repcached installation , when I test the
> replication using telnet command line it looks like good in 2 directions ,
> but when I try to make everything up by connecting me to my CAS server , it
> creates and add TGT ticket into one server succesfully , BUT the
> replication to t
esn't work. Is
>>> there any other way to check on which server a key is stored.
>>> > Additionally, when you say brute force, how would I be able to do it
>>> on memcached server as I will not know on which server instance the key is
>>> stored.
>>> > C
gt; >
> > Thanks and Regards,Om Kale
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 2, 2018 at 4:27 PM, dormando wrote:
> > Why are you trying to do this? That's generally a bad sign, the
> > replication is for redundancy. if you're just trying to confirm it
> wor
e
>
> On Thu, Aug 2, 2018 at 4:27 PM, dormando wrote:
> Why are you trying to do this? That's generally a bad sign, the
> replication is for redundancy. if you're just trying to confirm it
> works,
> you can do a brute force search for the key
>
>
and Regards,
Om Kale
On Thu, Aug 2, 2018 at 4:27 PM, dormando wrote:
> Why are you trying to do this? That's generally a bad sign, the
> replication is for redundancy. if you're just trying to confirm it works,
> you can do a brute force search for the key
>
> On Thu, 2 Aug 2018, Om Kale
Why are you trying to do this? That's generally a bad sign, the
replication is for redundancy. if you're just trying to confirm it works,
you can do a brute force search for the key
On Thu, 2 Aug 2018, Om Kale wrote:
> Hi All,I have enabled replication (using --NUMBER_OF_REPLICAS) and ket
Hi All,
I have enabled replication (using --NUMBER_OF_REPLICAS) and ketama hashing.
This means, I will have replicas of keys stored on different servers
memntioned in my server list.
My question is, is there any way of retrieving the list of servers where
replicas of a particular key lie
, Said Ramli a écrit :
>
> Hello ,
>
> I'm running into a new issue with HA jasig Cas configuration :
>
> CAS 4.0.6
>
> cas-server-integration-memcached 4.0.6
> memecached : 1.4.13
> repcached : 2.3.1
>
> I have 2 memcached instances with repcached installation ,
Hello ,
I'm running into a new issue with HA jasig Cas configuration :
CAS 4.0.6
cas-server-integration-memcached 4.0.6
memecached : 1.4.13
repcached : 2.3.1
I have 2 memcached instances with repcached installation , when I test the
replication using telnet command line it looks like good
There is no replication in 1.4 branch. For the part of functionality that
needed replication we switched to Redis (it has its own downsides: less
stable perf, a bit more memory hungry for our configuration, harder to
setup due tons of knobs but has replication)
On Thursday, February 5, 2015
Hi everybody,
I use Memcached 1.2.8 with Recached 2.2 on CentOS6.6.
It's working, but I want to know if it exists a recent version.
Or if I have repcache path with Memcached 1.4.22.
Thx for your response
King regards
Aziz
--
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
does repcached(replication of memcached) has Encryption function when
replicate data
thanks！
--
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
memcached group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to memcached
...@gmail.com wrote:
does repcached(replication of memcached) has Encryption function when
replicate data
thanks！
--
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
memcached group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email
Updates:
Status: Invalid
Comment #1 on issue 339 by dorma...@rydia.net: Segmentation fault - on
replication - freebsd
http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=339
The replication patch is unsupported, sorry.
--
You received this message because this project is configured
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 339 by rabcz...@googlemail.com: Segmentation fault - on
replication - freebsd
http://code.google.com/p/memcached/issues/detail?id=339
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1. memcached -p 11211 -m 64 -x 127.0.0.1 -vvv -u
I am starting Memcache in my Linux machine the following way , the second
ip below is the replication port , configured with the help of repcached
*memcached -d -u nobody -l 10.1.1.101 -p 11211 -m 64 -x 10.1.2.102 -v (Server
1)*
and
*memcached -d -u nobody -l 10.1.2.102 -p 11211 -m 64
Hi ,
I am using Memcace server as active active (Master Master ) where two
servers will be reciving requests , and applied repcached to those servers
for replication
What i observed is that the CAS Key stored by XMemcacheClient 1.3.5 is not
being replicated among hese servers
RIght now
, Hello,xmemcached);
Now i have memcache installed on both the IP addresses defined above . and
i observed that if the local host server is down , data is fetched from the
2nd defined server .
Please let me know , is there any difference between the Clustering and
Replication here
unique store of Data , and
finally repcached is applied on top of these severs for providing
replication .
The Data is being replicated bethween these two servers and i observed
that there is a small delay regarding the two servers being in sync with
each other
I am using
Application is in such a way that , there are two
Memcache servers (Server1 and Server2 )where both of them acting as active
active (Master - Master ) each of them gets unique store of Data , and
finally repcached is applied on top of these severs for providing
replication .
The Data
gets unique store of Data , and
finally repcached is applied on top of these severs for providing
replication .
The Data is being replicated bethween these two servers and i observed
that there is a small delay regarding the two servers being in sync with
each other
I am using
both of them acting as active active
(Master - Master ) each of them gets unique store of Data , and finally
repcached is applied on top of these severs for providing replication .
The Data is being replicated bethween these two servers and i observed that
there is a small delay
Les Mikesell , Thanks for the link , but unfortunately that is no where
related to my question above .
anyway once again , What i was asking is that as there is some delay in
Data Replication , will the Memcache Client checks server2 also in case
if it doesn't found in Server 1 .
And does
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 1:56 PM, Kiran Kumar krn1...@gmail.com wrote:
Les Mikesell , Thanks for the link , but unfortunately that is no where
related to my question above .
anyway once again , What i was asking is that as there is some delay in Data
Replication , will the Memcache Client
The only cluster solution using memcache protocol (syncronous replication)
that i remember is MySQL with ndb storage (there wa another but i dont
remember the Name). the repcache solution is Nice too but its async...
Maybe you should consider an abstraction layer that should be done
addresses defined above . and
i observed that if the local host server is down , data is fetched from the
2nd defined server .
Please let me know , is there any difference between the Clustering and
Replication here ??
*And i see a lot of buzz on using Repcached with memcached for replication
Since i know there is no cluster for memcached, cluster = syncronous
replication, repcache is assync
Em 12/10/2012 11:18, Kiran Kumar krn1...@gmail.com escreveu:
I have written a sample application as shown
String location = localhost:11211,122.34.5:11211;
MemcachedClientBuilder builder = new
,xmemcached);
Now i have memcache installed on both the IP addresses defined above . and i
observed that if the local host server is down , data is fetched from the
2nd defined server .
Please let me know , is there any difference between the Clustering and
Replication here ??
And i see
check the link
http://code.google.com/p/xmemcached/wiki/User_Guide#Client_distribution
On Friday, 12 October 2012 20:33:16 UTC+5:30, rspadim wrote:
Since i know there is no cluster for memcached, cluster = syncronous
replication, repcache is assync
Em 12/10/2012 11:18, Kiran Kumar krn
??
On Friday, 12 October 2012 20:33:16 UTC+5:30, rspadim wrote:
Since i know there is no cluster for memcached, cluster = syncronous
replication, repcache is assync
Em 12/10/2012 11:18, Kiran Kumar krn...@gmail.com javascript:
escreveu:
I have written a sample application as shown
String
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 11:00 AM, Kiran Kumar krn1...@gmail.com wrote:
Could you please check this link
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/memcached/YCKNM6wRTbk where the
author is saying that if you maintain two instances of servers in the list ,
the Data will be automatically backed up
Thanks LesMikesell you were right there is nothing mentioned anything
about data being backed up in that link .
What i really want to convery is that if one of the Memcahe Server one is
is down , then automatically Data is being obtained from Memcahe Server
two , which avoids single point of
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 11:31 AM, Kiran Kumar krn1...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks LesMikesell you were right there is nothing mentioned anything
about data being backed up in that link .
What i really want to convery is that if one of the Memcahe Server one is
is down , then automatically Data
Thanks LesMikesell,for the great explanation , i am helpless here , i am
working on a existing application , which is designed in such a way that
all the Data is written to Memcache (and there is no Database at all )
which is the only data store currently , so what i was asking is that, will
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 1:16 PM, Kiran Kumar krn1...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks LesMikesell,for the great explanation , i am helpless here , i am
working on a existing application , which is designed in such a way that all
the Data is written to Memcache (and there is no Database at all ) which is
Will replication of Memcache servers can solve the problem of not losing
the data ??
On Saturday, 13 October 2012 00:24:31 UTC+5:30, LesMikesell wrote:
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 1:16 PM, Kiran Kumar krn...@gmail.comjavascript:
wrote:
Thanks LesMikesell,for the great explanation , i am
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 2:03 PM, Kiran Kumar krn1...@gmail.com wrote:
Will replication of Memcache servers can solve the problem of not losing the
data ??
Not in an absolute sense. That is, there are still other reasons data
might be evicted, and nothing in memcache is going to provide
Thanks LesMikesell ,
I was searching for Data replication Option with xMemcahced library , what
i found is that Data replication with xmemcache is possible by using
repcached , please see this link
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/xmemcached/4LezU1A7ldU/OpXD_uEHDgAJ
and let me know
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Kiran Kumar krn1...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks LesMikesell ,
I was searching for Data replication Option with xMemcahced library , what i
found is that Data replication with xmemcache is possible by using repcached
, please see this link
https
replication Option with xMemcahced library ,
what i
found is that Data replication with xmemcache is possible by using
repcached
, please see this link
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/xmemcached/4LezU1A7ldU/OpXD_uEHDgAJ
and let me know is that dependable to go
Hi,
Are the key-value pairs replicated on different nodes or does the pair
remain with only on one RAM?
Regards,
Priya
On 3/4/11 3:54 AM, Priya wrote:
Are the key-value pairs replicated on different nodes or does the pair
remain with only on one RAM?
With memcached, key/value pairs remain only in one node in RAM. Have a
look at the wiki and the list archives for more info.
Good luck!
Matt
be
available on the other machine. this with the understanding that some
data may not yet have been replicated as replication isn't instantaneous.
Can you clarify for me?
thx,
-nathan
I sound like a broken record about this, but I like restating things
nobody cares about
guys, the creators of this much loved tool -- viz-a-viz memcache -- designed
it with one goal in mind: CACHING!!
using sessions with memcache would only make sense from a CACHING
standpoint, i.e. cache the session values in your memcache server and if the
caching fails for some reason or another,
guys, the creators of this much loved tool -- viz-a-viz memcache -- designed
it with one goal in mind: CACHING!!
using sessions with memcache would only make sense from a CACHING standpoint,
i.e. cache the session values in your memcache server and if the
caching fails for some reason or
On Mar 4, 2011 10:38 PM, dormando dorma...@rydia.net wrote:
soo. it's more about matching the tool
vs your actual needs. most of the problem here has always been separating
perceieved requirements from actual requirements.
yeah, that's an incredibly
that some data
may not yet have been replicated as replication isn't instantaneous.
Can you clarify for me?
thx,
-nathan
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 2:44 PM, Roberto Spadim robe...@spadim.com.brwrote:
more here:
http://repcached.lab.klab.org/
This was the first thing that came up on google, just wanted to verify
memcached doesn't replicate out-of-the-box.
thx,
-nathan
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 3:02 PM, Roberto Spadim robe...@spadim.com.brwrote:
humm i will tell my experience
there´s two ideas
one replication (like raid1)
other load balance (like raid0 stripe)
client side can load balance like 'raid0' (i don´t know if libmemcache
have this, in php i use
replicated data, such
that if i have 2 servers and one machine goes down the data would all
still be available on the other machine. this with the understanding
that some data may not yet have been replicated as replication isn't
instantaneous.
There are a few memcached related things that do
associated with repcached/libmemcached replication,
Membase took a very different approach with vbuckets and vbucket
hashing. Your browser will find you more. :)
Clients don't have to be aware of this, as moxi can abstract away the
details if the client doesn't know vbucket hashing.
FWIW, Trond
. this with the understanding that some data
may not yet have been replicated as replication isn't instantaneous.
Can you clarify for me?
thx,
-nathan
I sound like a broken record about this, but I like restating things
nobody cares about;
- memcached doesn't do replication by default
- because not replicating your
Here is the Blog link from where i found it,
http://www.howtoforge.com/how-to-install-memcached-with-repcached-built-in-server-side-replication-on-debian-lenny
Please share the experiences , if anybody tried this one. As i have
searched for many plugins for Memcache Data Backup(as i am highly
fyi, PostgreSQL CHAR(10) conference has detailed coverage of
* PostgreSQL and memcache integration
* Latest PostgreSQL 9.0 replication features
* Slony and pgpool updates
* other technologies for clustering and cloud computing
CHAR(10) is being held in Oxford, UK on July 2-3.
You can register
Hi, all,
I am glad to announce that MemcacheDB 1.2.0 beta is release!
This version has supported the new 'append/prepend' command that is
defined in memcache protocol. Also some replication code improved, and
many bug fixed. A new benchmark suit and top like monitor is shipped.
Have a try
55 matches
Mail list logo
