On Fri, May 17, 2002 at 07:59:43AM +0200, Herbert Voss wrote:
> reading the attached 1.1.6 file with latest cvs gives
> a lot of errors. maybe most of them are math-related??
They are (I think even all of them).
In fact it's the parser dropping to much braces ;-{
\dpa{\mathbf{B}} get read as \
On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 05:47:10PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> Already this is likely to clash with GUII :(
> How seriously I don't know.
>
> > - better .tex -> .lyx coversion
>
> Luckily independent (you mean python-relyx yes ?)
I don't mean anything special regarding languages etc. I just
On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 05:43:00PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 04:19:34PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> > I would much prefer trying to draw up a list of planned major and even
> > minor changes, and trying to keep to it.
>
> Ok... a few things on my agenda:
>
> global
Rod Pinna wrote:
>
> This works on my file. I now get the same output as 1.1.6. Haven't had an
> extensive play with it though, so I can't comment on anything else the
> patch does.
>
>>
>>>Just opened a file of mine, from 1.1.6fix4, which has a number of
>>>non-floating eps files. The output f
reading the attached 1.1.6 file with latest cvs gives
a lot of errors. maybe most of them are math-related??
Herbert
--
http://www.lyx.org/help/
test.tgz
Description: Binary data
On Thu, 16 May 2002, Angus Leeming wrote:
> On Thursday 16 May 2002 6:20 am, Allan Rae wrote:
[...]
> > Allan. (ARRae)
>
> Why don't you read the bloody code before talking a pile of crap?
Not all the pile was crap but after reading the code I now see that
some of it might have been.
> There ar
On Thu, 16 May 2002, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 03:33:50PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > Isn't that what branches are for? Why don't we set up a GUII branch and play
> > there. Ditto André/Jürgen could set up a RewriteCursorCodeToUseMetrics
> > branch. It isn't too hard to m
Herbert et al,
This works on my file. I now get the same output as 1.1.6. Haven't had an
extensive play with it though, so I can't comment on anything else the
patch does.
Rod
On Thu, 16 May 2002, Herbert Voss wrote:
> Rod Pinna wrote:
>
> >
> > Just opened a file of mine, from 1.1.6fix4, w
On Fri, May 17, 2002 at 11:18:12AM +0900, Shigeru Miyata wrote:
> I am going to submit a patch for xforms when I can find a time, but
> on the second thought, an OS/2 support patch I sent a year and a half
> ago was not been incorporated in xforms-0.
This was before the proper merge of patch
Philipp Reichmuth wrote:
> Would it seem a good idea to merge the CJK patch for support of
> multibyte character sets with the main trunk sometime in the near
> future (such as for 1.3)?
No. The CJK patch is not something we want to see merged with its
current status, and xforms-0. is not so
On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 05:47:10PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 05:43:00PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> > - better .tex -> .lyx coversion
>
> Luckily independent (you mean python-relyx yes ?)
Yes. That's mine.
---Kayvan
--
Kayvan A. Sylvan
Kornel Benko wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>
> On Thursday 16 May 2002 18:53, Herbert Voss wrote:
>
>>can someone confirm?
>>
>
> No, working here.
ok, I see,
thanks
Herbert
--
http://www.lyx.org/help/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Thursday 16 May 2002 18:53, Herbert Voss wrote:
> can someone confirm?
No, working here.
Kornel
- --
Kornel Benko
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 6.5.8
iQCVAwUBPOQRZbewfbDGmeqhAQGD0AQAiWs0Vcrb+9Z2qSkkFirMDidcToKfnNyt
A
Rod Pinna wrote:
>
> Just opened a file of mine, from 1.1.6fix4, which has a number of
> non-floating eps files. The output from latex has these is incorrectly
> sized. The graphics are scaled to a percentage of the paper width.
>
>
> Actually, I see, the new version has a "text%" option, whic
Would it seem a good idea to merge the CJK patch for support of
multibyte character sets with the main trunk sometime in the near
future (such as for 1.3)?
Supporting a whole extra version of LyX is probably a pain in the
rear. Moreover, merging it in would be a good step towards Unicode/Omega su
On Thursday 16 May 2002 6:20 pm, John Levon wrote:
> So, Lars, can we have a branch ??
Hes' on holiday I believe. Why don't you see if you can create one and commit
to it...
Angus
On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 06:14:05PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> But will mean that you can take people along with you. Dumping a huge change
> on us will mean that you're the only one who knows what's going on at all.
Perhaps. But bear in mind that in fact the changes are conceptually very
ver
On Thursday 16 May 2002 6:01 pm, John Levon wrote:
> On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 06:00:38PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > > But how can we tell it works without compiling and testing ?
> >
> > Well that's it. I'd like to get each logical change up and running
> > properly.
>
> This will certainly be
On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 06:00:38PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > But how can we tell it works without compiling and testing ?
>
> Well that's it. I'd like to get each logical change up and running properly.
This will certainly be slow, although I doubt it will be sure.
I suppose this is the
On Thursday 16 May 2002 5:43 pm, John Levon wrote:
> On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 05:28:10PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > That's what I meant. One logical change at a time, then does it work with
> > xforms and with Qt? Great, let's make the next logical change.
>
> But how can we tell it works with
can someone confirm?
- open new doc
- choose document->class->book(koma class)
- choose document->language->spanish
- write a word
-> dvi-view gives an error
the command
\addto\extrasspanish{\bbl@deactivate{~}}
is unknown
Herbert
--
http://www.lyx.org/help/
On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 05:43:00PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> - context sensitive keybindings
Already this is likely to clash with GUII :(
How seriously I don't know.
> - better .tex -> .lyx coversion
Luckily independent (you mean python-relyx yes ?)
> - the "cursor stuff"
MA
On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 05:28:10PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> That's what I meant. One logical change at a time, then does it work with
> xforms and with Qt? Great, let's make the next logical change.
But how can we tell it works without compiling and testing ?
Anyway, Qt is NOT important r
On Thursday 16 May 2002 5:23 pm, John Levon wrote:
> On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 04:29:19PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > We should gradually filter your own personal tree into the branch.
>
> Would that it were so easy, unless you are prepared to take merges that
> leave an uncompilable lyx. The na
On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 04:29:19PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> We should gradually filter your own personal tree into the branch.
Would that it were so easy, unless you are prepared to take merges that
leave an uncompilable lyx. The nature of the beast makes it near
impossible to split things
On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 08:56:51AM -0700, Kayvan A. Sylvan wrote:
> It is now in ftp://ftp.sylvan.com/pub/lyx/devel
I just noticed that the dependencies are "redhat like".
There is neither tetex-latex nor tetex-dvi on SuSE, the stuff is in
te_latex and tetex proper.
[OTOH, SuSE users a used to
I haven't paid any attention to these different make targets. Could someone
tell me which one I should use if I wanted to make a tarball for the DEC
Alpha users out there? "make dist"?
And can I build that with src dir != build dir?
Angus
On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 05:36:16PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 08:16:52AM -0700, Kayvan A. Sylvan wrote:
> > > How does rpm now what spec file to use?
> >
> > It looks for a spec file in the tarball.
>
> Ok. It works when build with sourcedir == builddir and automake 1
On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 04:19:34PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> I would much prefer trying to draw up a list of planned major and even
> minor changes, and trying to keep to it.
Ok... a few things on my agenda:
global
- context sensitive keybindings
- better .tex -> .lyx coversion
-
On Thursday 16 May 2002 4:36 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> PS: I've put a lyx-1.2.0pre5-1-suse73.i386.rpm into yur incoming/forlyx.
> Actually it was called lyx-1.3.0cvs-1.i386.rpm, but we are not in the
> 1.3.0series, are we?
Since Lars moved 1.2 off into it's own branch, we are yes.
Angus
On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 08:16:52AM -0700, Kayvan A. Sylvan wrote:
> > How does rpm now what spec file to use?
>
> It looks for a spec file in the tarball.
Ok. It works when build with sourcedir == builddir and automake 1.5
(neither 1.4 nor 1.6). Should be documented somehow. Maybe even some kin
On Thursday 16 May 2002 4:18 pm, John Levon wrote:
> On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 03:33:50PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > Isn't that what branches are for?
>
> To a degree. But big changes like GUII and not going to play well with
> other big changes.
>
> > Why don't we set up a GUII branch and play
On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 04:56:01PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> In the end everything will be a big mess, and we declare "fix up time",
Isn't this what happened with the abandoned development tree ?
I would much prefer trying to draw up a list of planned major and even
minor changes, and tryin
On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 03:33:50PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Isn't that what branches are for?
To a degree. But big changes like GUII and not going to play well with
other big changes.
> Why don't we set up a GUII branch and play there.
Yes please, at least temporarily. I need some help un
On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 05:01:31PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 03:27:09PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> > And are they ? (in spec file)
>
> Where is the spec file anyway? (I have not used 'rpm -ta' yet)
>
> development/lyx.spec?
>
> There isn't any in the .tar.gz...
Yes,
On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 03:27:09PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> And are they ? (in spec file)
Where is the spec file anyway? (I have not used 'rpm -ta' yet)
development/lyx.spec?
There isn't any in the .tar.gz...
How does rpm now what spec file to use?
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Fre
On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 03:33:50PM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Isn't that what branches are for? Why don't we set up a GUII branch and play
> there. Ditto André/Jürgen could set up a RewriteCursorCodeToUseMetrics
> branch. It isn't too hard to maintain a branch against changes in head if the
On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 02:52:14PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 02:46:04PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> > And you are sure you do not have any strange .deps or .libs dirs
> > w/files?
>
> This is 'rm -rf lyx-devel lyx-build ; cvs co lyx-devel ; cd lyx-devel ;
> .
On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 11:12:18AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> Is there anything special required to run this?
>
> I was trying it for the first time and got soon stuck with
>
>
> make[4]: Entering directory `/usr/src/lyx/lyx-devel/src/frontends/qt2/xforms'
> make[4]: *** No rule to make t
On Thursday 16 May 2002 3:21 pm, John Levon wrote:
> On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 03:20:08PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
> > (partly to keep the cycle shorter, partly to work out what hierarchy
>
> I'm glad to hear I'm not the only one worried about 1.3. With the
> current stuff slated for it, it won't be
On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 03:35:36PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> Ok. 1.5.1 now.
Where do we document this ?
Thou must use 1.5.1. No more, no less. 1.5.1 must be the number thou
must use, and the number of the use must be 1.5.1. 1.6 shalt thou not
use, nor either use thou 1.4, excepting that tho
On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 03:20:08PM +1000, Allan Rae wrote:
> (partly to keep the cycle shorter, partly to work out what hierarchy
I'm glad to hear I'm not the only one worried about 1.3. With the
current stuff slated for it, it won't be out until 2004 :(
regards
john
--
"It is very difficult
Hi all,
I just fell across a problem when I loaded an old (1.1.6) file into
lyx 1.2pre5:
It's a very ugly file, as I had to work alot with ERT. The old file
contained
\latex latex
\backslash
begin{multicols*}{2}[
\backslash
section*{
\color blue
{
\backslash
On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 01:50:26PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> (unless some qt2 stuff uses things from it)
No. Nuke away (after ignoring my nuking patch twice I believe :P)
john
--
"It is very difficult to prophesy, especially when it pertains to the
future."
- Patrick Kurzaw
Hello PAP, I send my answer to lyx-devel too, because
I do not have much time right now.
I do not understand why the change to kluwer.layout may
help figure captions, but maybe someone else will :)
Concerning latexconfig.yx, I think the problem you see has
been corrected some time ago. Did you
On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 03:06:15PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> rpm -q automake
> automake-1.5-8
Ok. 1.5.1 now.
Building Makefile templates...
.
src/Makefile.am:12: LIBS was set with `+=' and is now set with `='
src/frontend
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | It is not really a matter of 'older', but of funky GNU extension.
> | I thought you were a standards guy.
>
> Yes I am: "Ditch lyxstring now!"
Tssk, tssk... You really need this bit of vacation.
JMarc
--
-
Jean-Mar
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>>
>> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> | As far as I understand these ipfx0() and isfx() methods are nowhere to
>> | be found in the standard. If this is intended, compilation with
>> | lyxstring sho
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| I get a step further if I replace the 'noinst_' prefix with 'EXTRA_' but I
| really don't know what I am doing there...
That is not where you want to change things.
--
Lgb
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 02:46:04PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> And you are sure you do not have any strange .deps or .libs dirs
>> w/files?
>
| This is 'rm -rf lyx-devel lyx-build ; cvs co lyx-devel ; cd lyx-devel ;
| ./autogen ; cd ../lyx-bu
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | As far as I understand these ipfx0() and isfx() methods are nowhere to
> | be found in the standard. If this is intended, compilation with
> | lyxstring should only be allowed with gcc.
>
> and older dec compiler
I get a step further if I replace the 'noinst_' prefix with 'EXTRA_' but I
really don't know what I am doing there...
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| I do not know whether anybody cares, but compilation fails with
| lyxstring and compaq cxx as follows:
>
| mycxx -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../../lyx-devel/src/support -I../../src
|-I../../../lyx-devel/src/support/../ -I../../../lyx-devel -I../..
On Thursday 16 May 2002 6:20 am, Allan Rae wrote:
> > I'd like to see what you come up with instead in QPreferences though...
>
> I don't believe it! You are proposing to work around the abuse of
> input() by adding an extra way of handling inputs (what you
> euphamistically call "Suspects") whil
On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 02:46:04PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> And you are sure you do not have any strange .deps or .libs dirs
> w/files?
This is 'rm -rf lyx-devel lyx-build ; cvs co lyx-devel ; cd lyx-devel ;
./autogen ; cd ../lyx-build ; ../lyx-devel/configure'
[no script, typed by
I do not know whether anybody cares, but compilation fails with
lyxstring and compaq cxx as follows:
mycxx -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../../lyx-devel/src/support -I../../src
-I../../../lyx-devel/src/support/../ -I../../../lyx-devel -I../..
-I../../../lyx-devel/boost -I../../../lyx-devel/src/chea
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 01:30:28PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> Look lower and see the link_files target.
>>
>> It is possible that on your bot it should be
>> $(nodist_libqt2xforms_la_OBJECTS).
>
| The problem seems to be that automake fails a
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 02:02:37PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> >> It is possible that on your bot it should be
>> >> $(nodist_libqt2xforms_la_OBJECTS).
>> >
>> | Well, it is just $(libqt2xforms_la_OBJECTS)
>>
>> Yes, and:
>>
>>
>> >> It is
On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 02:02:37PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> >> It is possible that on your bot it should be
> >> $(nodist_libqt2xforms_la_OBJECTS).
> >
> | Well, it is just $(libqt2xforms_la_OBJECTS)
>
> Yes, and:
>
>
> >> It is possible that on your bot it should be
> >> $(nodist_l
On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 01:30:28PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Look lower and see the link_files target.
>
> It is possible that on your bot it should be
> $(nodist_libqt2xforms_la_OBJECTS).
The problem seems to be that automake fails and link_files is not called
afterwards.
If I touch
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 01:30:28PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> Look lower and see the link_files target.
>>
>> It is possible that on your bot it should be
>> $(nodist_libqt2xforms_la_OBJECTS).
>
| Well, it is just $(libqt2xforms_la_OBJECTS)
On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 01:30:28PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Look lower and see the link_files target.
>
> It is possible that on your bot it should be
> $(nodist_libqt2xforms_la_OBJECTS).
Well, it is just $(libqt2xforms_la_OBJECTS)
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in o
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 01:31:06PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> Perhaps (proberly), but can we first try to find out what the real problem is
>> with 1.4?
>
| Too late... I just installed 1.6.1 (but I can revert an probably will since
| this bai
"Garst R. Reese" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| shouldn't this file get nuked?
Yes it should.
(unless some qt2 stuff uses things from it)
--
Lgb
On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 01:31:06PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Perhaps (proberly), but can we first try to find out what the real problem is
> with 1.4?
Too late... I just installed 1.6.1 (but I can revert an probably will since
this bails out with:
poenitz@millo:/usr/src/lyx/lyx-devel
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 01:19:54PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> |nodist_libqt2xforms_la_SOURCES = \
>> |bmtable.h \
>> |bmtable.c \
>> |combox.h \
>> |combox.C \
>> | [.]
>> >
>> >
>> |
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 01:16:49PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> automake version please.
>>
>> I 1.5 without problems.
>
| 1.4-p5
>
| Should I upgrade?
Perhaps (proberly), but can we first try to find out what the real problem is
with 1.4?
-
On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 01:19:54PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | nodist_libqt2xforms_la_SOURCES = \
> | bmtable.h \
> | bmtable.c \
> | combox.h \
> | combox.C \
> | [.]
> >
> >
> | This somehow does not look sound
>
> To me
On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 01:16:49PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> automake version please.
>
> I 1.5 without problems.
1.4-p5
Should I upgrade?
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 11:20:59AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> Then you have something fishy in your source/build tree or on your
>> box, I use "make dist" "make distdir" and "make distcheck" all the
>> time.
>
| 'make dist' already does not wo
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| After a clean checkout I get
I never get that.
| Building Makefile templates...
| .
| src/frontends/qt2/xforms/Makefile.am:15: invalid unused variable name:
| `nodist_libqt2xforms_la_SOURCES'
| src/frontends/qt2/moc/Makefile.am:18: invalid unu
On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 11:20:59AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Then you have something fishy in your source/build tree or on your
> box, I use "make dist" "make distdir" and "make distcheck" all the
> time.
'make dist' already does not work on a clean check out.
> Are you trying to compi
After a clean checkout I get
Building Makefile templates...
.
src/frontends/qt2/xforms/Makefile.am:15: invalid unused variable name:
`nodist_libqt2xforms_la_SOURCES'
src/frontends/qt2/moc/Makefile.am:18: invalid unused variable name:
`nodist_libqt2moc_la_SOURCES'
src/frontends/qt2/ui/Make
"Garst R. Reese" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
>> I do not think that this is the solution that we really want, on my
>> box. libpspell is a libtool library: libpspell.la
>> I do not know how other boxes does this, do they also have a libtool
>> lib?
>>
>> I wonder w
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Is there anything special required to run this?
>
| I was trying it for the first time and got soon stuck with
>
>
| make[4]: Entering directory `/usr/src/lyx/lyx-devel/src/frontends/qt2/xforms'
| make[4]: *** No rule to make target `libqt2xforms.la.c',
Is there anything special required to run this?
I was trying it for the first time and got soon stuck with
make[4]: Entering directory `/usr/src/lyx/lyx-devel/src/frontends/qt2/xforms'
make[4]: *** No rule to make target `libqt2xforms.la.c', needed by `distdir'.
Andre'
--
Those who desire
I just created the 1.2.x branch,
and just put rc1 out.
On Rc1 I only want to fix blatant compilation errors or configure
install errors, and only if the errors are important enough.
The pspell fix does not cut it so far.
I am leaving for the weekend + monday later today, so I do not want to
re
77 matches
Mail list logo
