Paul Makepeace wrote:
``Must posts have list named in destination (to, cc) field
(or be among the acceptable alias names, specified below)? YES''
AFAIK, the only practical upshot to legit posters is that you
can't bcc london.pm(a)london.pm.org. If anyone can see a
downside to this, speak
My mother was asking me the other day about the best way for them to get
connected to the Internet. I assume it'll be via one of the unmetered deals
- Freeserve, BT, maybe even AOL or Compuserve.
Does anyone have any information that would help me choose the best service
(as opposed to just the
Have you already ruled out wires-only ADSL?
My mother was asking me the other day about the best way for them to get
connected to the Internet. I assume it'll be via one of the unmetered deals
- Freeserve, BT, maybe even AOL or Compuserve.
Does anyone have any information that would help
On Mon, 15 Apr 2002, Dave Cross wrote:
My mother was asking me the other day about the best way for them to get
connected to the Internet. I assume it'll be via one of the unmetered deals
- Freeserve, BT, maybe even AOL or Compuserve.
Does anyone have any information that would help me
My mother was asking me the other day about the best way for them to get
connected to the Internet. I assume it'll be via one of the unmetered deals
- Freeserve, BT, maybe even AOL or Compuserve.
Does anyone have any information that would help me choose the best service
(as opposed
-Original Message-
From: Dave Cross [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 15 April 2002 08:40
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Ask london.pm: Unmetered ISPs
My mother was asking me the other day about the best way for
them to get
connected to the Internet. I assume it'll be via one
On Mon, 15 Apr 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the hatter hatter wrote, with reguards to demon:
From 12ukp/month and normal bt minutes prices, with static IP and no
kick-offs, then you can F+F/FF it or surftime it through BT for
cheap/free calls, or pay extra to demon for cheaper/free
on 15/4/02 10:19 am, Dave Cross wrote:
Not completely. But cost is pretty important here. How cheap can a wires-only
ADSL deal go?
20 quid a month Ex VAT (23 quid inc), no installation (just need to buy a
router and microfilter) - Pipex.
http://www.xtreme.pipex.net/adsl/sales/solutions/solo.shtml
claims 19.95/month ex VAT and no setup fee.
I don't know how long it takes to set up or whether or not the
the exchange in question is ready. I suspect with those
prices there may be a bit of queue.
- Mark
Not completely. But cost
On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 08:40:23AM +0100, Dave Cross wrote:
My mother was asking me the other day about the best way for them to get
connected to the Internet. I assume it'll be via one of the unmetered deals
- Freeserve, BT, maybe even AOL or Compuserve.
Does anyone have any information
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Mark Blackman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I don't know how long it takes to set up or whether or not the
the exchange in question is ready. I suspect with those
prices there may be a bit of queue.
On the three occasions I've got Pipex wires-only set up, the
On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 08:54:08AM +0200, Newton, Philip wrote:
Paul Makepeace wrote:
``Must posts have list named in destination (to, cc) field
(or be among the acceptable alias names, specified below)? YES''
AFAIK, the only practical upshot to legit posters is that you
can't bcc
- Freeserve, BT, maybe even AOL or Compuserve.
Does anyone have any information that would help me choose
the best service (as opposed to just the cheapest) for them?
Well, best service is very hard to determine. I still find Demon to be
the best IP service around because I always find it
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Your mail to 'london.pm' with the subject
[ANNOUNCE] Test Test...
Is being held until the list moderator can review it for approval.
The reason it is being held:
Message has implicit destination
Either the message will get posted to the list, or
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Your request to the london.pm mailing list
Posting of your message titled [ANNOUNCE] Test Test...
has been rejected by the list moderator. The moderator gave the
following reason for rejecting your request:
Blind carbon copies or other implicit
On 15/04/2002 at 13:50 +0100, Paul Makepeace wrote:
On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 08:54:08AM +0200, Newton, Philip wrote:
Will this cause a problems for posts to london.pm-announce? It is
subscribed to london.pm so posts to announce get to the main list... but
doesn't -announce just pass on the
Paul Mison wrote:
Announce is a seperate list, but to save people having to subscribe to
it seperately, or to remember to unsub, [EMAIL PROTECTED] is a
member of the list too.
And this is a Good Thing, IMO. Announce was created for low-volume people,
but the high-volume sadists should also
-Original Message-
From: Newton, Philip [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 15 April 2002 14:49
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Test Test...
Newton, Philip wrote:
Hello, this is just a test of the announce list.
Let's see whether it's still allowed to post
On Mon, 15 Apr 2002, Oliver Smith wrote:
- Freeserve, BT, maybe even AOL or Compuserve.
Does anyone have any information that would help me choose
the best service (as opposed to just the cheapest) for them?
Well, best service is very hard to determine. I still find Demon to be
the
On Sat, Apr 13, 2002 at 09:10:19AM -0700, Paul Makepeace wrote:
Owing to an increase in spam that your trusty(?) custodians
london.pm-admin have to deal with[1] I have switched on mailman's
``Must posts have list named in destination (to, cc) field (or be among
the acceptable alias names,
Please be aware of the cross post! Best to reply only to me...
I have a 17 monitor in the boot of the car that is too heavy for me
to carry up to my flat and my mum does not want any more. It was
as ex-asset at an ex-employer of Neil's. If anyone can make use of
it, plese let me know becaue
21 matches
Mail list logo
