Re: Redhat 9 going out next week???

2003-03-25 Thread Ira Abramov
Quoting Nadav Har'El, from the post of Mon, 24 Mar: > > It's a strange explanation, because Redhat just sent out the new glibc that's one reason of many not to touch .0 RHL, yada yada :) > Maybe the real explanation is that they are trying to beat Mandrake's > version number ;) much more likely

Re: Gentoo mirror in Israel ?

2003-03-25 Thread Shachar Shemesh
Michael Sternberg wrote: Is it possible to establish a Gentoo mirror in Israel ? Somewhere on IGLU ? Instead of two almost same distributions (RH and Madrake) ? No, because RH and Mandrake are more widly used than gentoo. What we MAY be able to do is to mirror gentoo in addition to the rest. W

Re: Hebrew printing from KWord

2003-03-25 Thread Oded Arbel
On Tuesday 25 March 2003 08:48, Shachar Shemesh wrote: > Someone claimed at the time that KDE is supposed to have this magical > ability to convert TTF to Type-1 for printing purposes, but noone could > give me any clue as to how to control this feature, and how to debug it. KDE's KControl has a k

Re: ANSI C

2003-03-25 Thread Nadav Har'El
On Tue, Mar 25, 2003, Mark Veltzer wrote about "Re: ANSI C": > P.S. Ritchie and Kerninghan didn't even dream of GCC when they thought of C so > the small book is of little use these days. Actually, Kernighan & Ritchie have a second edition of their book, published in 1988, which corresponds to AN

Fwd: Re: Redhat 9 going out next week???

2003-03-25 Thread Lior Kesos
Well I found an interesting mail from a redhat employee that helps explain the jump ... check out ... https://listman.redhat.com/pipermail/phoebe-list/2003-March/004919.html -- Lior Kesos - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content Development Team Leader == "Everything should be ma

Why Choose Microsoft Solutions?

2003-03-25 Thread Gabor Szabo
There is a very interesting article about the future of technology. It is very long but worth looking at it and reading parts of it. The article can be found at http://aaxnet.com/editor/edit029.html Below are few quotations just to get you in the mood. regards Gabor http://www.perl.org.il/

Re: Gentoo mirror in Israel ?

2003-03-25 Thread Tal Peer
On Tue, 25 Mar 2003, Michael Sternberg wrote: > > Is it possible to establish a Gentoo mirror in Israel ? > Somewhere on IGLU ? > Instead of two almost same distributions (RH and Madrake) ? > > BTW I wonder how many people on this list are actually using Gentoo.. > > Micha

Re: Gimp missing something basic?

2003-03-25 Thread Tzafrir Cohen
On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 11:27:14PM +0200, Ilya Konstantinov wrote: > On Monday 24 March 2003 16:16, Ira Abramov wrote: > > I need to add a simple frame around some text. something even the oldest > > paint program on the mac had - draw a black rectangle of 2 pixels width. > > am I out of Focus or i

Re: Gimp missing something basic?

2003-03-25 Thread Ira Abramov
Quoting Tzafrir Cohen, from the post of Tue, 25 Mar: > > This is basically an attempt to preserve the "information" about the > existance of a separate frame object, and thus make possible to later > > If you still miss something in the size of paintbrush (and with > compatible load time), there'

Re: ANSI C

2003-03-25 Thread Oleg Goldshmidt
Vadim Vygonets <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Quoth Oleg Goldshmidt on Tue, Mar 25, 2003: > > > > how compliant is gcc with ansi? > > > > Very. > > C99? http://gcc.gnu.org/c99status.html -- Oleg Goldshmidt | [EMAIL PROTECTED] = T

Re: ANSI C

2003-03-25 Thread Oleg Goldshmidt
Vadim Vygonets <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Quoth Nadav Har'El on Tue, Mar 25, 2003: > > And of course, there is the text of the standard itself, which ISO probably > > charge $1000 (or something similarly outrageous) > > The Standard may (probably) be obtained from the Standards > Institution o

Re: Redhat 9 going out next week???

2003-03-25 Thread Eli Marmor
By the way, it's a part of a "Blitz" of annoucements that I "warned" several weeks ago. My original post told about zillion of announcements that were going to happen almost simultaneously in a very short time, including new releases from 4 distributers (Mandrake 9.1, RedHat 9, Slackware 9, SuSe 8

RE: Redhat 9 going out next week???

2003-03-25 Thread Josh Roden
Title: RE: Redhat 9 going out next week??? My friend compiled a program on RH8.0 and was not able to run it on RH 7.2. Should there be such an incompatibility? Is there a workaround -Original Message- From: Hetz Ben Hamo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, March 24, 2003 10:5

Re: ANSI C

2003-03-25 Thread Vadim Vygonets
Quoth Oleg Goldshmidt on Tue, Mar 25, 2003: > Mark Veltzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > If i am not mistaken - this in not so in ANSI C [i might be mistaken... > > > the ritchie&ker. book is not so clear about this point] > > It gives a warning about shadowing. I don't know what the standa

Re: Hebrew printing from KWord

2003-03-25 Thread Shachar Shemesh
Oded Arbel wrote: KDE's KControl has a kcm module called 'Font Installer' which does not convert TTF to Type1, but it does create AFM files for TTF file it installs. Mandrake's drakfont utility does convert TTF files to Type-1 (and then goes ahead and installs both version - beats me why). THA

Lyx 1.3

2003-03-25 Thread Eli Segal
I've installed LyX 1.3 with Qt3 And it does work with the dialog box in hebrew but i do have these question marks problem on servales places how do i deal with that ?? thanx Eli = To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] w

Re: ANSI C

2003-03-25 Thread Vadim Vygonets
Quoth Nadav Har'El on Tue, Mar 25, 2003: > On Tue, Mar 25, 2003, Mark Veltzer wrote about "Re: ANSI C": > > P.S. Ritchie and Kerninghan didn't even dream of GCC when they thought of C so > > the small book is of little use these days. > > Actually, Kernighan & Ritchie have a second edition of the

RE: ANSI C

2003-03-25 Thread Aviram Jenik
Vadim Vygonets wrote: > > > > Actually, Kernighan & Ritchie have a second edition of > their book, published > > in 1988, which corresponds to ANSI C. > > It's quite hard to get the first edition these days, don't you > agree? > Depends on who you ask - I've got a first-edition right here on m

Re: ANSI C

2003-03-25 Thread Nadav Har'El
On Tue, Mar 25, 2003, Vadim Vygonets wrote about "Re: ANSI C": > > Actually, Kernighan & Ritchie have a second edition of their book, published > > in 1988, which corresponds to ANSI C. > > It's quite hard to get the first edition these days, don't you > agree? Not for me :) Anyway, I didn't und

RE: ANSI C

2003-03-25 Thread Beni Cherniavsky
Aviram Jenik wrote on 2003-03-25: > Vadim Vygonets wrote: > > > > > > Actually, Kernighan & Ritchie have a second edition of > > their book, published > > > in 1988, which corresponds to ANSI C. > > > > It's quite hard to get the first edition these days, don't you > > agree? > > > > Depends on wh

RE: ANSI C

2003-03-25 Thread Aviram Jenik
Beni Cherniavsky Wrote: > There is a refernce section at the end (at least in the second > edition). Admittedly, it's a too dry and concise to look up > conveniently. But the book is great, I learnt from it too. > You're right - I didn't remember that, but I just looked and there is indeed an a

Re: ANSI C

2003-03-25 Thread Vadim Vygonets
Quoth Nadav Har'El on Tue, Mar 25, 2003: > On Tue, Mar 25, 2003, Vadim Vygonets wrote about "Re: ANSI C": > > A publically available draft from August 3, 1998: > > Well, I suppose this cannot be a draft of a standard that was defined over > 8 years earlier... :) Stranger things have happened. >

Re: ANSI C

2003-03-25 Thread Nadav Har'El
On Tue, Mar 25, 2003, Vadim Vygonets wrote about "Re: ANSI C": > > I suppose it is a draft of a newer standard (?) called > > C9X. When people speak of ANSI C, they don't normally refer to C9X. If you > > want your programs to be very portable, you better not rely on C9X extensions. > > "ANSI C" i

Re: Redhat 9 going out next week???

2003-03-25 Thread Muli Ben-Yehuda
On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 03:06:09PM +0200, Josh Roden wrote: > My friend compiled a program on RH8.0 and was not able to run > it on RH 7.2. > Should there be such an incompatibility? No. Will there be? yes. That's one of the reasons for the incompatible major version number, to warn you about

Re: Redhat 9 going out next week???

2003-03-25 Thread linux_il
On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 06:30:55PM +0200, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote: > No. Will there be? yes. That's one of the reasons for the incompatible > major version number, to warn you about such things. > > > Is there a workaround > > Of course. Don't pass binaries around, only source and compile on each

Re: Redhat 9 going out next week???

2003-03-25 Thread Yedidyah Bar-David
On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 06:58:41PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 06:30:55PM +0200, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote: > > No. Will there be? yes. That's one of the reasons for the incompatible > > major version number, to warn you about such things. > > > > > Is there a workaround

SLL gateway

2003-03-25 Thread gili gili
Hi List, I’m trying to set up a SLL gateway, what I mean is to create one server, and behind him all my http & https server. The client connect to the “SLL gateway” in https, the “SLL gateway” unwrap the https read the http header, and direct it to the right server. [Client] ---HTTPS---> [Squi

Re: SLL gateway

2003-03-25 Thread linux_il
On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 10:56:02PM +, gili gili wrote: > 2) Can any one can advise my where to find manuals on the specific subject, > I searched google, but, the only related subjects are old and doesn?t > concern the SLL patch... For a start, try googling for "SSL" rather than "SLL"? --Am