35:47PM +0200, Alexey Orishko wrote: > > > Hi guys, > > > > > > I have a problem building m

Re: [lfs-support] meson build failure

On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 07:35:47PM +0200, Alexey Orishko wrote: > Hi guys, > > I have a problem building meson (chapter 6.53) in LFS 9.1. I've tried the > original meson version and the one from the LFS dev branch (v.0.55.0). I > got the following error in v.0.55.0: > > python3 setup.py build >

Re: [lfs-support] LFS 9.1-systemd 5.33 Texinfo

On Sun, Jul 12, 2020 at 05:36:09PM -, Hans Malissa wrote: > I'm working my way through LFS 9.1-systemd, and I'm stuck in chapter 5.33 > Texinfo > (http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/stable-systemd/chapter05/texinfo.html): > > > $ ./configure --prefix=/tools > checking for a

Re: [blfs-support] Microcode on skylake - request for success/failure reports

On Sun, Jul 12, 2020 at 02:40:17PM -0700, donLouis via blfs-support wrote: > > > > > > Intel released fresh microcode on 20200609 to provide mitigation for > > the SRBDS vulnerability, and this week's kernel releases list > > Mitigation: Microcode for srbds on affected machines with that > >

Re: [lfs-support] LFS 9.1 GMP-6.2.0 test suite

On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 06:47:40PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > On 6/22/20 6:29 PM, Alexey Orishko wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > While building LFS 9.1 I got a problem with the description of GMP-6.2.0 > > test suite results in ch.6.19. In both LFS books it is said that there > > are 190 tests, but I

Re: [lfs-support] 9.1-systemd Errata

On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 10:47:10PM -, Hans Malissa wrote: > Hi all, > > > I noticed that the links on the 9.1-systemd Errata page > (http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/errata/stable-systemd/) are not working. Collateral damage from the move to the new build - what was chapter 6 is now

Re: [lfs-support] Development (v10) LFS

On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 09:13:40PM +0200, Frans de Boer wrote: > Dear all, > > I follow every step but always stumble on the '$LFS_TGT-gcc dummy.c' - in > the first glibc.c section - in that crti.o can't be located by ld. > Looking for crti.o, I find it residing in the $LFS/usr/lib64 directory.

Re: [lfs-support] Users cannot su in svn-20200616

On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 01:51:49PM -0400, Scott Andrews wrote: > On Wed, 17 Jun 2020 18:45:44 +0100 > Ken Moffat wrote: > > > On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 12:19:25PM -0400, Scott Andrews wrote: > > > On Wed, 17 Jun 2020 15:19:14 +0100 > > > Ken Moffat wrote: > &

Re: [lfs-support] Users cannot su in svn-20200616

On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 09:51:34AM -0600, Flareon Zulu wrote: > On Wed, Jun 17, 2020, 09:04 Ken Moffat wrote: > > > On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 09:26:19AM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > > > On 6/17/20 9:19 AM, Ken Moffat wrote: > > > > I've now completed, and booted, a

Re: [lfs-support] Users cannot su in svn-20200616

On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 12:19:25PM -0400, Scott Andrews wrote: > On Wed, 17 Jun 2020 15:19:14 +0100 > Ken Moffat wrote: > > > I've now completed, and booted, a build of the new-style LFS. I'm > > loggied in (and using ssh to write this post). Both my normal > >

Re: [lfs-support] Users cannot su in svn-20200616

On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 09:26:19AM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > On 6/17/20 9:19 AM, Ken Moffat wrote: > > I've now completed, and booted, a build of the new-style LFS. I'm > > loggied in (and using ssh to write this post). Both my normal > > users (ken, lfs), as well a

[lfs-support] Users cannot su in svn-20200616

I've now completed, and booted, a build of the new-style LFS. I'm loggied in (and using ssh to write this post). Both my normal users (ken, lfs), as well as root can login - so the passwords are correct. But only root can su, so I'm not going to be able to build anything after I've built X and

Re: [lfs-support] SIGFPE not generated by raise

On Mon, Jun 08, 2020 at 06:11:53PM +0300, Αγαθοκλής wrote: > On Sun, Jun 07, at 10:51 Bruce wrote: > > On 6/7/20 10:35 AM, Ken Moffat wrote: > > > On Sun, Jun 07, 2020 at 03:43:30PM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote: > > > > Finally replying to this: > > Hi Ke

Re: [lfs-support] SIGFPE not generated by raise

On Sun, Jun 07, 2020 at 10:51:22AM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > On 6/7/20 10:35 AM, Ken Moffat wrote: > > On Sun, Jun 07, 2020 at 03:43:30PM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote: > > > > So, I've been looking in the wrong place, it's embedded perl in > > rxvt-unicode: google found

Re: [lfs-support] SIGFPE not generated by raise

On Sun, Jun 07, 2020 at 03:43:30PM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote: > Finally replying to this: > > I did use that system for a fresh build, but the sigfpe problem was > present in the tests for both bash and check (building from xorg). > > Then I booted the latest system (last ni

Re: [lfs-support] SIGFPE not generated by raise

On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 12:43:46AM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote: > On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 03:28:17AM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote: > > On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 02:08:08AM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote: > > > On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 10:13:12PM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote: [...] > > > &g

Re: [lfs-support] SIGFPE not generated by raise

On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 03:28:17AM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote: > On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 02:08:08AM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote: > > On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 10:13:12PM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote: > > > On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 12:43:26PM +0800, Xi Ruoyao wrote: > > > > >

Re: [lfs-support] SIGFPE not generated by raise

On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 02:08:08AM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote: > On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 10:13:12PM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote: > > On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 12:43:26PM +0800, Xi Ruoyao wrote: > > > > > > > When the -O0 override in glibc errored, I changed that to -O1

Re: [lfs-support] SIGFPE not generated by raise

On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 10:13:12PM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote: > On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 12:43:26PM +0800, Xi Ruoyao wrote: > > > > When the -O0 override in glibc errored, I changed that to -O1 (still > with -march=native). Tests on bash still showed the SIGFPE falure, >

Re: [lfs-support] SIGFPE not generated by raise

On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 12:43:26PM +0800, Xi Ruoyao wrote: > > If SIGFPE is somehow masked by sigprocmask, this phenomenon would happen. The > SIGFPE raised by raise() will be masked, but the SIGFPE produced by 1/0 is > still > undefined behavior (on x86_64 Linux normally "as if" a SIGFPE is

Re: [lfs-support] SIGFPE not generated by raise

On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 10:07:50PM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote: > > I've now had a reply on the check list suggesting that I try > rebuilding with -O0. error: #error "glibc cannot be compiled without optimization" Fun, isn't it. ĸen -- Do you not know that, what you belitt

Re: [lfs-support] SIGFPE not generated by raise

On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 07:38:34PM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote: > On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 01:32:55PM -0400, Don Cross wrote: > > On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 1:17 PM Ken Moffat wrote: > > > > > I'm trying to discover why two tests in the testsuite for 'check' > > >

Re: [lfs-support] SIGFPE not generated by raise

On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 01:32:55PM -0400, Don Cross wrote: > On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 1:17 PM Ken Moffat wrote: > > > I'm trying to discover why two tests in the testsuite for 'check' > > always fail for me. I've now got a response that the tests raise > > S

Re: [lfs-support] SIGFPE not generated by raise

On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 12:28:15PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > On 5/26/20 12:17 PM, Ken Moffat wrote: > > I'm trying to discover why two tests in the testsuite for 'check' > > always fail for me. I've now got a response that the tests raise > > SIGFPE but do not rec

[lfs-support] SIGFPE not generated by raise

I'm trying to discover why two tests in the testsuite for 'check' always fail for me. I've now got a response that the tests raise SIGFPE but do not receive it. The example is ken@plexi ~/check-debug $cat test.c #include #include int main() { printf("Before\n"); raise(SIGFPE);

Re: [lfs-support] Python-3.8.1 Error

On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 01:41:52AM +0300, Greekforce1821 wrote: > ++ CHAPTER 5.30 LFS > > Στις Δευ, 25 Μαΐ 2020 στις 1:39 π.μ., ο/η Greekforce1821 < > spirosk...@gmail.com> έγραψε: > > > Hello, I am experiencing some issues with the Python-3.8.1, I followed > > exactly the orders and the first

Re: [lfs-support] Test failures in vim-8.2.0486 with gcc-10.

On Sun, May 24, 2020 at 10:12:50AM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > On 5/24/20 12:27 AM, Ken Moffat wrote: > > For me, vim-8.2.0814 tests take 120 seconds in chroot on a virgin LFS build. > > I think I did run down the tests hanging problem. We have a configuration > in /etc/ba

Re: [lfs-support] Test failures in vim-8.2.0486 with gcc-10.

On Sat, May 23, 2020 at 11:28:23PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > On 5/23/20 10:11 PM, Ken Moffat wrote: > > > > So, I gave vim's tests another try, but they failed somewhat badly: > > > > Executed: 2667 Tests > > Skipped:47 Tests > >FAI

Re: [lfs-support] Test failures in vim-8.2.0486 with gcc-10.

On Sun, May 24, 2020 at 04:11:53AM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote: > > This is LFS r11848 cross-chap5 branch from 13th May and I'm trying > to understand why tests fail (although I don't always achieve any > understanding). > > So, I gave vim's tests another try, but they fai

[lfs-support] Test failures in vim-8.2.0486 with gcc-10.

I keep thinking I'm coming towards the end of my cross-chap5 build, but this latest test breakage makes me wonder - A few months ago I stopped running tests on vim after they hung all night on one of my machines (my TERM is rxvt-unicode, in chroot I pretend to be running xterm-color and I

Re: [lfs-support] Updating secutiy fixes

On Fri, May 08, 2020 at 07:55:05PM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote: > > · Check p11-kit is latest. > Hmm, I think I should be running make-ca after updating p11-kit. > As soon as I'd sent this, I went to update my firefox scripts, and realised that I don't check p11-kit is latest: I

Re: [lfs-support] Updating secutiy fixes

On Fri, May 08, 2020 at 12:54:21PM -0500, Douglas R. Reno wrote: > > On 5/8/20 12:40 PM, Bud Rozwood wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I am reading the BLFS errata for the stable sysv version and I was > > wondering if, when following the instructions for the development book, > > would I need to install

Re: [lfs-support] GCC-9.2.0

On Mon, May 04, 2020 at 10:10:12PM +0300, Greekforce1821 wrote: > Hello, I am experiencing some issues with the GCC-9.2.0 library, I am > using the LFS Version 9.1 . > When I run the command (su nobody -s /bin/bash -c "PATH=$PATH make -k > check" ) an unexpected error pops up telling me that I

Re: [lfs-support] libnotify fails to install

On Sun, May 03, 2020 at 09:14:18AM +0800, Xi Ruoyao wrote: > On 2020-05-02 13:52 -0400, Bud Rozwood wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'm trying to install libnotify but I was having trouble getting passed the > > XML verification. It kept saying : > > > > FAILED: docs/notification-spec.html > >

Re: [lfs-support] Can't start X server

On Fri, May 01, 2020 at 08:52:31PM -0400, Bud Rozwood wrote: > > I know it's getting late but I've discovered something. It's only 2:30 am, the night is young - but I probably won't respond after this. > I did take your > hints on using the workaround with logind (I kind of cheated and looked >

Re: [lfs-support] Can't start X server

On Fri, May 01, 2020 at 02:47:36PM -0400, Bud Rozwood wrote: > On Fri, May 1, 2020 at 1:43 PM Ken Moffat wrote: > > > > On Fri, May 01, 2020 at 12:33:44AM -0400, Bud Rozwood wrote: > > [ keeping this paragraph, note that this rebuild of PAM might not be the same as your earli

Re: [lfs-support] Can't start X server

On Fri, May 01, 2020 at 12:33:44AM -0400, Bud Rozwood wrote: > Hi, > > I went through most of the X Window chapter in the BLFS version 9.1 but I > can't seem to get the server going. I've attached my Xorg log file for > reference. > Umm, /var/log/Xorg.log ? That is the old way, running the

Re: [lfs-support] su: Cannot drop the controlling terminal - 6.25 GCC

On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 08:34:22PM +0800, dev o wrote: > Good evening, > > With no more suggestions coming forward, I suppose that all troubleshooting > options have already been exhausted on this issue. > In that case, I guess it is time to wipe the host and start fresh with a > newly installed

Re: [lfs-support] Can't retrieve graphviz source

On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 06:07:05PM -0400, Bud Rozwood wrote: > Hi, > > On BLFS 9.1, I can't seem to retrieve the source file for graphviz 2.42 > because the server seems to hang. I even tried getting the one from > archlinux which is 2.44 but even trying to get that one seems to hang. I > was

Re: [lfs-support] linux 5.5.9: shutdown -h hangs on detaching cdrom

On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 12:33:42AM +0200, Stephen Berman wrote: > > I guess I should report this to the kernel bug list? I searched that > list for power-off issues and found only one report after the above > commit, and it seems to be a different issue. It is rather surprising > that my

Re: [lfs-support] OpenSSL 1.1.1g MD5

On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 09:43:41AM +0200, Pierre Labastie wrote: > On Fri, 2020-04-24 at 09:30 +0200, Pierre Labastie wrote: > > On Fri, 2020-04-24 at 00:41 -0600, flareonz...@gmail.com wrote: > > > Can someone update the MD5 for the OpenSSL 1.1.1g package in the > > > dev > > > book? The

Re: [lfs-support] libpthread is truncated

On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 12:54:55AM -0400, Bud Rozwood wrote: > Hi, > > I just recently got a message from ldconfig saying that a file "is > truncated" after installing a package in the chroot environment (after > chapter 6 in version 9.1): > > # ldconfig > ldconfig: file

Re: [lfs-support] linux 5.5.9: shutdown -h hangs on detaching cdrom

On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 10:41:27AM +0200, Stephen Berman wrote: > On Mon, 13 Apr 2020 21:29:33 +0200 Stephen Berman > wrote: > > > On Sun, 12 Apr 2020 18:47:08 +0100 Ken Moffat > > wrote: > > > >> On Sat, Apr 11, 2020 at 06:43:22PM +0200, Stephen Berman wr

Re: [lfs-support] Is there any runtime dependency on glibc so libs?

On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 12:13:21PM -0400, Olivier Langlois wrote: > Hi Xi, > > On Tue, 2020-04-14 at 10:03 +0800, Xi Ruoyao wrote: > > On 2020-04-13 20:41 -0400， Olivier Langlois wrote: [ just a few minor comments ] > > > > I think something like -L/home/juicingf/dev/glibc- > >

Re: [lfs-support] Util-linux test fails for column: invalid multibyte

On Sun, Apr 12, 2020 at 02:52:28PM -0400, Bud Rozwood wrote: > Correction: "running these tests" (for util-linux). > > On Sun, Apr 12, 2020 at 2:47 PM Bud Rozwood wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I'm trying to run the test suite as a non-root user for Util-linux for the > > LFS version 9.1 but I keep

Re: [lfs-support] su: Cannot drop the controlling terminal - 6.25 GCC

On Sun, Apr 12, 2020 at 10:01:07PM +0800, devin operline wrote: > Hi there, > > This is my 3rd attempt at getting through LFS for the first time using > (Debian 10). It was a fresh install when I made my second attempt. Then > hit this error and redid chapters 4, 5 and 6 before failing at the

Re: [lfs-support] linux 5.5.9: shutdown -h hangs on detaching cdrom

On Sat, Apr 11, 2020 at 06:43:22PM +0200, Stephen Berman wrote: > On Fri, 10 Apr 2020 15:51:22 -0500 Bruce Dubbs wrote: > > > On 4/10/20 3:29 PM, Stephen Berman wrote: > >> I've built current development LFS using jhalfs and when I invoke (via > >> sudo or logged in as root) `shutdown -h now',

Re: [lfs-support] Upgrade Kernel Version

On Thu, Apr 09, 2020 at 08:17:12AM +0900, WooHyung Jeon wrote: > On 2020-04-09 오전 3:30, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > > On 4/8/20 1:21 PM, Furkan İnciroğlu wrote: > > > > On 4/7/20 2:31 AM, Furkan İnciroğlu wrote: > > > > > Hi there, > > > > > > > > > > When I compiled LFS 8.4 systemd Linux kernel version

  1   2   3   4   5   6   >