Hi!
Has anybody gotten netscape 7 to work and if so, on what distro?
Thanks
--
Tony Alfrey
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'd rather be sailing
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -
Good Morning!
I'm using Hylafax faxserver and I've some problems with the Win client Cypheus...
What do you tell me about thiserror that the Cypheus setup has shown me as I tried to install Cypheus on my operating system Win 2000 nt?
the message error is:
"Auf Laufwerk C:\ ist nicht genugend
I am using netscape 7 on my caldera 2.4 box, with an upgraded kernel and
all.
It works fine.
What errors are you getting?
Joel
On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 02:34:59AM -0700, Tony Alfrey wrote:
Hi!
Has anybody gotten netscape 7 to work and if so, on what distro?
Thanks
--
Tony Alfrey
[EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 25 Sep 2002 02:34:59 -0700, Tony Alfrey wrote:
Hi!
Has anybody gotten netscape 7 to work and if so, on what distro?
Thanks
Here, on COL 3.1.1 workstation.
Federico Voges
Socio gerente
Intrasoft
Malabia 2137 14 A
(1425) Buenos Aires
dl last night seems to work ok
--
Rick Sivernell
Dallas, Texas 75287
972 306-2296
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Caldera Open Linux eWorkStation 3.1.1
Registered Linux User
.~.
/ v \
/( _ )\
^ ^
In Linux we trust!
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL
I'm guessing that the German message translates into
something like:
Your C:\ does not have enough free diskspace. You
need at least 26.91 MB to install this package. Free
up some disk space and click RETRY.
If that doesn't appear to be the problem, I would look
for any upgrades/patches to
There's a code fork in the Mozilla UI called Phoenix,
http://www.mozilla.org/projects/phoenix/
It's a browser only implementation, I guess it'd be similar to the likes
of Galeon, only it still uses XUL for the UI. Version 0.1 has recently
been released.
So far, it seems they're only building
I've goten Mozilla 1.0 1.1 to work under Caldera Redhat. I have no
need nor desire to touch Netscape.
On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, Tony Alfrey wrote:
Hi!
Has anybody gotten netscape 7 to work and if so, on what distro?
Thanks
--
On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, Tim Wunder wrote:
There's a code fork in the Mozilla UI called Phoenix,
http://www.mozilla.org/projects/phoenix/
It's a browser only implementation, I guess it'd be similar to the likes
of Galeon, only it still uses XUL for the UI. Version 0.1 has recently
been released.
On 9/25/2002 9:46 AM, someone claiming to be Net Llama! wrote:
On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, Tim Wunder wrote:
There's a code fork in the Mozilla UI called Phoenix,
http://www.mozilla.org/projects/phoenix/
It's a browser only implementation, I guess it'd be similar to the likes
of Galeon, only it still
Tony Alfrey wrote:
Hi!
Has anybody gotten netscape 7 to work and if so, on what distro?
Thanks
Works like a champ on RH 7.3. I've been using it since it was beta and
am quite happy with it. Do you have a problem or just surveying?
--
Andrew Mathews
Thanks all on netscape 7 feedback. I'll try again. I think I got some
conflict between my old ~/.mozilla from 6.2 and 7. Trying to keep all
versions so I need to do some cleanup/backup first.
--
Tony Alfrey
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'd rather be sailing
On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, Tim Wunder wrote:
On 9/25/2002 9:46 AM, someone claiming to be Net Llama! wrote:
On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, Tim Wunder wrote:
There's a code fork in the Mozilla UI called Phoenix,
http://www.mozilla.org/projects/phoenix/
It's a browser only implementation, I guess it'd be
On Wednesday 25 September 2002 06:39 am,Net Llama! wrote:
I've goten Mozilla 1.0 1.1 to work under Caldera Redhat. I have
no need nor desire to touch Netscape.
I was tempted to follow the SxS and put in mozilla. I need a specific
TIFF viewer for looking at images from the US patent office
On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, Tony Alfrey wrote:
On Wednesday 25 September 2002 06:39 am,Net Llama! wrote:
I've goten Mozilla 1.0 1.1 to work under Caldera Redhat. I have
no need nor desire to touch Netscape.
I was tempted to follow the SxS and put in mozilla. I need a specific
TIFF viewer for
All,
My mirror of the SxS will be offline until late tonight, Wednesday
September 25, 2002 or early tomorrow morning, Thursday, September
26, 2002, while I take remedial and preventive measures against
the Apache/SSL worm(s).
Sorry for the inconvenience.
Kurt
Tony Alfrey wrote:
Hi!
Has anybody gotten netscape 7 to work and if so, on what distro?
Thanks
It works fine on my pristine Caldera eDesk 2.4 as well as Libranet 2.7
Debian (2.4.19 kernel/KDE 3.0.3).
It installed from the $3 CD I got from Netscape flawlessly.
BTW Netscape 4.7X won't
On 9/25/2002 10:53 AM, someone claiming to be Leon A. Goldstein wrote:
snip
BTW Netscape 4.7X won't scroll in KDE 3. There is a work-around that
restores scrolling in Libranet 2.7, but not in SuSE 8.
IIRC, you need to have the NumLock off for scroll to work in NS4.7x
Tony Alfrey wrote:
Hi!
Has anybody gotten netscape 7 to work and if so, on what distro?
Thanks
Got it running on SuSE 7.2 and Mandrake 8.1; although it tends to lock
up on Mandrake due to some conflict with the bundled mozilla. Had a
little trouble at first, but solved problem by
Believe the question dealt with netscape not mozilla. That is a matter
of personal preference of which to use. If you haven't used it how would
you know which is better? That's a little like a bible fundamentalist
arguing against evolution even though he never a book about it.
Net Llama!
Because Netscape *is* Mozilla (minus a few months), with added marketing
advertising cruft.
On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, Lee wrote:
Believe the question dealt with netscape not mozilla. That is a matter
of personal preference of which to use. If you haven't used it how would
you know which is
Tim Wunder wrote:
BTW Netscape 4.7X won't scroll in KDE 3. There is a work-around that
restores scrolling in Libranet 2.7, but not in SuSE 8.
IIRC, you need to have the NumLock off for scroll to work in NS4.7x
That's not the problem. KDE 3 does not read .Xresources wherein abides
Mozilla is critically flawed in that it has no search engine
incorporated into it; unless you default load to a browser like
netscape, with all its advertising cruft, or www.google or something
like it. By itself it is totally useless unless you happen to have the
http address of the site
On Wednesday 25 September 2002 12:32 pm, Lee wrote:
Mozilla is critically flawed in that it has no search engine
incorporated into it; unless you default load to a browser like
netscape, with all its advertising cruft, or www.google or something
like it. By itself it is totally useless
On 9/25/2002 12:32 PM, someone claiming to be Lee wrote:
Mozilla is critically flawed in that it has no search engine
incorporated into it; unless you default load to a browser like
netscape, with all its advertising cruft, or www.google or something
like it. By itself it is totally
Gentle Readers,
OK, I give up. This is incredibly annoying behavior and I'd appreciate it
if anyone knows how/where to configure this. I've submitted bug after bug
to Mozilla (Bugzilla) about this, but it's still not fixed:
When I go to a web page requiring a login, the login box pops up
David,
When I go to a web page requiring a login, the login box pops
up (not the
problem). I enter:
myusernameEnter
then expect to enter my password, but the bloody thing
disappears, gives
me an error message that I gave it the wrong password (I
HAVEN'T ENTERED
MY @#$%$%@$ PASSWORD
Anyone know how to make it behave correctly? (usernameEnter
passwordEnter)?
usernameTABpasswordENTER
I think thats how it is setup to work and yes it lame...
regards-
Jim
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc
On 9/25/2002 1:23 PM, someone claiming to be David A. Bandel wrote:
Gentle Readers,
OK, I give up. This is incredibly annoying behavior and I'd appreciate it
if anyone knows how/where to configure this. I've submitted bug after bug
to Mozilla (Bugzilla) about this, but it's still not
Anyone managed to get try it yet?
http://download.unitedlinux.com/cgi-bin/reg.pl
--
Pam R: Don't put off until tomorrow what you can leave to the day after.
Linux StepbyStep: http://www.linux-sxs.org/stepbystep.html
___
Linux-users mailing list
On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, Lee wrote:
Mozilla is critically flawed in that it has no search engine
For starters, i'm not even sure you're right about this. But even if you
are, why should a web browser have a search engine integrated into it?
Does the word bloat mean anything to you?
incorporated
On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, David A. Bandel wrote:
Gentle Readers,
OK, I give up. This is incredibly annoying behavior and I'd appreciate it
if anyone knows how/where to configure this. I've submitted bug after bug
to Mozilla (Bugzilla) about this, but it's still not fixed:
When I go to a web
Its downloading right now at about .5K/s. High demand my ass. More like
insufficient supply.
On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, Pam R wrote:
Anyone managed to get try it yet?
http://download.unitedlinux.com/cgi-bin/reg.pl
--
~~
Net Llama! wrote:
Its downloading right now at about .5K/s. High demand my ass. More like
insufficient supply.
there were over 4000 signups in 6hours and there is a 400 person limit
to the ftp site.
regards-
jim
___
Linux-users mailing
Tim Wunder wrote:
On 9/25/2002 12:32 PM, someone claiming to be Lee wrote:
Mozilla is critically flawed in that it has no search engine
incorporated into it; unless you default load to a browser like
netscape, with all its advertising cruft, or www.google or something
like it. By
On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, Jim Bonnet wrote:
Net Llama! wrote:
Its downloading right now at about .5K/s. High demand my ass. More like
insufficient supply.
there were over 4000 signups in 6hours and there is a 400 person limit
to the ftp site.
And how does that explain why my connection
Net Llama! wrote:
On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, Lee wrote:
Mozilla is critically flawed in that it has no search engine
For starters, i'm not even sure you're right about this. But even if you
are, why should a web browser have a search engine integrated into it?
Does the word bloat mean
On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, Lee wrote:
Net Llama! wrote:
On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, Lee wrote:
Mozilla is critically flawed in that it has no search engine
For starters, i'm not even sure you're right about this. But even if you
are, why should a web browser have a search engine integrated
To state the obvious, I think we have a bit of a misunderstanding here.
If I understand Lee correctly, he's complaining that when you type stuff
in the location bar of Mozilla and press Enter it tries to load
www.stuff you typed.com and gives an error. Netscape and IE both send
the stuff you
On 9/25/2002 3:02 PM, someone claiming to be Lee wrote:
Tim Wunder wrote:
On 9/25/2002 12:32 PM, someone claiming to be Lee wrote:
Mozilla is critically flawed in that it has no search engine
incorporated into it; unless you default load to a browser like
netscape, with all its
On 09/25/2002 02:20 PM, Net Llama! wrote:
On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, Jim Bonnet wrote:
Net Llama! wrote:
Its downloading right now at about .5K/s. High demand my ass. More like
insufficient supply.
Hmmm. Mine downloaded at a respectable rate, but for some reason I can
only get to about 397M
On 9/25/2002 3:24 PM, someone claiming to be Net Llama! wrote:
snip
... What is so difficult about pointing your browser to
http://google.com ?
Nothing, but it sure is easier to type search terms in the URL bar,
press the down arrow, then hit enter. Usually, If I want to use Moz for
a
Net Llama! wrote:
On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, Jim Bonnet wrote:
Net Llama! wrote:
Its downloading right now at about .5K/s. High demand my ass. More like
insufficient supply.
there were over 4000 signups in 6hours and there is a 400 person limit
to the ftp site.
And how
On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, John Voigt wrote:
On 09/25/2002 02:20 PM, Net Llama! wrote:
On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, Jim Bonnet wrote:
Net Llama! wrote:
Its downloading right now at about .5K/s. High demand my ass. More like
insufficient supply.
Hmmm. Mine downloaded at a respectable rate, but
From: Joel Hammer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
With IE 5.5 and netscape 4.75, (windows), this is how it
works, too. Gotta
use the tab button. Same goes for other applications I have
to log on to.
It annoys me, too, because obviously the form is not complete
after entering
the user
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 25 Sep 2002 15:56:49 -0400 (EDT), Net Llama! wrote:
On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, John Voigt wrote:
On 09/25/2002 02:20 PM, Net Llama! wrote:
On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, Jim Bonnet wrote:
Net Llama! wrote:
Its downloading right now at about
On Wed, 25 Sep 2002 15:45:49 -0400
Tim Wunder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/25/2002 3:24 PM, someone claiming to be Net Llama! wrote:
snip
... What is so difficult about pointing your browser to
http://google.com ?
Nothing, but it sure is easier to type search terms in the URL bar,
On 9/25/2002 4:17 PM, someone claiming to be Vern W Heesch wrote:
On Wed, 25 Sep 2002 15:45:49 -0400
Tim Wunder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/25/2002 3:24 PM, someone claiming to be Net Llama! wrote:
snip
... What is so difficult about pointing your browser to
http://google.com ?
Net Llama! wrote:
snip
Currently i'm about 4% done with CD1 (and i sit on an internet backbone,
so this isn't a bandwith issue). CD3 is at 8%, and CD2 just keeps dying
after 2 or 3%. *shrug*
Apparently the UL folks never heard of something called a mirror. Funny,
Redhat has more mirrors
Allright gang, here's what I get.
a) I ran the off-line installer so that I could re-install at my
leisure if I had a problem (which I did with the on-line installer, but
same as below).
b) I also have netscape 6.2 which I set aside (renamed the
directories) so I would have no conflict. I
Currently i'm about 4% done with CD1 (and i sit on an internet backbone,
so this isn't a bandwith issue). CD3 is at 8%, and CD2 just keeps dying
after 2 or 3%. *shrug*
Apparently the UL folks never heard of something called a mirror. Funny,
Redhat has more mirrors than i can shake a stick
Net Llama! wrote:
On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, Lee wrote:
Net Llama! wrote:
Snip
What is so difficult about pointing your browser to
http://google.com ?
Once you go to an external browser you're running netscape anyway. Not
to mention the time lost accessing google then search.I assume you
Tony Alfrey wrote:
Allright gang, here's what I get.
a) I ran the off-line installer so that I could re-install at my
leisure if I had a problem (which I did with the on-line installer, but
same as below).
b) I also have netscape 6.2 which I set aside (renamed the
directories) so I
I didn't rename anything only created a dir for netscape7 in my home
directory. If the thing is installed try to order it up from the command
line with /netscape/netscape. or as /usr/local/nerscape/netscape. You
might want to run an ls on /usr/local/netscape/* to see if it's there.
Tony
On Thu, 26 Sep 2002 03:34, Pam R wrote:
Anyone managed to get try it yet?
http://download.unitedlinux.com/cgi-bin/reg.pl
I am onlist and am d/l it over the weekend, but Jim Conner is also on the old
list and he has installed it; waiting for an opinion.
--
Keith Antoine (GANDALF) aka
On Wednesday 25 September 2002 01:48 pm,Lee wrote:
I didn't rename anything only created a dir for netscape7 in my home
directory. If the thing is installed try to order it up from the
command line with /netscape/netscape. or as
/usr/local/nerscape/netscape. You might want to run an ls on
Pam R wrote:
Anyone managed to get try it yet?
http://download.unitedlinux.com/cgi-bin/reg.pl
Regarding the US mirror:
http://www.sco.com/products/beta
sign up for the openbeta and you get access right away to the UL stuff..
That site should give better bandwidth I would think.
Jim
On Wednesday 25 September 2002 01:50 pm,Andrew Mathews wrote:
snip
Don't know if this will help, but NS7 needs to have the variable
changed from LANG=en_US.iso885915 to LANG=en_US when run from a
shell. Otherwise, it never starts.
where??
As to the libgkgfx.so problem, I
have two. snip
Tony Alfrey wrote:
On Wednesday 25 September 2002 01:50 pm,Andrew Mathews wrote:
snip
Don't know if this will help, but NS7 needs to have the variable
changed from LANG=en_US.iso885915 to LANG=en_US when run from a
shell. Otherwise, it never starts.
where??
Run the env command to
RANT
For the first time in several years, I'm not going to try the latest
and greatest from what was Caldera, now SCO Group, and their new
playmates. They essentially shit on their customers, laughed in their
faces about it, and said We don't care what you think. Now when they
want to
On Wednesday 25 September 2002 02:32 pm,Andrew Mathews wrote:
Tony Alfrey wrote:
On Wednesday 25 September 2002 01:50 pm,Andrew Mathews wrote:
snip
Don't know if this will help, but NS7 needs to have the variable
changed from LANG=en_US.iso885915 to LANG=en_US when run from a
shell.
-Original Message-
From: David A. Bandel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
I've been logging into UNIX boxes for over 15 years. It's
always been:
usernameEnter
passwordEnter
So, you meant the command line interface, instead of the GUI interface.
Well of course, that is
OK, my netscape 7 saga continues to everyone's great (I'm sure)
interest.
Here's what /var/log/messages says when I try to start my new netscape7
after installation:
Sep 25 15:26:48 noname modprobe: modprobe: Can't locate module net-pf-10
Now I'm not competent on this module stuff. Do I need
On 25 Sep 2002 12:35:28 -0700 Aaron Grewell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To state the obvious, I think we have a bit of a misunderstanding
here. If I understand Lee correctly, he's complaining that when you
type stuff in the location bar of Mozilla and press Enter it tries
to loadwww.stuff you
On Wednesday 25 September 2002 03:32 pm,Tony Alfrey wrote:
OK, my netscape 7 saga continues to everyone's great (I'm sure)
interest.
Here's what /var/log/messages says when I try to start my new
netscape7 after installation:
Sep 25 15:26:48 noname modprobe: modprobe: Can't locate module
Funny... As you say, the command line UNIX login is and always has been
usernameEnter passwordEnter: the same for Microsoft's DOS network
client too, by the way. It's been long enough since I did Novell, that I
don't remember in the graphical login screen whether going from username to
On Wed, 25 Sep 2002 15:36:57 -0700
begin Condon Thomas A KPWA [EMAIL PROTECTED] spewed forth:
-Original Message-
From: David A. Bandel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
I've been logging into UNIX boxes for over 15 years. It's
always been:
usernameEnter
passwordEnter
So, you
Tony Alfrey wrote:
snip
Yeah, that's what I thought. LANG not set to start with. After
setting as above, I get
Gdk-WARNING **: locale not supported by C library
for either language selection. But still 6.2 does not mind and starts
anyway, 7 is still stuck. 7 is stuck where the
On Wed, 25 Sep 2002 16:16:41 -0400
Tim Wunder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/25/2002 4:17 PM, someone claiming to be Vern W Heesch wrote:
On Wed, 25 Sep 2002 15:45:49 -0400
Tim Wunder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/25/2002 3:24 PM, someone claiming to be Net Llama! wrote:
snip
...
On Wednesday 25 September 2002 04:13 pm,Andrew Mathews wrote:
snip
Okay, what are the perms on your ~/.mozilla dir?
rwxr-xr-x
Have you tried
moving it to ~/.oldzilla and letting NS recreate it?
Exactly. N7 makes the directory ~/.mozilla but doesn't put much in it,
certainly not even the
Tony Alfrey wrote:
On Wednesday 25 September 2002 04:13 pm,Andrew Mathews wrote:
snip
Okay, what are the perms on your ~/.mozilla dir?
rwxr-xr-x
Hmm... mine is:
ls -al /home/andy/| grep .mozilla
drwxrwxr-x3 andy andy 50 Sep 22 07:20 .mozilla
There's no write perm on
David,
I _am_ talking GUI. As I said, Netscape 4.x has the correct (for me)
behavior. Why should a form that requires two inputs submit
after one?
It requires a username then it requires a password, then, and
only then,
should it submit a form. It should not submit if the active box
Hi Guys.
This may seem a simplistic question but here it goes. I take it the
fix for this SSL exploit is to build the latest OpenSSL, 0.9.6g, and
then rebuild Apache against it? Or is it to rebuild modssl agains the
new libraries? I'd like to understand this a little better.
stayler
Also sprach stayler:
Hi Guys.
This may seem a simplistic question but here it goes. I take it the
fix for this SSL exploit is to build the latest OpenSSL, 0.9.6g, and
then rebuild Apache against it? Or is it to rebuild modssl agains the
new libraries? I'd like to understand this a
Jim Bonnet wrote:
Currently i'm about 4% done with CD1 (and i sit on an internet backbone,
so this isn't a bandwith issue). CD3 is at 8%, and CD2 just keeps dying
after 2 or 3%. *shrug*
Apparently the UL folks never heard of something called a mirror. Funny,
Redhat has more mirrors
the standard way to move between fields was and is TAB key.
Even in the days of Foxpro and IBM 3270 terminals, it was and is the
tab key. IN IBM termianl world, ENTER means submit or refresh.
I've been logging into UNIX boxes for over 15 years. It's always been:
usernameEnter
Since when has foxpro been a standard of anything?
m.w.chang wrote:
the standard way to move between fields was and is TAB key.
Even in the days of Foxpro and IBM 3270 terminals, it was and is the
tab key. IN IBM termianl world, ENTER means submit or refresh.
I've been logging into
I suspect you only need to update your mod_ssl for apache. Not sure,
though.
use OpenSSL. According to the Apache web site (http://httpd.apache.org/),
you should upgrade apache to 1.3.26 or 2.0.40, unless you are using UNIX,
in which case, 2.0.39 should be safe.
--
Swiftly. Silently.
foxpro was following standard and is the posisbly the most successful
dBase dialect after the romance of the 3 kingdoms (Fox Software,
Ashton-Tate and Nantucket). The TAB was always the key to move between
field. Even in nCurse, I believe...
I barely remembered that there was a SAA (System
On Wednesday 25 September 2002 04:42 pm,Andrew Mathews wrote:
snip
Try a chmod 775 ~/.mozilla.
Did that. Nothing yet.
snip
What gdk packages do you have?
well, we have
libgdk-1.2.so.0
libgdk.so.1.0.5 and related files.
gdk-pixbuf-0.14.0-8
gdk-pixbuf-gnome-0.14.0-8
So you're saying that i'm the first person to suggest that you should
have worldwide mirrors from a product that you wish to market
globally? Who's asleep at the wheel?
hm, I dont believe I ever suggested that...
US download site which I posted earlier-
http://www.sco.com/products/beta
On Wed, 25 Sep 2002 19:24:05 -0700
begin Net Llama! [EMAIL PROTECTED] spewed forth:
Since when has foxpro been a standard of anything?
m.w.chang wrote:
the standard way to move between fields was and is TAB key.
Even in the days of Foxpro and IBM 3270 terminals, it was and is the
David A. Bandel wrote:
Screw it, I'll uninstall X. I just need a way to open a dozen VTs on one
console so I can cut-n-paste between them.
screen?
--
~
L. Friedman[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux
well, mozilla should have added the OKCANCEL buttons to the login
prompt. Then users may automagically use the tab key since they see the
buttons and know that it's not a text-mode console login.
Anyway, I alawys use TAB since 10 years ago whenever I saw more than one
field on the screen.
Out of curiosity, I carefully read all of the propoganda on the UL
website. What I got
out of it is that they are attempting to create a Linux standard within
or 0out of the existing
Linux standard. In other words, a way to ensure operability between
various Linux releases
within the
On Wednesday 25 September 2002 08:04 pm,Andrew Mathews wrote:
Tony Alfrey wrote:
snip
where is this stuff on your box??
BTW, I put N7 on my SuSE partition and it installed and ran without
even thinking about it. So I'm not TOTALLY stupid. Now I just
need to figure out what my
86 matches
Mail list logo
