> From: Paul Rogers
> Date: Fri, 01 Sep 2017 09:04:36 -0700
>
> Being able to use my (now old) i7 to build (B)LFS has made this much
> faster, but seems to have tripped me up. I was trying to build an i686
> LFS, and thought it was enough to use an older i686-made OS and
> toolchain. Works on Co
> Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2017 18:49:11 -0400
> From: "Isaac D. Cohen"
>
> I'm up to the end of section 5.7.1 and everything compiled
> successfully. The book now says to do a "sanity check" to see if all
> is working out. It doesn't say in what directory to do it, but I
> figured it must mean /tools/bi
> Date: Sun, 11 Jun 2017 17:24:59 -0400
> From: "Isaac D. Cohen"
>
> Hi,
>
> While compiling GCC on the first pass I got the following error:
>
> checking for suffix of object files... configure: error: in
> `/media/isaac/LFS/Source_Code/build-gcc/i686-elf/libgcc':
> configure: error: cannot comp
> From: Alan Feuerbacher
> Date: Wed, 17 May 2017 23:09:59 -0600
>
> On 5/17/2017 10:29 PM, Ken Moffat wrote:
[...]
>
> I'm using LVM and LABEL/UUID (experimenting).
>
[...]
> > But
> > can I suggest that you try breaking the problem into smaller parts ?
+1 .
> >
> > 1. Enough of a kernel (fi
> From: Alan Feuerbacher
> Date: Wed, 17 May 2017 23:09:59 -0600
>
> On 5/17/2017 10:29 PM, Ken Moffat wrote:
[...]
> > [...] And I know nothing about Rod, or his books.
'Get over yerself, mate'?
rodsbooks.com - esp well-known for gpt/uefi/... works.
akh
--
--
http://lists.linuxfromsc
> From: Richard Melville <6tric...@gmail.com>
> Date: Tue, 16 May 2017 16:18:19 +0100
>
> n 16 May 2017 at 15:44, akhiezer wrote:
>
> > > From: Richard Melville <6tric...@gmail.com>
> > > Date: Tue, 16 May 2017 13:19:19 +0100
[...]
> > > de
> From: Richard Melville <6tric...@gmail.com>
> Date: Tue, 16 May 2017 13:19:19 +0100
>
>
> On 16 May 2017 at 11:57, Simon Geard wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 2017-05-16 at 11:03 +0100, Richard Melville wrote:
[...]
> Maybe so, but the problem still returns to the use of proprietary software
> in the first
> From: Simon Geard
> Date: Tue, 16 May 2017 22:57:04 +1200
>
> On Tue, 2017-05-16 at 11:03 +0100, Richard Melville wrote:
[...]
>
> > Recently, I saw Windows XP on a consultants terminal at a local
> > hospital. When I expressed my concern, and disbelief, he just threw
> > up his hands in a he
> From: Bruce Dubbs
> Date: Wed, 10 May 2017 21:00:38 -0500
>
> Ken Moffat wrote:
> > Since when has anybody purporting to be Cliff sent mail from
> > nlvz.yandex.ru ? Bloody impersonators. I expect they'll try to
> > claim to be me next.
>
> I suspect a hacked box but I'm not sure. I've blocke
> Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2017 07:32:00 +0100
> From: lf...@cruziero.com (akhiezer)
>
> > Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2017 23:57:11 -0400
> > From: Michael Shell
> >
> > On Sat, 29 Apr 2017 00:29:00 +0100
> > Ken Moffat wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks to
> Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2017 23:57:11 -0400
> From: Michael Shell
>
> On Sat, 29 Apr 2017 00:29:00 +0100
> Ken Moffat wrote:
>
> > Thanks to both of you for this thread - I had assumed that only
> > DataCenter-grade products (as in "unaffordable") were nvme, and those
> > (of course) have ridiculous
> From: Alan Feuerbacher
> Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2017 11:35:37 -0600
>
> On 4/25/2017 7:24 AM, Wayne Blaszczyk wrote:
> > On Sun, 2017-04-23 at 16:07 -0600, Alan Feuerbacher wrote:
[...]
> I had a similar experience last time I tried this 2 1/2 years ago. But I
> had so much trouble with booting on a
> From: Bruce Dubbs
> Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2017 19:02:47 -0500
>
> > Paul Rogers wrote:
[...]
>
> Since you are doing something beyond the book, why don't you create the
> tarball with the host system? There is really no need to do that inside
> chroot.
Maybe do also (if not already): a destdir
> From: ssmtpmailtesting ssmtpmailtesting
> Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2016 19:27:07 +0600
> Subject: [lfs-support] What is the best way to backup whole lfs system?
>
> I did this: cp -arf /mnt/lfs /media/sda7
'-a' includes '-r' .
>
> Is it ok? Or should I use other tool to backup whole system?
Gen
> From: ssmtpmailtesting ssmtpmailtesting
> Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2016 15:17:52 +0600
> Subject: [lfs-support] How can I remove linux kernel-4.7.2 from lfs
> completely?
>
> I've installed this:
> http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/stable/chapter08/kernel.html
>
> Now I want to remove/dele
> From: ssmtpmailtesting ssmtpmailtesting
> Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2016 12:29:38 +0600
> Subject: [lfs-support] Is the style of kernel booting message correct?
>
> After booting the kernel successfully, the init scripts start running.
> Everything works well.
>
> I see messages like this:
>
> * Startin
> From: ssmtpmailtesting ssmtpmailtesting
> Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2016 10:02:07 +0600
> Subject: Re: [lfs-support] Can't login after boot,
> typing keyboard doesn't display any character on console, why?
>
> cat /etc/inittab
> # Begin /etc/inittab
>
> id:3:initdefault:
>
> si::sysinit:/etc/rc.d/init.
> From: ssmtpmailtesting ssmtpmailtesting
> Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2016 09:57:09 +0600
> Subject: [lfs-support] Can't login after boot,
> typing keyboard doesn't display any character on console, why?
>
> I looks, kernel is booting well. Mounted rootfs(ext4). I got the login
> prompt as: (none) login:
> From: ssmtpmailtesting ssmtpmailtesting
> Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2016 07:03:20 +0600
> Subject: Re: [lfs-support] How can I install binutils and gcc with one pass
> to build temporary system?
>
> http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/stable/chapter05/
> binutils-pass2.html , http://www.linuxfrom
> From: ssmtpmailtesting ssmtpmailtesting
> Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2016 07:13:56 +0600
> Subject: [lfs-support] Why are /usr/bin, /usr/sbin, /sbin in chroot command?
>
> http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/stable/chapter06/chroot.html
>
> chroot "$LFS" /tools/bin/env -i \
> HOME=/root
> From: Frans de Boer
> Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2016 22:46:02 +0100
> Subject: [lfs-support] Error systemd
>
> While building systemd-232, I encounter the next errors during installing:
>
> mv: cannot stat '/usr/lib/libnss_myhostname.so.2': No such file or directory
> mv: cannot stat '/usr/lib/libnss_mym
In case of use and not already known about:
www.intestinate.com/pilfs/
- LFS on raspberry pi 1/2/3 .
BLFS isn't covered fully: it's mainly via several examples of 'how to
install main-app with deps'. The '*.Slackbuild' scripts and related
materials, in 'Slackware on Raspberry Pi' (www.fatdo
> Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2016 09:09:02 +
> From: lf...@cruziero.com (akhiezer)
> Subject: Re: [lfs-support] how to test rw/ro/&c of a file [Was: "I don't
> need to know"]
>
> > From: Paul Rogers
> > Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2016 17:29:56 -0800
> > S
> From: Paul Rogers
> Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2016 17:29:56 -0800
> Subject: [lfs-support] how to test rw/ro/&c of a file [Was: "I don't need to
> know"]
>
> > $ help test
> > .
> > .
> > -w [...]
> > . # &usw.
> > .
> >$
> >
> > ?
>
> Didn't work for me. Tried it first, an
> From: Paul Rogers
> Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2016 10:48:38 -0800
> Subject: [lfs-support] "I don't need to know"
>
> I want to write to a file on a device that may be mounted RO or RW.
> If it's RO, fine but I don't need to know, just drop it. The error
> appearing on the console can't be redirected t
> Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2016 09:32:28 +0800 (GMT+08:00)
> From: chenyiwei02
> Subject: Re: [lfs-support] gcc 4.1.2 when make bootstrap
>
> You are right, I will adopt it.
> My cordial thanks goes to you, William Harrington!
Another option is to simply unpack the Slackware packages into a folder
-
> From lfs-support-boun...@lists.linuxfromscratch.org Tue Oct 11 02:16:53 2016
> Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2016 09:37:19 +0800 (GMT+08:00)
> From: chenyiwei02
> To: "lfs-support@lists.linuxfromscratch.org"
>
> Subject: Re: [lfs-support] gcc 4.1.2 when make bootstrap
>
>
>
> I am sorry for I donot use th
> From: "Rob"
> Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2016 10:49:10 -0500
> Subject: [lfs-support] B- and LFS Roadmap
>
> Do we have something like a milestone tracker that shows the
> status/progress of B and LFS development?
>
Yes: ref b/lfs sections of website; u want to arrive at respective 'trac'
areas.
ak
> From: Michele Bucca
> Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2016 12:40:08 +
> Subject: Re: [lfs-support] p.s. -- Re: [OT] Post questions that do not rely
> completely on the book
>
> Il 30 set 2016 1:54 PM, "akhiezer" ha scritto:
> >
> > > Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2016 12
> Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2016 12:24:50 +0100
> From: lf...@cruziero.com (akhiezer)
> Subject: Re: [lfs-support] [OT] Post questions that do not rely completely
> on the book
>
.
.
>
> > and here's my question. is there a way to build a LFS system using b
> From: Michele Bucca
> Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2016 10:30:57 +
> Subject: [lfs-support] [OT] Post questions that do not rely completely on
> the book
>
> I was wondering where i could ask some questions that are not covered in
> lfs or blfs. for example:
>
> - suggestions to improve the toolc
> From: "Rob"
> Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2016 06:02:20 -0500
> Subject: Re: [lfs-support] Force i386
>
> Ken Moffat wrote:
> > Building LFS for the first time is hard. Many people have trouble.
> > And multilib is harder still (or perhaps just "more tedious", but
> > "harder" is probably a better starti
(Top-posting as I gather that can be useful re accessibility stuff:
is that correct?)
I'd certainly be very interested in learning such info in practice.
Although the software side would be the main info, if possible could
there be some details on hardware that would be used typically.
akh
>
> From: Pierre Labastie
> Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2016 08:08:18 +0200
> Subject: Re: [lfs-support] lfs-support Digest, Vol 563, Issue 1
>
> On 27/08/2016 06:53, Sumit Kokal wrote:
> > Hello,
> > Hello sir, my first pass is successfully done..all packages are properly
> > installed,and M move to pass 2.
> From: Hazel Russman
> Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2016 17:28:07 +0100
> Subject: Re: [lfs-support] LFS 7.10 rc1. Tool chain technical notes 5.2
>
> On Thu, 25 Aug 2016 10:54:46 -0500
> Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>
> > Hazel Russman wrote:
> > > On Thu, 25 Aug 2016 14:22:18 +0200 Pierre Labastie
> > > wrote:
> >
to boot on, so no grub no
> anything, i don't have the exact message because i'm home
> but it's something like "no boot device detected"
>
.
.
>
>
> 2016-06-29 14:22 GMT+02:00 akhiezer :
> >
> > From this and what you say in ot
> From: thibaut noah
> Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2016 11:16:11 +0200
> Subject: Re: [lfs-support] Grub failed me, my boot has sink
>
>
> 2016-06-29 9:39 GMT+02:00 akhiezer :
>
> For example, if:
> > --
> > * you have two separate physical disks;
> >
> > *
> From: thibaut noah
> Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2016 07:58:59 +0200
> Subject: [lfs-support] Grub failed me, my boot has sink
>
>
>
> Hi guys, i managed to get to the end of the lfs build.
>
> The problem i have now is that my /boot is on a separate partition and
> unfortunatly the book doesn't tell me m
> From: Pierre Labastie
> Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2016 15:58:34 +0200
> Subject: Re: [lfs-support] spam label [Was: Problem with find and -exec]
>
> On 25/06/2016 12:56, akhiezer wrote:
> > - is it beyond your wit to get rid of that '***SPAM***' once and for all.
>
- is it beyond your wit to get rid of that '***SPAM***' once and for all.
rgds,
akh
--
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Do not top post on this list.
A: Because it messe
> From: Edgar Alwers
> Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 14:28:10 +0200
> Subject: Re: [lfs-support] 6.7 Linux-4.6 API headers make mrproper fails
>
> Am 23.06.2016 um 10:14 schrieb akhiezer:
> >> From: Edgar Alwers
> >> Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2016 22:18:09 +0200
> >>
> From: Edgar Alwers
> Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2016 22:18:09 +0200
> Subject: Re: [lfs-support] 6.7 Linux-4.6 API headers make mrproper fails
>
>
> Am 22.06.2016 um 18:35 schrieb Pierre Labastie:
> > Did you type the CC=... CXX=... etc lines? They are needed (with
> > backslash as continuation characte
> From: rhubarbpie...@gmail.com
> Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2016 10:24:35 -0500
> Subject: Re: [lfs-support] #!/bin/sh: No such file or directory
>
>
> It appears the problem was file format. I wrote some scripts in
> OpenOffice and saved them as Text (.txt) but "file SomeScript_OO.sh" shows:
>
> POS
> From: Hazel Russman
> Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2016 10:34:15 +0100
> Subject: Re: [lfs-support] Messages not arriving at your end - test
>
> On Sat, 18 Jun 2016 11:40:42 +0100
> Richard Melville wrote:
>
> > Thanks Ken -- Bruce resolved my issue. Apparently I will have to
> > register the email addre
> From: rhubarbpie...@gmail.com
> Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2016 10:48:54 -0500
> Subject: Re: [lfs-support] #!/bin/sh: No such file or directory
>
> On 06/18/2016 07:20 AM, Simon Geard wrote:
> > On Fri, 2016-06-17 at 17:25 -0500, rhubarbpie...@gmail.com wrote:
> >> All exist but for linux-vdso.so.1. How
> From: Paul Rogers
> Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 15:01:23 -0700
> Subject: Re: [lfs-support] LFS-7.7 i686 build failure
>
.
.
> > Actually, that reminds me - the contrib script used to let me run the
> > tests in parallel and then summarise the results. At some time in the
> > past co
> From: Paul Rogers
> Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2016 18:29:09 -0700
> Subject: Re: [lfs-support] 6.7 Linux-4.6 API headers make mrproper fails
>
> [...] I did a few greps
> with line numbers on the "make check" log, so I could sort them into
> order. [...]
Just use grep's '-E' - e.g.:
grep -iE 'fail
> Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 11:36:04 +0100
> From: "A.M. Cumberworth"
> Subject: [lfs-support] Second pass of Binutils: unrecognized configure
> options
>
> Hello,
>
> This is my first time going though LFS. On the second pass of Binutils
> (5.9) (LFS Version 7.9-systemd), I noticed that the f
> Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2016 13:56:12 -0400
> From: Nathan Bibb
> Subject: [lfs-support] Glibc test error - Generating locale de_DE.ISO-8859-1
>
> I am building LFS version 7.9 (stable) on a very outdated machine, and
> everything was going well until Chapter 6.9 Glibc-2.23.
>
> I am building on a Deb
> Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2016 21:05:23 +0100
> From: (akhiezer)
> Subject: Re: [lfs-support] Glibc test error - Generating locale
> de_DE.ISO-8859-1
>
> > Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2016 13:56:12 -0400
> > From: Nathan Bibb
> > Subject: [lfs-support] Glibc test error - G
> Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2016 13:56:12 -0400
> From: Nathan Bibb
> Subject: [lfs-support] Glibc test error - Generating locale de_DE.ISO-8859-1
>
> I am building LFS version 7.9 (stable) on a very outdated machine, and
> everything was going well until Chapter 6.9 Glibc-2.23.
>
> I am building on a Deb
> Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 14:55:49 + (UTC)
> From: Madhusudhan Acharya
> Subject: [lfs-support] Need guidance on building tiny NAS server using LFS
>
>
>
> Hi all,
> I have successfully built a linux using LFS. While going through the website,
> I saw a statement about devs being able to devel
> From: "René Nidegger"
> Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 13:50:42 +0100
> Subject: [lfs-support] Do I have be root from 5.36 onwards?
>
> I am trying to execute the steps outlined in
> http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/stable/chapter06/kernfs.html
>
> I am logged in as lfs.
>
> The commands
>
> m
. I had a big misunderstanding here. Now I have
> it!
>
> You're really helpful.
>
Do note that others did try to help; but you were really unhelpful,
including to yourself, in getting to a fixup.
As Pierre says, it would be very helpful of you, to Pierre and others for
f
> From: Bjoern Meier
> Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 21:16:40 +
> Subject: Re: [lfs-support] 5.8.1. Installation of Target Libstdc++
>
> hi,
>
> ALZ (phyglos.org) schrieb am Mi., 24. Feb. 2016 um
> 20:37 Uhr:
>
> >
> > The point of trying GCC 4.9 was to discard some corner cases of your
> > specific
> From: Bjoern Meier
> Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 07:17:22 +
> Subject: Re: [lfs-support] 5.8.1. Installation of Target Libstdc++
>
> Hi,
>
> ok, let me answering the basic questions:
>
> - yes, I did build manually LFS several times before. Puppet is just a Tool
> for stateful executions (to kee
> From: Hazel Russman
> Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 17:50:18 +
> Subject: Re: [lfs-support] 5.8.1. Installation of Target Libstdc++
>
> On Tue, 23 Feb 2016 17:10:15 +
> Bjoern Meier wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > akhiezer schrieb am Di., 23. Feb. 2016 um 17:
> From: Bjoern Meier
> Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 17:10:15 +
> Subject: Re: [lfs-support] 5.8.1. Installation of Target Libstdc++
>
> Hi,
>
> akhiezer schrieb am Di., 23. Feb. 2016 um 17:02 Uhr:
>
> > > From: Bjoern Meier
> > > Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016
> From: Bjoern Meier
> Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 14:46:50 +
> Subject: [lfs-support] 5.8.1. Installation of Target Libstdc++
>
>
>
> I'm getting this error, at compiling libstdc++
>
> g++: error: unrecognized command line option '-std=gnu++14'
>
> System: Ubuntu 14.04
>
> bash, version 4.3.11(1)
> From: Stuart
> Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 11:35:43 +
> Subject: [lfs-support] CVE-2015-7547
>
>
> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2015-7547
>
> Are there any plans to address this issue in lfs's glibc ?
>
Yes. Look at posts from earlier this week. (EBBP).
akh
--
--
> From: "geist1...@juno.com"
> Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2016 02:21:56 GMT
> To: lfs-support@lists.linuxfromscratch.org
> Subject: Re: [lfs-support] on bringing up ver 7.0
>
.
.
> I actually don't know, I got this Machine out of the Trash, and
> I don't have a Manual for it, and Sony wants
> From: "geist1...@juno.com"
> Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2016 12:52:59 GMT
> To: lfs-support@lists.linuxfromscratch.org
> Subject: Re: [lfs-support] on bringing up ver 7.0
>
>
> -- Original Message --
> From: lf...@cruziero.com (akhiezer)
> To:
> From: "geist1...@juno.com"
> Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2016 02:44:12 GMT
> To: lfs-support@lists.linuxfromscratch.org
> Subject: Re: [lfs-support] on bringing up ver 7.0
>
.
.
>
> --
>
>
> Hi All;
>
> Thank You to EveryOne who has Responded..
> I know I will need to Re-Read these posti
> To: LFS Support List
> From: Bruce Dubbs
> Date: Sun, 7 Feb 2016 20:28:24 -0600
> Subject: Re: [lfs-support] on bringing up ver 7.0
>
> Ken Moffat wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 07, 2016 at 07:34:11PM -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> >> Ken Moffat wrote:
> >>
.
.
> >> On a fairly complete BL
> Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2016 17:47:20 +
> From: Ken Moffat
> To: LFS Support List
> Subject: Re: [lfs-support] O/T - loading distros *after* lfs
>
> On Fri, Feb 05, 2016 at 10:39:33AM +, akhiezer wrote:
> >
.
.
>
> Thanks for those suggestions.
> Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2016 15:23:21 +
> From: lf...@cruziero.com (akhiezer)
> To: LFS Support List
> Subject: Re: [lfs-support] Find /bin /usr /var - package manager
>
> > Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2016 11:13:41 + (UTC)
> > From:
> > To: Lfs Support
> > Su
> Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2016 11:13:41 + (UTC)
> From:
> To: Lfs Support
> Subject: Re: [lfs-support] Find /bin /usr /var - package manager
>
.
.
> >> With the "package manager" I'm using this changes into
> >>
> >> find /bin /boot /etc /lib* /opt /sbin /srv /usr /var >
> >> /tmp/be
> Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2016 22:09:09 +
> From: Ken Moffat
> To: lfs-support@lists.linuxfromscratch.org
> Subject: [lfs-support] O/T - loading distros *after* lfs
>
> Sorry for asking an O/T question here, but -chat seems to be full of
> people who don't actually use LFS (judging from replies I've
> Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2016 10:23:47 + (UTC)
> From:
> To: Lfs Support
> Subject: [lfs-support] Find /bin /usr /var - package manager
>
>
> While looking at the package management section in the LFS book I wonder if
> anyone uses a similar approach to what I'm currently using. Basically the way
> From: "Read, James C"
> https://www.essex.ac.uk/langling/staff/profile.aspx?ID=3588
> To: "lfs-support@lists.linuxfromscratch.org" >
>
> Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2016 22:15:14 +
> Subject: [lfs-support] LFS 7.8
>
>
>
> Has anybody ever actually built a LFS 7.8 system on a non LFS host?
Yes, ma
> From: "Daniel M."
> To: lfs-support@lists.linuxfromscratch.org
> Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 22:58:49 +0100
> Subject: Re: [lfs-support] iptables
>
>
>
> On Mon, 2016-01-04 at 19:05 +, William Harrington wrote:
>
> > I looked at your config settings and conntrack is in the kernel for ipv4.
> From: "Daniel M."
> To: lfs-support@lists.linuxfromscratch.org
> Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 22:58:49 +0100
> Subject: Re: [lfs-support] iptables
>
> On Mon, 2016-01-04 at 19:05 +, William Harrington wrote:
>
.
.
> > [...] --hitcount 6 --name SSH -j DROP
> >
.
.
>
> From: Michael Havens
> Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2015 09:45:12 -0500
> To: LFS Support List
> Subject: Re: [lfs-support] 5.33
>
.
.
> >
> > Last thing, as a general point, stated again: it really really is normally
> > very useful to have built the book manually at least once, prior to t
> From: Michael Havens
> Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2015 09:45:12 -0500
> To: LFS Support List
> Subject: Re: [lfs-support] 5.33
>
.
.
> lfs@debian:~$ /usr/bin/readelf -e /tools/bin/ls | grep interp
> bash: /tools/bin/grep: No such file or directory
You want to use full path there for gre
> From: Michael Havens
> Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2015 07:39:15 -0500
> To: LFS Support List
> Subject: Re: [lfs-support] 5.33
>
> On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 5:58 PM, William Harrington
> wrote:
> >
> > run the following, your interpreter may be wrong or missing:
> >
> > readelf -e /tools/bin/ls | grep inte
> From: Michael Havens
> Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2015 23:26:13 -0400
> To: LFS Support List
> Subject: Re: [lfs-support] section 5.5
>
.
.
> midnight in my part of Florida so I'll try to deal with this tomorrow
((
So you've moved from AZ to FL
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/pipe
> Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 16:49:42 +0100
> From: "Armin K."
> To: LFS Support List
> Subject: Re: [lfs-support] basic requitment
>
>
>
> On 12/12/2014 03:35 PM, openstud...@kewla.com wrote:
> > Before I'm going to far and format again my hard drive, so this is cool?
> > --
> >
> > bas
> From lfs-support-boun...@lists.linuxfromscratch.org Fri Dec 12 15:14:10 2014
> Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 15:13:57 +
> From: lf...@cruziero.com (akhiezer)
> To: LFS Support List
> Subject: Re: [lfs-support] basic requitment
>
> > From lfs-support-boun...@lists.linuxfroms
> From lfs-support-boun...@lists.linuxfromscratch.org Fri Dec 12 14:22:44 2014
> Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2014 14:35:08 +
> From: openstud...@kewla.com
> To: lfs-support@lists.linuxfromscratch.org
> Subject: [lfs-support] basic requitment
>
> Before I'm going to far and format again my hard drive, so
> Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2014 00:45:01 -0600
> From: Bruce Dubbs
> To: LFS Support List
> Subject: Re: [lfs-support] lfs-support Digest, Vol 183, Issue 1
>
> Your comments are unhelpful. Please stop.
They are pointing out that the 'ad-hominem' card is being played too readily,
wrongly, and in a w
> From: Paul Rogers
> To: lfs-support@lists.linuxfromscratch.org
> Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2014 14:55:02 -0800
> Subject: Re: [lfs-support] lfs-support Digest, Vol 183, Issue 1
>
> > From: lf...@cruziero.com (akhiezer)
> > It's idiotic to label such a critique as ad
> From: Paul Rogers
> To: lfs-support@lists.linuxfromscratch.org
> Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2014 14:39:03 -0800
> Subject: Re: [lfs-support] LFS 20141104-systemd
>
.
.
>
> I also have to agree with Bruce,
Well, you're both allowed to be wrong, of course.
> these ad-hominem attacks se
> From: "Dr.-Ing. Edgar Alwers"
> To: LFS Support List
> Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2014 10:56:24 +0100
> Subject: Re: [lfs-support] LFS 20141104-systemd
>
> On Sunday 30 November 2014 21:00:11 Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>
> > I don't think these comments are called for. Not everyone follows
> > development iss
> Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2014 08:20:59 +
> From: lf...@cruziero.com (akhiezer)
> To: LFS Support List
> Subject: Re: [lfs-support] LFS 20141104-systemd
>
.
.
> the second is more non-sequitir.
>
- or even '...-sequitur' .
--
--
http://list
> Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2014 15:42:42 -0600
> From: Bruce Dubbs
> To: LFS Support List
> Subject: Re: [lfs-support] LFS 20141104-systemd
>
> Dr.-Ing. Edgar Alwers wrote:
> > On Saturday 29 November 2014 21:21:50 Paul Rogers wrote:
> >>> I'm inclined to give up on systemd ( I don't want, like or need
> Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2014 21:00:11 -0600
> From: Bruce Dubbs
> To: LFS Support List
> Subject: Re: [lfs-support] LFS 20141104-systemd
>
> lf...@cruziero.com (akhiezer) wrote:
> >> From: "Dr.-Ing. Edgar Alwers"
> >> To: LFS Support List
> >>
> From: "Dr.-Ing. Edgar Alwers"
> To: LFS Support List
> Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2014 22:14:34 +0100
> Subject: Re: [lfs-support] LFS 20141104-systemd
>
>
> On Saturday 29 November 2014 21:21:50 Paul Rogers wrote:
> > > I'm inclined to give up on systemd ( I don't want, like or need more
> > > complexi
> Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 09:10:54 +
> From: lf...@cruziero.com (akhiezer)
> To: LFS Support List
> Subject: Re: [lfs-support] LFS-7.6 with asterisk
>
> > Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 14:00:38 +0700
> > From: Sorawit Ngoenyotrak
> > To: lfs-support@lists.linux
> Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 14:00:38 +0700
> From: Sorawit Ngoenyotrak
> To: lfs-support@lists.linuxfromscratch.org
> Subject: [lfs-support] LFS-7.6 with asterisk
>
>
> I install asterisk on LFS-7.6 but dose not have blfs_bootscript for this
> services. Can or Can not help me for this script.
If yo
> Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 04:07:24 +
> From: Ken Moffat
> To: LFS Support List
> Subject: Re: [lfs-support] LFS-7.2, Ch6.17, gcc-4.7.1 test failures
>
> On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 04:05:15PM -0800, Paul Rogers wrote:
> >
.
.
> > > > Do you want the bash-4.2 ShellShock patch file
> Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 10:44:12 +
> From: lf...@cruziero.com (akhiezer)
> To: LFS Support List
> Subject: Re: [lfs-support] which operating system is best for building LFS
> as host
>
> > Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 16:11:49 +0530
> > From: &quo
> Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 16:11:49 +0530
> From: "j.sai buduu"
> To: lfs-support@lists.linuxfromscratch.org
> Subject: [lfs-support] which operating system is best for building LFS as
> host
>
> Hi,
>
> I am going to build LFS so kindly suggest me which operating system is best
> for build LF
> To: lfs-supp...@linuxfromscratch.org
> From: Christer Solskogen
> Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2014 14:11:01 +0200
> Subject: Re: [lfs-support] Where to find the newlib source when compiling
> GCC pass 1?
>
> On 09.10.2014 13:39, akhiezer wrote:
>
> > Christer: are you
ompiler.
>
Seems like there's an apples'n'pears situation here.
Christer: are you saying that any of the ch.5/6/... LFS instructions should
be changed; and if so, changed to what, explicitly and literally?
I know and understand what you're saying in your posts: but what,
> Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2014 12:08:54 +0100
> From: lf...@cruziero.com (akhiezer)
> To: LFS Support List
> Subject: Re: [lfs-support] issue with 6.9.2. Configuring Glibc - localtime
>
> > From: Alexey Orishko
> >
> > While using LFS system I found one problem
> Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2014 09:55:52 +0200
> From: Alexey Orishko
> To: lfs-support@lists.linuxfromscratch.org
> Subject: [lfs-support] issue with 6.9.2. Configuring Glibc - localtime
>
> Hi,
>
> While using LFS system I found one problem related to recommendations in ch.
> 6.9.2. Configuring Glibc (c
> From lfs-support-boun...@lists.linuxfromscratch.org Sun Sep 7 10:58:22 2014
> Date: Sun, 07 Sep 2014 10:58:01 +0100
> From: lf...@cruziero.com (akhiezer)
> To: LFS Support List
> Subject: Re: [lfs-support] section 9.3
>
> > > Bear in mind too that your lfs build env
> From: Michael Havens
> Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2014 00:07:50 -0700
> To: LFS Support List
> Subject: Re: [lfs-support] section 9.3
>
>
>
> On Sat, Sep 6, 2014 at 2:25 PM, akhiezer wrote:
>
> > Bear in mind too that your lfs build environment is inside a chroot, and
> From lfs-support-boun...@lists.linuxfromscratch.org Sat Sep 6 22:14:44 2014
> Date: Sat, 06 Sep 2014 22:14:33 +0100
> From: lf...@cruziero.com (akhiezer)
> To: LFS Support List
> Subject: Re: [lfs-support] section 9.3
>
> >
> .
> .
> >
> >
> From lfs-support-boun...@lists.linuxfromscratch.org Sat Sep 6 21:52:54 2014
> From: Michael Havens
> Date: Sat, 6 Sep 2014 13:55:47 -0700
> To: LFS Support List
> Subject: [lfs-support] section 9.3
>
.
.
>
> I have a little problem, I D/L a program and then scp it to the lfs bo
1 - 100 of 166 matches
Mail list logo
