konnichiha.
I think I should change the parameter MTU= in
/etc/sysconfig/network/ifcfg-qeth-bus-ccw-0.0. file.
Right. sou desu. :-)
Should I change other file?
No, no other file has to be changed.
Regards,
S. Korte
--
copied from IBM-MAIN
Anyone know about this ??
Regards
Gerard
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of John S. Giltner, Jr.
Sent: 05 January 2006 05:04 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: z/Linux to p/Linux
John R. Grout wrote:
Just speculation on my part, but ...
Linux for pSeries (and the pSeries hypervisor) is now getting
to a level where IBM wants to market it. Good! So there is surely
going to be a push.
Personally, I'm pretty serious about V12N, so I deal a hard hand to
IBM on this one: The pSeries equiv
On Thursday, 01/05/2006 at 01:15 ZE2, Ceruti, Gerard G
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
copied from IBM-MAIN
Anyone know about this ??
Know about what, Gerard? The post asserts no facts, containing only
speculation about IBM marketing strategies.
Alan Altmark
z/VM Development
IBM Endicott
Hello. Not exactly related to zLinux. How can I set eth0 to full duplex?
When my Intel Linux boots up eth0 defaults to 100Mb/s Half duplex, I
want Full duplex. I need to do this when Linux is booting. Is there a
file that I can specify full duplex or do I need to use ethtool somewhere?
Rick, I have never actually tested this, but vmware ESX runs directly on
the hardware (no host OS required) and may be able to run an instance of
vmware as a guest. I'm struggling to come up with a reason why this
would be a useful thing to do however..
-Sam
-Original Message-
From:
Steve,
For a Red Hat system the preferred way it to set it in your
/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0 interface config file. Add the
following line:
ETHTOOL_OPTS=speed 100 duplex full autoneg off
-Sam
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
On Thursday, 01/05/2006 at 07:36 CST, Rick Troth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Personally, I'm pretty serious about V12N, so I deal a hard hand to
IBM on this one: The pSeries equiv of PR/SM requires a cooperative
guest. (I say guest for lack of a better term. No one called
pSeries LPAR a
Sam, thanks, this is what I was looking for.
Steve
Kielek, Samuel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: Linux on 390 Port LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
01/05/2006 09:11 AM
Please respond to Linux on 390 Port
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
cc:
Subject:Re: How to set network
Hi Alan
Ok let me rephrase, does this collective (after looking into respective
crystal balls) have any comments/speculations ?,
As Marketing does have an influence on higher powers decision making and I
am about to put forward a proposal that includes a zSeries Linux leg and if
the
If IBM de-emphasizes z/Linux, it would almost certainly be
in favor of
p/Architecture (and p/Linux) rather than in favor of z/OS (or z/VM).
As pure speculation... I would not be surprised to see mixed
p/Arch-z/Arch sysplexes sharing high-powered hierarchal
file systems
(or raw
On Thursday, 01/05/2006 at 04:47 ZE2, Ceruti, Gerard G
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Alan
Ok let me rephrase, does this collective (after looking into respective
crystal balls) have any comments/speculations ?,
As Marketing does have an influence on higher powers decision making and
I
am about
I currently have a 31 bit installation of SLES9 on two dasd, one mdisk is
mounted as / and the other as /usr. We aren't using logicial volumes. We
would like to copy this installation to a logical volume with 9 dasd. What
is the recommended way of doing this? Or is it necessary to do a new
On Jan 5, 2006, at 8:07 AM, Kielek, Samuel wrote:
Rick, I have never actually tested this, but vmware ESX runs
directly on
the hardware (no host OS required)
Actually, it's running on top of a stripped-down Red Hat.
and may be able to run an instance of
vmware as a guest. I'm struggling to
Just curious if this installation was done so that /usr (being on its own
mdisk) could be shared read-only with CP LINK .. .. .. RR and fstab
considerations among multiple instances?
David
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port on behalf of Michael Krysiak
Sent: Thu 1/5/2006 10:47
On Jan 5, 2006, at 8:47 AM, Ceruti, Gerard G wrote:
Hi Alan
Ok let me rephrase, does this collective (after looking into
respective
crystal balls) have any comments/speculations ?,
As Marketing does have an influence on higher powers decision
making and I
am about to put forward a
Actually, it's running on top of a stripped-down Red Hat.
That is incorrect. ESX does not run on Red Hat or any other Linux based
OS. I think you are referring to the service console which is based off
of an older version of Red Hat (7.x). However, the service console is
not required for
I do believe that was the idea behind it. This was our first attempt at a
Linux installation on VM, and we just followed the recommendations on the
installation documentation we had.
Mike
David Kreuter DKreuter
@vm-resources.com
Sent by: Linux on 390 Port LINUX-390
01/05/2006 10:49 AM
Kielek, Samuel wrote:
That is incorrect. ESX does not run on Red Hat or any other Linux based
OS. I think you are referring to the service console which is based off
of an older version of Red Hat (7.x). However, the service console is
not required for operation. In fact, you can shut the
Carsten,
I'm standing by my statement and will say that IT Week is incorrect as
well.. There is no Linux code in the ESX hypervisor and ESX does not
require the Linux based service console to function.
-Sam
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
On Jan 5, 2006, at 9:57 AM, Kielek, Samuel wrote:
Actually, it's running on top of a stripped-down Red Hat.
That is incorrect. ESX does not run on Red Hat or any other Linux
based
OS. I think you are referring to the service console which is based
off
of an older version of Red Hat (7.x).
Sorry, meant to post to the list.
-Original Message-
From: Meanor, Tim
Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2006 11:41 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: z/Linux to p/Linux
The service console in ESX is a minimal RH 7.2 OS. It's purpose is to
bootstrap the hardware, then turn over control
Meanor, Tim wrote:
The service console in ESX is a minimal RH 7.2 OS. It's purpose is to
bootstrap the hardware, then turn over control to the ESX kernel and
resource manager. So IT Week is incorrect in referring to ESX as based
on a Linux kernel. For more information, see
Michael,
You'll need to be a little more explicit. Are you saying that you want
to move to an environment where you'll be using 9 separate minidisks
that make up an LVM VG, with multiple file systems carved out of it on
multiple logical volumes?
If so, then with the caveat that your /boot
Sorry, we have 9 complete dasd to use for the installation, not mdisks. It
would be one VG and only one LV.
Mike
Post, Mark K mark.post
@eds.com
Sent by: Linux on 390 Port LINUX-390
01/05/2006 12:07 PM
Please respond to Linux on 390 Port
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
cc:
Carsten,
Using the same thread you are referencing, please read the responses
from Paulo Meireles and I think you will see that he is very clearly
stating the opposite of what your are saying. The use of Linux is done
as a convenience, not a requirement. BTW, I don't believe these are
VMWare
I can't say I would recommend that configuration, but that's your
choice. In any event, the means of copying the data would be the same.
When you're done, update /etc/zipl.conf or /boot/parmfile, which ever
you use, then chroot to the new disks, and run zipl. As I said before,
make sure /boot is
I did what you're asking about: convert (by copying) a non-LVM, 2
minidisk (/ and /usr) SLES9 31-bit to turn it into a SLES9 guest that
has a non-LVM root-boot partition with the rest of its partitions and
dasd given to LVM.
(Everyone has rightly scared me out of putting the whole thing onto LVM
What type of configuration would you recommend?
Thanks,
Mike
-
Michael Krysiak
CSC/GIS, 500 Creek View Rd, Newark, DE 19711
Office:(302) 391-8803 Mobile: (203) 558-2432
A relatively small non-LVM root partition.
A separate, small non-LVM /boot partition
The rest of the space dedicated to LVM. One VG, perhaps more, depending
on what the space will be used for. (System stuff versus application)
Separate (appropriately sized) logical volumes for
/home
/opt
/tmp
Here's quick detail about how to do what Michael Krysiak asked about:
I did what you're asking about: convert (by copying) a non-LVM, 2
minidisk (/ and /usr) SLES9 31-bit to turn it into a SLES9 guest that
has a non-LVM root-boot partition with the rest of its partitions and
dasd given to LVM.
Wow, thanks John.
-
Michael Krysiak
CSC/GIS, 500 Creek View Rd, Newark, DE 19711
Office:(302) 391-8803 Mobile: (203) 558-2432
Hello from Gregg C Levine
If I may comment a bit.
I have seen an ESX system startup. It wasn't pretty. I also do not
remember when. I do remember noting that its startup sequences did in
fact resemble Red Hat Linux. Possibly one of the earlier versions
before they went to the FC project.
We are upgrading from a 9672-R76 toe z890-370. I have SuSE Linux SLES
S/390 Version 7.2.0-0 (Kernel 2.4.7) running in an LPAR (no z/VM).
Will this release run unchanged on the z890?
Thanks,
Craig
--
For LINUX-390 subscribe
Yes it will.
Good luck with the upgrade, too!
DJ
Kittendorf, Craig wrote:
We are upgrading from a 9672-R76 toe z890-370. I have SuSE Linux SLES
S/390 Version 7.2.0-0 (Kernel 2.4.7) running in an LPAR (no z/VM).
Will this release run unchanged on the z890?
Thanks,
Craig
Has anybody done this? I'm trying to configure our STK 9310 powderhorn
robotics to work with TSM running under Suse LE 9. If you've down
this, I'd love to see some outline of where to start. STK support
hasn't been too helpful with this venture.
Tim
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 1/5/06, Kittendorf, Craig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Will this release run unchanged on the z890?
Probably you change a whole lot more than that... getting new network
devices? Maybe new DASD subsystem? Your old Linux system will not be
able to exploit those new things, and it's obviously not
On Thu, 5 Jan 2006, Rob van der Heij wrote:
On 1/5/06, Kittendorf, Craig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Will this release run unchanged on the z890?
Probably you change a whole lot more than that... getting new network
devices? Maybe new DASD subsystem? Your old Linux system will not be
able to
HEy Gang. This is probably as obvious as warts on a baby, but I am not getting
past it.
I have a file that contains the PID's of all the clamscan processes launched by
a script.
PID_FOO
7292
7293
7294
7295
7296
7297
7298
7299
7300
7301
7302
Then I have the output of a simple grep/awk pipe:
On Thursday 05 January 2006 17:02, James Melin wrote:
HEy Gang. This is probably as obvious as warts on a baby, but I am not
getting past it.
I have a file that contains the PID's of all the clamscan processes launched
by a script.
PID_FOO
...
Then I have the output of a simple grep/awk pipe:
They won't, however, have support for 2nd level hypervisors.
What do you mean by this? 2nd level up? 2nd level down?
Running Xen/Linux MS/Win OS' side-by-side? What exactly?
--
Rod
--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff /
On Thursday, 01/05/2006 at 03:55 CET, Rod [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
They won't, however, have support for 2nd level hypervisors.
What do you mean by this? 2nd level up? 2nd level down?
Running Xen/Linux MS/Win OS' side-by-side? What exactly?
The terms 1st level and 2nd level are somewhat
On Thu, 5 Jan 2006, Alan Altmark wrote:
In zSeries you can run Linux in a virtual machine created by an instance
of z/VM which is running in a virtual machine created by another instance
of z/VM in a virtual machine created by yet another instance of z/VM
You have entered -- The Twilight
I should have asked a further question. I assume you realize that TSM
under z/Linux will only write to fibrechannel drives, not FICON or
ESCON. If your 9310 is controlled by an open system running ACSLS, you
are fine. If it is controlled by a z/OS system, you need an additonal
piece of software
To effectively use TSM on z/Linux with an STK 9310, you need an
additional piece of software called Enterprise Distributape,
sold/supported by Gresham Computing. Give them a call.
http://www.gresham-computing.com/main.asp?page=148
Scott Ledbetter
Sun Microsystems/StorageTek
-Original
45 matches
Mail list logo
