Hi, Experts,
Since meego sdk can be installed on “meego” too, to develop on meego,
we also need tools like “make”, where can we download these tools?
Best Regards
He Yunlong (何云龙)
Cube: GTC-18M08
iNet: 8751-1645
Tel: +86-010-57511645
Email:
I have never noticed obvious issues with Firefox on
Linux. I have had issues uploading photographs on Ebay with Chrome
and some web-sites don't work properly with Chrome. Perhaps this
is because website developers tend to test with IE and Firefox but
not
with Chrome.
If it works in
From
http://wiki.meego.com/SDK/Docs/1.1/Building_a_MeeGo_chroot_on_Linux#Install_developer_packages
is a quite good list, probably throw in git as well:
$ zypper install man qt-creator qt-devel make libmeegotouch-devel gcc gcc-c++
gdb wget
(assuming your zypper repos are appropriate)
From:
Hi,
Since meego sdk can be installed on “meego” too, to develop on meego, we
also need tools like “make”, where can we download these tools?
You can add MeeGo SDK repository
(http://repo.meego.com/MeeGo/sdk/host/repos/meego/) to get the MeeGo SDK.
make command is in make package (you
you can use zypper to install these tools.
zypper install make
use zypper search `tool name` to check if the tool exists in meego repo.
regards,
Dhaval
2010/12/28 He, Yunlong yunlong...@intel.com
Hi, Experts,
Since meego sdk can be installed on “meego” too, to develop on
meego,
Thanks a lot, the issue is caused by run it with “sudo zypper install make”,
after running it with root, works perfect. Sorry for such stupid questions, :)
B.R.
He Yunlong
From: Zhang, Zheng
Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2010 5:04 PM
To: dhaval bc; He, Yunlong
Cc: meego-dev@meego.com;
zypper install gcc gcc-c++ make build-utils
then your qt creator can work nativlly
-zheng
From: meego-sdk-boun...@meego.com [mailto:meego-sdk-boun...@meego.com] On
Behalf Of dhaval bc
Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2010 4:46 PM
To: He, Yunlong
Cc: meego-dev@meego.com; meego-...@meego.com
Subject:
All ideas on x-less solution are welcome. As Thiago points out the solution to
be targetted is wayland managing the Egl surfaces and then a product specific
window manager. Input drivers need consideration too.
Mikk0 Terh0
On Dec 27, 2010, at 4:14 PM, ext Thiago Macieira thi...@kde.org wrote:
Hi All,
The FN's UX design library is public and available at[0]. Recommended
reading for people designing UXs looking for guidelines and direction.
Cheers,
-Sivan
[0]:
Thanks for the user agent tip. It wasn't documented in the man page (probably
generated from --help).
For starbucks: http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=15945
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 10:54 AM, fathi.bou...@nokia.com wrote:
I have never noticed obvious issues with Firefox on
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 12:50 PM, fathi.bou...@nokia.com wrote:
Thanks for the user agent tip. It wasn't documented in the man page (probably
generated from --help).
For starbucks: http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=15945
Works fine here (8.0.552.224).
--
Felipe Contreras
What are the advantages of developing QT apps without libmeegotouch over MTF
(Meego touch framework) enabled application.?
If we need to implement gestures for any given use case, will a application
based on libmeegotouch be more smoother than QT app without libmeegotouch?
Any touch testing
Disadvantage with both QWidgets (which is what I assume you mean by Qt w/o
meegotouch) and mtf is that neither is an officially supported solution, i.e.
you are on your own if you use them. If something works today (e.g. gestures),
somebody may decide to break it tomorrow without prior warning.
From: meego-dev-boun...@meego.com [meego-dev-boun...@meego.com] on behalf of
ext Ville M. Vainio [vivai...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2010 3:23 PM
To: Rohit Baravkar; meego-dev
Subject: Re: [MeeGo-dev] What are the advantages of developing QT apps
On Tue, 28 Dec 2010, 13:50:35 GMT, kate.alh...@nokia.com wrote:
With Qt Quick you have all enablers for full MeeGo UX and in Qt Quick
Components you have all UX components ready made.
Well, not yet. And it's not yet clear what that means in terms of good
cross-platform support (e.g. Symbian,
A related question for me as I'm going to implement a couple of UXs
soon, what sort of already ready made regular application components
are available from Qt Quick Components right now?
Button, Windows, Dialogs? Can I use everything I would have used using
Qt Designer default mainwindow app
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 3:26 PM, Sivan Greenberg si...@omniqueue.com wrote:
A related question for me as I'm going to implement a couple of UXs
soon, what sort of already ready made regular application components
are available from Qt Quick Components right now?
You can follow the progress
From: Andrew Flegg [afl...@gmail.com] on behalf of ext Andrew Flegg
[and...@bleb.org]
Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2010 4:20 PM
To: Alhola Kate (Nokia-FNDC/Helsinki); meetthero...@gmail.com;
meego-dev@meego.com
Subject: Re: [MeeGo-dev] What are the
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 3:20 PM, Andrew Flegg and...@bleb.org wrote:
With Qt Quick you have all enablers for full MeeGo UX and in Qt Quick
Components you have all UX components ready made.
Well, not yet. And it's not yet clear what that means in terms of good
cross-platform support (e.g.
From: ext Ville M. Vainio [vivai...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2010 4:40 PM
To: Andrew Flegg
Cc: Alhola Kate (Nokia-FNDC/Helsinki); meetthero...@gmail.com;
meego-dev@meego.com
Subject: Re: [MeeGo-dev] What are the advantages of developing QT
On Tue, 28 Dec 2010 16:37:26 +0800
He, Yunlong yunlong...@intel.com wrote:
Hi, Experts,
Since meego sdk can be installed on “meego” too, to develop
on meego, we also need tools like “make”, where can we download these
tools?
Zypper patterns are your friend in this case...
To see
From: meego-dev-boun...@meego.com [meego-dev-boun...@meego.com] on behalf of
ext Benoît HERVIER [kher...@khertan.net]
Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2010 5:52 PM
To: meego-dev@meego.com
Subject: Re: [MeeGo-dev] What are the advantages of developing QT apps
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 09:09:00AM +, ext mikko.j.te...@nokia.com wrote:
All ideas on x-less solution are welcome. As Thiago points out the solution
to be targetted is wayland managing the Egl surfaces and then a product
specific window manager. Input drivers need consideration too.
hey
On Tue, 2010-12-28 at 17:06 +0800, He, Yunlong wrote:
Thanks a lot, the issue is caused by run it with “sudo zypper install
make”, after running it with root, works perfect. Sorry for such
stupid questions, J
If you don't want to use sudo, just do a
pkcon install make
(Sorry about posting at meego-dev - it appears almost nobody is
on-topic on this mailing list, so one more won't hurt).
2010/12/28 Benoît HERVIER kher...@khertan.net:
Currently it s look like a new technology, require to reconstruct many
things, isn't ready, and many push for using it. It s
Hi,
Am Dienstag 28 Dezember 2010 schrieb Ville M. Vainio:
QWidgets were not good enough for anybody
You are talking about these QWidgets that several tutorials on the meego
conference were about?
Are you really wondering why developers are confused and loosing confidence in
all this? Do you
On Tuesday, 28 de December de 2010 14:37:26 kate.alh...@nokia.com wrote:
What is the timescale and roadmap for Qt Quick Components?
Thiago or Henrik Harz can comment this issue ?
As soon as humanly possible. So sometime in Q1 or Q2 in 2011. Hopefully in
time for us to talk about in the MeeGo
From: meego-dev-boun...@meego.com [meego-dev-boun...@meego.com] on behalf of
ext Till Harbaum / Lists [li...@harbaum.org]
Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2010 9:35 PM
To: meego-dev@meego.com
Subject: Re: [MeeGo-dev] What are the advantages of developing QT
On Tuesday, 28 de December de 2010 19:50:35 kate.alh...@nokia.com wrote:
I promise that we in Forum Nokia do everything to get developers informed as
well as possible. We release Qt Quick Components pre-alpha as soon as we
get it done, we released Qt for Maemo5 with first SDK. Reason that you
2010/12/28 Till Harbaum / Lists li...@harbaum.org:
Am Dienstag 28 Dezember 2010 schrieb Ville M. Vainio:
QWidgets were not good enough for anybody
You are talking about these QWidgets that several tutorials on the meego
conference were about?
Are you really wondering why developers are
On Tue, 28 Dec 2010 21:21:46 +0100
Ville M. Vainio vivai...@gmail.com wrote:
If someone is *still* confused, do let us know and we can make it more
explicit in the future.
What seems very ironic about the situation is that there appears to be
a new, strict separation between the UX
On Tuesday 28 Dec 2010 20:41:51 Bernd Stramm wrote:
On Tue, 28 Dec 2010 21:21:46 +0100
Ville M. Vainio vivai...@gmail.com wrote:
If someone is *still* confused, do let us know and we can make it more
explicit in the future.
What seems very ironic about the situation is that
On Tue, 28 Dec 2010 21:25:42 +
kate.alh...@nokia.com wrote:
From: meego-dev-boun...@meego.com [meego-dev-boun...@meego.com] on
behalf of ext Bernd Stramm [bernd.str...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday,
December 28, 2010 10:41 PM To: Ville M. Vainio
Cc:
From: ext Till Harbaum / Lists [li...@harbaum.org]
Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2010 10:27 PM
To: Alhola Kate (Nokia-FNDC/Helsinki)
Cc: meego-dev@meego.com
Subject: Re: [MeeGo-dev] What are the advantages of developing QT apps without
libmeegotouch over MTF
On 12/28/2010 9:21 PM, Ville M. Vainio wrote:
2010/12/28 Till Harbaum / Listsli...@harbaum.org:
Am Dienstag 28 Dezember 2010 schrieb Ville M. Vainio:
QWidgets were not good enough for anybody
You are talking about these QWidgets that several tutorials on the meego
conference were about?
Hi Timo,
The default adaptor of accelerometer used input event.
If we use sysfs to replace input event, are there any effect of this?
Does any information will be lose because of replacing input event to sysfs?
I assume no side effect by replacing input event with sysfs, but like to
On 2010-12-29 at 05:23:37, ext Zhao, Forrest wrote:
The default adaptor of accelerometer used input event.
If we use sysfs to replace input event, are there any effect of this?
Does any information will be lose because of replacing input event to
sysfs?
That depends a little bit on the
Hi all,
Because we need to run application on handset image with screen non-black for
long time.
After I remove libXScrnSaver, xorg-x11-proto-scrnsaverproto, but the screen
will turn black all the same.
Here, anyone know how to disable screensaver?
Thanks
best wishes
Junmin Zhu
38 matches
Mail list logo
