Dear LyX Developers,
I am writing this e-mail for a couple of reasons. First, I wanted to
generally say thank you for creating a fantastic program. LyX is my
favorite writing environment. It was my first introduction to LaTeX and the
concept of "WYSIWYM" editing. Each iteration of the
On Wednesday 04 March 2009 00:09:49 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> In Fedora 11 the errors might probably be fixed by usinging a more up to
> date boost (1.38 f.ex.) and --without-included-boost. For all others
> stuck with an older boost no such luck. So I have a Q: Would you like me
> to upgrade
Andre Poenitz
writes:
| On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 08:20:34AM +0100, Peter Kümmel wrote:
>>> I think I'll just go and hide beneath my rock again ;-)
>>
>> Maybe you are interested in replacing boost with 'real' C++: TR1.
>
| I tried replacing our
As part of job related work I am investigating and using git quite a
lot. I wondered if some of you might be interrested in testing out using
git when doing LyX development. (For all I know several of you already
are...)
If there are interest I'll try to setup a git tree that you can clone
and
lar...@gullik.net (Lars Gullik Bjønnes)
writes:
| Andre Poenitz
|
| writes:
>
| | On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 08:20:34AM +0100, Peter Kümmel wrote:
I think I'll just go and hide beneath my rock again ;-)
>>>
>>> Maybe you are interested in replacing
Rob Oakes wrote:
> In particular, there are a few features I would love to develop (either as
> plug-ins/extensions or part of the main program). However, I do not know
> how such features are proposed to the developer community at large. What
> is the best way to go about this? At the moment,
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> If there are interest I'll try to setup a git tree that you can clone
> and set up as a git-svn tree.
> (I'll even write up a wiki page to explain briefly how to do that.)
Personally, I would be interested in that (although I do not have
experiences with git yet).
Le 4 mars 09 à 20:46, Juergen Spitzmueller a écrit :
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
This should eventually go to branch, but there is no need to hurry.
The decision is up to you.
Since I may be the only one noticing it, I guess it can wait for 1.6.3.
JMarc
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Since I may be the only one noticing it, I guess it can wait for 1.6.3.
OK, fine.
Jürgen
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
As part of job related work I am investigating and using git quite a
lot. I wondered if some of you might be interrested in testing out using
git when doing LyX development. (For all I know several of you already
are...)
If there are interest I'll try to setup a git
On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 09:26:27PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> As part of job related work I am investigating and using git quite a
> lot.
I thought you were doing Qt programming? ;-)
> I wondered if some of you might be interrested in testing out using
> git when doing LyX development.
Andre Poenitz
writes:
| On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 09:26:27PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> As part of job related work I am investigating and using git quite a
>> lot.
>
| I thought you were doing Qt programming? ;-)
>
>> I wondered if some of you
Peter Kümmel writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> As part of job related work I am investigating and using git quite a
>> lot. I wondered if some of you might be interrested in testing out using
>> git when doing LyX development. (For all I know several of you already
>>
lar...@gullik.net (Lars Gullik Bjønnes)
writes:
| Peter Kümmel writes:
>
| | Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>>> As part of job related work I am investigating and using git quite a
>>> lot. I wondered if some of you might be interrested in testing out using
>>> git when doing
Andre Poenitz
writes:
| Last time the topic came up it looked like there are not too many people
| around who would mind a complete switch to git.
Did you then also talk about placing the repo on a different server?
Something similar to github perhaps?
On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 09:28:33PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
> I would like to upgrade to 1.38 first though, and then work on replacing
> boost libs with libs that exist in tr1 (or the upcoming standard).
please, note that there are systems (most notably, Solaris) that still
ship gcc
On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 10:50:52PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> | Last time the topic came up it looked like there are not too many people
> | around who would mind a complete switch to git.
>
> If going that route, I would suggest getting some experience with git-svn
> first. Then you
lar...@gullik.net (Lars Gullik Bjønnes)
writes:
| And now I see that this is also mentioned on the wiki. But it should be
| the preferred way to doing it. (So placed at the top of the page).
And *now* I see that this is just how to setup a "dumb" git clone, so
git svn init, so not exacly what I
Enrico Forestieri writes:
| On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 09:28:33PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>>
>> I would like to upgrade to 1.38 first though, and then work on replacing
>> boost libs with libs that exist in tr1 (or the upcoming standard).
>
| please, note that there are
On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 10:55:49PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Andre Poenitz
>
> writes:
>
> | Last time the topic came up it looked like there are not too many people
> | around who would mind a complete switch to git.
>
> Did you then also talk
Andre Poenitz
writes:
| On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 10:50:52PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> | Last time the topic came up it looked like there are not too many people
>> | around who would mind a complete switch to git.
>>
>> If going that route, I
Andre Poenitz
writes:
| On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 10:55:49PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> Andre Poenitz
>>
>> writes:
>>
>> | Last time the topic came up it looked like there are not too many people
>> |
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Andre Poenitz
writes:
| On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 10:55:49PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Andre Poenitz
writes:
| Last time the topic came up it looked like there are not too
lar...@lyx.org (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
> I do not think that the repo and the web/wiki/ftp have to be in the same
> place. But it would be nice though.
We have to find a place with either a competent admin with time in his
hands or a well run forge. Aussie is getting more and more
rgheck writes:
>> I do not think that the repo and the web/wiki/ftp have to be in the same
>> place. But it would be nice though.
>>
>>
| I could provide server space for the web/wiki/ftp on my office server,
| probably.
Do you mean a server in your office or a server
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes writes:
| lar...@lyx.org (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
>> I do not think that the repo and the web/wiki/ftp have to be in the same
>> place. But it would be nice though.
>
| We have to find a place with either a competent admin with time in his
| hands or
lar...@lyx.org (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
| I belive github might be a good place for the repo and the wiki (other
| can judge better than me). And do we really need the regular web space
| if the wiki is good?
>
| Anyhow we certainly can buy web space if that is required. (to a certain
|
>
> The bug database might be a problem...
I know that many people dislike sourceforge but sourceforge supports
pmwiki (our web), trac, and some project and bug tracking systems...
http://apps.sourceforge.net/trac/sitedocs/wiki/Hosted%20Apps
Bo
On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 11:48:34PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> We should (soonish, already overdue) get a new machine, if we want/need
> one that is. I have not seen the box since before Trolltech moved office
> a couple of years ago, they handled the move and everything.
>
> I have
Bo Peng writes:
>>
>> The bug database might be a problem...
>
| I know that many people dislike sourceforge but sourceforge supports
| pmwiki (our web), trac, and some project and bug tracking systems...
>
| http://apps.sourceforge.net/trac/sitedocs/wiki/Hosted%20Apps
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
rgheck writes:
I do not think that the repo and the web/wiki/ftp have to be in the same
place. But it would be nice though.
| I could provide server space for the web/wiki/ftp on my office server,
| probably.
Do you mean a server
rgheck writes:
[...]
| Another possibility would be to see if the Brown LUG would want to do
| it. They've got space, and they're always looking for things to do for
| the FOSS community.
Now that is has been brought up, I think we should have a close look at
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Bo Peng writes:
The bug database might be a problem...
| I know that many people dislike sourceforge but sourceforge supports
| pmwiki (our web), trac, and some project and bug tracking systems...
|
Peter Kümmel writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> Bo Peng writes:
>>
The bug database might be a problem...
>> | I know that many people dislike sourceforge but sourceforge supports
>> | pmwiki (our web), trac, and some project and bug tracking
> Now that is has been brought up, I think we should have a close look at
> sourceforge.net.
I have used sourceforge for my own project for five years and I am
satisfied with their services.
1. mailinglist based on mailman works.
2. I use subversion but it supports git as well.
Bo Peng writes:
>> Now that is has been brought up, I think we should have a close look at
>> sourceforge.net.
>
| I have used sourceforge for my own project for five years and I am
| satisfied with their services.
>
| 1. mailinglist based on mailman works.
Note that our
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Peter Kümmel writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Bo Peng writes:
The bug database might be a problem...
| I know that many people dislike sourceforge but sourceforge supports
| pmwiki (our web), trac, and some project
Peter Kümmel writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
[...]
>> | What about a 'evaluation'? Possible candidates are:
>> | ww.sf.net
>>
>> I'll look hard at that. It seems to have everything that we want. bug
>> tracker, wiki, git...
>> (Unless I get objections I'll register
Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
>
> As part of job related work I am investigating and using git quite a
> lot. I wondered if some of you might be interrested in testing out using
> git when doing LyX development. (For all I know several of you already
> are...)
i use git as main tool when working on
Richard Heck wrote:
>> | I could provide server space for the web/wiki/ftp on my office server,
>> | probably.
>>
>> Do you mean a server in your office or a server (in a server room) at
>> your office?
>>
>>
> The server in my office: frege.brown.edu. I guess the downside is that, if
>
On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 11:12:16PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
> Q: Is that a sun provided solaris?
Yes, latest solaris 10 also bundles gcc:
$ pkginfo | grep gcc
system SUNWgcc gcc - The GNU C compiler
system SUNWgccruntime GCC
Pavel Sanda writes:
| Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
>>
>> As part of job related work I am investigating and using git quite a
>> lot. I wondered if some of you might be interrested in testing out using
>> git when doing LyX development. (For all I know several of you already
>>
Pavel Sanda writes:
| Richard Heck wrote:
>>> | I could provide server space for the web/wiki/ftp on my office server,
>>> | probably.
>>>
>>> Do you mean a server in your office or a server (in a server room) at
>>> your office?
>>>
>>>
>> The server in my office:
Enrico Forestieri writes:
| On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 11:12:16PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>>
>> Q: Is that a sun provided solaris?
>
| Yes, latest solaris 10 also bundles gcc:
>
| $ pkginfo | grep gcc
| system SUNWgcc gcc - The GNU C compiler
lar...@gullik.org (Lars Gullik Bjønnes)
writes:
| | Please add some people also as administrator, how knows when you go
| | back
| | beneath your rock again ;)
>
| Well of course, we must plan for contengencies.
| But it is actually possible to get in contact with me... even if some
|
Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote:
> >> If there are interest I'll try to setup a git tree that you can clone and
> >> set
> >> up as a git-svn tree. (I'll even write up a wiki page to explain briefly
> >> how
> >> to do that.)
> >
> | this is already done on git.or.cz, though not under our control
On Thu, Mar 05, 2009 at 01:23:26AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> But I must say if that is the most recent developemtn tools on solaris
> it is hugely useless as a development platform (and I don't belive it
> is).
I get the impression most C++ people on Solaris are using Sun Studio.
>
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Pavel Sanda writes:
| Richard Heck wrote:
| I could provide server space for the web/wiki/ftp on my office server,
| probably.
Do you mean a server in your office or a server (in a server room) at
your office?
The server in my office:
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
rgheck writes:
[...]
| Another possibility would be to see if the Brown LUG would want to do
| it. They've got space, and they're always looking for things to do for
| the FOSS community.
Now that is has been brought up, I think we should have a
http://www.tuxfamily.org/en/main
pmwiki
git
svn
mail
but no trac and bugzilla
Cheers,
Charles
On Thu, Mar 05, 2009 at 01:23:26AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri writes:
>
> | On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 11:12:16PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> >>
> >> Q: Is that a sun provided solaris?
> >
> | Yes, latest solaris 10 also bundles gcc:
> >
> | $
> for example i like to have personal web pages so i can run things like doxygen
> generated docs for lyx,
sf.net provides ssh access, something even my web hosting company is
unwilling to provide. I just checked and it has doxygen pre-installed.
Dear Jürgen and other LyX Developers,
Thank you very much for the kind welcome. Pursuant to your advice, I have
gone through and tried to develop my thoughts on a few features that I would
be excited to develop and add to LyX. Because of dummy-layouts and a few
other graphics I wasn't able
Bo Peng wrote:
for example i like to have personal web pages so i can run things like doxygen
generated docs for lyx,
sf.net provides ssh access, something even my web hosting company is
unwilling to provide. I just checked and it has doxygen pre-installed.
101 - 154 of 154 matches
Mail list logo