We now got Knoppix and Gentoo that basically boot you into a working linux.
how could you start building a system using instructions on
linuxfromscratch if you don't even have any linux distribution?
kind of like what Mr. Trovald got when he wrote linux-0.1. can one walk
in his shoes?
--
got the answer from news://news.linux.org.hk
http://gcc.gnu.org/libstdc++/status.html
The most recent version of this library that will build with GCC 2.95.2
is the ninth snapshot release, libstdc++-2.90.8.tar.gz.
ok, I am and was not familiar with gcc stuffs... sorry.
m.w.chang wrote:
seems
I have just had a sco box at work kark itself and
it was upgraded to rh7.2 the only issue is the sony 9000 dat drive is now
spitting back WR_PROT errors any ideas/web
sites
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc
ok. gcc 3.2.1 built following gcc_notes.
proftpd-1.2.8cvs built ok (now using it).
now going back to htdig-3.1.6 (which complained loudly about ostream...)
m.w.chang wrote:
seems that libstdc++-2.92 was NOT meant for gcc-2.95.3.
even caldera used libstdc++-2.10 only. what should be the most
I just added wireless capability and went the with simplest (but not least
expensive) way. My setup:
Cabel Modem
|
Linksys Cable/DSL 4 port Router w/ wireless (it can do both)
||. .
||. .
Linux PCLinux
I've recently read an article written in 2001 for Linux Gazette,
http://www.linuxgazette.com/issue72/bright.html, concerning setting up a
PDF service with Samba. It looked rather interesting and fairly
straightforward to set up, so I gave it a shot. I'm currently using
Samba 2.2.0 (I know, I
What's the exact error you're seeing?
Oh, and please fix your wordwrap to something under 80 char/line.
On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, James McDonald wrote:
I have just had a sco box at work kark itself and it was upgraded to rh7.2 the only
issue is the sony 9000 dat drive is now spitting back WR_PROT
James McDonald wrote:
I have just had a sco box at work kark itself and it was upgraded to
rh7.2 the only issue is the sony 9000 dat drive is now spitting back
*WR_PROT errors any ideas/web sites*
**
**
Its probably none of my business.. But, why would you upgrade to
rh7,2? Didn't you
m.w.chang wrote:
We now got Knoppix and Gentoo that basically boot you into a working
linux.
how could you start building a system using instructions on
linuxfromscratch if you don't even have any linux distribution?
kind of like what Mr. Trovald got when he wrote linux-0.1. can one
walk
I've been knocking my head against the screen for the last couple of days.
I can't play audio cd's no matter what I do.
I can burn audio cd's successfully. I can play both wav and mp3 files
from disk. However, when I try and play directly from cd everything looks
ok but there isn't any
Not trying to be facetious here but are you sure that there is a audio cable running
from you cd-rom to your sound card? That would be my first guess.
--Tom Wilson
- Original Message -
From: Gerry Doris [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2003 11:47:08 -0500 (EST)
To: SXS Users
On Thu, 30 Jan 2003, Tom Wilson wrote:
Not trying to be facetious here but are you sure that there is a audio cable running
from you cd-rom to your sound card? That would be my first guess.
--Tom Wilson
Yes, there is an audio cable connected. I even booted back to win98 (it's
been a
Gerry Doris wrote:
I've been knocking my head against the screen for the last couple of days.
I can't play audio cd's no matter what I do.
I can burn audio cd's successfully. I can play both wav and mp3 files
from disk. However, when I try and play directly from cd everything looks
ok but
Gerry Doris wrote:
I've been knocking my head against the screen for the last couple of days.
I can't play audio cd's no matter what I do.
I can burn audio cd's successfully. I can play both wav and mp3 files
from disk. However, when I try and play directly from cd everything looks
ok but
Condon Thomas A KPWA wrote:
Net Llama! mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] typed thusly on Tuesday, January
28, 2003 12:25 PM:
Do your own stinking taxes. It build character ;)
Thus speaks someone with more time than money and no need of many and varied
deductions. Wait until you get a bit
U ... do you have the CD slide on the Mixer turned up? Make sure
that there is no
mixer conflicts.
Gerry Doris wrote:
I've been knocking my head against the screen for the last couple of days.
I can't play audio cd's no matter what I do.
I can burn audio cd's successfully. I can play
On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Gerry Doris wrote:
I've been knocking my head against the screen for the last couple of days.
I can't play audio cd's no matter what I do.
I can burn audio cd's successfully. I can play both wav and mp3 files
from disk. However, when I try and play directly from cd
Open Kmix and see if the cd is selected.
On Wed, 29 Jan 2003 11:47:08 -0500 (EST) - Gerry Doris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
the following
Re: No sound from audio cd's
I've been knocking my head against the screen for the last couple of days.
I can't play audio cd's no matter what I do.
I can burn
On 1/29/2003 12:16 PM, someone claiming to be Gerry Doris wrote:
On Thu, 30 Jan 2003, Tom Wilson wrote:
Not trying to be facetious here but are you sure that there is a
audio cable running from you cd-rom to your sound card? That would
be my first guess.
--Tom Wilson
Yes, there is an
On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Tim Wunder wrote:
On 1/29/2003 12:16 PM, someone claiming to be Gerry Doris wrote:
On Thu, 30 Jan 2003, Tom Wilson wrote:
Not trying to be facetious here but are you sure that there is a
audio cable running from you cd-rom to your sound card? That would
be my
On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Gerry Doris wrote:
Hmmm, this is weird. I now have it working.
If I use kmix I can get it to work. However, if I use the gnome mixer
(the one on the sound menu called Volume Control) it kills the sound as
soon as it opens. There is no way to turn the sound on again
On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Net Llama! wrote:
On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Gerry Doris wrote:
Hmmm, this is weird. I now have it working.
If I use kmix I can get it to work. However, if I use the gnome mixer
(the one on the sound menu called Volume Control) it kills the sound as
soon as it opens.
On 1/29/2003 1:39 PM, someone claiming to be Gerry Doris wrote:
On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Tim Wunder wrote:
On 1/29/2003 12:16 PM, someone claiming to be Gerry Doris wrote:
On Thu, 30 Jan 2003, Tom Wilson wrote:
Not trying to be facetious here but are you sure that there is a
audio cable
Hmmm, this is weird. I now have it working.
If I use kmix I can get it to work. However, if I use the gnome mixer
(the one on the sound menu called Volume Control) it kills the sound as
soon as it opens. There is no way to turn the sound on again except to
start kmix and turn on the cd
On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Tim Wunder wrote:
I really don't think RH put much effort into getting KDE working right
under BlueCurve. If you're gonna run one of the RH stock desktops, use
Redhat admitted it. In one interview from LinuxWorld last week, (i think
it was on slashdot, or newsforge) they
On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Net Llama! wrote:
On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Tim Wunder wrote:
I really don't think RH put much effort into getting KDE working right
under BlueCurve. If you're gonna run one of the RH stock desktops, use
Redhat admitted it. In one interview from LinuxWorld last week, (i
On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Gerry Doris wrote:
On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Net Llama! wrote:
On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Tim Wunder wrote:
I really don't think RH put much effort into getting KDE working right
under BlueCurve. If you're gonna run one of the RH stock desktops, use
Redhat admitted it. In
On 1/29/2003 2:44 PM, someone claiming to be Net Llama! wrote:
On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Gerry Doris wrote:
On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Net Llama! wrote:
On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Tim Wunder wrote:
I really don't think RH put much effort into getting KDE working right
under BlueCurve. If you're gonna run
On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Tim Wunder wrote:
That was BeRo.
And he's working on a new linux distro, isn't he?
At least according to a Newsforge NewsVac story I read a while back.
Ark Linux, or something like that.
--
~~
Lonni
Anybody install OOo.org version 1.0.2? Is it worth the effort? I've
heard that there's a speed improvement, but no new features.
Regards,
Tim
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -
On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Tim Wunder wrote:
Anybody install OOo.org version 1.0.2? Is it worth the effort? I've
heard that there's a speed improvement, but no new features.
I didn't know it was released. Is there a CHANGELOG somewhere?
--
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
m.w.chang spewed electrons into the ether that resembled:
We now got Knoppix and Gentoo that basically boot you into a working linux.
how could you start building a system using instructions on
linuxfromscratch if you don't even have any linux
On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Douglas J Hunley wrote:
m.w.chang spewed electrons into the ether that resembled:
We now got Knoppix and Gentoo that basically boot you into a working linux.
how could you start building a system using instructions on
linuxfromscratch if you don't even have any linux
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Aaron Grewell spewed electrons into the ether that resembled:
Have you tried using the Konstruct tool from KDE's site? I've been
trying to get it to compile using the tool since yesterday, and so far
it has been kind of a pain. I had some weird
Net Llama! wrote:
On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Douglas J Hunley wrote:
m.w.chang spewed electrons into the ether that resembled:
We now got Knoppix and Gentoo that basically boot you into a working linux.
how could you start building a system using instructions on
linuxfromscratch if you don't
KDE 3.1 is here and about as nice as it can be...
However, I had two compile issues...
The first compile problem had to do with multiple copies of zlib on my system.
The compiled terminated with gzgets errors... What happened is, I have a
system with a copy of zlib on it plus XF86Config with
On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Tim Wunder wrote:
I really don't think RH put much effort into getting KDE working
right
under BlueCurve. If you're gonna run one of the RH stock desktops,
use
Redhat admitted it. In one interview from LinuxWorld last week, (i
think
it was on slashdot, or newsforge)
On Wed, 29 Jan 2003 19:37:09 -0500 Tim Wunder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wednesday 29 January 2003 7:02 pm, someone claiming to be Jerry McBride
wrote:
snip
The second issue has to do with the KDE 3.1 requirement of having some of
components of Mozilla hanging around... namely the
Have you gotten any help with this? I'd like to set it up too but would
like to know of any pitfalls before hand
--
Matt
On Wed, 2003-01-29 at 08:43, Tim Wunder wrote:
I've recently read an article written in 2001 for Linux Gazette,
http://www.linuxgazette.com/issue72/bright.html, concerning
Feigning erudition, dep wrote:
% begin Kurt Wall's quote:
% | Feigning erudition, James Bonnet wrote:
% |
% | [...]
% |
% | % kinda like if I made a new OS jimbix on xenix or something... =)
% |
% | Jimbix! I like that.
%
% yup. i loved it as a kid -- getting up in the morning and having a big
yes, WITH ABSOLUTE CONFIDENCE. it's a typo.. I didn't double-check.
why were you installing Caldera WITHOUT ABSOLUTE CONFIDENCE? Don't you
mean with absolute confidence? I'm not clear on your meaning of
I didn't need to backup my data partition to install COL 3.1
I have no courage to do that
Net Llama! [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 01/29/03 17:59, tom wrote:
I would stay away from RH or Mandrake, since the compilier
is now non-GNU, and is somewhat troublesome on the
edition after 7.0, without severe patching.
Huh? Where did you get that idea?
Uhm, well, I don't know. :)
Maybe
On 01/29/03 19:16, tom wrote:
Net Llama! [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 01/29/03 17:59, tom wrote:
I would stay away from RH or Mandrake, since the compilier
is now non-GNU, and is somewhat troublesome on the
edition after 7.0, without severe patching.
Huh? Where did you get that idea?
Uhm,
Feigning erudition, Net Llama! wrote:
%
% Redhat-7.0 had a seriously broken gcc implimentation. 8.0 has a beta
% release of glibc. All the intermediate releases had no such problems,
% and use standards compliant releases of gcc glibc.
I beg your pardon, but Red Hat 7.3 still used GCC 2.96:
I've never had a single problem installing Redhat 7.1, 7.2 or 7.3.
On 01/29/03 19:31, Joel Hammer wrote:
This reminds me of the problems I had with RH 7.2 or whatever. I think
redhat was not using the partitions properly. As I RECALL, I made everything
just one big partition and it worked.
On 01/29/03 19:42, Kurt Wall wrote:
Feigning erudition, Net Llama! wrote:
%
% Redhat-7.0 had a seriously broken gcc implimentation. 8.0 has a beta
% release of glibc. All the intermediate releases had no such problems,
% and use standards compliant releases of gcc glibc.
I beg your pardon,
m.w.chang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am sorry to say that Redhat's whole installation is less than trivial,
esp if you compare it against the old Caldera product lines.
I'm sorry to butt in, but I've never had a REDHAT installations
heave like your mentioning here. Sounds like your installing
no. it's just a P3 on a Abit TUSLC-2 and CUBX with 384M RAM.
I'm sorry to butt in, but I've never had a REDHAT installations
heave like your mentioning here. Sounds like your installing on
the latest and greatest Pentium 4, with the ia-32bit verision, or
the CDROM your using is a dud.
No. I
m.w.chang wrote:
snip
I didn't need to backup my data partition to install COL 3.1
I have no courage to do that with Redhat 8's installation. .. ...scarry
Yes, you *do* need to backup your data partition, especially if you're
moving to a more modern filesystem type. (Caldera 3.1 is
Since when is a P4 the same as IA64??
On 01/29/03 20:02, tom wrote:
m.w.chang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am sorry to say that Redhat's whole installation is less than trivial,
esp if you compare it against the old Caldera product lines.
I'm sorry to butt in, but I've never had a REDHAT
I don't know what redhat was doing at all, but compared my virgin
experienemnt with redhat ahd col, redhat is a mess. for any newbies,
backup is a must.
the distribution. I understand you're speaking of your confidence level,
not of the actual, realistic differences of the install process,
on the other hand, I am expecting a proven COL 3.1.1 workstaiton cdrom
from the mailbox.
I had one working copy, but its surface was scratched badly. All recent
attempts to pull the same disk image off ftp.iso.caldera.com failed to
produce a working cdrom.
Maybe you should try downloading the
Greets Net Llama;
Net Llama! [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since when is a P4 the same as IA64??
Isn't it? I've seen the progression of the hardware over the
years as this;
386-486 = 16 bit OS platforms/ 32 bit architecture
586-686-P3 = 32 bit OS platforms/ 64 bit architecture
P4- P5 - P6 = 64
I only heard that 32bit OS could not handles date arithematics after
2038... :)
And as I understand it, going from 32 bits to 64 bits
creates problems, and a OS developer has to start
from the ground all over again?
--
Swiftly. Silently. Invisibly. .~. In Linux We Trust.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
80386, 80486, Pentium, Pentium MMX/Pro/II/III/4 (including Celerons)=
IA32 (or i386) - 32 bits
Itanium, Itanium 2 = IA64 - 64 bits
IIRC IAxx means something like Intel Architecture xx bits (or something
like that)
Bye!
On Thu, 30 Jan 2003
If comcast allows what you are doing it may be as simple as asking them to put
you into their reverse lookup table.
On Wed, 29 Jan 2003 22:01:29 -0500 - Joel Hammer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
the following
Re: Sendmail: Proxy server or whatever
I am on comcast cable. I run sendmail to directly
56 matches
Mail list logo
