Kayvan A. Sylvan wrote:
The GUI stuff is icing that will take 10 minutes; I'm happy to do that.
However, I'd prefer to leave the configure stuff to you. Happy?
Sure. This patch almost works right. LyX now checks the new variable
(which was set by configure) and does the right thing.
Has a
Angus == Angus Leeming [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Angus Has a consensus been reached that Kayvan's solution is 'good
Angus enough'? That's my reading of the conversation that has
Angus followed, but I'd like an explicit yes before tackling the
Angus GUI stuff.
Yes, it certainly qualifies for
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Angus Has a consensus been reached that Kayvan's solution is 'good
Angus enough'? That's my reading of the conversation that has
Angus followed, but I'd like an explicit yes before tackling the
Angus GUI stuff.
Yes, it certainly qualifies for 'good enough'. I
Kayvan A. Sylvan wrote:
>> The GUI stuff is icing that will take 10 minutes; I'm happy to do that.
>> However, I'd prefer to leave the configure stuff to you. Happy?
> Sure. This patch almost works right. LyX now checks the new variable
> (which was set by configure) and does the right thing.
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> Has a consensus been reached that Kayvan's solution is 'good
Angus> enough'? That's my reading of the conversation that has
Angus> followed, but I'd like an explicit "yes" before tackling the
Angus> GUI stuff.
Yes, it certainly
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Angus> Has a consensus been reached that Kayvan's solution is 'good
> Angus> enough'? That's my reading of the conversation that has
> Angus> followed, but I'd like an explicit "yes" before tackling the
> Angus> GUI stuff.
>
> Yes, it certainly qualifies for 'good
On Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 01:08:32PM -0800, Kayvan A. Sylvan wrote:
Hmmm... Yes, that can happen. I route around such problems though.
For example: The Acrobat reader program needs dos paths. So, I use
the following shell script (as /usr/local/bin/acroread):
#!/bin/sh
if [ $# -eq 1
On Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 01:08:32PM -0800, Kayvan A. Sylvan wrote:
> Hmmm... Yes, that can happen. I route around such problems though.
> For example: The Acrobat reader program needs dos paths. So, I use
> the following shell script (as /usr/local/bin/acroread):
>
> #!/bin/sh
>
> if [ $#
Kayvan == Kayvan A Sylvan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Your patch does not sound right. It says that under cygwin, all
programs should use dos-style paths. If this is the case, a simple
#ifdef __CYGWIN__ could be used to hardcode this into LyX...
Kayvan No, it's the other way around. In my
> "Kayvan" == Kayvan A Sylvan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Your patch does not sound right. It says that under cygwin, all
>> programs should use dos-style paths. If this is the case, a simple
>> #ifdef __CYGWIN__ could be used to hardcode this into LyX...
Kayvan> No, it's the other way
Kayvan == Kayvan A Sylvan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Kayvan On Sat, Jan 01, 2005 at 01:38:07PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
The GUI stuff is icing that will take 10 minutes; I'm happy to do
that. However, I'd prefer to leave the configure stuff to you.
Happy?
Kayvan Sure. This patch almost
On Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 11:20:22AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Kayvan == Kayvan A Sylvan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Kayvan On Sat, Jan 01, 2005 at 01:38:07PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
The GUI stuff is icing that will take 10 minutes; I'm happy to do
that. However, I'd prefer to
> "Kayvan" == Kayvan A Sylvan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Kayvan> On Sat, Jan 01, 2005 at 01:38:07PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
>> The GUI stuff is icing that will take 10 minutes; I'm happy to do
>> that. However, I'd prefer to leave the configure stuff to you.
>> Happy?
>>
Kayvan> Sure.
On Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 11:20:22AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Kayvan" == Kayvan A Sylvan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Kayvan> On Sat, Jan 01, 2005 at 01:38:07PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> >> The GUI stuff is icing that will take 10 minutes; I'm happy to do
> >> that.
On Sat, Jan 01, 2005 at 01:38:07PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
The GUI stuff is icing that will take 10 minutes; I'm happy to do that.
However, I'd prefer to leave the configure stuff to you. Happy?
Sure. This patch almost works right. LyX now checks the new variable (which
was set by
Kayvan A. Sylvan wrote:
The GUI stuff is icing that will take 10 minutes; I'm happy to do that.
However, I'd prefer to leave the configure stuff to you. Happy?
Sure. This patch almost works right. LyX now checks the new variable
(which was set by configure) and does the right thing.
The
On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 07:42:46PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
I don't know the right way to fix this. Please take a look and see
if you can tackle this little piece in addition to the GUI stff.
Will do. Many thanks for doing the grunt work.
Great. I can do a last minute check on the patch
On Sat, Jan 01, 2005 at 01:38:07PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
>
> The GUI stuff is icing that will take 10 minutes; I'm happy to do that.
> However, I'd prefer to leave the configure stuff to you. Happy?
>
Sure. This patch almost works right. LyX now checks the new variable (which
was set by
Kayvan A. Sylvan wrote:
>> The GUI stuff is icing that will take 10 minutes; I'm happy to do that.
>> However, I'd prefer to leave the configure stuff to you. Happy?
>>
>
> Sure. This patch almost works right. LyX now checks the new variable
> (which was set by configure) and does the right
On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 07:42:46PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > I don't know the right way to fix this. Please take a look and see
> > if you can tackle this little piece in addition to the GUI stff.
>
> Will do. Many thanks for doing the grunt work.
Great. I can do a last minute check on the
Kayvan A. Sylvan wrote:
On Fri, Dec 31, 2004 at 04:24:37PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
Angus Leeming wrote:
Sure. This means that the s/slashify_path/internal_path/ switch was
less carefully done that it needed to be. Mea culpa.
I'll try and come up with something in the next couple of
Kayvan A. Sylvan wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 31, 2004 at 04:24:37PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
>> Angus Leeming wrote:
>> > Sure. This means that the s/slashify_path/internal_path/ switch was
>> > less carefully done that it needed to be. Mea culpa.
>> >
>> > I'll try and come up with something in the
Kayvan A. Sylvan wrote:
Hi Angus,
Here is another clue. I ran the lyx executable with strace under Cygwin.
The output was very interesting and seems to point to an infinite
loop in startup:
[...]
39 433123 [main] lyx 3884 mount_info::conv_to_posix_path:
conv_to_posix_path
Angus Leeming wrote:
Sure. This means that the s/slashify_path/internal_path/ switch was less
carefully done that it needed to be. Mea culpa.
I'll try and come up with something in the next couple of hours.
Ok, Kayvan. The problem (I believe) lies in the call to 'MakeLatexName',
below, which
On Fri, Dec 31, 2004 at 04:24:37PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
Angus Leeming wrote:
Sure. This means that the s/slashify_path/internal_path/ switch was less
carefully done that it needed to be. Mea culpa.
I'll try and come up with something in the next couple of hours.
Ok, Kayvan. The
On Thu, Dec 30, 2004 at 08:42:19AM +0100, Michael Schmitt wrote:
Dear Kayvan,
I guess you have upgraded from gcc 3.3.1 to 3.3.3, right? All I can say is
that this compiler version does not work and 3.4X neither :-(
I can say now that gcc-3.3.3 works fine with the latest Cygwin with
the
Kayvan A. Sylvan wrote:
> Hi Angus,
>
> Here is another clue. I ran the lyx executable with strace under Cygwin.
>
> The output was very interesting and seems to point to an infinite
> loop in startup:
>
> [...]
>39 433123 [main] lyx 3884 mount_info::conv_to_posix_path:
>
Angus Leeming wrote:
> Sure. This means that the s/slashify_path/internal_path/ switch was less
> carefully done that it needed to be. Mea culpa.
>
> I'll try and come up with something in the next couple of hours.
Ok, Kayvan. The problem (I believe) lies in the call to 'MakeLatexName',
below,
On Fri, Dec 31, 2004 at 04:24:37PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Angus Leeming wrote:
> > Sure. This means that the s/slashify_path/internal_path/ switch was less
> > carefully done that it needed to be. Mea culpa.
> >
> > I'll try and come up with something in the next couple of hours.
>
> Ok,
On Thu, Dec 30, 2004 at 08:42:19AM +0100, Michael Schmitt wrote:
> Dear Kayvan,
>
> I guess you have upgraded from gcc 3.3.1 to 3.3.3, right? All I can say is
> that this compiler version does not work and 3.4X neither :-(
I can say now that gcc-3.3.3 works fine with the latest Cygwin with
the
Dear Kayvan,
I guess you have upgraded from gcc 3.3.1 to 3.3.3, right? All I can say is
that this compiler version does not work and 3.4X neither :-(
Actually, I spent countless days on uncovering and fixing the problem but
all I found was this email:
On Thu, Dec 30, 2004 at 08:42:19AM +0100, Michael Schmitt wrote:
Dear Kayvan,
I guess you have upgraded from gcc 3.3.1 to 3.3.3, right? All I can say is
that this compiler version does not work and 3.4X neither :-(
Actually, I spent countless days on uncovering and fixing the problem but
Hi Angus,
Here is another clue. I ran the lyx executable with strace under Cygwin.
The output was very interesting and seems to point to an infinite
loop in startup:
[...]
39 433123 [main] lyx 3884 mount_info::conv_to_posix_path:
conv_to_posix_path (/usr/local/, keep-rel, add-slash)
25
Dear Kayvan,
I guess you have upgraded from gcc 3.3.1 to 3.3.3, right? All I can say is
that this compiler version does not work and 3.4X neither :-(
Actually, I spent countless days on uncovering and fixing the problem but
all I found was this email:
On Thu, Dec 30, 2004 at 08:42:19AM +0100, Michael Schmitt wrote:
> Dear Kayvan,
>
> I guess you have upgraded from gcc 3.3.1 to 3.3.3, right? All I can say is
> that this compiler version does not work and 3.4X neither :-(
>
> Actually, I spent countless days on uncovering and fixing the
Hi Angus,
Here is another clue. I ran the lyx executable with strace under Cygwin.
The output was very interesting and seems to point to an infinite
loop in startup:
[...]
39 433123 [main] lyx 3884 mount_info::conv_to_posix_path:
conv_to_posix_path (/usr/local/, keep-rel, add-slash)
25
I'm having the following problem after having upgraded Cygwin to the latest
and then compiling the latest lyx CVS:
Lyx does not start up.
Running it in gdb, I get:
$ gdb src/lyx
GNU gdb 2003-09-20-cvs (cygwin-special)
Copyright 2003 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
GDB is free software, covered
Kayvan A. Sylvan wrote:
I'm having the following problem after having upgraded Cygwin to the
latest and then compiling the latest lyx CVS:
Hi, Kayvan.
I've made a lot of little changes recently that may well impact Cygwin.
I'd be suspicious of this mail and the associated patch:
[PATCH 13x,
On Wed, Dec 29, 2004 at 09:40:55PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
Kayvan A. Sylvan wrote:
I'm having the following problem after having upgraded Cygwin to the
latest and then compiling the latest lyx CVS:
Hi, Kayvan.
I've made a lot of little changes recently that may well impact Cygwin.
I'm having the following problem after having upgraded Cygwin to the latest
and then compiling the latest lyx CVS:
Lyx does not start up.
Running it in gdb, I get:
$ gdb src/lyx
GNU gdb 2003-09-20-cvs (cygwin-special)
Copyright 2003 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
GDB is free software, covered
Kayvan A. Sylvan wrote:
> I'm having the following problem after having upgraded Cygwin to the
> latest and then compiling the latest lyx CVS:
Hi, Kayvan.
I've made a lot of little changes recently that may well impact Cygwin.
I'd be suspicious of this mail and the associated patch:
[PATCH
On Wed, Dec 29, 2004 at 09:40:55PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Kayvan A. Sylvan wrote:
>
> > I'm having the following problem after having upgraded Cygwin to the
> > latest and then compiling the latest lyx CVS:
>
> Hi, Kayvan.
>
> I've made a lot of little changes recently that may well
42 matches
Mail list logo
