On Monday 30 March 2009 19:03:25 Uwe Stöhr wrote:
The only important point I have is that more than one developer should know
about our finances (maybe only Lars and José, but more than one person). So
just more transparency. Still now I only know that we got 2 Euros on
Saturday ;-)
FWIW I do
On Monday 30 March 2009 19:03:25 Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> The only important point I have is that more than one developer should know
> about our finances (maybe only Lars and José, but more than one person). So
> just more transparency. Still now I only know that we got 2 Euros on
> Saturday ;-)
FWIW
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
That being said Lars, I guess you received some money throughout the
years thanks to your paypal
account and we know basically _nothing_ about it ;-)
This is an important issue. We for example had to pay all costs for our
last developer meeting on our own but
Waluyo Adi Siswanto wrote:
Well maybe the LyX web site is quite popular who knows? :-)
Actually, we don't even know if LyX users count in the thousands,
hundreds of thousand or millions...
http://wiki.lyx.org/Devel/LyXGeography
Yes it is popular, have a look here:
On Tue, 31 Mar 2009, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Waluyo Adi Siswanto wrote:
Well maybe the LyX web site is quite popular who knows? :-)
Actually, we don't even know if LyX users count in the thousands,
hundreds of thousand or millions...
http://wiki.lyx.org/Devel/LyXGeography
Can you login to
Oops... uploads don't seem to be working. Guess that'll be the next thing
I have to look at.
/C
http://wiki.lyx.org/Devel/LyXGeography
Yes it is popular, have a look here:
http://www.alexa.com/data/details/traffic_details/lyx.org
Lyx.org has a traffic rank of: 168,508
but this is
On Tue, 31 Mar 2009, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Waluyo Adi Siswanto wrote:
Well maybe the LyX web site is quite popular who knows? :-)
Actually, we don't even know if LyX users count in the thousands,
hundreds of thousand or millions...
http://wiki.lyx.org/Devel/LyXGeography
Not sure if i did
Christian Ridderström wrote:
On Tue, 31 Mar 2009, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Waluyo Adi Siswanto wrote:
Well maybe the LyX web site is quite popular who knows? :-)
Actually, we don't even know if LyX users count in the thousands,
hundreds of thousand or millions...
On Tue, 31 Mar 2009, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Christian Ridderström wrote:
On Tue, 31 Mar 2009, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Waluyo Adi Siswanto wrote:
Well maybe the LyX web site is quite popular who knows? :-)
Actually, we don't even know if LyX users count in the thousands,
hundreds of thousand or
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> That being said Lars, I guess you received some money throughout the
years thanks to your paypal
account and we know basically _nothing_ about it ;-)
This is an important issue. We for example had to pay all costs for our
last developer meeting on our own but
Waluyo Adi Siswanto wrote:
>
> > Well maybe the LyX web site is quite popular who knows? :-)
> > Actually, we don't even know if LyX users count in the thousands,
> > hundreds of thousand or millions...
> >
http://wiki.lyx.org/Devel/LyXGeography
> Yes it is popular, have a look here:
>
On Tue, 31 Mar 2009, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Waluyo Adi Siswanto wrote:
Well maybe the LyX web site is quite popular who knows? :-)
Actually, we don't even know if LyX users count in the thousands,
hundreds of thousand or millions...
http://wiki.lyx.org/Devel/LyXGeography
Can you login to
Oops... uploads don't seem to be working. Guess that'll be the next thing
I have to look at.
/C
http://wiki.lyx.org/Devel/LyXGeography
Yes it is popular, have a look here:
http://www.alexa.com/data/details/traffic_details/lyx.org
Lyx.org has a traffic rank of: 168,508
but this is
On Tue, 31 Mar 2009, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Waluyo Adi Siswanto wrote:
Well maybe the LyX web site is quite popular who knows? :-)
Actually, we don't even know if LyX users count in the thousands,
hundreds of thousand or millions...
http://wiki.lyx.org/Devel/LyXGeography
Not sure if i did
Christian Ridderström wrote:
> On Tue, 31 Mar 2009, Pavel Sanda wrote:
>
>> Waluyo Adi Siswanto wrote:
>>>
Well maybe the LyX web site is quite popular who knows? :-)
Actually, we don't even know if LyX users count in the thousands,
hundreds of thousand or millions...
>>
>>
On Tue, 31 Mar 2009, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Christian Ridderström wrote:
On Tue, 31 Mar 2009, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Waluyo Adi Siswanto wrote:
Well maybe the LyX web site is quite popular who knows? :-)
Actually, we don't even know if LyX users count in the thousands,
hundreds of thousand or
rgheck rgh...@bobjweil.com writes:
Well, it will be the third, so people are getting tired of always
hearing the same news ;)
Now you will be outnumbered.
I did not say we are only two! (ok, you win: we are)
JMarc
On Sun, 29 Mar 2009, Andre Poenitz wrote:
This is an important issue. We for example had to pay all costs for
our last developer meeting on our own but the general LyX donations
are exactly for that purpose in my opinion. Moreover are the people
who sponsor us still not listed at our webpage
Christian Ridderström christian.ridderst...@gmail.com writes:
It's our (collective) fault in Berlin for not taking more care with
the financial aspects, but that is probably what happens when you are
used to relying on Lars' to take care of this.
What I remember from Berlin was that it was a
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Christian Ridderström christian.ridderst...@gmail.com writes:
It's our (collective) fault in Berlin for not taking more care with
the financial aspects, but that is probably what happens when you are
used to relying on Lars' to take care of this.
What I
Abdelrazak Younes you...@lyx.org writes:
Well, honestly, I don't think anybody doubted Lars' honesty. It was
just a problem of lack of information.
OK, I see that what I wrote looked like that. So I apologize to people
who think I misrepresented their thoughts. Nevertheless, I really think
that
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes you...@lyx.org writes:
Well, honestly, I don't think anybody doubted Lars' honesty. It was
just a problem of lack of information.
OK, I see that what I wrote looked like that. So I apologize to people
who think I misrepresented their
On Sunday 29 March 2009 21:41:19 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Indeed.
JMarc
+1
And congratulations to both Abdel and Jean-Marc BTW. :-)
--
José Abílio
On Mon, 30 Mar 2009, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes you...@lyx.org writes:
Well, honestly, I don't think anybody doubted Lars' honesty. It was
just a problem of lack of information.
OK, I see that what I wrote looked like that. So I apologize
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 06:04:26PM -0400, rgheck wrote:
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 29 mars 09 à 23:02, rgheck a écrit :
I do not see why he deserves it. My wife is also pregnant and I do
not boast about it
on lyx-devel!
Maybe you should.
Well, it will be the third, so people are
On Mon, 30 Mar 2009, Andre Poenitz wrote:
I do not see why he deserves it. My wife is also pregnant and I do
not boast about it on lyx-devel!
Maybe you should.
Well, it will be the third, so people are getting tired of always
hearing the same news ;)
Now you will be outnumbered.
Being
Being outnumbered starts with having a wife...
And even sometimes with having a life.
JMarc
Christian Ridderström schrieb:
Maybe it would be more constructive to discuss how we _would_ like
things like this dealt with?
The only important point I have is that more than one developer should know about our finances
(maybe only Lars and José, but more than one person). So just more
rgheck writes:
>> Well, it will be the third, so people are getting tired of always
>> hearing the same news ;)
>>
> Now you will be outnumbered.
I did not say we are only two! (ok, you win: we are)
JMarc
On Sun, 29 Mar 2009, Andre Poenitz wrote:
This is an important issue. We for example had to pay all costs for
our last developer meeting on our own but the general LyX donations
are exactly for that purpose in my opinion. Moreover are the people
who sponsor us still not listed at our webpage
Christian Ridderström writes:
> It's our (collective) fault in Berlin for not taking more care with
> the financial aspects, but that is probably what happens when you are
> used to relying on Lars' to take care of this.
What I remember from Berlin was that it
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Christian Ridderström writes:
It's our (collective) fault in Berlin for not taking more care with
the financial aspects, but that is probably what happens when you are
used to relying on Lars' to take care of this.
What I
Abdelrazak Younes writes:
> Well, honestly, I don't think anybody doubted Lars' honesty. It was
> just a problem of lack of information.
OK, I see that what I wrote looked like that. So I apologize to people
who think I misrepresented their thoughts. Nevertheless, I really think
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes writes:
Well, honestly, I don't think anybody doubted Lars' honesty. It was
just a problem of lack of information.
OK, I see that what I wrote looked like that. So I apologize to people
who think I misrepresented their
On Sunday 29 March 2009 21:41:19 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Indeed.
>
> JMarc
+1
And congratulations to both Abdel and Jean-Marc BTW. :-)
--
José Abílio
On Mon, 30 Mar 2009, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes writes:
> Well, honestly, I don't think anybody doubted Lars' honesty. It was
> just a problem of lack of information.
>
OK, I see that what I wrote looked like that. So I
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 06:04:26PM -0400, rgheck wrote:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> Le 29 mars 09 à 23:02, rgheck a écrit :
I do not see why he deserves it. My wife is also pregnant and I do
not boast about it
on lyx-devel!
>>> Maybe you should.
>>
>> Well, it will be
On Mon, 30 Mar 2009, Andre Poenitz wrote:
I do not see why he deserves it. My wife is also pregnant and I do
not boast about it on lyx-devel!
Maybe you should.
Well, it will be the third, so people are getting tired of always
hearing the same news ;)
Now you will be outnumbered.
Being
Being outnumbered starts with having a wife...
And even sometimes with having a life.
JMarc
Christian Ridderström schrieb:
Maybe it would be more constructive to discuss how we _would_ like
things like this dealt with?
The only important point I have is that more than one developer should know about our finances
(maybe only Lars and José, but more than one person). So just more
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 10:37:14AM -0400, rgheck wrote:
This seems complicated, and it seems worth making some distinctions. One
case would be where RedHat wanted to sponsor something. To them, LyX is
part of their product. Another would be if Trolltech wanted to do so.
(Of course, they
On 28/03/2009 21:25, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
More seriously, the money is all yours if you implement the feature.
I'll add your name in the table now if you want.
Sign me up...
You're in. I've let my name for the time being because that's my paypal
account and I'd like to follow what
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 08:10:35PM +0100, Christian Ridderström wrote:
On Sat, 28 Mar 2009, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Lyx.org has a traffic rank of: 168,508
The LyX Users:
United States16.2%
Germany13.5%
Sweden6.9%
Man, I must have spent a lot of time on the lyx site... ;-)
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 07:56:45PM +0100, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
On 28/03/2009 19:40, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
As it stands now it seems that _you_ have got sponsorship to do
work on lyx, that
place some requirements on the LyX Project.
Well, I am part of the LyX project and I created this
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 08:07:52PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
That being said Lars, I guess you received some money throughout the
years thanks to your paypal
account and we know basically _nothing_ about it ;-)
This is an important issue. We for example had to pay all costs
On 29/03/2009 17:43, Andre Poenitz wrote:
I think the sponsorship as such is ok, and your handling of the issue
is ok, and covered by the results of the last discussion of the topic.
Good, thanks for your support.
Abdel.
What we (as a community) want to see in exchange is a new, major
and well
written feature be added to LyX. This is then a fair exchange IMHO.
But it is not a given that we will get that :-)
Indeed. Now the (moral) contract is between Abdel and the rest of the
team :)
JMarc
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 10:37:14AM -0400, rgheck wrote:
This seems complicated, and it seems worth making some distinctions. One
case would be where RedHat wanted to sponsor something. To them, LyX is
part of their product. Another would be if Trolltech wanted to do
Le 29 mars 09 à 03:27, Edwin Leuven a écrit :
you can already be proud of yourself, the speed and competence with
which you have made yourself
familiar with lyx internals is impressive.
Indeed.
JMarc
Concerning transportation: We usually meet in Europe. Europeans can
by cheap flights for even 100 € two ways.
But when Richard and Bo want to join use, they cannot buy such
cheap flights, so when we have 300 € for
transportation I think it is fair to give them the money. (Just a
thought.)
Le 28 mars 09 à 20:37, Christian Ridderström a écrit :
On Sat, 28 Mar 2009, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
What's your excuse? ;-)
I am a family man and my wife is pregnant :-)
Congratulations!
I do not see why he deserves it. My wife is also pregnant and I do
not boast about it
on
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 28 mars 09 à 20:37, Christian Ridderström a écrit :
On Sat, 28 Mar 2009, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
What's your excuse? ;-)
I am a family man and my wife is pregnant :-)
Congratulations!
I do not see why he deserves it. My wife is also pregnant and I do
Le 29 mars 09 à 23:02, rgheck a écrit :
I do not see why he deserves it. My wife is also pregnant and I do
not boast about it
on lyx-devel!
Maybe you should.
Well, it will be the third, so people are getting tired of always
hearing the same news ;)
JMarc
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 29 mars 09 à 23:02, rgheck a écrit :
I do not see why he deserves it. My wife is also pregnant and I do
not boast about it
on lyx-devel!
Maybe you should.
Well, it will be the third, so people are getting tired of always
hearing the same news ;)
Now you
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 10:37:14AM -0400, rgheck wrote:
> This seems complicated, and it seems worth making some distinctions. One
> case would be where RedHat wanted to sponsor something. To them, LyX is
> part of their product. Another would be if Trolltech wanted to do so.
> (Of course,
On 28/03/2009 21:25, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
More seriously, the money is all yours if you implement the feature.
I'll add your name in the table now if you want.
Sign me up...
You're in. I've let my name for the time being because that's my paypal
account and I'd like to follow what
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 08:10:35PM +0100, Christian Ridderström wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Mar 2009, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
>
>>> Lyx.org has a traffic rank of: 168,508
>>>
>>> The LyX Users:
>>> United States16.2%
>>> Germany13.5%
>>> Sweden6.9%
>
> Man, I must have spent a lot of time on the
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 07:56:45PM +0100, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> On 28/03/2009 19:40, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
>> >> As it stands now it seems that _you_ have got sponsorship to do
>> work on lyx, that
>> >> place some requirements on the LyX Project.
>> >
>> > Well, I am part of the LyX project and
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 08:07:52PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> > That being said Lars, I guess you received some money throughout the
> years thanks to your paypal
>
> > > account and we know basically _nothing_ about it ;-)
> >
> > This is an important issue. We for example had to
On 29/03/2009 17:43, Andre Poenitz wrote:
I think the sponsorship as such is ok, and your handling of the issue
is ok, and covered by the results of the last discussion of the topic.
Good, thanks for your support.
Abdel.
>What we (as a community) want to see in exchange is a new, major
and well
>written feature be added to LyX. This is then a fair exchange IMHO.
But it is not a given that we will get that :-)
Indeed. Now the (moral) contract is between Abdel and the rest of the
team :)
JMarc
Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 10:37:14AM -0400, rgheck wrote:
This seems complicated, and it seems worth making some distinctions. One
case would be where RedHat wanted to sponsor something. To them, LyX is
part of their product. Another would be if Trolltech wanted to do
Le 29 mars 09 à 03:27, Edwin Leuven a écrit :
you can already be proud of yourself, the speed and competence with
which you have made yourself
familiar with lyx internals is impressive.
Indeed.
JMarc
Concerning transportation: We usually meet in Europe. Europeans can
by cheap flights for even 100 € two ways.
But when Richard and Bo want to join use, they cannot buy such
cheap flights, so when we have 300 € for
transportation I think it is fair to give them the money. (Just a
thought.)
Le 28 mars 09 à 20:37, Christian Ridderström a écrit :
On Sat, 28 Mar 2009, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
What's your excuse? ;-)
I am a family man and my wife is pregnant :-)
Congratulations!
I do not see why he deserves it. My wife is also pregnant and I do
not boast about it
on
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 28 mars 09 à 20:37, Christian Ridderström a écrit :
On Sat, 28 Mar 2009, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
What's your excuse? ;-)
I am a family man and my wife is pregnant :-)
Congratulations!
I do not see why he deserves it. My wife is also pregnant and I do
Le 29 mars 09 à 23:02, rgheck a écrit :
I do not see why he deserves it. My wife is also pregnant and I do
not boast about it
on lyx-devel!
Maybe you should.
Well, it will be the third, so people are getting tired of always
hearing the same news ;)
JMarc
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 29 mars 09 à 23:02, rgheck a écrit :
I do not see why he deserves it. My wife is also pregnant and I do
not boast about it
on lyx-devel!
Maybe you should.
Well, it will be the third, so people are getting tired of always
hearing the same news ;)
Now you
Dear LyX developers,
I just received a new sponsorship from Beslist.nl (700 €). The only
thing they asked in exchange was to put a link to their news item for a
minimum of three years. I thought the deal was fair and the news text is
OK (http://www.beslist.nl/nieuws/82.html). Maybe I should
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 13:35, Abdelrazak Younes you...@lyx.org wrote:
Dear LyX developers,
I just received a new sponsorship from Beslist.nl (700 €). The only thing
they asked in exchange was to put a link to their news item for a minimum of
three years. I thought the deal was fair and the
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 14:15, Lars Gullik Bjønnes lar...@lyx.org wrote:
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 13:35, Abdelrazak Younes you...@lyx.org wrote:
Dear LyX developers,
I just received a new sponsorship from Beslist.nl (700 €). The only thing
they asked in exchange was to put a link to their
As it stands now it seems that _you_ have got sponsorship to do
work on lyx,
that place some requirements on the LyX Project.
Well, this means that a company pay someone to get some work done for
LyX,
which is very close to what happens with other projects, for example. If
the company had
Le 28 mars 09 à 14:27, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
Well, this means that a company pay someone to get some work done
for LyX,
which is very close to what happens with other projects, for
example. If
the company had contributed the code, we would have had no problem
acknowledging it (would
I just received a new sponsorship from Beslist.nl (700 €).
Do you have some context explaining why LyX was chosen, BTW?
JMarc
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
I just received a new sponsorship from Beslist.nl (700 €). The only
thing they asked in exchange was to put a link to their news item for a
minimum of three years. I thought the deal was fair and the news text is
OK (http://www.beslist.nl/nieuws/82.html). Maybe I
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 14:27, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes lasgout...@lyx.orgwrote:
As it stands now it seems that _you_ have got sponsorship to do work on
lyx,
that place some requirements on the LyX Project.
Well, this means that a company pay someone to get some work done for LyX,
which is
Abdelrazak Younes schreef:
Dear LyX developers,
I just received a new sponsorship from Beslist.nl (700 €). The only
thing they asked in exchange was to put a link to their news item for
a minimum of three years. I thought the deal was fair and the news
text is OK
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
Besides, the bugs are running out anyway.
Ha!
It would also be nice if I could construct a somewhat larger feature to
have something to be proud of.
I think your bugfixing is more than enough reason to be proud (having said
that, I certainly will not try to
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes schreef:
Dear LyX developers,
I just received a new sponsorship from Beslist.nl (700 €). The only
thing they asked in exchange was to put a link to their news item for
a minimum of three years. I thought the deal was fair and the news
text is
The donations page already seems to list corporate and individual
sponsors, separately. And I don't really see any problem with letting
people link to little news blurbs, or just to their own websites. I
wouldn't have any problem, for example, if the record of the corporate
donation from
On 28/03/2009 14:27, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
As it stands now it seems that _you_ have got sponsorship to do work
on lyx,
that place some requirements on the LyX Project.
Well, this means that a company pay someone to get some work done for
LyX,
which is very close to what happens with
On 28/03/2009 14:32, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
I just received a new sponsorship from Beslist.nl (700 €).
Do you have some context explaining why LyX was chosen, BTW?
Not really, the marketing person said that some people in the company
used LyX and love it. They recommended to give LyX a
On 28/03/2009 14:39, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
I just received a new sponsorship from Beslist.nl (700 €). The only
thing they asked in exchange was to put a link to their news item for a
minimum of three years. I thought the deal was fair and the news text is
OK
On 28/03/2009 14:20, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 14:15, Lars Gullik Bjønnes lar...@lyx.org
mailto:lar...@lyx.org wrote:
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 13:35, Abdelrazak Younes you...@lyx.org
mailto:you...@lyx.org wrote:
Dear LyX developers,
I just
On 28/03/2009 15:16, Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes schreef:
Dear LyX developers,
I just received a new sponsorship from Beslist.nl (700 €). The only
thing they asked in exchange was to put a link to their news item for
a minimum of three years. I thought the deal was fair
Well maybe the LyX web site is quite popular who knows? :-)
Actually, we don't even know if LyX users count in the thousands,
hundreds of thousand or millions...
Yes it is popular, have a look here:
http://www.alexa.com/data/details/traffic_details/lyx.org
Lyx.org has a traffic rank of:
As it stands now it seems that _you_ have got sponsorship to do work on lyx,
that
place some requirements on the LyX Project.
Well, I am part of the LyX project and I created this page so maybe. I did
all of this as openly
as possible but I should have have asked for permission for the 3
On 28/03/2009 19:26, Waluyo Adi Siswanto wrote:
Well maybe the LyX web site is quite popular who knows? :-)
Actually, we don't even know if LyX users count in the thousands,
hundreds of thousand or millions...
Yes it is popular, have a look here:
On 28/03/2009 19:40, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
As it stands now it seems that _you_ have got sponsorship to do
work on lyx, that
place some requirements on the LyX Project.
Well, I am part of the LyX project and I created this page so maybe.
I did all of this as openly
as possible but I should
On Sat, 28 Mar 2009, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
That said, I do not think this is a bad thing, but I'd like to know
that the sponsorhip is for, special procjetcs etc.
You meant what the sponsorship is for I guess? Well, isn't it clear?
To sponsor the development of the listed feature?
It
That being said Lars, I guess you received some money throughout the
years thanks to your paypal
account and we know basically _nothing_ about it ;-)
This is an important issue. We for example had to pay all costs for our
last developer meeting on our own but the general LyX donations
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 20:05, Christian Ridderström
christian.ridderst...@gmail.com wrote:
That being said Lars, I guess you received some money throughout the years
thanks to your paypal account and we know basically _nothing_ about it ;-)
Some of that money at least has been used to
On Sat, 28 Mar 2009, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Some of that money at least has been used to sponsor LyX meetings. (Or
at least beer;-)
And once upon a time it bought us aussie.
Cool, I didn't know that.
/Christian
--
Christian Ridderström Mobile: +46-70 687 39
On 28/03/2009 20:09, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 20:05, Christian Ridderström
christian.ridderst...@gmail.com wrote:
That being said Lars, I guess you received some money throughout the years
thanks to your paypal account and we know basically _nothing_
On 28/03/2009 20:05, Christian Ridderström wrote:
On Sat, 28 Mar 2009, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
That said, I do not think this is a bad thing, but I'd like to know
that the sponsorhip is for, special procjetcs etc.
You meant what the sponsorship is for I guess? Well, isn't it
clear? To
On Sat, 28 Mar 2009, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Lyx.org has a traffic rank of: 168,508
The LyX Users:
United States16.2%
Germany13.5%
Sweden6.9%
Man, I must have spent a lot of time on the lyx site... ;-)
Seriously though, I didn't know there are that many Swedish users?
/C
--
On Sat, 28 Mar 2009, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
It wasn't clear to me at least. By now I infer they're sponsoring a
certain feature. I would like more details on how they are to be cited
for it?
Well exactly as I did?
I guess I don't understand what's not clear...
Maybe I could figure it
On Sat, 28 Mar 2009, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
And once upon a time it bought us aussie.
Well, all these details are in your memories, not a very transparent
process :-) Not that I care much really but I am trying personally to do
things as transparently as possible.
It's not easy doing
On 28/03/2009 20:07, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
That being said Lars, I guess you received some money throughout the
years thanks to your paypal
account and we know basically _nothing_ about it ;-)
This is an important issue. We for example had to pay all costs
for our last
On 28/03/2009 20:18, Christian Ridderström wrote:
On Sat, 28 Mar 2009, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
It wasn't clear to me at least. By now I infer they're sponsoring a
certain feature. I would like more details on how they are to be cited
for it?
Well exactly as I did?
I guess I don't
1 - 100 of 142 matches
Mail list logo