On Mon Dec 4, 2023 at 9:32 PM CET, Matt Corallo wrote:
> On the call the vote was split between "host our own ML, or maybe use
> groups.io" and "some discourse
> instance, probably delvingbitcoin.org", with a weak majority for the second.
>
> With that in mind, we're gonna give
Ciao Laolu & list,
> Vincenzo wrote:
> > A problem that I see with http://delvingbitcoin.org/ is what happens 10
> > years from now?
>
> Who knows ¯\_(ツ)_/¯? The Bitcoin mailing list started on Sourceforge, then
> moved between another instance before finding its home today on the Linux
>
On Mon, Dec 04, 2023 at 07:19:41PM -0500, James O'Beirne wrote:
> Please see https://github.com/jamesob/delving-bitcoin-archive, which anyone
> can run an instance of themselves.
Looks like that's missing images unfortunately, which are being frequently
used. Do you know of a way to fix that?
Please see https://github.com/jamesob/delving-bitcoin-archive, which anyone can
run an instance of themselves.
On December 4, 2023 3:48:59 PM EST, Peter Todd wrote:
>On Mon, Dec 04, 2023 at 12:35:32PM -0800, Matt Corallo wrote:
>> Ah, there was also some concern over archiving of a discourse,
> Some folks indicated they'd like to interact with it via the supposed
> "mailing list mode", but sadly AJ indicated it may not be super reliable
> (and seems to be disabled on delvingbitcoin.org). I've asked AJ to enable
> it so people can maybe try it out but we'll see if it works. Sadly if you
A problem that I see with http://delvingbitcoin.org/ is what happens
10 years from now?
I am more in favour of keeping the ML (and I can host it because I
have a couple of projects that need an ML too) because
10 years from now we are sure that the mail is still alive.
In addition, I was going
On Mon, Dec 04, 2023 at 12:35:32PM -0800, Matt Corallo wrote:
> Ah, there was also some concern over archiving of a discourse, which we'd
> hoped was trivial through "mailing list mode", but apparently that may not
> be the case. Further thoughts on that are welcome.
You mean archiving of
Ah, there was also some concern over archiving of a discourse, which we'd hoped was trivial through
"mailing list mode", but apparently that may not be the case. Further thoughts on that are welcome.
Matt
On 12/4/23 12:32 PM, Matt Corallo wrote:
On the call the vote was split between "host our
On the call the vote was split between "host our own ML, or maybe use groups.io" and "some discourse
instance, probably delvingbitcoin.org", with a weak majority for the second.
With that in mind, we're gonna give delvingbitcoin.org a try, at least for two weeks, and then we
can come back to
Ciao Matt & readers,
>host a mailman instance and we use another mailing list. I dug into this a
bit and am happy to do this, on the one condition that the ML remains
fully moderated, though this
doens't seem like a substantial burden today. One question is if
spam-foldering will be an issue,
but
Hi y'all,
Re Google Groups:
It appears that one can join a Google Group without a _gmail_ account by
sending a special subscribe email to a certain Google Groups endpoint:
https://webapps.stackexchange.com/a/126053. FWIW, this won't let you use the
web UI directly (useful for searching, the
Hey Matt,
That sounds good to me! Let's settle that during the next spec meeting.
Thank you for the option of hosting a mailing list instance, I'd be happy
to moderate it to share some of the burden.
Bastien
Le dim. 26 nov. 2023 à 17:51, Matt Corallo a
écrit :
> During the last meeting it
During the last meeting it came up that the mailing list here will likely shut down somewhere around
the end of the year. We listed basically the following options for future discussion forums:
* google groups as a mailing list hoster. One question was whether its friendly to subscribing
13 matches
Mail list logo
