Hello,
I'm using openoffice 1.1.0
Antonio Teixeira
Subject: Re: [Ltsp-discuss] SEgmentation Fault
From: Sudev Barar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2004 20:18:38 +0530
On Thu, 2004-12-16 at 17:04, atex wrote:
> Now my problem is that when I try tu use
On Thu, 2004-12-16 at 17:04, atex wrote:
> Now my problem is that when I try tu use openoffice in the client I got
> a message "segmentation fault" and returns to the prompt. If started in
> X it does nothing.
Which version of OpenOffice?
--
Sudev Barar
Learning Linux
-
Hello,
Before anything else thanks to all people that help me about "can't put
this thing work with a switch".
Using recente nic's I put the system to work.
Now my problem is that when I try tu use openoffice in the client I got
a message "segmentation fault" and returns to the prompt. If started
On Mon, 15 Jul 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> John,
>
> You are getting 'fragmented packet' on your tftp requests.
>
> That might be a problem. Maybe your MTU is low, and that
> could be causing a problem.
>
> Can you do this command:
>
>
> ifconfig -a
>
>
> and show me the results ?
>
> Th
On Mon, 15 Jul 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> John,
>
> You are getting 'fragmented packet' on your tftp requests.
>
> That might be a problem. Maybe your MTU is low, and that
> could be causing a problem.
>
> Can you do this command:
>
>
> ifconfig -a
>
> and show me the results ?
Sure th
John,
You are getting 'fragmented packet' on your tftp requests.
That might be a problem. Maybe your MTU is low, and that
could be causing a problem.
Can you do this command:
ifconfig -a
and show me the results ?
Thanks,
Jim McQuillan
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 15 Jul 2002, John Karn
On Fri, 12 Jul 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> John,
>
> I've missed the first part of the problem. Which binary are
> you trying to run that results in the segfault ?
It seems to be dhclient. Some of the details of my config are:
Server: Asus P5a mobo, w/ AMD K6-II 500Mhz uP, Realtek 8139 NI
On Fri, 12 Jul 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> You can change the 'rw' in /etc/exports all you want, but it
> still wont' make the workstation mount it in read-write mode.
>
> That is controlled by the mount command inside the /linuxrc script
> that is in the initrd.
*** Oh yes, sorry my mistak
You can change the 'rw' in /etc/exports all you want, but it
still wont' make the workstation mount it in read-write mode.
That is controlled by the mount command inside the /linuxrc script
that is in the initrd.
Jim McQuillan
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 12 Jul 2002, John_Cuzzola wrote:
>
>
>
*** Here something that might help you track down where the problem
is. On the server Change to the root directory of the ltsp client. (For
LTSP V2 its /tftpboot/lts/ltsroot for V3 its in /opt). Now look for any
core (or core.) files
find -name core*
and delete them.
Now edit /etc/exports
John,
I've missed the first part of the problem. Which binary are
you trying to run that results in the segfault ?
Jim McQuillan
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 12 Jul 2002, John Karns wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Jul 2002, John Karns said:
>
> > That's the part I wasn't sure about. Actually, I was thinki
On Tue, 9 Jul 2002, John Karns said:
> That's the part I wasn't sure about. Actually, I was thinking that the DC
> perhaps was getting the dhclient binary which resides on the server and
> executing it from within the LTSP environment, which uses a different set
> of libraries than those which t
On Tue, 9 Jul 2002, Jason Bechtel said:
> > On Tue, 9 Jul 2002, Jason Bechtel said:
> >> As I said, "with otherwise proven software". I take it
> >> Sophos is a precompiled binary. In that case, sure. Your
> >> underlying system libraries could have an effect,
> >> especially the way Red Hat like
> On Tue, 9 Jul 2002, Jason Bechtel said:
>> As I said, "with otherwise proven software". I take it
>> Sophos is a precompiled binary. In that case, sure. Your
>> underlying system libraries could have an effect,
>> especially the way Red Hat likes to play with versions
of
>> glibc... But in this
On Tue, 9 Jul 2002, Jason Bechtel said:
> Julius,
>
> As I said, "with otherwise proven software". I take it
> Sophos is a precompiled binary. In that case, sure. Your
> underlying system libraries could have an effect,
> especially the way Red Hat likes to play with versions of
> glibc... Bu
2002 21:22:21 -0400 (EDT)
> From: Julius Szelagiewicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [Ltsp-discuss] segmentation fault
>
> Jason,
> try this for size: same physical machine, sophos
mailmonitor and
> antivirys package dies with segmentation fault under
rh7.3 and runs fin
Jason,
try this for size: same physical machine, sophos mailmonitor and
antivirys package dies with segmentation fault under rh7.3 and runs fine
under rh7.2. i dare say it is the software, not the hardware. julius
On Mon, 8 Jul 2002, Jason Bechtel wrote:
> John,
>
> For me, seg. fault im
John,
For me, seg. fault immediately implies hardware problem (at
least with otherwise proven software). See below for more
comments...
> From: John Karns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [Ltsp-discuss] segmentation fault
>
> On Sun, 7 Jul 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
&
On Sun, 7 Jul 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> Hi John,
> from my experience I had seg faults for different reasons.
> Hardware related:
> One was bad ram, the other a bad mobo (on our ltsp-machines).
> I also had seg faults on my personal machine for different (software related).
> Check if it's
Hi John,
from my experience I had seg faults for different reasons.
Hardware related:
One was bad ram, the other a bad mobo (on our ltsp-machines).
I also had seg faults on my personal machine for different (software related).
Check if it's defietely not a hardware prob.
(This is from the view o
I have installed ltsp on a SuSE 7.3 server from the compressed tar files.
The client makes it through the boot process about 20% of the time, seg
faulting the rest of the time when running dhclient after DL'ing the
kernel from the server. I've DL'd the latest dhcp source from ISC and
compiled and
21 matches
Mail list logo
