How silly of me - I forgot to post the address.
http://www.inegroup.com/pollBooth.php3?qid=nextnitwit
remember - vote for me and vote often. I want walsh to live and breath
me. It's something he's good at.
On Thu, 17 Feb 2000, !Dr. Joe Baptista wrote:
As all of you know - William X
going well - I've beat out Joop and
all the others.
Regards
Joe Baptista
By the way, didn't Willy the Whiner embezzle hundreds of thousands of
dollars from the .tk registry? I seem to recall that. Is this the
same William Walsh?
-rizzz
At 7:47 AM -0500 2/17/00, !Dr. Joe Bapt
at least the web site http://www.nic.pn/ is pretty - looks like it was put
together in a hurry - but it's pretty.
regards
joe
On Wed, 16 Feb 2000, Jeff Williams wrote:
Richard and all,
I would suggest a much closer checking on this.. .PN is hosted by 2day.com.
I will leave right
?
This one (See below) is just too heavily censored to be of much use
as I see it. What are your thoughts?
!Dr. Joe Baptista wrote:
This is a juicy tid bit. Of course Roberto won't be getting this
one. The IAEA's anti spam list seems to be getting a little ratty, And
offensive
--
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2000 15:14:55 +0700
To: Joe Baptista [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Antispam domain block
The Department of XXX CENSORED XXX, XXX CENSORED XXX has been informed of
the temporary closure of XXX CENSORED XXX by
XXX CENSORED XXX from XXX CENSORED XXX
XXX CENSORED XXX is the web
unfortunate. And just another continous fraud. Where the
hell is the Department of Commerce on this. This is all very unwholesome
and very unamerican.
Regards
Joe Baptista
On Tue, 15 Feb 2000, William X. Walsh wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 15-Feb-2000 Roberto
I suppose, but hardly representative of anything legitimately....
!Dr. Joe Baptista wrote:
I'm cross posting this to make sure other members of the community can
follow this insanity.
I and Walsh agree that for the GA@DNSO to get any works of substance done,
it is critical that we meet
their own namespace and keep it wholesome and safe
for them and their children. And if ICANN does not - I hope the cristian
community will do it on their own initiative. Not only is it a good
project - it's right up there with salvation.
Amen
Joe Baptista
On Tue, 15 Feb 2000, Jeff Williams wrote
something like walshhasnt.clue or WXWno.clue for instance.
Of course there are other permiations that would be very fitting as well...
!Dr. Joe Baptista wrote:
Oh - I would never operate a wholesome family values service name
space. It's too much overhead. I'm going to have fun with t
I am under the impression that by swtiching dot.pn over to the islanders
is going to cause a bit of a problem for ICANN - have not the cctld
operators formed a pack - if one goes - the whole lot walks.
Cairo should be entertaining.
Regards
Joe Baptista
i don't think the cctld's are very happy - it looks all cat and mouse to
me.
On Wed, 16 Feb 2000, Richard J. Sexton wrote:
At 02:31 AM 2/16/00 -0500, you wrote:
I am under the impression that by swtiching dot.pn over to the islanders
is going to cause a bit of a problem for ICANN - have
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2000 13:26:19 -0500
From: James Love [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Multiple recipients of list RANDOM-BITS
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Random-bits] TACD statement on ICANN
The following is the text of one of the resolutions approved by the
to do this, provided
everyone get's the same treatment. It's about time that we end the
contraversy of who' who.
Regards
Joe Baptista
from Love ..
---
The Hague Conference on Private International Law has issued a
preliminary draft for a "Convention on Jurisdiction and Foreign
Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters."
This contains controversial elements regarding electronic commerce.
There will be a meeting of ecommerce
conditions of their
employment contracts while assisting you in this farce.
You have been warned.
Indeed I think it best you heed the investigation by the Department of
Commerce into your activities.
Regards
Joe Baptista
deleted as usual.
rellevant CC's put back in.
Regards
Joe Baptista
.
Regards
Joe Baptista
or
tommorrow afternoon.
Regards
Joe baptista
is
unnatural.
Regards
Joe Baptista
Since Harald and Roberto rammed those new rules on the GA, split the lists
into full and rules, and ostrazized some of the key people - it's been
really dead over there.
The IFWP on the other hand is booming. Maybe it's time to start
discussing issues of substance. Like what do we do as the
more to destabilize
convertional politics then consolidate it. Another propaganda book much
like Lessig's.
Regards
Joe Baptista
be a time consumming
proposal.
Regards
Joe Baptista
!Dr. Joe Baptista wrote:
Since Harald and Roberto rammed those new rules on the GA, split the lists
into full and rules, and ostrazized some of the key people - it's been
really dead over there.
The IFWP on the other hand is boom
I've noticed that the GA DNSO listadmin is posting old messages to the ga
list. Is this a lame attempt at generating traffic ;-) or just another
mistake.
On Fri, 4 Feb 2000, !Dr. Joe Baptista wrote:
I have decided that it is time to kick our chair where it hurts
most. I will start
just send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and in the body of the message
type unsubscribe ga.
You see Harald, building consensus is going to be difficult so close to
cairo. And why are we seeing so many old messages. How many messages has
elizabeth been sitting on.
On Mon, 7 Feb 2000, Mikki
On Thu, 10 Feb 2000, Roberto Gaetano wrote:
Hi, Ellen.
Sorry to reply this late, but your message has been buried in hundreds
of private messages by Joe Baptista, and I did not read it until some
cleanup has been done.
I object to you using my name for damage control.
Regards
Joe
Today - our Mr. Gaetano has been busy cutting and pasting denials to
hundreds of people. Good bless Mr. Gato and all who would sail in her.
On Fri, 11 Feb 2000, Roberto Gaetano wrote:
I would like to point out a couple of things, and make a suggestion.
First of all, there's no
will be next - or another round on roberto
shaw might be in order. Of course there's one more button on the Gato
list before I close out the day on the IAEA.
It's been another very productive week here at PCCF.
Regards
Joe Baptista
On Thu, 10 Feb 2000, Jeff Williams wrote:
Joe and all,
I
Looks like the IAB is a bit nervose these days.
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Internet Architecture Board Working Group of the IETF.
Title : IAB Technical Comment on the Unique DNS Root
with the
noise level. Currently, I peg the value-add content somewhere south of 1% of
list traffic. I can mostly lay this at the feet of one Joe Baptista.
Congratulations Joe, you've done PCCF proud.
Well Roeland, PCCF is a leader in exposing stupidity and fraud. The GA
and ICANN have been exposed by us
al members for purposes of accuracy,
don't you think? ;)
!Dr. Joe Baptista wrote:
Looks like the IAB is a bit nervose these days.
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Internet Architecture Board Working Group of
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2000 11:04:04 -0500
From: James Love [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Multiple recipients of list RANDOM-BITS
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Random-bits] healthnet.org domain dispute
These are URLs to stories about the dispute between Satellite,
More detail - it's don't work.
regards
joe
On Tue, 8 Feb 2000, Ben Edelman wrote:
This is the first report I've had recently of any problems with it. Can you
provide more details about the problems you're currently experiencing?
Ben Edelman
Berkman Center for Internet and Society
All the real audio links on the following page do not work.
http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/icann/dnso/
Does that help you out Ben? If you have any further problems with this
myopic view of your network - please advise.
Regards
Joe
On Tue, 8 Feb 2000, !Dr. Joe Baptista wrote:
More detail
On Tue, 8 Feb 2000, John Berryhill Ph.D. J.D. wrote:
I believe that Mr. Walsh should be prepared to support his allegation
against vrx.net and its customers, or else do the honorable thing and admit
that he has no idea what he is talking about here.
I think everyone knows Walsh is a bit of
cked email addresses is at
http://www.iaea.org/general/spam.html
If you feel Mr. Gaetano is illegally blocking your email address from
communicating with the International Atomic Energy Agency - please let
me
know.
Regards
Joe Baptista
CauseNET
The Common Cause Email Alert Network
http://www.commoncause.org
Monday, February 7, 2000
- - Webcast of ICANN Roundtable - -
The Internet community is on the brink of holding a
first-of-its-kind global election. The Internet
Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
will
WHO'S CONTROLLING CYBERSPACE?
http://www.pcworld.com/cgi-bin/pcwtoday?ID=15153
Harvard law professor says commercialism will stifle the Net.
On Mon, 7 Feb 2000, Kent Crispin wrote:
It is a fact that when iciiu.org first appeared on the air its name
service was provided by vrx.net -- that was publicly acknowledged by
Richard Sexton on some list or another, and probably appears in some
public archive. iciiu.org is no longer
William - could you just shut up. Your the only person I know who replies
to his own propaganda in order to generate more propaganda. Go to your
room.
On Sun, 6 Feb 2000, William X. Walsh wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06-Feb-2000 William X. Walsh wrote:
You know Roberto - this is something nice that you do. The holiday
trip. Why don't you resign as our chair and instead we'll appoint you as
our official GA Holiday Clock. I think you would be a much happier puppy
if we did that.
And by the way Roberto, have you heard - a bunch of people just
leadership skills of the Chair and Alternate Chair of the GA in building
consesus.
God bless the GA and all who would sink in her.
Regards
Joe Baptista
It looks as if Elizabeth the DNSO list admins has closed the GA list. I
anticipate this is a temporary anomyly, but we shall see.
of
fools - but in this case i feel it appropriate from an information point
of view.
Regards
Joe Baptista
P.S. Just a follow up on Fanego, we found his body and the spanish charge
d'affairs is now in charge of the patriation of the body.
On Sat, 5 Feb 2000, Richard J. Sexton wrote:
At 06:36 PM 2
Newsbytes is reporting on it. Here is an affiliate site carrying the story.
http://www.32bitsonline.com/news.php3?news=news/21/nb21316page=1
I anticipate ICANN and the EU have made a deal on the .eu tld after EU
treatened to start their own root servers.
Mr. Francis Fanego the lead sponsor of the BIND 1999 Survey passed away
this January 25th, 2000 at 9 AM. He will be missed dearly by his wife,
mother and friends.
as what IANA used some guy named Daucher - very
expensive. Of course this leads to the next question, CORE is effectively
bankrupt - so who's the sugar daddy (or mommy) who is paying thier fees
legal fees..
Regards
Joe Baptista
. Per Haugaard and find out more from him.
Regards
Joe Baptista
On Thu, 3 Feb 2000, Joseph Friedman wrote:
Is there any truth to the rumor that the European Union is threatning to
start their own root servers if ICANN does not grant them a .EU?
--Joseph
From: Network Solutions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Renew your domain for up to 10 years!
Lock in your Internet domain name for up to 10 years, and you
won't have to worry about renewing until 2010!
http://offer.networksolutions.com/go/na1/renewaloffer8/
QUALCOMM AND CISCO) THE DOW JONES
WILL FALL BELOW 6000 BY DECEMBER 31, 1999"
never published anything like that either.
Regards
Joe
----- Original Message -
From: !Dr. Joe Baptista [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2000 12:50 AM
Subject: Re
On Tue, 1 Feb 2000, domainiac wrote:
for those of your who wish to rely on the "insight ??"
then why don't you provide your insight?
He can't. If he were to reply to the original question, he would have to
either lie that everything is rosy - or alternatively tell the truth and
confirm
pper slope will be introduced. Once the
world knows diversity is an option, the pressure will rise on ICANN to
perform and deliver.
Regards
Joe Baptista
On Mon, 31 Jan 2000, Ron Bennett wrote:
Is CORE going out of business??
Their Whois database has become extremely desychronized
and disconnected from reality. Also, their website hasn't been
updated from what I can tell since Dec-01-1999; and still no
Registrant transfer procedure as of
On Sun, 30 Jan 2000, Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote:
After having come to the conclusion that you're not interested merely in
communicating, but discovering the correct respondent for some arcane
ritual of American law, the details of which I, being a Norwegian citizen,
know nothing
Incidentally Harald, Joop and Roberto - still waiting a reply with respect
to this question on the recent poll of the dnso ga - and the fraud that
resulted from it.
Regards
Joe
On Sat, 29 Jan 2000, !Dr. Joe Baptista wrote:
I have a question concerning the recent poll. I would like
I saw it too - look to me like she's had too much coke.
On Sun, 30 Jan 2000, Jeff Williams wrote:
All,
All in all Esther was made to look pretty stupid on CNN by the
interviewer as questions to her had to be repeated or restated
in a different fashion so she could understand them.
, 30 Jan 2000, Jeff Williams wrote:
Joe and all,
I don't think Esther uses Coke or crack. She is just cluless or nearly
so on many aspects of the internet and the "New Economy". I now
wish had gone to Davo Switzerland though....
!Dr. Joe Baptista wrote:
I saw it too -
Harald and Roberto - just because the dnso.org is down is no reason to not
answer my question - I need this information.
On Sat, 29 Jan 2000, !Dr. Joe Baptista wrote:
OK I'm confused - Harald can I walk you through this. I need a correct
answer to my question. What is the address
-Original Message-
From: Andrew McLaughlin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2000 5:07 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Hans Kraaijenbrink; Amadeu Abril i Abril; Ken Fockler; Louis L.
Touton
Subject: Reconsideration Request 00-1
Dear Mr. Smith:
The Reconsideration
-Original Message-
From: Russ Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2000 10:17 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Hans Kraaijenbrink;
Amadeu Abril i Abril; Ken Fockler
Cc: Louis L. Touton
Subject: RE: Reconsideration Request 00-1
Dear Mr. Mclaughlin,
e person I would address this matter
to via registered mail.
I also suggest you post to the dnso.org web site a legal address for the
purpose of notices and correspondence to the dnso.
Regards
Joe Baptista
First of all, before I begin my reply to you I feel I should appologise
first. I forwarded your "message from the chair" to other newsgroups and
in so doing called you Roberto a Nazi Hitler.
However, calling you Hitler is a historical error. Hitler had a plan and
you don't.
On Tue, 25 Jan
As a Minister of the Peterborough Mission of the Church of the Universe I
would like to offer up a little prayer on behalf of the GA and the DNSO,
but especially for the Names Council and our bereived Chair.
But first as is customary in the service - the lecture.
Brothers and Sisters under
Hi Jeff:
The i-dns stories are mainly bogus. i-dns started with a claim that they
had registered 90,000 domains. Altogether they have about 100 -
150. This story is nothing more then self full filling fud.
On Wed, 26 Jan 2000, Jeff Williams wrote:
All,
Are there some shanagans going
Just a follow up on i-dns - they don't even have their zones setup
properly. All domains are in the root zone file mixed in with all the
tld's.
Apparently the Dr. in charge of the project specializes in bioinfomatrix -
whatever that is.
Regards
Joe
On Wed, 26 Jan 2000, !Dr. Joe Baptista wrote
Roberto Gaetano imposes law on the GA - the hitler speech. Great
stuff.
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2000 03:28:03 +0100 (MET)
From: Roberto Gaetano [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [ga] Message from the Chair
Folks,
it is time for me to take a
On Fri, 14 Jan 2000, Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote:
my name to be used in this joke you call an election or nomination
process. I refuse to participate in a question that is another NC hoax.
Interesting: You want to have an opinion, but you do not want it recorded.
You don't even want
of the reasons they have not pushed any attempt to
delete grandfathered dot.gov domain names. The rationalization which I
agree with is if they start to delete domains from other governments, if
they later decide to include world governments it would look bad revoking
the records now.
Regards
Joe
The dot.gov server has been down all day. It's affecting all whois
queries. have brought this to the attention of the domain manager earlier
today and was told they were working on it.
Did a search on geektools and other systems and you get this as a
response.
[nic.gov]
* System has
401 - 468 of 468 matches
Mail list logo
