age-
> From: Lsr On Behalf Of Joel M. Halpern
> Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2021 5:52 AM
> To: tom petch ; lsr@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Lsr] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-liu-lsr-p2poverlan-00.txt
>
> Tom, please look at the latest revision and see if that helps.
>
> Also note, th
still of the opinion that it is not needed.
> >
> > Les
> >
> >
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: Lsr On Behalf Of Joel M. Halpern
> >> Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2021 5:52 AM
> >> To: tom petch ; lsr@ietf.org
> >> Subject: Re: [Ls
alf Of tom petch
Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2021 1:43 AM
To: Joel M. Halpern ; Harold Liu
; lsr@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Lsr] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-liu-lsr-p2poverlan-00.txt
From: Joel M. Halpern
Sent: 22 June 2021 09:57
Do Les' suggested edits address your concerns.
We will apply yor changes t
.
Les
> -Original Message-
> From: Lsr On Behalf Of tom petch
> Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2021 1:43 AM
> To: Joel M. Halpern ; Harold Liu
> ; lsr@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Lsr] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-liu-lsr-p2poverlan-00.txt
>
> From: Joel M. Halpern
> Sent: 22
nal Message-
> From: Lsr On Behalf Of tom petch
> Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2021 1:43 AM
> To: Joel M. Halpern ; Harold Liu
> ; lsr@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Lsr] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-liu-lsr-p2poverlan-00.txt
>
> From: Joel M. Halpern
> Sent: 22 June 2021 09:57
&
> For example, if no entry saying p2pOverLan layer over ethernet, the
>> management will suffer since lose the ability to get to the
>> Ethernet-specific management properties (Ethernet MIB or YANG model) via
>> many tools; So we propose this draft to define a compl
lan-00-rev%2520Med.docx
Cheers,
Med
-Message d'origine-
De : Lsr [mailto:lsr-boun...@ietf.org] De la part de Joel M. Halpern
Envoyé : mercredi 16 juin 2021 22:47 À : Acee Lindem (acee)
; lsr@ietf.org Objet : Re: [Lsr] Fwd: I-D Action:
draft-liu-lsr-p2poverlan-00.txt
This document (an
tom petch
> ; Harold Liu
> ; lsr@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Lsr] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-liu-lsr-p2poverlan-00.txt
>
> The change Tom has proposed to the IANA considerations section is fine
> with me.
>
> If there are other specific changes that will make it clearer, I and my
> c
he Ethernet-specific
> management properties (Ethernet MIB or YANG model) via many tools; So we
> propose this draft to define a complete p2pOverLan ifStack(Including higher
> layer and lower layer);
>
> Brs
>
> -----Original Message-
> From: mohamed.boucad...@orange.co
AM
To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) ; tom petch
; Harold Liu
; lsr@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Lsr] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-liu-lsr-p2poverlan-00.txt
The change Tom has proposed to the IANA considerations section is fine
with me.
If there are other specific changes that will make it clearer, I and my
co-a
t; >
> >> -----Original Message-
> >> From: Joel Halpern Direct
> >> Sent: Monday, June 21, 2021 8:13 AM
> >> To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) ; tom petch
> >> ; Harold Liu
> >> ; lsr@ietf.org
> >> Subject: Re: [Lsr] Fwd: I-D Action:
is confusing.
Les
-Original Message-
From: Joel Halpern Direct
Sent: Monday, June 21, 2021 8:13 AM
To: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) ; tom petch
; Harold Liu
; lsr@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Lsr] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-liu-lsr-p2poverlan-00.txt
Les, I am missing something ion both your and Tom's
sberg) ; tom petch
> ; Harold Liu
> ; lsr@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Lsr] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-liu-lsr-p2poverlan-00.txt
>
> Les, I am missing something ion both your and Tom's comments. 5309
> didn't define the ifType. If you look at 5309, it has no IANA
> considerations at al
isting reference.
Les
-Original Message-
From: Lsr On Behalf Of Joel M. Halpern
Sent: Monday, June 21, 2021 7:13 AM
To: tom petch ; Harold Liu
; lsr@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Lsr] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-liu-lsr-p2poverlan-00.txt
Tom, 5309 did not define the ifType. Go read 5
Of Joel M. Halpern
> Sent: Monday, June 21, 2021 7:13 AM
> To: tom petch ; Harold Liu
> ; lsr@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Lsr] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-liu-lsr-p2poverlan-00.txt
>
> Tom, 5309 did not define the ifType. Go read 5309. You seem to have
> gotten confused by the fact t
-
From: mohamed.boucad...@orange.com
Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2021 2:16 PM
To: Joel M. Halpern ; draft-liu-lsr-p2pover...@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [Lsr] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-liu-lsr-p2poverlan-00.txt
Hi Joel, all,
Please find some quick comments to this draft, fwiw:
* pdf:
https://protect2.fire
-
From: mohamed.boucad...@orange.com
Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2021 2:16 PM
To: Joel M. Halpern ; draft-liu-lsr-p2pover...@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [Lsr] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-liu-lsr-p2poverlan-00.txt
Hi Joel, all,
Please find some quick comments to this draft, fwiw:
* pdf:
https://protect2.fire
.@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [Lsr] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-liu-lsr-p2poverlan-00.txt
Hi Joel, all,
Please find some quick comments to this draft, fwiw:
* pdf:
https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=e8e7d1aa-b77ce948-e8e79131-86073b36ea28-edbd778070bbec9a=1=d4a020c9-b337-41fd-bf1b-56dcfaef1044=h
From: Joel M. Halpern
Sent: 18 June 2021 17:41
How can we clarify the wording. If it is misleading you, we need to
improve it. The text is not asking to create an entry (i.e. it does
not "ask for an assignment"), but rather to change an entry that already
exists. (And obviously, it won't do
How can we clarify the wording. If it is misleading you, we need to
improve it. The text is not asking to create an entry (i.e. it does
not "ask for an assignment"), but rather to change an entry that already
exists. (And obviously, it won't do so until and if the document
becomes an RFC.)
From: Joel M. Halpern
Sent: 18 June 2021 16:29
Tom, I am not sure what you mean by "the update has happened"> The code
point has been assigned. Assuming this document becomes an RFC, it will
be significantly clearer if the 303 code point IANA entry points at this
for information instead of
Tom, I am not sure what you mean by "the update has happened"> The code
point has been assigned. Assuming this document becomes an RFC, it will
be significantly clearer if the 303 code point IANA entry points at this
for information instead of 5309. So this document requests that update.
From: Lsr on behalf of Joel M. Halpern
Sent: 16 June 2021 21:46
This document (and the code point) are intended to be in line with 5309.
I believe they are. If we got it wrong, please help us fix it.
A reference would be reasonable to add. (The IANA entry for the code
point does reference
This document (and the code point) are intended to be in line with 5309.
I believe they are. If we got it wrong, please help us fix it.
A reference would be reasonable to add. (The IANA entry for the code
point does reference 5309.)
Thank you,
Joel
On 6/16/2021 4:41 PM, Acee Lindem
Hi Joel,
At first I wondered where this document should reside and then decided that LSR
is probably as good as any other place.
Can you guys check whether it is mostly in line with
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc5309/ and comment as to whether it should
be referenced?
Thanks,
Acee
Recently, Ericsson requested and received an IF Type assignment from
IANA (with expert review) for point-to-point over Ethernet links.
It was noted during the discussion around the assignment that a document
(eventually, we hope, an RFC) describing how to use that and why we
asked for it
26 matches
Mail list logo
