On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 02:52:49PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
I don't think so, as it is a very particular switch. Here is the
pertinent comment in src/lyxfunc.C:
void actOnUpdatedPrefs(LyXRC const lyxrc_orig, LyXRC const lyxrc_new)
{
// Why the switch you might ask. It is a
On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 02:52:49PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> I don't think so, as it is a very particular switch. Here is the
> pertinent comment in src/lyxfunc.C:
>
> void actOnUpdatedPrefs(LyXRC const & lyxrc_orig, LyXRC const & lyxrc_new)
> {
> // Why the switch you might ask.
Bo == Bo Peng [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Bo As I have said, this patch is strictly cygwin only, and JMarc is
Bo obviously not an active cygwin user, I (we) have to trust Enrico
Bo on his patches to move cygwin/lyx forward.
I will review the patch tomorrow. And, yes, I prefer to have the
time
> "Bo" == Bo Peng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Bo> As I have said, this patch is strictly cygwin only, and JMarc is
Bo> obviously not an active cygwin user, I (we) have to trust Enrico
Bo> on his patches to move cygwin/lyx forward.
>> I will review the patch tomorrow. And, yes, I prefer to
Bo Peng [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Please, can you see if the attached patch can be applied to both trunk
and branch?
It seems to touch Bo's and Jean-Marc's work so I'll let them comment that.
Since this patch is small enough, and it is strictly in your domain
(cygwin), I have applied to
On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 09:09:51AM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
Bo Peng [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Please, can you see if the attached patch can be applied to both trunk
and branch?
It seems to touch Bo's and Jean-Marc's work so I'll let them comment that.
Since this patch is small
On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 09:46:14PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 06:43:14PM +, Luis Rivera wrote:
case RC_TEX_ALLOWS_SPACES:
if (lexrc.next()) {
tex_allows_spaces = lexrc.getBool();
@@ -1342,6
Since this patch is small enough, and it is strictly in your domain
(cygwin), I have applied to both 1.4 and 1.5.
Bo, please DO NOT apply ANYTHING to the 1.4 branch without Jean-Marc's
agreement.
I think I have to be blamed for this, not Bo.
Do not feel bad, Enrico. At least I do not.
On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 07:26:55PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 09:46:14PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 06:43:14PM +, Luis Rivera wrote:
case RC_TEX_ALLOWS_SPACES:
if (lexrc.next()) {
Bo == Bo Peng [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Bo As I have said, this patch is strictly cygwin only, and JMarc is
Bo obviously not an active cygwin user, I (we) have to trust Enrico
Bo on his patches to move cygwin/lyx forward.
I will review the patch tomorrow. And, yes, I prefer to have the time
to
Bo As I have said, this patch is strictly cygwin only, and JMarc is
Bo obviously not an active cygwin user, I (we) have to trust Enrico
Bo on his patches to move cygwin/lyx forward.
I will review the patch tomorrow. And, yes, I prefer to have the time
to have a look at everything that goes in
Bo Peng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Please, can you see if the attached patch can be applied to both trunk
and branch?
>>> It seems to touch Bo's and Jean-Marc's work so I'll let them comment that.
> Since this patch is small enough, and it is strictly in your domain
> (cygwin), I have
On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 09:09:51AM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Bo Peng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Please, can you see if the attached patch can be applied to both trunk
> and branch?
>
> >>> It seems to touch Bo's and Jean-Marc's work so I'll let them comment that.
>
> > Since
On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 09:46:14PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 06:43:14PM +, Luis Rivera wrote:
> case RC_TEX_ALLOWS_SPACES:
> if (lexrc.next()) {
> tex_allows_spaces = lexrc.getBool();
> @@ -1342,6
> > Since this patch is small enough, and it is strictly in your domain
> > (cygwin), I have applied to both 1.4 and 1.5.
>
> Bo, please DO NOT apply ANYTHING to the 1.4 branch without Jean-Marc's
agreement.
I think I have to be blamed for this, not Bo.
Do not feel bad, Enrico. At least I do
On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 07:26:55PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 09:46:14PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 06:43:14PM +, Luis Rivera wrote:
> > case RC_TEX_ALLOWS_SPACES:
> > if (lexrc.next()) {
> >
> "Bo" == Bo Peng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Bo> As I have said, this patch is strictly cygwin only, and JMarc is
Bo> obviously not an active cygwin user, I (we) have to trust Enrico
Bo> on his patches to move cygwin/lyx forward.
I will review the patch tomorrow. And, yes, I prefer to have
Bo> As I have said, this patch is strictly cygwin only, and JMarc is
Bo> obviously not an active cygwin user, I (we) have to trust Enrico
Bo> on his patches to move cygwin/lyx forward.
I will review the patch tomorrow. And, yes, I prefer to have the time
to have a look at everything that goes in
Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 10:24:09PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
I have put another package which contains the exe and the needed
runtimes dll:
http://younes.a.free.fr/Lyx-15-experimental/lyx-qt4-exe-and-dlls.zip
Abdel,
I tried your LyX/Qt4 and got a bug
Please, can you see if the attached patch can be applied to both trunk
and branch?
It seems to touch Bo's and Jean-Marc's work so I'll let them comment that.
That is a good detective work! I will apply if JMarc does not object.
I have to trust Enrico on this though, since I can not test the
On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 02:24:21PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 10:24:09PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
I have put another package which contains the exe and the needed
runtimes dll:
Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 02:24:21PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
If you just copied the exe inside a 1.4.1 directory, I think there is a
mismatch between configure.sh and configure.py. Please try the full package.
Nope, it was the
On 4/29/06, Bo Peng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please, can you see if the attached patch can be applied to both trunk
and branch?
It seems to touch Bo's and Jean-Marc's work so I'll let them comment that.
Since this patch is small enough, and it is strictly in your domain
(cygwin), I have
On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 03:32:06PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
And does your patch to configure.py solve the crash of the open file
button?
No, sorry. It is an unrelated problem, only showing up because I used
a cmd.exe to launch your LyX/Qt4. I did so because from a rxvt terminal
I got
On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 08:50:29AM -0500, Bo Peng wrote:
On 4/29/06, Bo Peng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please, can you see if the attached patch can be applied to both trunk
and branch?
It seems to touch Bo's and Jean-Marc's work so I'll let them comment that.
Since this patch is
Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 10:24:09PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
I have put another package which contains the exe and the needed
runtimes dll:
http://younes.a.free.fr/Lyx-15-experimental/lyx-qt4-exe-and-dlls.zip
Abdel,
I tried your LyX/Qt4 and got a bug
> Please, can you see if the attached patch can be applied to both trunk
> and branch?
It seems to touch Bo's and Jean-Marc's work so I'll let them comment that.
That is a good detective work! I will apply if JMarc does not object.
I have to trust Enrico on this though, since I can not test
On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 02:24:21PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
> > On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 10:24:09PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> >
> >> I have put another package which contains the exe and the needed
> >> runtimes dll:
> >>
Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 02:24:21PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
If you just copied the exe inside a 1.4.1 directory, I think there is a
mismatch between configure.sh and configure.py. Please try the full package.
Nope, it was the
On 4/29/06, Bo Peng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Please, can you see if the attached patch can be applied to both trunk
> > and branch?
>
> It seems to touch Bo's and Jean-Marc's work so I'll let them comment that.
Since this patch is small enough, and it is strictly in your domain
(cygwin),
On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 03:32:06PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> And does your patch to configure.py solve the crash of the "open file"
> button?
No, sorry. It is an unrelated problem, only showing up because I used
a cmd.exe to launch your LyX/Qt4. I did so because from a rxvt terminal
I
On Sat, Apr 29, 2006 at 08:50:29AM -0500, Bo Peng wrote:
> On 4/29/06, Bo Peng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Please, can you see if the attached patch can be applied to both trunk
> > > > and branch?
> > >
> > > It seems to touch Bo's and Jean-Marc's work so I'll let them comment that.
>
>
Luis Rivera a écrit :
Luis Rivera [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Consequently, and taking the opportunity open by the switch to the
1.4.x series,
I recommend to sign the death certificate for LyX's support on Win95/98.
Following another thread made me realize that I failed to mention that
Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
We had information that lyx-15svn/qt4 works on Win98, maybe also on
Win98. There some info to try it on the Wiki.
I think that Abdel meant to say, We had information that
lyx-15svn/qt4 works on WinME, ...
The improvement comes, of course, from the
Angus Leeming a écrit :
Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
We had information that lyx-15svn/qt4 works on Win98, maybe also on
Win98. There some info to try it on the Wiki.
I think that Abdel meant to say, We had information that
lyx-15svn/qt4 works on WinME, ...
Yep, sorry.
The
Angus The improvement comes, of course, from the switch to Qt4.
Angus Note, however, that your hard work to get LyX working on
Angus Win98 would need a little tweaking because the changes we made
Angus to Boost.Filesystem haven't been propogated formward into
Angus the version of Boost.Filesystem
Angus Leeming a écrit :
Angus The improvement comes, of course, from the switch to Qt4.
Angus Note, however, that your hard work to get LyX working on
Angus Win98 would need a little tweaking because the changes we made
Angus to Boost.Filesystem haven't been propogated formward into
Angus the
Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Angus Leeming a écrit :
| Angus The improvement comes, of course, from the switch to Qt4.
| Angus Note, however, that your hard work to get LyX working on
| Angus Win98 would need a little tweaking because the changes we made
| Angus to
Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yes. One of the files in boost/libs/filesystem/src (Sorry, no viewsvn...)
#includes and uses NewAPIs.h. I can dig out the details if you can't track
the
change down.
Well, I don't have enough disk space to get the 1.4 tree. Bo, Enrico,
could
Angus Leeming a écrit :
Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yes. One of the files in boost/libs/filesystem/src (Sorry, no viewsvn...)
#includes and uses NewAPIs.h. I can dig out the details if you can't track the
change down.
Well, I don't have enough disk space to get the 1.4 tree.
Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Angus Leeming a écrit :
| Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Yes. One of the files in boost/libs/filesystem/src (Sorry, no viewsvn...)
| #includes and uses NewAPIs.h. I can dig out the details if you can't
track the
| change down.
|
|
Lars Gullik Bjønnes a écrit :
Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Angus Leeming a écrit :
| Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| Yes. One of the files in boost/libs/filesystem/src (Sorry, no viewsvn...)
| #includes and uses NewAPIs.h. I can dig out the details if you can't
Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Here are the relevant logs and the diff against current svn, please tell
me what I should do
You should drop the stuff that's needed for Win95. LyX on Win95 is broken for
other reasons. That may well mean that all you need is the ERROR_ACCESS_DENIED
Angus Leeming a écrit :
Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Here are the relevant logs and the diff against current svn, please tell
me what I should do
You should drop the stuff that's needed for Win95. LyX on Win95 is broken for
other reasons. That may well mean that all you need is
Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Given that Win95 is dead as a dodo, it may well be that you don't need the
NewAPIs.h. The only way to check, however, is to compile (on a WinXP machine,
presumably) and then see if it'll run on Win98. That's what the stub magic in
NewAPIs.h does:
Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Louis, could you please try the experimental lyx for windows described
in http://wiki.lyx.org/Windows/LyX150Experimental ?
Sure enough! Give me half an hour.
So, if I understand you correctly, all the special code in this boost
file is
Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Louis, could you please try the experimental lyx for windows described
in http://wiki.lyx.org/Windows/LyX150Experimental ?
I downloaded the exe only zip file. Apparently, LyX 15x needs the library
zlib1.dll besides the files distributed with
Luis Rivera a écrit :
Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Louis, could you please try the experimental lyx for windows
described in http://wiki.lyx.org/Windows/LyX150Experimental ?
I downloaded the exe only zip file. Apparently, LyX 15x needs the
library zlib1.dll besides the
On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 06:43:14PM +, Luis Rivera wrote:
AFAIK, LyX still works on Win95/Cygwin (on an Intel486!). Slow as anything
can
be, but works. On Win98 it greatly improves, thanks to the hardware. The
real
mess seems to be the path handling. On Cygwin everything is normal
Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Luis Rivera a écrit :
Where did you get this file?
From the gnuwin32 project. I've put it in my web site
(younes.a.free,fr) I could not post it to the list even after having
changed the extension so it can pass the filters.
I see. I
Luis Rivera a écrit :
Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Luis Rivera a écrit :
Where did you get this file?
From the gnuwin32 project. I've put it in my web site
(younes.a.free,fr) I could not post it to the list even after having
changed the extension so it can pass the
Enrico Forestieri [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Cygwin runs on top of Windows. It works because it is developed by
competent people **who** know how to deal with various Windows flavors.
Agree...
The path handling is not a mess in my copy of LyX, perhaps it is
in the official sources.
On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 08:30:18PM +, Luis Rivera wrote:
Enrico Forestieri [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think it looks native because the interface to the user doesn't go
through
the command prompt; however, it is may not a native application. To be
a native application it had to go
Enrico Forestieri [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 08:30:18PM +, Luis Rivera wrote:
Enrico Forestieri forenr at ... writes:
I think it looks native because the interface to the user doesn't go
through
the command prompt; however, it is may not a native
On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 11:15:53PM +, Luis Rivera wrote:
Having that definition in mind, then none of your exes is a true native
windows app. Sorry! ;-)
I have never claimed they are :-)
However, I tested both on Win98, and both work pretty much as expected:
1/ LyX native (Qt library
On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 10:24:09PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
I have put another package which contains the exe and the needed
runtimes dll:
http://younes.a.free.fr/Lyx-15-experimental/lyx-qt4-exe-and-dlls.zip
Abdel,
I tried your LyX/Qt4 and got a bug report for you.
After launching
Luis Rivera a écrit :
Luis Rivera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Consequently, and taking the opportunity open by the switch to the
1.4.x series,
I recommend to sign the death certificate for LyX's support on Win95/98.
Following another thread made me realize that I failed to mention that
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> We had information that lyx-15svn/qt4 works on Win98, maybe also on
> Win98. There some info to try it on the Wiki.
I think that Abdel meant to say, "We had information that
lyx-15svn/qt4 works on WinME, ..."
The improvement comes, of course, from
Angus Leeming a écrit :
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
We had information that lyx-15svn/qt4 works on Win98, maybe also on
Win98. There some info to try it on the Wiki.
I think that Abdel meant to say, "We had information that
lyx-15svn/qt4 works on WinME, ..."
Yep, sorry.
Angus> The improvement comes, of course, from the switch to Qt4.
Angus> Note, however, that your hard work to get LyX working on
Angus> Win98 would need a little tweaking because the changes we made
Angus> to Boost.Filesystem haven't been propogated formward into
Angus> the version of
Angus Leeming a écrit :
Angus> The improvement comes, of course, from the switch to Qt4.
Angus> Note, however, that your hard work to get LyX working on
Angus> Win98 would need a little tweaking because the changes we made
Angus> to Boost.Filesystem haven't been propogated formward into
Angus>
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Angus Leeming a écrit :
| > Angus> The improvement comes, of course, from the switch to Qt4.
| > Angus> Note, however, that your hard work to get LyX working on
| > Angus> Win98 would need a little tweaking because the changes we made
| > Angus> to
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Yes. One of the files in boost/libs/filesystem/src (Sorry, no viewsvn...)
>> #includes and uses NewAPIs.h. I can dig out the details if you can't track
>> the
>> change down.
> Well, I don't have enough disk space to get the 1.4 tree. Bo, Enrico,
Angus Leeming a écrit :
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Yes. One of the files in boost/libs/filesystem/src (Sorry, no viewsvn...)
#includes and uses NewAPIs.h. I can dig out the details if you can't track the
change down.
Well, I don't have enough disk space to get the 1.4 tree.
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Angus Leeming a écrit :
| > Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| >>> Yes. One of the files in boost/libs/filesystem/src (Sorry, no viewsvn...)
| >>> #includes and uses NewAPIs.h. I can dig out the details if you can't
track the
| >>>
Lars Gullik Bjønnes a écrit :
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Angus Leeming a écrit :
| > Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| >>> Yes. One of the files in boost/libs/filesystem/src (Sorry, no viewsvn...)
| >>> #includes and uses NewAPIs.h. I can dig out the details
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Here are the relevant logs and the diff against current svn, please tell
> me what I should do
You should drop the stuff that's needed for Win95. LyX on Win95 is broken for
other reasons. That may well mean that all you need is the
Angus Leeming a écrit :
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Here are the relevant logs and the diff against current svn, please tell
me what I should do
You should drop the stuff that's needed for Win95. LyX on Win95 is broken for
other reasons. That may well mean that all you need
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Given that Win95 is dead as a dodo, it may well be that you don't need the
>> NewAPIs.h. The only way to check, however, is to compile (on a WinXP machine,
>> presumably) and then see if it'll run on Win98. That's what the stub magic in
>> NewAPIs.h
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
> Louis, could you please try the experimental lyx for windows described
> in http://wiki.lyx.org/Windows/LyX150Experimental ?
>
Sure enough! Give me half an hour.
>
> So, if I understand you correctly, all the special code in this boost
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
> Louis, could you please try the experimental lyx for windows described
> in http://wiki.lyx.org/Windows/LyX150Experimental ?
>
I downloaded the exe only zip file. Apparently, LyX 15x needs the library
zlib1.dll besides the files
Luis Rivera a écrit :
> Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>>
>> Louis, could you please try the experimental lyx for windows
described in http://wiki.lyx.org/Windows/LyX150Experimental ?
>>
>
> I downloaded the exe only zip file. Apparently, LyX 15x needs the
library zlib1.dll
On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 06:43:14PM +, Luis Rivera wrote:
> AFAIK, LyX still works on Win95/Cygwin (on an Intel486!). Slow as anything
> can
> be, but works. On Win98 it greatly improves, thanks to the hardware. The
> real
> mess seems to be the path handling. On Cygwin everything is
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Luis Rivera a écrit :
>
> > Where did you get this file?
>
> From the gnuwin32 project. I've put it in my web site
> (younes.a.free,fr) I could not post it to the list even after having
> changed the extension so it can pass the filters.
>
Luis Rivera a écrit :
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Luis Rivera a écrit :
> Where did you get this file?
From the gnuwin32 project. I've put it in my web site
(younes.a.free,fr) I could not post it to the list even after having
changed the extension so it can pass the
Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Cygwin runs on top of Windows. It works because it is developed by
> competent people **who** know how to deal with various Windows flavors.
>
Agree...
> The path handling is not a mess in my copy of LyX, perhaps it is
> in the official
On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 08:30:18PM +, Luis Rivera wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I think it "looks" native because the interface to the user doesn't go
> through
> the command prompt; however, it is may not a native application. To be
> a "native" application it
Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 08:30:18PM +, Luis Rivera wrote:
> > Enrico Forestieri ...> writes:
>
> > I think it "looks" native because the interface to the user doesn't go
through
> > the command prompt; however, it is may not a native
On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 11:15:53PM +, Luis Rivera wrote:
> Having that definition in mind, then none of your exes is a "true native"
> windows app. Sorry! ;-)
I have never claimed they are :-)
> However, I tested both on Win98, and both work pretty much as expected:
>
> 1/ LyX "native"
On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 10:24:09PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> I have put another package which contains the exe and the needed
> runtimes dll:
> http://younes.a.free.fr/Lyx-15-experimental/lyx-qt4-exe-and-dlls.zip
Abdel,
I tried your LyX/Qt4 and got a bug report for you.
After
Hello,
I've been busy, and I'd just like to add two announcements; what follows should
mean what I say.
1/ WinLyX 1.4.1 doesn't seem to work on Win98 (didn't even try on Win95). Aborts
with a Page Fault error; doesn't go to the ugly blue screen, but it's certain
that something's wrong very deep
Luis Rivera [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Consequently, and taking the opportunity open by the switch to the
1.4.x series,
I recommend to sign the death certificate for LyX's support on Win95/98.
Following another thread made me realize that I failed to mention that
Cygwin (Qt|xforms)
Hello,
I've been busy, and I'd just like to add two announcements; what follows should
mean what I say.
1/ WinLyX 1.4.1 doesn't seem to work on Win98 (didn't even try on Win95). Aborts
with a "Page Fault" error; doesn't go to the ugly blue screen, but it's certain
that something's wrong very
Luis Rivera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Consequently, and taking the opportunity open by the switch to the
> 1.4.x series,
> I recommend to sign the death certificate for LyX's support on Win95/98.
>
Following another thread made me realize that I failed to mention that
Cygwin
84 matches
Mail list logo
