Re: [LMMS-devel] Default Theme

On 08/29/2014 06:44 AM, HDDigitizerMusic wrote: > @Vesa > > I have to just point out that the latest theme is so much better than the > older one. So Vesa's work has really improved LMMS and I think it will > continue to do so. Awww, thanks :) -

Re: [LMMS-devel] Default Theme

On 08/29/2014 05:42 AM, Brian Millar wrote: > > Great I have a degree in Photoshop so I'd be more than happy to help > with artwork :) Just note that if you want to make graphics for LMMS, you can't use Photoshop. All the graphics have to be made with GIMP or Inkscape, and you'll have to share the

Re: [LMMS-devel] Default Theme

@Vesa I have to just point out that the latest theme is so much better than the older one. So Vesa's work has really improved LMMS and I think it will continue to do so. -- View this message in context: http://linux-multimedia-studio-lmms.996328.n3.nabble.com/Default-Theme-tp10212p10227.html S

Re: [LMMS-devel] Default Theme

On 08/29/2014 05:21 AM, Tres Finocchiaro wrote: > > Furthermore, Vesa has asked on a few occasions for help with some > instrument plugin artwork which he's received almost no help on, but > is a very good way to start getting comfortable with the theming and > layout. Actually most of the instrum

Re: [LMMS-devel] Default Theme

On 08/29/2014 05:21 AM, Tres Finocchiaro wrote: > This is why VLC and Gimp succeed with terrible interfaces, they do > things that are amazing and people can live with a terrible interface. VLC and GIMP, yes, not to mention Blender, and my own favorite when it comes to these kinds of things... In

Re: [LMMS-devel] Default Theme

On 08/29/2014 04:30 AM, Tres Finocchiaro wrote: > > Currently I don't feel like the icons and overall look match the > new logo and splash screen and I feel an upgraded look would > really help the project. > > > I'm sorry to inform you of this Brian, but this is the upgraded look. Yea

Re: [LMMS-devel] Fwd: LMMS/physical modelling synth?

On 08/29/2014 01:08 AM, Stefaan Himpe wrote: >> Their's no doubt that Pianoteq is pretty amazing by limited I meant that >> they're only geared at one type of sound typically, emulating a Piano, >> Organ, or Guitar etc. where as with FM, Additive, Subtractive, or Phase >> Distortion you can't make

Re: [LMMS-devel] Growl Instrument Idea

On 08/29/2014 01:07 AM, midi-pascal wrote: > Depends on the step value: > step <=0 --> Infinite loop > step > 0 --> One iteration > > Right? ;-) We have another gold star student I see ;) -- Slashdot TV. Video for Nerds

Re: [LMMS-devel] Copying wiki articles from 0.4 to 1.0

On 08/29/2014 12:06 AM, I'm Umcaruje wrote: > Also musikbear, please try to watch your spelling in the articles. Not everyone is good at English, which is understandable since most people in the world do not speak English as their first language. (And even some who do... not everyone has access to

Re: [LMMS-devel] Default Theme

That's fine, I'm running on Gentoo myself so command line GIT stuff and compiling is not an issue. I mainly use GIMP these days but I have a VM with Windows and Photoshop for when its needed. Thanks again and best of luck with the 1.1 release! On Friday, 29 August 2014, 3:56, Tres Finocchiaro

Re: [LMMS-devel] Default Theme

And one final thing... you probably figured this out already but this won't compile on windows, so to be able to edit using Photoshop and compile on the same machine, you'll be stuck using a Mac (which the software will compile on) or you'll be stuck running two operating systems. For this reason

Re: [LMMS-devel] Default Theme

Great. Oh, one more thing... we're almost ready to release 1.1 so please do your work on master branch (or if you are good with Git, do as Vesa does and make a dedicated branch for it -- usually requires git command line -- if you want a dedicated branch for each major change). But for starters..

Re: [LMMS-devel] Default Theme

>Please reply all when responding to this list. Sorry, new to mailing lists :P >https://github.com/LMMS/lmms/issues/387 Fantastic! I was literally thinking about this issue earlier today. I've found some of the C++ code dealing with this and am working on it now, thanks this is exactly the kind

Re: [LMMS-devel] Default Theme

Please reply all when responding to this list. yes GIMP and VLC are truly disgusting graphically but I feel like they have > the advantage of being often recommended and very well known. I sometimes > think LMMS does not get the attention it deserves in this respect. Our windows version gets ove

Re: [LMMS-devel] Default Theme

> > Currently I don't feel like the icons and overall look match the new logo > and splash screen and I feel an upgraded look would really help the project. I'm sorry to inform you of this Brian, but this is the upgraded look. Normal people are far more likely to download a program if the screen

Re: [LMMS-devel] Default Theme

Yeah, you can totally do a theme. LMMS is open to multiple themes and are finding out a way to make it easier to use. Though If its super amazing, it is possible that people decide to use the theme. In fact, we have an alternate theme in the making. You can totally contribute to this or make your

Re: [LMMS-devel] Growl Instrument Idea

Alright. Moving it to a Git Repository. It can be found here: https://github.com/cubician/Karnex On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 4:07 PM, midi-pascal wrote: > Depends on the step value: > step <=0 --> Infinite loop > step > 0 --> One iteration > > Right? ;-) > > On 14-08-28 10:18 AM, Vesa wrote: > > On

[LMMS-devel] Default Theme

Hi guys, I'm new to the LMMS developer community but I hope to contribute some commits soon. I'm sure you are probably sick of hearing about the visual style over and over since it can be themed anyway but I do feel like the default theme is an important issue. Currently I don't feel like the ic

Re: [LMMS-devel] Fwd: LMMS/physical modelling synth?

> Their's no doubt that Pianoteq is pretty amazing by limited I meant that > they're only geared at one type of sound typically, emulating a Piano, > Organ, or Guitar etc. where as with FM, Additive, Subtractive, or Phase > Distortion you can't make a realistic sounding Piano or anything but you >

Re: [LMMS-devel] Growl Instrument Idea

Depends on the step value: step <=0 --> Infinite loop step > 0 --> One iteration Right? ;-) On 14-08-28 10:18 AM, Vesa wrote: > On 08/28/2014 02:50 PM, musikbear wrote: >> diiz wrote >>> for (int i = 0; i < 1; i += step) >>> This loop will either only iterate once, or it'll get stuck in infinite

Re: [LMMS-devel] Copying wiki articles from 0.4 to 1.0

Also musikbear, please try to watch your spelling in the articles. Also I saw you use uppercase sentences too. Please don't do that. The wiki should be consistent. Best regards, Uroš On 28 August 2014 21:41, Stian Jørgensrud wrote: > Copying wiki articles from 0.4 to 1.0 IS NOT ALLOWED! This i

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS Memory Manager

Thanks! A new bug report might be a better place, just drop a link to it in that pull request. - tres.finocchi...@gmail.com On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 4:06 PM, bubblegummer wrote: > Hi, I checked the Win64 binary. where to report bugs? maybe here: > https://github.com/LMMS/lmms/pull/1088 ? > >

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS Memory Manager

Hi, I checked the Win64 binary. where to report bugs? maybe here: https://github.com/LMMS/lmms/pull/1088 ? Am 28.08.2014 15:16, schrieb Tres Finocchiaro: On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 1:59 PM, Vesa > wrote: Now available here: https://github.com/LMMS/lmms/pull/1088

Re: [LMMS-devel] Growl Instrument Idea

It's a C#/M$ joke. -- Slashdot TV. Video for Nerds. Stuff that matters. http://tv.slashdot.org/___ LMMS-devel mailing list LMMS-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.source

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS 1.x

On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 3:30 PM, Stian Jørgensrud wrote: > I don't know what kind of functionality already made for 1.2.0, but I guess > the milestones is then postponed? > https://github.com/LMMS/lmms/milestones/1.2.0 > Stability is the best, and some small enhancements (like logical key > short

[LMMS-devel] Copying wiki articles from 0.4 to 1.0

Copying wiki articles from 0.4 to 1.0 IS NOT ALLOWED! This is because legal reasons/hell. You must use the *duplicate* option and tick off "duplicate version history". There aren't many pages left to wrongly copy, but musikBear, you did it. http://lmms.sourceforge.net/wiki/index.php/1.0:Working_wi

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS 1.1

That's probably a good idea. - tres.finocchi...@gmail.com On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 3:31 PM, Stian Jørgensrud wrote: > Should we post it on FB perhaps? > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://linux-multimedia-studio-lmms.996328.n3.nabble.com/LMMS-1-1-tp9922p10200.html > Sent from the

Re: [LMMS-devel] SingerBot

- tres.finocchi...@gmail.com On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 1:52 PM, Ian Sannar wrote: > Apparently there was an old plugin called SingerBot that was some sort of > speech synthesizer. > I know it was removed. > Was it just super buggy? > Is it possible to bring it back? Is it worth bringing back? > T

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS 1.1

Should we post it on FB perhaps? -- View this message in context: http://linux-multimedia-studio-lmms.996328.n3.nabble.com/LMMS-1-1-tp9922p10200.html Sent from the lmms-devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Slas

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS 1.1

That there is a RC4! -- View this message in context: http://linux-multimedia-studio-lmms.996328.n3.nabble.com/LMMS-1-1-tp9922p10201.html Sent from the lmms-devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Slashdot TV. V

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS 1.x

I don't know what kind of functionality already made for 1.2.0, but I guess the milestones is then postponed? https://github.com/LMMS/lmms/milestones/1.2.0 Stability is the best, and some small enhancements (like logical key shortcuts, and more: http://linuxmultimediastudio.blogspot.no/2014/07/sim

Re: [LMMS-devel] Growl Instrument Idea

Haha. What happened in the quoting here? Grejppi definitively didn't say Microsoft Office?! Tres Finocchiaro wrote > On Aug 28, 2014 2:58 PM, "Hannu Haahti" < > grejppi@ > > wrote: >> >> Why are you doing this with Google Docs instead of Microsoft Office? -- View this message in context:

Re: [LMMS-devel] SingerBot

but the best one so far, that I have heard: https://soundcloud.com/xard/singing-llamas diiz wrote > Meanwhile, the LMMS formant filter is pretty good at doing singing > synthesis too: > > https://soundcloud.com/psygfault/happy-birthday -- View this message in context: http://linux-multime

Re: [LMMS-devel] Growl Instrument Idea

Fixed. ;) On Aug 28, 2014 2:58 PM, "Hannu Haahti" wrote: > > Why are you doing this with Google Docs instead of Microsoft Office? -- Slashdot TV. Video for Nerds. Stuff that matters. http://tv.slashdot.org/

Re: [LMMS-devel] Growl Instrument Idea

Why are you doing this with Google Docs instead of a git repository? 2014-08-28 20:07 GMT+03:00 Ian Sannar : > Thanks, Tres. Fixed the loop thing. C# really isn't picky about decimal > precision. However, the int rather than the float was a stupid mistake that > I really should've noticed. xD >

Re: [LMMS-devel] SingerBot

On 08/28/2014 08:52 PM, Ian Sannar wrote: > Apparently there was an old plugin called SingerBot that was some sort > of speech synthesizer. > I know it was removed. > Was it just super buggy? > Is it possible to bring it back? Is it worth bringing back? Never heard it in action, but AFAIK it was d

[LMMS-devel] SingerBot

Apparently there was an old plugin called SingerBot that was some sort of speech synthesizer. I know it was removed. Was it just super buggy? Is it possible to bring it back? Is it worth bringing back? This is all I could find on it. http://lmms.io/forum/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=628

Re: [LMMS-devel] Growl Instrument Idea

Thanks, Tres. Fixed the loop thing. C# really isn't picky about decimal precision. However, the int rather than the float was a stupid mistake that I really should've noticed. xD And guys! The code is open for anyone to edit. https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=0ByeSWzzih0ymT2V2aW5aTl93eGc&usp=d

Re: [LMMS-devel] Growl Instrument Idea

On 08/28/2014 07:42 PM, Tres Finocchiaro wrote: > > I don't remember if C# has some implicit conversion weirdness > which would allow the loop to function as intended, but in C/C++ > it definitely doesn't work. > > > No, it's bad, but it's not *THAT* bad. :) I'd link you the MSDN > ar

Re: [LMMS-devel] Growl Instrument Idea

> > I don't remember if C# has some implicit conversion weirdness which would > allow the loop to function as intended, but in C/C++ it definitely doesn't > work. > No, it's bad, but it's not *THAT* bad. :) I'd link you the MSDN article, but I'd rather not put a Microsoft page in your internet h

Re: [LMMS-devel] Growl Instrument Idea

On 08/28/2014 06:33 PM, Tres Finocchiaro wrote: > > for (int i = 0; i < 1; i += step) > This loop will either only iterate once, or it'll get stuck in > infinite loop. Pop quiz... can you spot why? > > > If step > 1, it becomes 1 and dies. > If step < 1, it becomes 0, -1, -2, -3, -4, -5

Re: [LMMS-devel] What happened to the SF forum?

We need a representative there. They offered us a software release section like they do for other software. It's a matter of time. Is this something you would like to take charge of Bill? - tres.finocchi...@gmail.com On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 9:37 AM, Bill Y. wrote: > I'm curious if we've giv

Re: [LMMS-devel] Growl Instrument Idea

> > for (int i = 0; i < 1; i += step) > This loop will either only iterate once, or it'll get stuck in infinite > loop. Pop quiz... can you spot why? If step > 1, it becomes 1 and dies. If step < 1, it becomes 0, -1, -2, -3, -4, -5, -6, -7, -8, -9, -10, -11, -12, -13, -14, -15, -16, -17, -18, -19

Re: [LMMS-devel] Growl Instrument Idea

I fixed it by the way. xD Anybody can edit the files in the Karnex folder that I shared on Google Drive. On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 8:18 AM, Vesa wrote: > On 08/28/2014 02:50 PM, musikbear wrote: > > diiz wrote > >> for (int i = 0; i < 1; i += step) > >> This loop will either only iterate once, o

Re: [LMMS-devel] Growl Instrument Idea

On 08/28/2014 02:50 PM, musikbear wrote: > diiz wrote >> for (int i = 0; i < 1; i += step) >> This loop will either only iterate once, or it'll get stuck in infinite >> loop. Pop quiz... can you spot why? > var i was initated <1 > i<=1 should secure one cycle, and i belive a pre-increment would too

Re: [LMMS-devel] What happened to the SF forum?

I'm curious if we've given much thought to getting a KVR forum, and possibly adding it to our sites forum list. KVR is one of the big hubs for almost all DAWs, and it is a good place to expose and draw in people who would not give LMMS a glance otherwise. On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 8:25 AM, Tres Fin

Re: [LMMS-devel] LMMS Memory Manager

On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 1:59 PM, Vesa wrote: > Now available here: > > https://github.com/LMMS/lmms/pull/1088 For anyone willing to help test this MemoryManager release, here are some precompiled binaries for Windows: https://github.com/tresf/lmms/releases/tag/v1.0.990

Re: [LMMS-devel] What happened to the SF forum?

> > redirect worked perfextly (firefox) > I must say : wow! > This looks fatastic. professional, clean, inviting > A great job! > Everyone will apreciate this. Thanks. There are still a few miscellaneous bugs since the forum theme uses bootstrap 2 and we are using bootstrap 3 for the menu (on m

Re: [LMMS-devel] Growl Instrument Idea

> If i make an edit in the wiki for what i am missing in respect to get > started with lmms and let all the unknowns be 'open' fields > Would someone with knowlegde fill these open-fields with valid info? > Things like I need are > *pc minimum specs > * dl links for *all* needed libraries and sizes

Re: [LMMS-devel] Growl Instrument Idea

diiz wrote > for (int i = 0; i < 1; i += step) > This loop will either only iterate once, or it'll get stuck in infinite > loop. Pop quiz... can you spot why? var i was initated <1 i<=1 should secure one cycle, and i belive a pre-increment would too (cant rem. the syntax :p I was thinking.. If i

Re: [LMMS-devel] What happened to the SF forum?

redirect worked perfextly (firefox) I must say : wow! This looks fatastic. professional, clean, inviting A great job! Everyone will apreciate this. -- View this message in context: http://linux-multimedia-studio-lmms.996328.n3.nabble.com/What-happened-to-the-SF-forum-tp9238p10179.html Sent from