Grendel wrote:
Hi, I will talk about the server I use in another mail ;-) it's
unbelievable that it works with 8 clients :-) In the end the
performance are equal to a light PC? I've surf the network and found
some thin clients with different CPUs. What kind of advantages have a
thin client wi
Hi,
I will talk about the server I use in another mail ;-) it's unbelievable
that it works with 8 clients :-)
In the end the performance are equal to a light PC? I've surf the
network and found some thin clients with different CPUs. What kind of
advantages have a thin client with a faster CPU th
PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, 30 October 2030 11:21 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Ltsp-discuss] LTSP - hardware choise
Hi,
I have an LTSP lab with 10 clients in a school where I work. It works well.
For the clients do you suggest to use a light PCs or a thin-clients?
And if the clients are more than
Grendel wrote:
Hi,
I have an LTSP lab with 10 clients in a school where I work. It works
well.
For the clients do you suggest to use a light PCs or a thin-clients?
And if the clients are more than 10?
Thanks in advance,
Enrico
If you plan to buy new hardware, I'd suggest to choose thin clients.
Hi,
I have an LTSP lab with 10 clients in a school where I work. It works well.
For the clients do you suggest to use a light PCs or a thin-clients?
And if the clients are more than 10?
Thanks in advance,
Enrico
---
This SF.net email is sponsore
Offray:
On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 08:24:40PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi William,
>
> I would like to see a project like that come to life.
Me too! It's coming along, pretty much on schedule.
> I am not a hacker, so I can help little at this moment and I have no
> much money (My son's
Hi William,
I would like to see a project like that come to life. I am not a hacker,
so I can help little at this moment and I have no much money (My son's
salary comes from my mom :-) ). I wonder how can I help. I would like a
"Open Source Hardware Solution". I know, I know: software and hardwar
Guys:
I'm kicking around a notion to build a designed-for-LTSP single board
computer. The device would be powered by a non-Intel chip, have
onboard video, usb and ethernet, and an extremely rugged, tamper-proof
case that would come in around the size of a pack of playing cards.
The unit price
Il giorno Mon, 22 Apr 2002, Odd Mortensen così ha scritto:
|From: Odd Mortensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
|To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
|<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
|Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2002 12:54:42 GMT
|Subject: [Ltsp-discuss] LTSP - hardware
|
|Hey from Norway,
|I like to now hwat is
>Yes, you can run on a much smaller server. That example is
>for a company who has 110 terminals.
>If you want only 20 to 25 terminals, you could go with a much
>smaller server, but it really depends on the applications that
>you are using.
Actually for 20-25 users the stated machine doesn't see
Odd,
Yes, you can run on a much smaller server. That example is
for a company who has 110 terminals.
If you want only 20 to 25 terminals, you could go with a much
smaller server, but it really depends on the applications that
you are using.
I strongly recommend going with a lightweight window
Hey from Norway,
I like to now hwat is the min.I must use in hardware to run LTSP on
about 20 to 25 workstations. Ihave read in the introduction in
LTSP v 3.0, it says a "Dual PIII - 650 with 1GB RAM" ???.
Is it not possible to run on lesser config???
I meen to read an other spec.
(S
Hello All
I think the good people at LTSP should publish a list
of hardware compatible with LTSP in particular the network cards and VGA
cards.
Most of the problems on the list will be eliminated.
The major advantage would be that anyone using LTSP would become productive
quickly without
PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2001 1:47 PM
Subject: Re: [Ltsp-discuss] ltsp hardware
> I am using my laptop with ltsp because it is basically silent without the
> drive spinning. I just used lilo to do the inital boot instead
Ah, I see. Sorry for muddying the waters; and thanks for the explanation.
-emile
On Wed, 10 Oct 2001, Jason A. Pattie wrote:
> Nope. You still need the user-space cardmgr service running. It's what
> does everything, for the moment. It interacts with the kernel
> modules/drivers to set th
e mine a shot and
>>maybe add a contrib of how to do this
>>
>>- Original Message -----
>>From: "Alan C" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2001 3:50 PM
>>Subject: [Ltsp-discuss] ltsp hardware
Alan C" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2001 3:50 PM
> Subject: [Ltsp-discuss] ltsp hardware
>
>
> >
> > Is anyone compiling a list of good hardware for ltsp?
> > Specifically PCI and PCMCIA network cards, an
am going to give mine a shot and
>maybe add a contrib of how to do this
>
>- Original Message -
>From: "Alan C" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2001 3:50 PM
>Subject: [Ltsp-discuss] ltsp hardware
>
&g
October 10, 2001 3:50 PM
Subject: [Ltsp-discuss] ltsp hardware
>
> Is anyone compiling a list of good hardware for ltsp?
> Specifically PCI and PCMCIA network cards, and flash disks for
non-bootable cards.
> Some posts to Ltsp-discuss suggest that some kit is a bit iffy, and there
Am Mittwoch, 10. Oktober 2001 17:50 schrieb Alan C:
> Is anyone compiling a list of good hardware for ltsp?
> Specifically PCI and PCMCIA network cards, and flash disks for
For the network cards have a look at http://etherboot.sourceforge.net/db/
Georg
__
Is anyone compiling a list of good hardware for ltsp?
Specifically PCI and PCMCIA network cards, and flash disks for non-bootable cards.
Some posts to Ltsp-discuss suggest that some kit is a bit iffy, and there has been
some negative press about linux and tulip cards.
I plan to use a notebooks a
21 matches
Mail list logo
