On Mon, 2002-11-11 at 18:06, Marcy Cortes wrote:
> Adam wrote:
> >Here's how: go get the virgin 2.4.19 kernel sources
> >from kernel.org. Go get the s390-may2002, s390-1-may2002, and
> >timer-1-may2002 patches from IBM Developerworks, and apply them in
> >that order. Also get the qeth driver from
On Mon, 11 Nov 2002, McKown, John wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Marcy Cortes [mailto:marcy@;WellsFargo.COM]
> > Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 12:06 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: Virtual network topology questions...
> >
>
.
Sharing such things as userids and passwords to restricted sites would be
another matter entirely.
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Marcy Cortes [mailto:marcy@;WellsFargo.COM]
Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 1:06 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Virtual network topology questions
On Mon, Nov 11, 2002 at 10:06:01AM -0800, Marcy Cortes wrote:
> Suppose another customer had a SuSE support contract. Could
> that customer email Robert the kernel patch rpm file without
> violating their support contract? That's all he would need to run
> guest LAN on his existing HW/SW.
I thin
> -Original Message-
> From: Marcy Cortes [mailto:marcy@;WellsFargo.COM]
> Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 12:06 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Virtual network topology questions...
>
> Suppose another customer had a SuSE support contract. Could
> that c
Adam wrote:
>Here's how: go get the virgin 2.4.19 kernel sources
>from kernel.org. Go get the s390-may2002, s390-1-may2002, and
>timer-1-may2002 patches from IBM Developerworks, and apply them in
>that order. Also get the qeth driver from there. Build a kernel.
>Build your modules. Copy the qet
On Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 11:09:02AM -0600, Nix, Robert P. wrote:
> This has gone completely off track, and in no way resembles or answers
> my original questions. We're running zVM 4.2, not 4.2. We're on a 9672,
> not a z-series, we have a single OSA interface, shared with a zOS image,
> and no opt
PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Virtual network topology questions...
In a message dated 11/8/2002 10:37:37 AM Mountain Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Further, there is another option from SuSE. For free, they will send you
> CDs with their GA code on them. You just don't get any sup
> This has gone completely off track, and in no way resembles
> or answers my original questions.
Huh?
> We're running zVM 4.2, not 4.2.
OK, you have guest LAN support, just no broadcast support.
> We're on a 9672, not a
> z-series,
Guest LANs work fine on 9672s.
> we have a single OSA interf
In a message dated 11/8/2002 10:37:37 AM Mountain Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Further, there is another option from SuSE. For free, they will send you
> CDs with their GA code on them. You just don't get any support during the
> trial.
There is?
I thought sles7 was all i can get
: Nix, Robert P. [mailto:Nix.Robert@;mayo.edu]
Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 12:09 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Virtual network topology questions...
This has gone completely off track, and in no way resembles or answers my
original questions.
We're running zVM 4.2, not 4.2. We're on a
In a message dated 11/8/2002 10:14:42 AM Mountain Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> The answers have been fairly much the same as "Put out your resume, and find
> a job at a company with a different system..."
>
h...then you either haven't been reading them carefully...or you don't
u
e: 507-255-3450
Rochester, MN 55905
"In theory, theory and practice are the same,
but in practice, theory and practice are different."
> -Original Message-
> From: Adam Thornton [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 11:38 AM
> To: [EMAI
On Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 10:57:41AM -0500, Dave Myers wrote:
> So according to the statements below...I CAN use SUSE SLES7
> to play the guest lan game, using QDIO instead of virtual hipersockets?
> Am I correct in this assumption?
> Any testimony from someone who has setup guest lans with SUSE SLES
From:
|
| Subject: Re: Virtual network top
So according to the statements below...I CAN use SUSE SLES7
to play the guest lan game, using QDIO instead of virtual hipersockets?
Am I correct in this assumption?
Any testimony from someone who has setup guest lans with SUSE SLES7?
Tia
Dave Myers
Adam said...
Now, you're using SuSE, so that may
|
|cc:
|
| From:
|
| Subjec
Nix, Robert P. writes:
> 9672, so no hiper-sockets. In trial mode, so no money to buy a distribution or
>support, but with the potential to do so if / when it goes into production.
>Potentially running DB2 and WebSphere, so SuSE instead of RedHat, as IBM supports
>SuSE more so than RedHat, in ou
> 9672, so no hiper-sockets. In trial mode, so no money to buy
> a distribution or support, but with the potential to do so if
> / when it goes into production. Potentially running DB2 and
> WebSphere, so SuSE instead of RedHat, as IBM supports SuSE
> more so than RedHat, in our experience.
Guest
Thornton [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 9:59 AM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: Virtual network topology questions...
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 08:44:20AM -0600, Nix, Robert P. wrote:
> > > Given an IFL running zV
If at all possible, use the Guest LAN. It gets past all of this point to
point stuff and for all the reasons that Adam mentioned.
On Friday 08 November 2002 08:44 am, you wrote:
> Given an IFL running zVM and several Linux/390 images, is it better to fan
> out to all the Linux images from zVM's T
> Given an IFL running zVM and several Linux/390 images, is it
> better to fan out to all the Linux images from zVM's TCPIP,
> or should TCPIP talk to a selection of images, with these
> images each handling several end machines, more like a tree
> structure?
If you have a version of z/VM that sup
ce are the same,
but in practice, theory and practice are different."
> -Original Message-
> From: Adam Thornton [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 9:59 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Virtual network topology questions...
>
On Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 08:44:20AM -0600, Nix, Robert P. wrote:
> Given an IFL running zVM and several Linux/390 images, is it better to
> fan out to all the Linux images from zVM's TCPIP, or should TCPIP talk to a
> selection of images, with these images each handling several end
> machines, more
Given an IFL running zVM and several Linux/390 images, is it better to fan out to all
the Linux images from zVM's TCPIP, or should TCPIP talk to a selection of images, with
these images each handling several end machines, more like a tree structure? What
would be the advantages and disadvantages
25 matches
Mail list logo
