Re: [M100] mcomm on linux

2021-03-09 Thread Kurt McCullum
Those messages would indicate an error in the pySerial library, not mComm. The list_ports functions gets a list of available serial ports. You may want to check what version is installed. I think the most recent one is 3.4. There is more information at the site below.

Re: [M100] mcomm on linux

2021-03-09 Thread Peter Vollan
Well I've got the "wrapper" file that launches mcomm fixed, so now I am getting the following errors from the actual python script: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/share/mcomm/mcomm.py", line 199, in main() File "/usr/share/mcomm/mcomm.py", line 163, in main lPorts =

Re: [M100] mcomm on linux

2021-03-04 Thread Kurt McCullum
Brian, Great diagnostics procedures. Thanks. Kurt On Thu, Mar 4, 2021, at 2:02 AM, Brian K. White wrote: > On 3/3/21 1:50 PM, Peter Vollan wrote: > > FYI my problem persists, despite installing python 3.5 > > I haven't seen an answer to either mine or others questions that would > nail down

Re: [M100] mcomm on linux

2021-03-04 Thread Brian K. White
On 3/3/21 1:50 PM, Peter Vollan wrote: FYI my problem persists, despite installing python 3.5 I haven't seen an answer to either mine or others questions that would nail down that the the installed 3.5 is actually what the script is using. Merely installing a package doesn't guarantee

Re: [M100] mcomm on linux

2021-03-03 Thread David Grissom
: [M100] mcomm on linux I'll look into this when I get a chance Peter. I have not forgotten but thanks for the reminder. Kurt On Wed, Mar 3, 2021, at 10:50 AM, Peter Vollan wrote: FYI my problem persists, despite installing python 3.5 On Tue, 2 Mar 2021 at 17:16, John R. Hogerhuis wrote: On Tue

Re: [M100] mcomm on linux

2021-03-03 Thread Kurt McCullum
I'll look into this when I get a chance Peter. I have not forgotten but thanks for the reminder. Kurt On Wed, Mar 3, 2021, at 10:50 AM, Peter Vollan wrote: > FYI my problem persists, despite installing python 3.5 > > > On Tue, 2 Mar 2021 at 17:16, John R. Hogerhuis wrote: >> >> >> On Tue,

Re: [M100] mcomm on linux

2021-03-03 Thread Peter Vollan
FYI my problem persists, despite installing python 3.5 On Tue, 2 Mar 2021 at 17:16, John R. Hogerhuis wrote: > > > On Tue, Mar 2, 2021 at 4:57 PM Jim Anderson wrote: > >> It's easy to forget that when you're just starting out with this machine >> > > No, I get it. It's complicated. We've

Re: [M100] mcomm on linux

2021-03-02 Thread Kurt McCullum
I don't know of a good teeny file but I did upload an MP3 for TS-DOS that could be played on a phone. http://www.club100.org/memfiles/index.php?action=downloadfile=DOS100.CO.MP3=Kurt%20McCullum; With these instructions: TS-DOS 4.01 in MP3 Format. For those who don't have a ROM or DOS loader.

Re: [M100] mcomm on linux

2021-03-02 Thread John R. Hogerhuis
On Tue, Mar 2, 2021 at 4:57 PM Jim Anderson wrote: > It's easy to forget that when you're just starting out with this machine > No, I get it. It's complicated. We've lost multiple newbie's coming to the list. One guy, "Dunebuggy" departed the list informing us that he had ripped all the wires

Re: [M100] mcomm on linux

2021-03-02 Thread John R. Hogerhuis
Actually, here is the generic instructions for preparing to launch any CO file http://bitchin100.com/wiki/index.php?title=Loading_a_typical_CO_file And here are instructions about recovering an unresponsive / memory corrupted laptop. It actually covers the case of taking a machine from

Re: [M100] mcomm on linux

2021-03-02 Thread Jim Anderson
> -Original Message- > But TSLOAD.CO doesn't do anything but loads > DOS100.CO binary file. Which is 8k. This is true, but with a difference. It loads DOS100.CO on demand rather than have it reside in your RAM at all times, so when you quit TS-DOS you get the RAM back. Sometimes you

Re: [M100] mcomm on linux

2021-03-02 Thread John R. Hogerhuis
On Tue, Mar 2, 2021 at 4:24 PM AvantGuard Systems < cavaug...@avantguardsystems.com> wrote: > Ok I finally found some documentation on TEENY and it looks like I have to > use Windows and run TEENY.EXE on it. Grrr > >> >>> No, no... TEENY.EXE is not TEENY. TEENY.EXE is an "injector". But if

Re: [M100] mcomm on linux

2021-03-02 Thread AvantGuard Systems
Ok I finally found some documentation on TEENY and it looks like I have to use Windows and run TEENY.EXE on it. Grrr Curtis Vaughan | Computer Consultant AvantGuard Computer and Security Systems Phone: (206) 423-6979 ▪ Web: www.avantguardsystems.com On Tue,

Re: [M100] mcomm on linux

2021-03-02 Thread AvantGuard Systems
Ok, i've got TEENY.CO running, but have no idea what I'm supposed to do. Where are the instructions? Curtis Vaughan | Computer Consultant AvantGuard Computer and Security Systems Phone: (206) 423-6979 ▪ Web: www.avantguardsystems.com On Tue, Mar 2, 2021 at 2:37

Re: [M100] mcomm on linux

2021-03-02 Thread John R. Hogerhuis
So TSL100.DO is a 3K file, that can be downloaded through TELCOM or the RUN"COM command. It's a text form of a BASIC program that creates TSLOAD.CO, a 526 byte CO program. But TSLOAD.CO doesn't do anything but loads DOS100.CO binary file. Which is 8k. It all works... but if you go straight to

Re: [M100] mcomm on linux

2021-03-02 Thread Jim Anderson
> -Original Message- > > Well, if I try to rename ADVENT1.BA to ADVEN.DO, it still says file already > exists and > actually it just creates ADVENT1.BA in RAM. Just wanted to point out that when it was suggested to rename the file, the idea was to rename it on the PC end rather than

Re: [M100] mcomm on linux

2021-03-02 Thread Joshua O'Keefe
On Mar 2, 2021, at 1:04 PM, John R. Hogerhuis wrote: > In which case you need something in plain text .DO file format to start with. > I think the "IPL.BA" A solution that worked for me before I had a REX was to inject TSLOAD which is small, and use that to run TSDOS off the emulated disk as

Re: [M100] mcomm on linux

2021-03-02 Thread John R. Hogerhuis
And if you want to ditch TS-DOS RAM altogether, you can just inject TEENY in one step: http://club100.org/memfiles/index.php?=0==John%20Hogerhuis/TEENY This is a TEENY loader in DO format. You run it, and it creates TEENY.CO It's bare bones but it gets the file transfer job done. It's only

Re: [M100] mcomm on linux

2021-03-02 Thread John R. Hogerhuis
On Tue, Mar 2, 2021 at 12:25 PM AvantGuard Systems < cavaug...@avantguardsystems.com> wrote: > Well, if I try to rename ADVENT1.BA to ADVEN.DO, it still says file > already exists and actually it just creates ADVENT1.BA in RAM. > I even tried LOADing a .DO file. Again it says file already exists,

Re: [M100] mcomm on linux

2021-03-02 Thread Gregory McGill
pretty easy to do just copy the file listing for it and paste it into a terminal on the pc side while doing the load on the m100 side Greg On Tue, Mar 2, 2021 at 12:25 PM AvantGuard Systems < cavaug...@avantguardsystems.com> wrote: > Well, if I try to rename ADVENT1.BA to ADVEN.DO, it still

Re: [M100] mcomm on linux

2021-03-02 Thread AvantGuard Systems
Well, if I try to rename ADVENT1.BA to ADVEN.DO, it still says file already exists and actually it just creates ADVENT1.BA in RAM. I even tried LOADing a .DO file. Again it says file already exists, but this time the file in RAM has 1 bit. In reality it should be around 511. Uh RAM is

Re: [M100] mcomm on linux

2021-03-02 Thread John R. Hogerhuis
On Tue, Mar 2, 2021 at 12:06 PM Kurt McCullum wrote: > So true. > > So the philosophy is that when you touch a hot stove, you should get > burned. > > Here endeth the lesson, newbs :-) -- John.

Re: [M100] mcomm on linux

2021-03-02 Thread Kurt McCullum
So true. > So the philosophy is that when you touch a hot stove, you should get burned. > >

Re: [M100] mcomm on linux

2021-03-02 Thread John R. Hogerhuis
Ah. I think it is a file format/ extension problem. A Known issue ADVEN1.BA is misnamed. It is a text file, so its extension should be .DO not .BA . .BA is only for tokenized basic programs. TS-DOS sees the BA extension and tries to load the contents as a tokenized (binary) BASIC program, into

Re: [M100] mcomm on linux

2021-03-02 Thread Kurt McCullum
Is ADVEN1.BA a text file or tokenized basic? Quite a few of the files from club100 have a .BA extension but are actually .DO files. Kurt On Tue, Mar 2, 2021, at 11:56 AM, AvantGuard Systems wrote: > Right, so I push Disk to see the files in my TPDD directory. So for example, > let's say I want

Re: [M100] mcomm on linux

2021-03-02 Thread AvantGuard Systems
Right, so I push Disk to see the files in my TPDD directory. So for example, let's say I want to load ADVEN1.BA, which under FILE on the M100 shows as having 17875 bits (17.9 KB according to the computer). So all's good. RAM free is 23477 So I've killed ADVEN1.BA on the RAM side. I go to DISK,

Re: [M100] mcomm on linux

2021-03-02 Thread John R. Hogerhuis
On Tue, Mar 2, 2021 at 11:42 AM AvantGuard Systems < cavaug...@avantguardsystems.com> wrote: > I'm wondering how I'm supposed to get that over to M100 should I lose it? > Well, many people have a ROM version of TS-DOS either in a option ROM or in a REX. So they never need to bootstrap TS-DOS

Re: [M100] mcomm on linux

2021-03-02 Thread John R. Hogerhuis
"But what happens when I load a file is that it will always say that the file already exists, but when I go to RAM it's an empty file. So even if I try to save it, it says it's an empty file." What file are you trying to load? When you launch TS-DOS you are looking at the M100's directory. If

Re: [M100] mcomm on linux

2021-03-02 Thread AvantGuard Systems
OK back to mcomm on linux. It does seem so far more stable than on windows. However! when running my CPU is being taxed by python3. Anyhow After I launch TS-DOS on M100, I can go to Disk and see all the files that will fit on the screen. Looking at the TSDOS documentation it seems that I

Re: [M100] mcomm on linux

2021-02-28 Thread Brian K. White
On 2/26/21 6:28 PM, Chris Fezzler wrote: Hey, after I type RUN "COM:98N1E" in BASIC, do I hit ENTER on the M100? Yes. -- bkw

Re: [M100] mcomm on linux

2021-02-26 Thread Chris Fezzler
Over a decade of Club100 and multiple decades with Model T computing and I never tried mComm.  Looks cool. Dug out my old Win7 subnotebook, my Gigaware USB-to-serial cable and a null modem gender changer.  Connected everything up.mComm installed perfectly and put a nice icon on my desktop.  It

Re: [M100] mcomm on linux

2021-02-26 Thread John R. Hogerhuis
udev is the way, IMO. At least on the Pi that I have a lot of experience with. The rules are a pain in the rear. Probably because I don't fully understand how it works, so it is a process of trial and error. But udev is the only way I've gotten consistent control of device naming for projects.

Re: [M100] mcomm on linux

2021-02-26 Thread Daryl Tester
On 27/2/21 7:04 am, Kurt McCullum wrote: Once you plug your USB to serial adapter into your system, it will show up under /dev. You have to have permissions to access it so you will likely need to use chmod on it before you can use it. Because the permissions are ephemeral and will disappear

Re: [M100] mcomm on linux

2021-02-26 Thread Kurt McCullum
Curtis, Once you plug your USB to serial adapter into your system, it will show up under /dev. You have to have permissions to access it so you will likely need to use chmod on it before you can use it. By default, mComm will use the first serial port (if there are any). By default, mComm will

[M100] mcomm on linux

2021-02-26 Thread AvantGuard Systems
I have yet to get the cables for connecting my M100 to my computer to access files. However in the meantime I have installed mcomm. I'm wondering how I'm supposed to use it. So if I enter the command: mcomm -lit says there are no serial ports available. Perhaps once it's plugged into the M100