-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michael Hipp wrote:
| Andrew Mathews wrote:
|
|> If they
|> have a TOS, (Terms of Service) doesn't the customer have inversely, an
|> SLA (Service Level Agreement) that they're accountable for?
|
|
| I've never seen a consumer-grade Internet service wit
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
James McDonald wrote:
| James McDonald wrote:
|
|> Folks I have the following setup for my home email
|>
http://www.jamesmcdonald.id.au/faqs/technical_documentation/linux/net/home-net.png
|>
|>
|> I am using NAT and portforwarding to point my external p
On Sat, 6 Sep 2003 22:29:50 -0500
ronnie gauthier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> >Collins Richey wrote:
> >
> >| To paraphase the Great Bard himself,
> >|
> >| Out, out, brief candle!
> >| Gartner's but a walking shadow,
> >| a poor excuse of an analyst
> >| That marches to Microsoft's drum
James McDonald wrote:
Folks I have the following setup for my home email
http://www.jamesmcdonald.id.au/faqs/technical_documentation/linux/net/home-net.png
I am using NAT and portforwarding to point my external port to my
internal postfix mail server.
I got in part an email with my ip address
>
>Collins Richey wrote:
>
>| To paraphase the Great Bard himself,
>|
>| Out, out, brief candle!
>| Gartner's but a walking shadow,
>| a poor excuse of an analyst
>| That marches to Microsoft's drum and lies through FUD its hour upon the
>| stage And then is heard no more.
>| It is a tale
>| Told
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Collins Richey wrote:
| To paraphase the Great Bard himself,
|
| Out, out, brief candle!
| Gartner's but a walking shadow,
| a poor excuse of an analyst
| That marches to Microsoft's drum and lies through FUD its hour upon the
| stage And then is hear
Andrew Mathews wrote:
If they
have a TOS, (Terms of Service) doesn't the customer have inversely, an
SLA (Service Level Agreement) that they're accountable for?
I've never seen a consumer-grade Internet service with an SLA. You pay,
you get what you get. Most of the stuff masquerading as "busines
burns wrote:
On Sat, 2003-09-06 at 19:25, Bruno Vieira wrote:
Hi everyone.
Do someone here have already installed a Genius Vivid Pro 4 Scanner
under Linux.
I've never heard of this scanner.
I googled about that but i couldn't find anything especific for this
scanner.
I'm not surprised.
I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Collins Richey wrote:
[...]
| Yes, it is a no win situation. My previous employer allowed no mail
| retrieval from the corporate network accept via the corporate Outlook
| system. Inconvenient for a few, but it worked. It still failed to
| protect th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Collins Richey wrote:
| Not being an email ISP myself, I would love to hear more (exact details)
| about how this works. How do Comcast ip's become a source of spam? How
| would a Comcast sysadmin go about rectifying the situation?
They would start b
On Sat, 2003-09-06 at 19:25, Bruno Vieira wrote:
> Hi everyone.
>
> Do someone here have already installed a Genius Vivid Pro 4 Scanner
> under Linux.
I've never heard of this scanner.
> I googled about that but i couldn't find anything especific for this
> scanner.
I'm not surprised.
--
bur
Hi everyone.
Do someone here have already installed a Genius Vivid Pro 4 Scanner
under Linux.
I googled about that but i couldn't find anything especific for this
scanner.
Thanks a lot.
--
Bruno Vieira
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OK. I thought that the extension would take care of that. When I was running
Raq's I just enabled FP, set their password and told them YOYO.
On Sat, 6 Sep
2003 20:18:46-0500-"David A. Bandel"<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote the following
Re: Re: Front Page
>On Sat, 6 Sep 2003 11:40:48 -0500
>ronnie gau
On Sat, 6 Sep 2003 11:40:48 -0500
ronnie gauthier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I might be confused here but why not jsut enable FP extensions on the
> apache server?
Yep, you're confused. I have a customer with the same problem. Under
Windoze, the filenames: Customer.htm, customer.html and CusT
On Sat, 06 Sep 2003 11:40:58 -0600
Andrew Mathews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Collins Richey wrote:
> | On 06 Sep 2003 07:52:26 -0400
> | burns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> |
> |
> |>These people are operating on vigilante principles... they do
On Sat, Sep 06, 2003, burns wrote:
>On Sat, 2003-09-06 at 19:22, Collins Richey wrote:
>
>> The laughing point he makes is that the new, spiffy M$ Server will not
>> run existing M$ applications!!! Why would anyone deal with a company
>> like this?
>
>Oh gawd, what a question. I've been asking mys
On Sat, 2003-09-06 at 18:15, Richard Sivernell wrote:
> Burnsie
(?!)
>
> Could it be by chance Love, Ransom style.
>
Bingo! Lonesome Love - sounds like a Robert Duval movie doesn't it?
I wonder if he escaped from Caldera with a bag of dubloons?
--
burns
On Sat, 6 Sep 2003 17:22:20 -0600
Collins Richey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 06 Sep 2003 18:08:27 -0400
> burns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 2003-09-06 at 17:56, Keith Antoine wrote:
> > > EWEEK: ENTERPRISE LINUX VS SERVER 2003 : SMACKDOWN!
> > >
> > > "What's this? People whinin
On Sat, 2003-09-06 at 19:22, Collins Richey wrote:
> The laughing point he makes is that the new, spiffy M$ Server will not
> run existing M$ applications!!! Why would anyone deal with a company
> like this?
Oh gawd, what a question. I've been asking myself this for years - and
I'm in the busine
On Sat, 6 Sep 2003 17:22:20 -0600
Collins Richey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 06 Sep 2003 18:08:27 -0400
> burns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 2003-09-06 at 17:56, Keith Antoine wrote:
> > > EWEEK: ENTERPRISE LINUX VS SERVER 2003 : SMACKDOWN!
> > >
> > > "What's this? People whinin
On 06 Sep 2003 18:06:01 -0400
burns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 2003-09-06 at 16:41, Bruce Marshall wrote:
>
> > Be on your own?? Gee, I thought you had lots of friends here... :-)
> >
> > (not all of them like SuSE tho... :-)
>
> I liked Suse until they got in bed with Caldera's we
On 06 Sep 2003 18:08:27 -0400
burns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 2003-09-06 at 17:56, Keith Antoine wrote:
> > EWEEK: ENTERPRISE LINUX VS SERVER 2003 : SMACKDOWN!
> >
> > "What's this? People whining about the cost of serious Linux
> > enterprise use? Folks get real? Have you priced Micro
On Sat, 2003-09-06 at 16:41, Bruce Marshall wrote:
> Be on your own?? Gee, I thought you had lots of friends here... :-)
>
> (not all of them like SuSE tho... :-)
I liked Suse until they got in bed with Caldera's weird United Linux
consortium.
1) Why is the SCO site down (again)?
2) Given
On Sat, 2003-09-06 at 17:56, Keith Antoine wrote:
> EWEEK: ENTERPRISE LINUX VS SERVER 2003 : SMACKDOWN!
>
> "What's this? People whining about the cost of serious Linux
> enterprise use? Folks get real? Have you priced Microsoft Server
> 2003 lately...?"
>
I traded emails with the author. The poin
EWEEK: ENTERPRISE LINUX VS SERVER 2003 : SMACKDOWN!
"What's this? People whining about the cost of serious Linux
enterprise use? Folks get real? Have you priced Microsoft Server
2003 lately...?"
COMPLETE STORY:
http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,4149,1238672,00.asp
--
Keith Antoine (GANDALF) aka 'S
On Sat, 2003-09-06 at 15:36, Wil McGilvery wrote:
> I was afraid of this answer. This is a hugely bloated web site. I am shutting down
> my last Windows IIS machine and everything will be hosted on apache.
>
Someone else suggested a server switch that would allow FP pages to run.
Sorta like run
On Sat, 2003-09-06 at 17:18, Joel Hammer wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 06, 2003 at 01:46:25PM -0400, burns wrote:
> > Have you updated the firmware in your Netgear lately? I have a RP614
> No. I didn't know it could be updated.
Yes. Don't.
--
burns
___
Linux-us
On Sat, Sep 06, 2003 at 01:46:25PM -0400, burns wrote:
> Have you updated the firmware in your Netgear lately? I have a RP614
No. I didn't know it could be updated.
Joel
___
Linux-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsubscribe/Suspend/Etc -> http://www.
On Sat, 6 Sep 2003 16:41:40 -0400
Bruce Marshall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Saturday 06 September 2003 14:35 pm, Richard Sivernell wrote:
> >It is a Suse 8.0 Pro, I wanted to use grub, but if I did I would be
> > on my own, as per cd install. I will do as you suggest and get back
> > with
On Saturday 06 September 2003 16:00 pm, Bill Campbell wrote:
> I would strongly recommend updating to SuSE 8.2 Pro. There have been
> many improvements in yast2, and SuSE has been very responsive to
> feedback from their users so 8.2 is a much better product than 8.0.
I agree and disagree a
On Saturday 06 September 2003 14:35 pm, Richard Sivernell wrote:
>It is a Suse 8.0 Pro, I wanted to use grub, but if I did I would be
> on my own, as per cd install. I will do as you suggest and get back
> with you. many thanks here
Be on your own?? Gee, I thought you had lots of friends her
On Sat, Sep 06, 2003, Wil McGilvery wrote:
>I was afraid of this answer. This is a hugely bloated web site. I am
>shutting down my last Windows IIS machine and everything will be hosted on
>apache.
>This last site is not designed by me; I personally stay as far away from
>Front Page as possible.
It is not just Comcast (even though they may be and industry leader). Up here in
Toronto, several of my customers experienced intermittent connectivity over the past
week. Some were on Rogers, some were on Bell and some were on smaller Internet
providers. I use Rogers at home and my Internet con
On Sat, Sep 06, 2003, Richard Sivernell wrote:
>Bruce
>It is a Suse 8.0 Pro, I wanted to use grub, but if I did I would be on my
>own, as per cd install. I will do as you suggest and get back with you.
>many thanks here
I would strongly recommend updating to SuSE 8.2 Pro. There have been many
im
On Sat, Sep 06, 2003, Collins Richey wrote:
...
>Yes, it is a no win situation. My previous employer allowed no mail
>retrieval from the corporate network accept via the corporate Outlook
>system. Inconvenient for a few, but it worked. It still failed to
>protect them from the soBig virus .
SoB
Bruce
It is a Suse 8.0 Pro, I wanted to use grub, but if I did I would be on my own,
as per cd install. I will do as you suggest and get back with you. many thanks
here
--
Rick Sivernell
Dallas, Texas 75287
972 306-2296
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Linux
Registered Linux User
.~.
/ v \
/
Great idea. I have a simple script to search and replace file strings with in files,
but there are many different possibilities and I am not that good a programmer.
I will keep googling and hoping that someone has a solution that might speed up this
process.
Thanks for your answer.
Regards,
W
On Sat, 6 Sep 2003 13:07:06 -0500
Richard Sivernell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> list
>
> I have installed the Pro 8.0 version of Sue on a ide hd. on system
> boot I get
> l 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02
>
> 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02
I was afraid of this answer. This is a hugely bloated web site. I am shutting down my
last Windows IIS machine and everything will be hosted on apache.
This last site is not designed by me; I personally stay as far away from Front Page as
possible.
Thanks for your response.
My problem
Regar
On Saturday 06 September 2003 14:07 pm, Richard Sivernell wrote:
> list
>
> I have installed the Pro 8.0 version of Sue on a ide hd. on system
> boot I get l 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02
> 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02
> 02 02 02
I have front page enabled on the apache server, but front page is ok with spaces in
file names when posting to IIS, but chokes when posting to apache.
The Uppercase/lowercase scenario causes broken links.
Regards,
Wil McGilvery
Manager
Lynch Digital Media Inc
416-744-7949
416-716-3
list
I have installed the Pro 8.0 version of Sue on a ide hd. on system boot I get
l 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02
02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02
02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02 02
0
On 06 Sep 2003 13:46:25 -0400
burns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 2003-09-06 at 09:41, Joel Hammer wrote:
> > This morning my internal network was down. The problem was the
> > netgear switch box. It was accepting signals but not transferring
> > them to recipients. Unplugging it and plugg
On Sat, 06 Sep 2003 11:40:58 -0600
Andrew Mathews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Collins Richey wrote:
> | On 06 Sep 2003 07:52:26 -0400
> | burns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> |
> |
> |>These people are operating on vigilante principles... they do
On Sat, 2003-09-06 at 13:25, Bill Campbell wrote:
> Unfortunately ATTBI and COMCAST didn't continue these policies. While this
> is nice for the folks on the Linux list, the net effect has been to make
> the COMCAST network a major source of network abuse. It has gotten so bad
> that some major
On Sat, 2003-09-06 at 10:57, Wil McGilvery wrote:
>
>
> I have a web site from a customer that has asked me to convert his Front
> Page site to be workable on apache.
>
> To do this and have the web site still work with front page all the
> spaces in file names/links need to be removed and upper
On Sat, 2003-09-06 at 09:41, Joel Hammer wrote:
> This morning my internal network was down. The problem was the netgear
> switch box. It was accepting signals but not transferring them to
> recipients. Unplugging it and plugging it back in solved the problem.
Have you updated the firmware in you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Collins Richey wrote:
| On 06 Sep 2003 07:52:26 -0400
| burns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
|
|
|>These people are operating on vigilante principles... they don't care.
|>If they can eliminate 80% of spam by blackholing 15% of the genuine
|>innocent mail u
On Sat, 2003-09-06 at 13:13, Bill Campbell wrote:
> More often they're only attempting to protect their networks from abuse.
> They are accountable to the people who own the systems and pay them. The
> volume of spam and other network abuse is truly astounding, and the
> professional spammers are
On Sat, Sep 06, 2003, Joel Hammer wrote:
>Its not just spam. I am on comcast and I still log endless code red and
>other nasties trying to attack web servers, and almost every originating
>IP is from comcast.
When @HOME was running this system, they were blocking incoming port 80 to
their customer
On Sat, Sep 06, 2003, burns wrote:
...
>The scary thing is no-one voted for these guys, they weren't appointed
>by any government agency and they aren't accountable to anyone. These
>are just people who are feeding their ego and power-tripping on how they
>are 'saving the world.'
More often they
I usually have my hubs/switches powered by one of the UPS's. It helps
quite a bit with these periodic spells...
On Sat, 6 Sep 2003 09:41:01 -0400 Joel Hammer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
professed:
> This morning my internal network was down. The problem was the netgear
> switch box. It was accepting si
I might be confused here but why not jsut enable FP extensions on the apache
server?
On Sat, 6 Sep 2003 10:57:30 -0400 - "Wil McGilvery"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote the following
Re: Front Page
>
>
>I have a web site from a customer that has asked me to convert his Front
>Page site to be workable
I've used the office ebuilds and as long as you pay attention and have a
jre installed it's worked fine for me. KDE is a huge thing - I heard it's
about between 1 and 2 thirds of the kernel size so it takes a while to
compile even on a fast machine. When I did it under Caldera eDesktop on a
9
On 06 Sep 2003 07:52:26 -0400
burns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> These people are operating on vigilante principles... they don't care.
> If they can eliminate 80% of spam by blackholing 15% of the genuine
> innocent mail users, they are happy. It's a war and they don't care
> who gets hurt - th
On Sat, 06 Sep 2003 13:44:50 +1000
James McDonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Brett I. Holcomb wrote:
>
> >Glad you like it! Check out alt.os.linux.gentoo if you haven't
> >already.
> >
> >
> >Alan Jackson wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >>Well I got the Gentoo CD and did the install over Labor Day.
> >
On Fri, 05 Sep 2003 21:12:17 -0600
Andrew Mathews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> As of today's count, Comcast now has 1783 ip addresses that I've
> automatically blocked for being a spam source in the last week. These
> people have got to quali
Wil McGilvery wrote:
I have a web site from a customer that has asked me to convert his Front
Page site to be workable on apache.
To do this and have the web site still work with front page all the
spaces in file names/links need to be removed and uppercase/lowercase
issues resolved.
Is there any
joel wrote:
This in today's online Wall Street Journal.
Who was Be, Inc. ?
What did MS actually do?
This settlement sounds pathetic, and another victory for MS.
Joel
BeOS ?
--
James McDonald
(Would you like fries with that MCSE?)
Singleton Australia
61+ (0)2 65712401
61+ 0428 320 219
01:35:00
I have a web site from a customer that has asked me to convert his Front
Page site to be workable on apache.
To do this and have the web site still work with front page all the
spaces in file names/links need to be removed and uppercase/lowercase
issues resolved.
Is there any easy way to do thi
This in today's online Wall Street Journal.
Who was Be, Inc. ?
What did MS actually do?
This settlement sounds pathetic, and another victory for MS.
Joel
Microsoft and Be Inc. Reach
Settlement in Antitrust Suit
*Associated Press*
SEATTLE -- *Microsoft* Corp. agreed Friday to pay $23.3 million to
Joel Hammer wrote:
This morning my internal network was down. The problem was the netgear
switch box. It was accepting signals but not transferring them to
recipients. Unplugging it and plugging it back in solved the problem.
Does this have any ominous portents?
I don't know anything about omnibus
This morning my internal network was down. The problem was the netgear
switch box. It was accepting signals but not transferring them to
recipients. Unplugging it and plugging it back in solved the problem.
Does this have any ominous portents?
Joel
_
Its not just spam. I am on comcast and I still log endless code red and
other nasties trying to attack web servers, and almost every originating
IP is from comcast.
Joel
On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 09:12:17PM -0600, Andrew Mathews wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> As of
On Sat, 2003-09-06 at 01:13, James McDonald wrote:
> Another thing is that they expect the mail domain to align with the
> reverse dns entry which is rediculous... do the people administering
> these black lists actually understand that a rdns query frequently has
> absolutely nothing to do wit
The original message was received at Sat, 6 Sep 2003 03:56:29 -0500
from h000625a9a137.ne.client2.attbi.com [24.61.222.23]
- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(reason: 550 5.1.1 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... User unknown)
- Transcript of sessi
We are unable to deliver the message from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
The email address used to send your message is not subscribed to this
group. If you are a member of this group, please be aware that you may
only send messages to this group using the email address(es) you hav
The original message was received at Sat, 6 Sep 2003 00:15:43 -0700 (PDT)
from adsl-67-121-155-249.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net [67.121.155.249]
- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(reason: 553 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... User unknown)
- Transcrip
68 matches
Mail list logo
