On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 2:53 PM, Sean Reque wrote:
[...]
>
> I am inlining the buildr buildfile I created for Lift's hello world
> example below.
>
[..]
I recently did the same for Gradle (it does require building Gradle from
source to get the Scala plugin). This is the result:
usePlugin('sc
Hi Sean,
I've been using Lift + Buildr for a while now and I'm pretty happy with
both.
See some comments below.
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 5:53 AM, Sean Reque wrote:
> =begin
> Differences between maven pom.xml and this buildr file:
>
> 1. I could not get buildr to build this project without set
Maven does not really use Jelly anymore (in Maven2). I agree a Maven1 was
rather ridiculous. Maven2 takes the idea that the pom should just be
configuration + declaration, not implementation details. It's a breath of
fresh air from other build tools (even Maven1). The issue still becomes how
do
> Wow, strong words. I'm wondering what it was about maven that caused this
> productivity loss? So far my shop has not run into this, in fact, we've had
> the opposite vs. Ant. Granted, Raven and Buildr are different beasts.
I apologize for the strong words. I think I was still angry from
re
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 7:40 PM, Sean Reque wrote:
>
> I am a newcomer to Scala and Lift, and I plan on trying to figure out
> how to use either Buildr or Raven, to run Lift, and if I can
> successfully do so I will try to share my work. If I cannot, I will
> probably stop pursuing Lift and start
Well, maybe the archetype code could be generalized and go into sbt. We can
continue discussing that on the sbt mailing list if you are interested. The
remaining part is just dependency declarations for the hello-lift example.
Thanks,
Mark
On Thursday 16 April 2009, Alexander Kellett wrote:
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 10:21 AM, Alexander Kellett wrote:
>
> hey sean,
>
> i hope you're open to other possibilities than buildr/raven :)
> i myself have no real interest in messing with maven after my terrible
> experiences from when i was working on java code full time..
> i just verified that
Here's a decent start for an ant build. If anyone is interested in helping
flesh out this build file more, let's start up a github project/node and
crank it out.
Note: This will compile a lift project (I only tested with an archetype),
but not package or anything else.
-Josh
On Fri, Apr 17, 2
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 10:40 PM, Sean Reque wrote:
>
> I am a newcomer to Scala and Lift, and I plan on trying to figure out
> how to use either Buildr or Raven, to run Lift, and if I can
> successfully do so I will try to share my work. If I cannot, I will
> probably stop pursuing Lift and star
hey sean,
i hope you're open to other possibilities than buildr/raven :)
i myself have no real interest in messing with maven after my terrible
experiences from when i was working on java code full time..
i just verified that it takes just a few minutes to install sbt and
get a running lift app :
I am a newcomer to Scala and Lift, and I plan on trying to figure out
how to use either Buildr or Raven, to run Lift, and if I can
successfully do so I will try to share my work. If I cannot, I will
probably stop pursuing Lift and start looking at other areas of Scala.
I say this simply to state y
excellent, thanks for finishing this off mark! is it possible this
might get into a later sbt release or does this belong somewhere in
the lift source tree?
thank you!
Alex
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 7:11 PM, Mark Harrah wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for putting effort into this. The inline dependency
Hi,
Thanks for putting effort into this. The inline dependency
declarations replace the pom.xml, so it isn't needed. You can also
declare the archetype as a dependency and extract and process it. I
have attached a project definition that does not require downloading
the zip manually or processi
attached a replacement for the sbt script provided, with inline
comments for getting it to work. barely tested and trivial. not yet
verified that this works without a preexisting maven install. will
automate more at weekend.
will look into getting the blocking-on-page-load modification into
sbt/li
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 9:37 AM, Alexander Kellett wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 5:26 PM, David Pollak
> wrote:
> > While we are a community that welcomes newbies and tries to work with as
> > many different people and with as many different styles as possible,
> there
> > are things that we
from what i can see the latest sbt supports jetty-run command :)
testing it out now!
next step, write a command for it to perform the equiv of mvn idea:idea.
Alex
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 7:22 PM, Timothy Perrett
wrote:
>
>
> Alex,
>
> We could do something like this, but it would still need to
looks like it works
"Welcome to hello-lift at Wed Apr 15 20:17:44 CEST 2009"
:)
Alex
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 8:17 PM, Alexander Kellett wrote:
> from what i can see the latest sbt supports jetty-run command :)
> testing it out now!
> next step, write a command for it to perform the equiv of
Alex,
We could do something like this, but it would still need to use maven to
start the server (mvn jetty:run). Unfortunately, you'll need to have a local
maven repo, that's a) part of how maven works and b) the legal implications
of us redistributing a bunch of other peoples code to make it se
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 5:26 PM, David Pollak
wrote:
> While we are a community that welcomes newbies and tries to work with as
> many different people and with as many different styles as possible, there
> are things that we've collectively learned. We've found that Maven is
> preferable for ou
which would also make
http://code.google.com/p/simple-build-tool/wiki/WebApplicationExample
much much more interesting to me...
Alex
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 8:58 PM, marius d. wrote:
>
>
>
> On Apr 14, 2:40 pm, Viktor Klang wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 1:38 PM, marius d. wrote:
>>
>> > E
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 8:52 PM, tk050305cnx wrote:
>
>
> On Apr 14, 7:53 pm, TylerWeir wrote:
> >
> > You'll have a better experience if you take the time to learn how
> > maven works.
>
> Perhaps. But, it's a bit like this:
>
> "Can I have a beer, please."
> "We don't have beer right now, but
Does the ant build file already exist? If not, it wouldn't be too hard to
create a maven assembly that "assembles" all the various dependencies and
such into a directory (or uses something like the maven-ant-tasks to
materialize them for the project later), and includes an ant build
script/starter
Perhaps David B can help on the feasibility of this with our current hudson
install / services.
Cheers, Tim
On 15/04/2009 06:40, "marius d." wrote:
>
> sounds good to me
>
> On Apr 14, 10:58 pm, Timothy Perrett wrote:
>> Perhaps we could couple this with Hudson? Hudson has an API (see
>> h
On Apr 14, 7:53 pm, TylerWeir wrote:
>
> You'll have a better experience if you take the time to learn how
> maven works.
Perhaps. But, it's a bit like this:
"Can I have a beer, please."
"We don't have beer right now, but I think you would have a better
experience with our own brand whiskey."
sounds good to me
On Apr 14, 10:58 pm, Timothy Perrett wrote:
> Perhaps we could couple this with Hudson? Hudson has an API (see
> here:http://wiki.hudson-ci.org/display/HUDSON/Remote+access+API) so
> perhaps we could serve stuff up on the fly through that? Just
> spitballing here
>
> Cheer
Perhaps we could couple this with Hudson? Hudson has an API (see here:
http://wiki.hudson-ci.org/display/HUDSON/Remote+access+API ) so
perhaps we could serve stuff up on the fly through that? Just
spitballing here
Cheers, Tim
On Apr 14, 8:46 pm, João Pereira wrote:
> yeah. nice service. may
yeah. nice service. maybe built with lift?
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 7:58 PM, marius d. wrote:
>
>
>
> On Apr 14, 2:40 pm, Viktor Klang wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 1:38 PM, marius d. wrote:
>>
>> > Even if I find maven quite helpful for Lift there are people that just
>> > want to stay awa
On Apr 14, 2:40 pm, Viktor Klang wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 1:38 PM, marius d. wrote:
>
> > Even if I find maven quite helpful for Lift there are people that just
> > want to stay away from maven. I can understand that. Perhaps it would
> > be helpful to also have some ant script to buil
> expected output. I don't want to bother with Maven at this time. Can
You'll have a better experience if you take the time to learn how
maven works.
On Apr 14, 7:11 am, tk050305cnx wrote:
> I am new to Liftweb. Unfortunately, the example app in the "getting
> started" doc did not work. That is
Didn't Eric make some ant scripts ages ago... I certainly remember someone
making them prior to this discussion.
Tim
On 14/04/2009 12:38, "marius d." wrote:
>
> Even if I find maven quite helpful for Lift there are people that just
> want to stay away from maven. I can understand that. Perh
Thanks for your comments, João.
I am using Ant (or respectively the Eclipse built-in Ant-based
dependency management) for my Java and Scala work. I am on Vista.
Maven sputtered a number of different error messages on several
trials. I don't want to learn Maven and get to the bottom of this.
Busy
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 1:38 PM, marius d. wrote:
>
> Even if I find maven quite helpful for Lift there are people that just
> want to stay away from maven. I can understand that. Perhaps it would
> be helpful to also have some ant script to build a lift project? ...
> or perhaps have a downloada
Even if I find maven quite helpful for Lift there are people that just
want to stay away from maven. I can understand that. Perhaps it would
be helpful to also have some ant script to build a lift project? ...
or perhaps have a downloadable zip archive from lift's site that
contains incipient proj
Hello,
I find that maven will ease your work a lot. Usually it take only one
step to get a lift app running.
mvn jetty:run
if you want to create an eclipse project for the downloaded app, you
just do mvn eclipse:eclipse and then import it to eclipse.
Not using maven you'll have to deal with al
34 matches
Mail list logo
