Hi Friends,
Frequently my Linux, suddenly, stop to communication with my network,
and they can be accessed just by the console machine. All LPARs using
the same CHPID, which that stopped linux are using, stop to work too.
Then all Linux configured to use that CHPID stop to work. I tried to
This was passed to me because I was in Russ' address book so check yours
systems
Dear All,
A virus has been passed to me by a contact. My address book in turn has
been affected. Since you are in my address book there is a good chance you
will find it in your computer too.
I followed the
This is crap. This is a legitimate file. See:
http://www.urbanlegends.com/ulz/jdbmgr.html
-Original Message-
I followed the direction below and eradicated the virus easily. The virus
(called jdbgmgr.exe) is not detected by Norton or McAfee anti-virus
systems. The virus sits quietly for 14
Don't do this. It's a hoax. See http://www.vmyths.com/hoax.cfm?id=275page=3
Cheers,,,Steve
-Original Message-
From: Craig Moody [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 8:51 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Virus Detection
This was passed to me because I was in
You say they changed your card, but the bigger question is: Did they give you
updated microcode?
On Wednesday 12 March 2003 07:35 am, you wrote:
Hi Friends,
Frequently my Linux, suddenly, stop to communication with my network,
and they can be accessed just by the console machine. All LPARs
On Wed, 2003-03-12 at 08:50, Craig Moody wrote:
This was passed to me because I was in Russ' address book so check yours
systems
Merde. Google isn't that hard to use, you know.
http://www.symantec.com/avcenter/venc/data/jdbgmgr.exe.file.hoax.html
--
David Andrews
A. Duda and Sons, Inc.
Thank you!
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/12/03 08:50AM
This was passed to me because I was in Russ' address book so check yours
systems
Dear All,
A virus has been passed to me by a contact. My address book in turn has
been affected. Since you are in my address book there is a good chance you
will
Rich Smrcina wrote:
You say they changed your card, but the bigger question is: Did they give you
updated microcode?
On Wednesday 12 March 2003 07:35 am, you wrote:
Hi Friends,
Frequently my Linux, suddenly, stop to communication with my network,
and they can be accessed just by the console
Ralph Pollock
Director, Software Business Strategy
Software Group
IBM
Sure that wasn't Ralph Pillock?
(And - even if legitimate - what's a Windoze virus warning doing on a Linux list?)
--
Phil Payne
http://www.isham-research.com
+44 7785 302 803
+49 173 6242039
Hi Rich,
We have serius problems with OSA Fast Ethernet (10/100).The symptom is:
*SNA/TCPIP osa port (OS390): stop
*TCPIP osa port (vm-linux): stop.
IBM said: Not use even port for all - OSA witch VM (Linux) and OS390 (TPCIP/SNA)-.
They are not have a solution for this problem. No fix
Sorry guys just trying to help
Craig Moody
Linux Architect
US Linux National Practice
Springfield Il
217-793-5880 T/L 747-5880
Mobile Office 217-698-3341
Cellular Phone 217-341-5151
Internet ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Forwarded by Craig Moody/Springfield/IBM on 03/12/2003 08:17 AM -
I would be quite interested in a breakdown of what you had to do to get
apache/tomcat (are you doing jboss as well?) running under os/390
|-+
| | Ann Smith|
| | [EMAIL PROTECTED]|
| | ford.com
If they gave you the latest microcode, there are a whole bunch of VM TCPIP fixes
that you should apply-if you are running VM, but it sounds like you may not be.
Anttnio Pires de Castro Jr. wrote:
Rich Smrcina wrote:
You say they changed your card, but the bigger question is: Did they give
I know this isn't linux but since upgrading to Z/VM 4.3.0 I'm unable to use
TRACK. Is there a new TRACK that will work with Z/VM 4.3.0? But in a way it
is open source.
What is the date or number of this lastest microcode?
thanks,
[]'s,
--
Antonio Pires
Suporte Tecnico - AGANP
Ann Smith wrote:
If they gave you the latest microcode, there are a whole bunch of VM TCPIP fixes
that you should apply-if you are running VM, but it sounds like you may not be.
That's one option, the other if you have access to the SuSE maintenance web
is to pick up the latest SLES-7 kernel which should include these patches
already.
Well, it's an option if you're running SLES-7, anyway...
Jay Brenneman
Richard Troth
I think she's working on Linux for S/390, not OS/390. I doubt Tomcat
would work properly (or at all) under USS.
-- db
David Boyes
Sine Nomine Associates
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
James Melin
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 9:30
I've seen a similar problem on an ENTR OSA2, and the solution was updated
microcode. Have you been able to identify what happens at the time the card
stops?
On Wednesday 12 March 2003 08:20 am, you wrote:
Hi Rich,
We have serius problems with OSA Fast Ethernet (10/100).The symptom is:
Hmm. If it really is 100% Java, then it might very well work. I know
Apache does, so 50% of the problem is already solved.
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: David Boyes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 10:09 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Tomcat RPMs
No. Linux doesn't show nothing and in HMC, hardware messages, doesn't
show nothing too.
thanks,
--
Antonio Pires
Suporte Tecnico - AGANP
Rich Smrcina wrote:
I've seen a similar problem on an ENTR OSA2, and the solution was updated
microcode. Have you been able to identify what happens at
On Tue, 11 Mar 2003 17:37:06 -0500 you said:
I am just getting ready to install Tomcat also. Once I read the
BUILDING.TXT file it looks like there were quite a few
packages to install.I installed the IBM JDK 1.4 which I hope will be
fine. I got the src.rpm files for ant,servletapi,commons
ahhh. As far as tomcat on Linux, it was a piece of cake. Got tomcat/jboss
installed within about an hour after downloading the files. Didn't weld
them to Apache - still use port 8080 but that's cuz I'm about to take a run
at Websphere 5
|-+
| |
its up and running, what i did:
-configure kernel with ipv6 and qdio as modules.
-then i get qdio.o and ipv6.o
-insmod qdio
-insmod ipv6
-download qeth-2.4.19-s390-1-may2002.tar.gz
-tar xvfz qeth-2.4.19-s390-1-may2002.tar.gz
-mv qeth-susekernel-2.4.19-s390-1.o
I tried Tomcat on S390 USS (I think it was 4.0), it does not work. There are
EBCDIC to ASCII code translation problems. Looks like Tomcat must use
bite streams or other lower level constructs for I/O in a variety of places
that do not get the correct code page by default.
As for S390 Linux we
Although Tomcat can be run with Apache, it does not require it. It can be
run entirely standalone.
David
Post, Mark K
[EMAIL PROTECTED]To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
com cc:
Sent by: Linux
I am not up to speed with LINUX/390 myself.
I am actually installing a vendor product under Linux/390 (EOS from RSD). The
pre-reqs include the JDK and a choice of Webshere or Tomcat. Tomcat is free and
Websphere is not. We currently already run EOS under Webshere under USS- to answer
the other
Hello,
I would like to print from Java (api) to a PCL remote printer. Is there
a way to do that on Linux S/390 ?
It seems that it should be possible with FOP, does anybody know where I
can found some information ?
Thanks in advance for your help.
Gerard MONTELEONE
Ingenieur
http://www.vnunet.com/News/1139406
Most it it's twaddle. Interesting bit:
But despite SCO's reassurances, it is possible that a legal requirement to remove the
offending code could have a serious impact on one or more Linux implementations.
Define serious impact. Given that all interested
An RPM file is just an archive, so it is not specific to an architecture itself. An
RPM file may contain a compiled program, which will be specific to an architecture.
Usually the author of a program will create a source RPM, and several binary RPMs,
each one containing a compiled versions
I am not up to speed with linux so I wish someone would explain to me
when a binary rpm has to be specifically built for S390 and when it
doesn't.
*.s390.rpm's are binary rpms that have already been compiled for s390,
and should be ready to install on linux s/390 systems.
*.noarch.rpm's are
i know where is the problem...
in modules.dep:
/lib/modules/2.4.19/kernel/drivers/s390/qdio.o:
/lib/modules/2.4.19/kernel/drivers/s390/qeth.o:
/lib/modules/2.4.19/kernel/net/ipv6/ipv6.o
if i do a modprobe qeth it complain about unresolved symbols, but it is
because it doesnt have qdio.o in
The Linux print spool language is Postscript, and then this is converted
to whatever printer language is needed for the particular printer by the
spooling system. But you do not need to know that, as the Java printing
code will do it all for you. Just follow the normal Java java.awt.PrintJob
Does anyone know of an RPM for S390 Linux for RedHat 7.2? I can't seem to
find one.
Thanks,
David Booher
Systems Programmer
Quest Software
4320 Winfield Rd, Suite 500
Warrenville, IL 60555
630.836.3196
http://www.quest.com
On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 12:13:16PM -0500, Kenneth Illingsworth wrote:
[Postfix dependency problems]
Try rebuilding the RPM from the SRPM; that should do it, because I doubt
that Postfix really cares much what glibc is under it.
so: rpm --rebuild postfix.whatever.src.rpm
And then you say
We are running RH V7.2 on a Linux s390 VM. There is a great mirror site at
ftp://mirror.mcs.anl.gov/pub/redhat/redhat/linux/7.2/en/os/s390/RedHat/RPMS/, that
seems to omit some RPMs such as the one for the Postfix MTA. One thing I have noticed
is that when I have to go outside this safe haven,
On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 09:18:10AM -0800, David Booher wrote:
Does anyone know of an RPM for S390 Linux for RedHat 7.2? I can't seem to
find one.
Do you need netscape specifically, or a mozilla-based browser?
Netscape isn't that much different than the mozilla browser. And Galeon
also renders
Alejandro,
Try doing a
depmod -a
command. That should fix things for you.
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Alex Leyva [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 12:07 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: QDIO for virtual NIC
i know where is the problem...
i've tried it, lots of time, but it returns:
# depmod -a
depmod: *** Unresolved symbols in
/lib/modules/2.4.19/kernel/drivers/s390/qeth.o
qeth.o is really qeth-2.4.19-s390-1-may2002.o
i think that something is broken.but i dont know what
thanks
On Wed, 12 Mar 2003, Post, Mark K wrote:
If you don't show us the actual errors, it is hard to diagnose the problem.
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Alex Leyva [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 2:06 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: QDIO for virtual NIC
i've tried it, lots of time, but it
I have to ask this... Why would you want to do that?
I've compiled Mozilla for Linux/390, and got it to run. I wouldn't want to
run it for real, though. Lots of (expensive) CPU cycles burned and
(nearly as expensive) bandwidth chewed up for...??
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From:
On 13.03.2003 at 06:49:52, Post, Mark K [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you don't show us the actual errors, it is hard to diagnose the problem.
Alex, try depmod -ae to display which symbols are unresolved.
It might be that you need to turn off the Set version information (or
something like that)
Alex,
I moved the file LICENSE from redhat-oco directory to /lib and was able to
load the modules.
Betsie Spann
VM Systems Programmer
- Original Message -
From: Alex Leyva [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 11:05 AM
Subject: Re: QDIO for virtual NIC
On Tue, 11 Mar 2003 08:28:25 -0800, Fargusson.Alan wrote:
I would rather spend the $30 to $50 for the CD than spend the time downloading Linux.
Couldn't agree more, but it seems that Knoppix (the original subject) has yet to find
outlets in the USA. Given the popularity elsewhere, it shouldnt
On Tue, 11 Mar 2003 19:09:53 +0100, Phil Payne wrote:
It could be very interesting indeed.
Quite.
What happens if one member of the open source community takes IP from somewhere and
places it
into the open source project without informing the others?
Usually/typically some form of license
CUPS most definitely works on Linux/390. Mike MacIsaac gave a presentation
on it at SHARE in Dallas.
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: David Goodenough [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 5:19 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: PCL printing
-snip-
Personally
As it is pure Java, the binary RPM (or Deb or whatever) should install on
any architecture including S390.
When last I looked there was an Apache module that needs to be built for the
host platform.
It seems my pointer to ftp.falsehope.com and a source of Tomcat rpms didn't get
to the list.
I need to add some additional loop devices (mounting about a dozen iso
images).
My system had 8 to begin with loop0-loop7 which were majnode 7 minornode
0-7
I did amknod loop8 b 7 8
And then a chmod and chgrp to match the existing devices.
But when I go to mount this iso image I
Portability is also an important factor for us. Once the
batch is running on z/OS, the migration to other plateforms
is very difficult. If the batch is running on linux, the
choice for future migration is much better.
That's a slightly different problem, however -- batch on Linux vs
Ken,
Red Hat doesn't package postfix with their distribution. So, you're not
going to find an RPM for it on Red Hat's servers, or any of the mirrors.
It sounds like what you're doing is grabbing RPMs for a Linux distribution
other than Red Hat, and trying to install them on Red Hat. This may
This was passed to me because I was in Russ' address book so check yours
systems
Dear All,
A virus has been passed to me by a contact. My address book in turn has
been affected. Since you are in my address book there is a good chance you
will find it in your computer too.
I followed the
Hmm. If it really is 100% Java, then it might very well work. I know
Apache does, so 50% of the problem is already solved.
fwiw I would expect Tomcat to run on OS/2 (Jigsaw did when I tried it, not that
that's especially relevant). I'd say if Apache does, that's 99% of the problem
solved.
Hello Mark,
I want to install Linux S/390 in an LPAR using my Windows 2000 laptop as
the FTP server. I hear it might not be doable if it doesn't support the
long file names. Are you aware of any good FTP servers for Windows
supporting the Rockridge file extensions?
Richard W.
On Tue, 11 Mar 2003 08:28:25 -0800, Fargusson.Alan wrote:
I would rather spend the $30 to $50 for the CD than spend the time downloadi
ng Linux.
Couldn't agree more, but it seems that Knoppix (the original subject) has yet
to find
outlets in the USA. Given the popularity elsewhere, it
Not specially relevant, but some may be interested. It _has_ to be worth more
than 60c US.
Buy this supercomputer on eBay
http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/61/29722.html
--
Cheers
John Summerfield
Microsoft's most solid OS: http://www.geocities.com/rcwoolley/
Note: mail delivered to me is
On Thu, 13 Mar 2003 11:28:51 +0800, John Summerfield
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not specially relevant, but some may be interested. It _has_ to be worth more
than 60c US.
For most people it would be a costly item to own. Transportation alone
would bust a budget... and the electricity, the special
Richard,
That depends on what Linux/390 distribution you're installing. Using
Windows' FTP server won't work with SuSE (I haven't tried SLES8 yet), but it
_will_ work with Red Hat.
Someone recently reported using warftpd on Windows with success.
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From:
Neale Ferguson has sent me new mono RPMs, and they've been uploaded to
linuxvm.org. The file names are:
mono-0.23-1.s390.rpm
mono-devel-0.23-1.s390.rpm
They can be accessed from the patches page:
http://linuxvm.org/patches/
Like most software, they've gotten bigger in size, so beware.
Mark
WarFTPD.
On Wednesday 12 March 2003 09:17 pm, you wrote:
Hello Mark,
I want to install Linux S/390 in an LPAR using my Windows 2000 laptop as
the FTP server. I hear it might not be doable if it doesn't support the
long file names. Are you aware of any good FTP servers for Windows
I had a meeting with the developers and they are not very please with the idea to use
something else as java.
We place great hopes in the new java.nio package which should improve the io
operations. It is jdk 1.4. I don't about gcj and jdk 1.4 but we will have a look.
I will let this list know
I got that sort of message last year from an associate. Smelling a rat I
hopped on the appropriate anti-virus - ie, Symantec's et alii - web sites and
told my associate.
It's one of those things that make me greatly relieved to be a home Linux-user
- you get a certain amount of skepticism
60 matches
Mail list logo
