Brad Knowles wrote:
Correct. The Mailman developers feel that forcing all
replies to go back to the list causes much more harm than
good.
For a real-world example: We run several thousand lists here
at our university (not all in Mailman) and we had a class list
set up with replies go to
On 6/20/2008 3:09 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just wanted to say I did not mean to start a header war here.
And I apologize for for letting my type A personality rear its ugly head.
--
Best regards,
Charles
--
Mailman-Users mailing list
For users who have their mail go through procmail the problem can be
fixed by a rule like the following. But in light of Brads letter, I
feel it is necessary to add a disclaimer saying that if this setting
gets you killed or fired, I cannot be held responsible! :p
:0 fw
* [EMAIL
Brad Knowles writes:
Then you must not have read the FAQ I referenced.
Please, Brad, don't go there. You know he's not going to change his
mind, neither are you, or me, but what matters is that neither will
Barry. So it's a moot point.
--
You replied on list, so I will too... but I will not respond to further
arguments about it, since neither of us are likely to change our mind.
On 6/19/2008, Brad Knowles ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Whats the big deal anyway? If you want lists configured to reply to
the list, just set it that
Charles Marcus wrote:
*My* point was simply pointing out that there *is a preference setting*
in the Mailman GUI for changing this, so if someone *wants* to change
it, they obviously *can* - so what difference does the *default* make?
There is also an mm_cfg.py setting to override the default
Allan Odgaard wrote:
I use an anonymous remailer so personally wouldnt work for me, plus
when people reply to me and cc the list, there are no list headers in
that message, even though it is a list message (one of the reasons
reply to poster sucks).
If this is a problem for you, set
Charles Marcus wrote:
You replied on list, so I will too...
Not really a very wise idea. When I use my @python.org e-mail address
(which I very rarely do), I speak from a position of a certain amount of
authority on the subject.
If you want to try to have a civilized private conversation
On 6/20/2008 1:27 PM, Brad Knowles wrote:
Charles Marcus wrote:
You replied on list, so I will too...
Not really a very wise idea.
Really. Well, I had started to reply point by point until it became
obvious that you are confused about something...
Read the following carefully...
Charles Marcus wrote:
I am *not* arguing for changing the default - whatever gave you that
idea?
You may say that, but then virtually everything else you wrote was in
strong, even violent, support of changing the default.
So, what am I supposed to believe -- the tiny little disclaimer,
On 6/20/2008, Brad Knowles ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
It wasn't a threat. It was a statement of fact -- continued arguing
with us on a subject considered long since dead is likely to have
results that you're probably not going to like.
I was talking about your cute little remark about giving
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
.
Also it seems clicking reply on a msg here does a off list reply. So
all my previous reply`s were done off list.
I just wanted to say I did not mean to start a header war here. What I
meant was I should have looked more closely where my reply was going and
Charles Marcus wrote:
I was talking about your cute little remark about giving someone a
FIREARM so that they could 'come demonstrate to me the danger their
deear departed one faced'.
I said I wouldn't do it. So there's no threat there.
That chip on your shoulder is getting pretty heavy,
Well I finished my setup. I have a Multi-Mailman install set up and
working. I have also wrote up a little writeup on how I did it. If
someone who knows mailman would look at it and tell me if I have done
something wrong that would be nice. Its at
http://skagitattic.com/mailman.html
On 6/19/2008, Brad Knowles ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Correct. The Mailman developers feel that forcing all replies to go
back to the list causes much more harm than good, see FAQ 3.48 at
http://wiki.list.org/x/44A9.
Whats the big deal anyway? If you want lists configured to reply to the
Charles Marcus wrote:
Whats the big deal anyway? If you want lists configured to reply to the
list, just set it that way. What difference does it make what the
default is?
The point is that there are lots of MUAs out there that are broken, and if
you screw with the Reply-To: header, they
Hello all,
I have searched all over for how to do true virtual list with mailman
and finely decided to run multiple mailman installs side by side.
However when setting up the fist mailman install I have ran into a
wall. In mm_cfg.py
POSTFIX_STYLE_VIRTUAL_DOMAINS = ['domian.com']
MTA =
On 18 Jun 2008, at 10:04, adsarebad-at-. wrote:
I have searched all over for how to do true virtual list with
mailman and finely decided to run multiple mailman installs side by
side.
Have you seen http://www.gurulabs.com/downloads/postfix-to-mailman-2.1.py
?
It was included
Allan Odgaard wrote:
I don’t think it will verify that the domain is the proper one (for
mails sent to each list), but it should be simple to duplicate the
service as mailman-list-a, b, c and setup the different ones to be used
as transport for the different list domains (via transport_maps
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have searched all over for how to do true virtual list with mailman
and finely decided to run multiple mailman installs side by side.
However when setting up the fist mailman install I have ran into a
wall. In mm_cfg.py
POSTFIX_STYLE_VIRTUAL_DOMAINS =
On 18 Jun 2008, at 17:51, Brad Knowles wrote:
Allan Odgaard wrote:
I don’t think it will verify that the domain is the proper one (for
mails sent to each list), but it should be simple to duplicate the
service as mailman-list-a, b, c and setup the different ones to be
used as transport
On 18-Jun-08, at 4:04 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have searched all over for how to do true virtual list with
mailman and finely decided to run multiple mailman installs side by
side.
This doesn't answer your questions, but have you considered giving
the lists unique names, but
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmm.. It would be easy to write a little script to edit the tables
mailman makes to be right but I don`t know how I would get mailman to
call my script instead of (is it postmap?)...? I was looking through
the mailman source for a call to postmap but could not
On 18 Jun 2008, at 20:59, adsarebad-at-. wrote:
Have you seen http://www.gurulabs.com/downloads/postfix-to-mailman-2.1.py
?
[...]
I think I may have ran into that file in my travels, can`t remember
for sure through because I ran into so many. Is that the one where
I need to have
24 matches
Mail list logo
