Re: hildon animation

On Thu, 2009-11-26 at 07:32 +0100, ext kyle cronan wrote: > Ah, never mind! I see now that HildonStackableWindow is all I need. > I figured I was missing something. Yes, the animation code is in the window manager (hildon-desktop). AnimationActors are remote Clutter actors that you can command (s

Re: Debian on the n900 / Configuring NOLO

On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 4:10 AM, Christopher Allan Webber wrote: > Hello all, > Hiya, > However, I realize I need to configure the bootloader to load off the SD > card.  This is proving a bit hard to do, however, as I cannot find any > documentation on configuring the NOLO bootloader.  So even if

Re: Debian on the n900 / Configuring NOLO

On Thu, 2009-11-26 at 05:10 +0100, ext Christopher Allan Webber wrote: > Hello all, > > I'm interested in exploring installing Debian on the n900. I assume > that for the most part, if I loosely follow these instructions: > http://www.debian.org/releases/stable/arm/apds03.html.en > > ... that it

Re: hildon animation

Ah, never mind! I see now that HildonStackableWindow is all I need. I figured I was missing something. Thanks, Kyle On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 10:24 PM, kyle cronan wrote: > Hi, > > Is there some code you would recommend I look at in order to > understand how to do animated window transitions usi

hildon animation

Hi, Is there some code you would recommend I look at in order to understand how to do animated window transitions using the Hildon API? I assume this is going to involve the AnimationActor objects? What I'd like to do is use HildonTouchSelectors to implement a menu so that when you make a select

Debian on the n900 / Configuring NOLO

Hello all, I'm interested in exploring installing Debian on the n900. I assume that for the most part, if I loosely follow these instructions: http://www.debian.org/releases/stable/arm/apds03.html.en ... that it may be possible to do so. However, I realize I need to configure the bootloader to

Scratchbox package versions on autobuilder?

Hi, Could someone with access to the autobuilder machine send to me the output of "dpkg -l scratchbox*" ? I'm getting a build error that I'm unable to reproduce on my own installation: http://pastebin.com/m4f98186 (This is armel.build.log.FAILED.txt pasted into pastebin because the log may disap

HeFullscreenButton now in hildon-extras

Hi, after a long long delay, I finally managed to get HeFullscreenButton into hildon-extras. If you want to see it in action have a look at conboy-unstable or just use it in your code :) Cheers! Conny ___ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers

Re: Updating the info for Extras-devel non-free

On 11/25/09 4:07 PM, Andrew Flegg wrote: > On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 14:55, David Greaves wrote: > >> Does the community really have so much spare resource that we can QA >> non-free (and presumably non-community) apps? >> > fms/RST38h's emulators are non-free. However much I'd prefer to h

Problems with extras-devel and outdated Packages.bz2

Hi, I uploaded a package to fremantle extras-devel (some hours ago), and it even hit the extras-devel repo already: http://repository.maemo.org/extras-devel/pool/fremantle/free/a/apiextractor/ (look by the date of today) But it is still not installable, because the Package index was not updated

Re: Updating the info for Extras-devel non-free

On Wed, 2009-11-25 at 15:07 +, Andrew Flegg wrote: > On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 14:55, David Greaves wrote: > > > > Does the community really have so much spare resource that we can QA > > non-free (and presumably non-community) apps? > > fms/RST38h's emulators are non-free. However much I'd pre

Re: Updating the info for Extras-devel non-free

On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 14:55, David Greaves wrote: > > Does the community really have so much spare resource that we can QA > non-free (and presumably non-community) apps? fms/RST38h's emulators are non-free. However much I'd prefer to have the source and not special case them, they are useful p

Re: Updating the info for Extras-devel non-free

On Wed, 2009-11-25 at 12:04 +0100, Jeremiah Foster wrote: >> We are seeing more questions about this and actually the current > >> information is misleading since it suggests that non-free packages can > >> bypass the Extras-testing QA process, which is not true. > > I am hesitant here, some of th

Re: Updating the info for Extras-devel non-free

On Nov 25, 2009, at 15:11, Valerio Valerio wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 1:55 PM, Dave Neary wrote: > Hi, > > I know I'm not the only one confused here... > > Quim says: > We are seeing more questions about this and actually the > current information is misleading since i

Re: why is gtk20-l10n package in 'non-free' ?

Hi Christian, I'm the one who created these packages a year or so ago. It's probably my mistake that it went unnoticed. CC'ing our l10n people so they can do something as there's nothing I can do about it now. Oksan, This seems like a GPL violation. I'm not sure as I have no time to investigate

Re: Updating the info for Extras-devel non-free

Hi, On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 1:55 PM, Dave Neary wrote: > Hi, > > I know I'm not the only one confused here... > > Quim says: > We are seeing more questions about this and actually the > current information is misleading since it suggests that > non-free packages can bypass the Ext

Re: Updating the info for Extras-devel non-free

Hi, I know I'm not the only one confused here... Quim says: We are seeing more questions about this and actually the current information is misleading since it suggests that non-free packages can bypass the Extras-testing QA process, which is not true. And Jeremiah says: > He

Re: Updating the info for Extras-devel non-free

> We have had an ad-hoc solution which basically is that Niels takes care of > non-free. > >> >>> Yet there are several non-free packages in extras-devel & extras- >>> testing >>> / Extras. Can someone please update the wiki information reflecting the >>> current practice for Maemo 5? I will t

Re: Can't debug an application under FREMANTLE_ARMEL target in Scratchbox

ext Burka Victor wrote: > [sbox-FREMANTLE_ARMEL: ~/Projects/simple] > gdb simple > GNU gdb 6.8 > Copyright (C) 2008 Free Software Foundation, Inc. > License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later > This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it. > T

Re: Updating the info for Extras-devel non-free

On Nov 25, 2009, at 11:49, wrote: >> -Original Message- >> From: maemo-developers-boun...@maemo.org [mailto:maemo-developers- >> boun...@maemo.org] On Behalf Of Gil Quim (Nokia-D/Helsinki) >> Sent: 25 November, 2009 11:48 >> To: maemo developers >> Cc: marc...@maemo.org >> Subject: Upda

RE: Updating the info for Extras-devel non-free

> -Original Message- > From: maemo-developers-boun...@maemo.org [mailto:maemo-developers- > boun...@maemo.org] On Behalf Of Gil Quim (Nokia-D/Helsinki) > Sent: 25 November, 2009 11:48 > To: maemo developers > Cc: marc...@maemo.org > Subject: Updating the info for Extras-devel non-free > >

Re: Updating the info for Extras-devel non-free

Hi, Quim Gil wrote: > Hi, the information to upload binary-only packages to extras-devel is > out of date: > http://wiki.maemo.org/Uploading_to_Extras-devel#.22non-free.22_packages > > Yet there are several non-free packages in extras-devel & extras-testing > / Extras. Can someone please update t

Updating the info for Extras-devel non-free

Hi, the information to upload binary-only packages to extras-devel is out of date: http://wiki.maemo.org/Uploading_to_Extras-devel#.22non-free.22_packages Yet there are several non-free packages in extras-devel & extras-testing / Extras. Can someone please update the wiki information reflecting th

Re: Can't debug an application under FREMANTLE_ARMEL target in Scratchbox

On Tue, 2009-11-24 at 18:02 +0100, ext Alberto Garcia wrote: > On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 07:55:47PM +0300, Burka Victor wrote: > > > I'm trying to debug very simple application under FREMANTLE_ARMEL > > target and can't do that. > > The armel target is not meant to actually run or debug application