Hi list,
I just stumbled over a few posts mentioning the scheduled 2.1 release of
pfSense on June 6, 2012.
This has made me wonder: Is there any centralized resource (ordinary web
page, wiki, whatever) where one can review what Microsoft would call the
product support lifecycle of pfSense?
Op 24-4-2012 9:13, Stefan Baur schreef:
Hi list,
The thing is, I rolled out 2.0.1 (upgrading from 1.2.3) between November
2011 and February 2012, IIRC. I'd prefer to stay on 2.0.1 for a while,
as I don't need the IPv6 features of 2.1 just yet. I'm just wondering
how long after June 6, 2012
Am 24.04.2012 09:32, schrieb Chris Buechler:
Nothing formal. To date, once we put out a new release, all prior
releases will not get any updates. That will probably especially be
true going forward, with much shorter release cycles than we had from
1.2.3 to 2.0, and much fewer changes, hence
On 23 apr. 2012, at 19:28, Ernst den Broeder wrote:
Hi All.
I am trying to work through a kernel crash I keep having with pfSense 2.0.1
on Alix 2d13 hardware (my home router). This has been going on for about 3-4
weeks now. The crash happens about every 2 days, but it varies. Some
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 3:46 AM, Stefan Baur
newsgroups.ma...@stefanbaur.de wrote:
Am 24.04.2012 09:32, schrieb Chris Buechler:
Nothing formal. To date, once we put out a new release, all prior
releases will not get any updates. That will probably especially be
true going forward, with much
Hi,
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 3:25 AM, Stefan Baur newsgroups.ma...@stefanbaur.de
wrote:
Am 24.04.2012 09:20, schrieb Seth Mos:
There's a lot of other fixes unrelated to IPv6 in 2.1 that you'll find
which you will probably like.
Well, I'm sure you've heard of never change a running
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 4:54 AM, Stefan Baur
newsgroups.ma...@stefanbaur.de wrote:
Uh, don't get me wrong, I'm all for timely updates that fix security issues.
I just don't want to drag fancy stuff along that I don't need. And at
present, that's what full IPv6 support is for me.
Which will
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 4:50 AM, Gerald A geraldabli...@gmail.com wrote:
Lots of commercial firewall makers make updates to their firmware or loads
which they expect you to load on as soon as you can. With those, you get a
combo of security, bug fixes and features which may or may not be
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 4:54 AM, Stefan Baur newsgroups.ma...@stefanbaur.de
wrote:
Am 24.04.2012 10:50, schrieb Gerald A:
Uh, don't get me wrong, I'm all for timely updates that fix security
issues. I just don't want to drag fancy stuff along that I don't need.
And at present, that's
From: list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org [mailto:list-boun...@lists.pfsense.org]
On Behalf Of Chris Buechler
Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2012 4:41 AM
To: pfSense support and discussion
Subject: Re: [pfSense] pfSense product support lifecycle?
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 3:46 AM, Stefan Baur
On 4/24/2012 4:11 AM, Pim van Stam wrote:
On 23 apr. 2012, at 19:28, Ernst den Broeder wrote:
Hi All.
I am trying to work through a kernel crash I keep having with pfSense 2.0.1 on
Alix 2d13 hardware (my home router). This has been going on for about 3-4
weeks now. The crash happens about
- Adam Thompson athom...@athompso.net escribió:
You can't really compare them directly. Sure, on paper there are a
lot of common points, but the approach is so radically different, a
comparison point-by-point would merely be misleading.
If I had to draw analogies, I'd say pfSense is
Hello everyone,
I have a pfsense with 4 vlans on 2 nics. The goal is that the user
gets served a different captive portal depending on which vlan he came
from.
I managed to do this making each vlan a different subnet and uploading
a captive portal which would redirect to the appropriate pages
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 7:56 AM, k_o_l k_...@hotmail.com wrote:
Don't you have a way to track which release is being used the most and
tailor support accordingly
We don't have any means of knowing. Besides, that ultimately wouldn't
impact anything. I have little doubt there are tens of
14 matches
Mail list logo
