Maybe you can suggest optimal configuration for mail server?
It will be used for spam/virus filtering (~4000 mail accounts), proxy
server (~100 clients). I think it's enought with 1CPU DL 145 system, but
local dealer gives 2nd CPU for free for DL 385 :)
Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2006/03/14 2
On 2006-03-14, Chris Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anyhow... disklabel still acts strange. See the attached output and notice
> after I create wd0a, it sets the offset of wd0b to the beginning of wd0a
> instead of at the end of wd0a. Why is this?
I noticed the same problem on my X40 (although
J.C. Roberts wrote:
On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 16:37:17 +0200, "Marius Van Deventer - Umzimkulu"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Maybe the team should consider this for the OpenBSD 4.0 artwork.
Maybe with a tagline like "The Admin who could not read" or "Annie get
your Glasses".
OR, (in light of so m
On Tuesday 14 March 2006 22:48, FTP wrote:
> If ISPs have a fixed pool of static IP addresses then what happens if we
> 'spend' all the existing ones and nothing is left for the newcomers?
The idea is that IPv6 should have replaced Ipv4 by that time
---
Lars Hansson
On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 17:50:31 -0700, Darrin Chandler
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>The often used OpenBSD phrase "Secure By Default" actually encourages
>>the lazy attitudes and lack of learning. Worse yet, "Secure By Default"
>>is fairly misleading since systems are always secured by knowledge,
>>e
I agreed too. Anyone who choose to use OpenBSD should have a basic
understanding that no system is 100% secure. Even if there is, people
can still attack the weakest link(human) with social engineering.
OpenBSD and other projects allow us a choice against vendors who care
about making more $ than p
J.C. Roberts wrote:
These days, you see computer security mentioned on the nightly news, yet
there's never any mention of correctness or quality. The result has been
obvious; people have flocked to OpenBSD in hopes of attaining this
supposed "security" thing but they never realized there is a lo
> >> Are these new programable cards capable of reading main memory, which
> >> OpenBSD would not be able to prevent if machdep.allowaperture were
> >> set to something other than 0?
> >
> > Yes, they have DMA engines. If the privilege seperate X server has a
> > bug, it can still wiggle the IO re
Thanks Theo,
On 2006.03.15, at 5:22 AM, Theo de Raadt wrote:
Are these new programable cards capable of reading main memory, which
OpenBSD would not be able to prevent if machdep.allowaperture were
set to something other than 0?
Yes, they have DMA engines. If the privilege seperate X server
Or you can donate a ton of money?
On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 16:50:30 -0700, "Theo de Raadt"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> > Danilo Piazzalunga wrote:
> > > Steve Shockley ha scritto:
> > >
> > >>Danilo Piazzalunga wrote:
> > >>
> > >>>Are snapshot not available anymore?
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I have be
I have two of the "Vision" Servers that Tiger sells for $600:
http://www.tigerdirect.com/applications/SearchTools/item-details.asp?
EdpNo=705537&CatId=0
I've had no problems whatsoever as a low-volume server platform.
On Mar 14, 2006, at 8:59 AM, Chris 'Xenon' Hanson wrote:
Andrew Ng wrote:
Gongalo Ferreira wrote:
I'm not a C programmer, but I actually don't see nothing wrong
with that code... Could you point the error out?
Ah. Took me a few moments, but...
Marco Peereboom wrote:
#include
#include
struct moo {
u_int32_t a, b, c, d;
chare[44
On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 16:37:17 +0200, "Marius Van Deventer - Umzimkulu"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Maybe the team should consider this for the OpenBSD 4.0 artwork.
>
>Maybe with a tagline like "The Admin who could not read" or "Annie get
>your Glasses".
>
>OR, (in light of so many users who expect
> Danilo Piazzalunga wrote:
> > Steve Shockley ha scritto:
> >
> >>Danilo Piazzalunga wrote:
> >>
> >>>Are snapshot not available anymore?
>
> Hello,
>
> I have been looking for 3.9 snapshots for i386 on OBSD mirrors and I can
> not find the X stuff there. Is it a matter of waiting more time un
Is the code frozen for OpenBSD 3.9? I hope not, and that someone is
looking at this issue. Looks a better proposition for my case. I had
queried the PR, didn't seem to have any related case opened? Can anyone
log one, as it is inappropiate for me to do that when I don't even have
the hardware? Appr
On 2006/03/14 22:50, Srebrenko Sehic wrote:
> On 3/14/06, edgarz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I will be a very happy if those two servers (DL 145 and DL 385) will
> > work. Means hardware will detect and work without strange things, like a
> > slow hdd system, unusable raid or similar crap :)
Danilo Piazzalunga wrote:
Steve Shockley ha scritto:
Danilo Piazzalunga wrote:
Are snapshot not available anymore?
Hello,
I have been looking for 3.9 snapshots for i386 on OBSD mirrors and I can
not find the X stuff there. Is it a matter of waiting more time until
they appear or is that
Most ports support setting CFLAGS.
cd /usr/ports/foo/bar
env 'CFLAGS=-g -O0' make install
Don't be surprised if '-O0' makes the bug dissappear.
Hello Andrew,
Many thanks for the valuable information. I will start doing the
debugging this week end.
We are in this world to learn things, not
I'm not a C programmer, but I actually don't see nothing wrong
with that code... Could you point the error out?
Marco Peereboom wrote:
#include
#include
struct moo {
u_int32_t a, b, c, d;
chare[44];
};
int
main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
struct moo
frantisek holop wrote:
hi there,
it is not my intention to pick a fight again about t-shirts,
size, color, etc.
but i was just wondering... the other day i went out in my
puffy wireframe t-shirt and people who never heard of openbsd
noticed it and expressed how nice and catchy it was.
My
Kurt B. Kaiser wrote:
"Ramiro Aceves" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Nice to see someone who says something constructive. Would you mind if
you can point me to a HOWTO on how to do that. I will be pleased to
help. I supose that I must compile gnumeric with debugging simbols
first, as someone stat
Matthias Kilian wrote:
On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 08:34:08PM +, Edd Barrett wrote:
cd /usr/ports/math/gnumeric
make configure
cd w-gnumeric-x.x.x/gnumeric-x.x.x
vi Makefile
Ouch.
make DEBUG=-g install should do the job.
Thank you very much!
Ramiro.
On 3/14/06, edgarz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I will be a very happy if those two servers (DL 145 and DL 385) will
> work. Means hardware will detect and work without strange things, like a
> slow hdd system, unusable raid or similar crap :)
I would choose the SCSI version of DL145 G2, since SA
On 3/14/06, Bryan Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sunfire X2100? They're Opterons, not Pentiums, but...
Has issues, but has no showstoppers. Unless you put your nfe(4) card
under stress.
Look at http://www.armorlogic.com/oscl/ for all the details.
Ouu, sounds interesting. Sometimes it can be a very usefull thing :)
Can't wait for 3.9 anymore :)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
edgarz wrote:
Looks good!
but what is that:
> "Compaq iLO" rev 0x01 at pci1 dev 2 function 0 not configured
> "Compaq iLO" rev 0x01 at pci1 dev 2 function 2 not configur
[IMAGE]
If you don't see this newsletter, you can access it on the web at:
http://toltecmysteryschool.com/newsletter/november2002/november2002.htm
[IMAGE]
The Toltec Mystery School
Issue #40
New Articles in this Issue of the Toltec Path!
--
On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 08:34:08PM +, Edd Barrett wrote:
> cd /usr/ports/math/gnumeric
> make configure
> cd w-gnumeric-x.x.x/gnumeric-x.x.x
> vi Makefile
Ouch.
make DEBUG=-g install should do the job.
--
It's a Barrier Of Entry issue: if you can't figure out which floppy
to boot from, go
I will be a very happy if those two servers (DL 145 and DL 385) will
work. Means hardware will detect and work without strange things, like a
slow hdd system, unusable raid or similar crap :)
Srebrenko Sehic wrote:
On 3/14/06, edgarz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Looks good!
but what is that:
edgarz wrote:
Looks good!
but what is that:
> "Compaq iLO" rev 0x01 at pci1 dev 2 function 0 not configured
> "Compaq iLO" rev 0x01 at pci1 dev 2 function 2 not configured
iLO (integrated Lights-Out) is an onboard mini-computer on a chip
which can control the machine's state, e.g. reboot it, s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sunfire X2100? They're Opterons, not Pentiums, but...
I haven't put OpenBSD on mine (it's running Solaris 10), but there
have been other messages to the list suggesting it works Pretty Well
and should work Just Fine for 3.9.
It's actually a ver
"Ramiro Aceves" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Nice to see someone who says something constructive. Would you mind if
> you can point me to a HOWTO on how to do that. I will be pleased to
> help. I supose that I must compile gnumeric with debugging simbols
> first, as someone stated before. And run
On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 08:34:08PM +, Edd Barrett wrote:
> Nice to see someone who says something constructive. Would you mind if
>
> > you can point me to a HOWTO on how to do that. I will be pleased to
> > help. I supose that I must compile gnumeric with debugging simbols
> > first, as someo
On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 10:43:30PM +0200, edgarz wrote:
> Looks good!
> but what is that:
> > "Compaq iLO" rev 0x01 at pci1 dev 2 function 0 not configured
> > "Compaq iLO" rev 0x01 at pci1 dev 2 function 2 not configured
> ?
>
It is a remote server management card, can be afaik on-board or
as a a
On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 09:09:52PM +0100, frantisek holop wrote:
> and that's where i realized that i want to face the people
> who look at my shirt so i can see their reaction, because
> sometimes they do react. but never happened that someone
> came up from behind and said, that shirt on your ba
On 3/14/06, edgarz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Looks good!
> but what is that:
> > "Compaq iLO" rev 0x01 at pci1 dev 2 function 0 not configured
> > "Compaq iLO" rev 0x01 at pci1 dev 2 function 2 not configured
That's just Integrated Lights Out stuff. You don't need that from OpenBSD.
And yes
Looks good!
but what is that:
> "Compaq iLO" rev 0x01 at pci1 dev 2 function 0 not configured
> "Compaq iLO" rev 0x01 at pci1 dev 2 function 2 not configured
?
Stuart Henderson wrote:
DL385: sorry it's only from bsd.rd, but here's a dmesg. NICs and disks
are seen. Haven't tested performance unde
Nice to see someone who says something constructive. Would you mind if
> you can point me to a HOWTO on how to do that. I will be pleased to
> help. I supose that I must compile gnumeric with debugging simbols
> first, as someone stated before. And run gdb or ddd.
Hi,
There is no howto, but I t
hi there,
it is not my intention to pick a fight again about t-shirts,
size, color, etc.
but i was just wondering... the other day i went out in my
puffy wireframe t-shirt and people who never heard of openbsd
noticed it and expressed how nice and catchy it was.
and that's where i realized tha
On 3/14/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > GNUMERIC. The application crashes after introducing a number on a
> > cell-> right click->format cells
>
> Clearly something rather fundamental is broken. It is very likely an
> issue
> relating to the port.
>
> We have no reports of s
On 3/12/06, Vijay Sankar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here is one suggestion . . .
>
> 1) Use sendmail that is installed from the stock OpenBSD CD, just comment
> out the localhost.cf portion in rc.conf so that you use the standard
> sendmail.cf
Agreed. What is it that postfix can do that sendmai
DL385: sorry it's only from bsd.rd, but here's a dmesg. NICs and disks
are seen. Haven't tested performance under OpenBSD. BBU for the RAID
card has a cable that seems exceptionally short until you realise it's
been wrapped around (hey, don't laugh, took me half an hour to spot
that!).
OpenBSD 3.9
Steve Shockley ha scritto:
> Danilo Piazzalunga wrote:
>> Are snapshot not available anymore?
>
> http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq5.html#NoSnaps
Sorry, I have completely missed this FAQ entry (I didn't search under
"Building the system from source" when looking for pre-build snapshots).
A small su
I suggested something along those lines and got the email equivalent
of a blank look.
--
Best regards,
Craig
http://slashboot.org/
Andreas Kahari wrote:
On 14/03/06, Andris Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I use the ksh shell. Tried csh in an xterm, no problem there (I can
use the charact
On 14/03/06, David T Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It depends on what's currently in your .kshrc file.
> If you want you can just backup your current .kshrc file
> to some other filename, and then try ksh. If you still
> have problems then it's probably not a problem with your
> local settin
> Are these new programable cards capable of reading main memory, which
> OpenBSD would not be able to prevent if machdep.allowaperture were
> set to something other than 0?
Yes, they have DMA engines. If the privilege seperate X server has a
bug, it can still wiggle the IO registers of the c
Thanks but local technical/customer support is required.
On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 17:44:50 +, "Edd Barrett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
said:
> On 3/14/06, chefren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On 03/14/06 16:46, Andrew Ng wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > from previous threads in this list, I gathered tha
Greg Thomas ha scritto:
> Around release time snapshots get taken down. I have an i386 Mar 2
> snapshot if you want to try it. Send me a private email and I'll put
> it up somewhere. I didn't grab the X install files, though, just
> bsd.rd, bsd, and the basic system stuff.
After some more sear
I might be barking up the wrong tree here, but is it a coincidence
that the letters affected are s and q, when you look at the default
content of dot.profile ?
Have a look at your .profile file and make sure that the tset line is
in good shape.
It should read:
if [ -x /usr/bin/tset ]; then
On 3/13/06, Jeff Quast <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you don't mind me chiming in, my disks arn't nearly as slow, but I
> expected them to be faster. Can anybody make a recommendation to
> improve my disk i/o, or confirm the speeds I get are about right? This
> is the first machine I've had thats
A possible option but as explained earlier, I had bad experience with
Dell technical/customer support. I was treated as if a know-nothing user
even when talking to them in technical capacity. Presented a lack of
interest on after-sales support, YMMV.
On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 18:19:19 +0100, "chefren" <[
On 14/03/06, Andris Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I use the ksh shell. Tried csh in an xterm, no problem there (I can
> use the characters there). So, is something I can tweak to make them
> work in ksh?
Sounds to me you want to "un-tweak" something that you've been tweaking...
Have a look
On 3/14/06, chefren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 03/14/06 16:46, Andrew Ng wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > from previous threads in this list, I gathered that the Dell PowerEdge
> > SC1425 works well with OpenBSD 3.8. However, I have reservations from
> > past experience with Dell's customer support, h
It depends on what's currently in your .kshrc file.
If you want you can just backup your current .kshrc file
to some other filename, and then try ksh. If you still
have problems then it's probably not a problem with your
local settings, but rather with your global ksh settings.
If that's the ca
I use the ksh shell. Tried csh in an xterm, no problem there (I can
use the characters there). So, is something I can tweak to make them
work in ksh?
On 3/14/06, David T Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Actually if you're having the same problems on a tty,
> you might want to ssh in remotely an
On 03/14/06 16:46, Andrew Ng wrote:
Hi,
from previous threads in this list, I gathered that the Dell PowerEdge
SC1425 works well with OpenBSD 3.8. However, I have reservations from
past experience with Dell's customer support, hope anyone can recommend
an equivalent low-cost system with the foll
Actually if you're having the same problems on a tty,
you might want to ssh in remotely and change your default
shell, to see if it's a problem with some config setting
in your .kshrc or .bashrc, etc...
Have you tried logging in as a different user? Do you still
have the same problems regardles
What exactly happens when you hit the "q" or "s" characters
on your keyboard? Do you have some other application launch,
or some funky character appear somewhere, etc...? Just
wondering because sometimes if you have a keyboard combination
shortcut defined in your window manager's config file,
tho
hi there,
graphs make the world go around.
this graph will tell my super-satisfaction with spamd much
better than any of my words could.
obiit.org/openbsd/spamdb.png
graph made using this (excellent tool):
http://nces.ed.gov/nceskids/createagraph/
this mail powered by ellen allien and appar
Andrew Ng wrote:
Hi,
from previous threads in this list, I gathered that the Dell PowerEdge
SC1425 works well with OpenBSD 3.8. However, I have reservations from
past experience with Dell's customer support, hope anyone can recommend
an equivalent low-cost system with the following minimum requir
edgarz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So SCSI/RAID is working or no? :)
All i know, the fix is in 3.9 :)
Hi, my problem is that I can't use characters like "q" or "s" in xterm
or a console. When I'm about to login, I can use that characters, but
once logged, no.
Is there something I can do? Thanks
So SCSI/RAID is working or no? :)
Martin Reindl wrote:
"Andrew Ng" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
According to this url ->
http://www.armorlogic.com/openbsd_information_server_compatibility_list.html,
SCSI/RAID does not work.
They should test again, the PR was fixed and closed.
On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 10:16:18AM -0500, Peter Landry wrote:
> >> Third, if you live in a house with a single address, you cannot
> >> publicly start announcing different addresses without the postal
> >> service knowing about it. If packets should arrive at your home, then
> >> you better make su
"Andrew Ng" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> According to this url ->
> http://www.armorlogic.com/openbsd_information_server_compatibility_list.html,
> SCSI/RAID does not work.
They should test again, the PR was fixed and closed.
On 2006/03/14 15:50, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2006/03/14 17:36, edgarz wrote:
> > Hello, one our customer is interested in that HP server.
> > It will run OpenBSD.
ahhh sorry - I am confused between DL385 and DL145. (I am sitting next
to one of each at the moment and the noise is burrowing int
Thanks to all who responded.
I was (and still am) having a rough time of it (ill) and not thinking
too clearly. I'm slowly getting to grips with Postfix and think I
should have it working as I want it, before too long.
The problem that I was having was down to nothing being created on the
disk (
According to this url ->
http://www.armorlogic.com/openbsd_information_server_compatibility_list.html,
SCSI/RAID does not work.
On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 15:50:49 +, "Stuart Henderson"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On 2006/03/14 17:36, edgarz wrote:
> > Hello, one our customer is interested in that HP
>> Third, if you live in a house with a single address, you cannot
>> publicly start announcing different addresses without the postal
>> service knowing about it. If packets should arrive at your home, then
>> you better make sure you write your street and number on the
>> announcement, other thin
On 2006/03/14 17:36, edgarz wrote:
> Hello, one our customer is interested in that HP server.
> It will run OpenBSD.
SATA version will run, but OpenBSD does not get on well with the disk
controller: disk throughput is really *really* bad.
SCSI version, not sure, the host adapter used to hide behi
Hello, one our customer is interested in that HP server.
It will run OpenBSD. I want to ask about NIC:
Dual HP NC7781 PCI-X Gigabit server adapters (embedded)
So looks like it's not supported by OpenBSD, didn't fint on hw page :/
Forget question :)
Any cahnces to get it working?
Edgars.
Hi,
from previous threads in this list, I gathered that the Dell PowerEdge
SC1425 works well with OpenBSD 3.8. However, I have reservations from
past experience with Dell's customer support, hope anyone can recommend
an equivalent low-cost system with the following minimum requirements -
1) Form
Hello, one our customer is interested in that HP server.
It will run OpenBSD. I want to ask about NIC:
Dual HP NC7781 PCI-X Gigabit server adapters (embedded)
So looks like it's not supported by OpenBSD, didn't fint on hw page :/
Edgars.
I am not an expert at all finding these bugs but I can tell you of an
anecdote in some code that I maintain.
This is a large application that would fail seemingly random under a
fair amount of stress. The odd thing is that this app, which runs on
multiple OS' seemed to work on RHEL3, AS 2.1,
On 2006/03/14 15:48, FTP wrote:
> If ISPs have a fixed pool of static IP addresses then what happens
> if we 'spend' all the existing ones and nothing is left for the
> newcomers?
ISPs should have enough address space for their customers and if they
need more they'll apply for more from an LIR/RIR
On Tuesday 14 March 2006 15:48, you wrote:
> I know the way to have different ports by using NAT but this isn't really
> what I try to achieve!
>
> If ISPs have a fixed pool of static IP addresses then what happens if we
> 'spend' all the existing ones and nothing is left for the newcomers?
>
The
please see my replies below!
Thank you
On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 02:43:17PM +0100, Bernd Schoeller wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 02:20:15PM +0100, FTP wrote:
> > but isn't a way to route and translate connections via a existing static IP
> > address? To have 'internal' IPs acting as static in
I know the way to have different ports by using NAT but this isn't really what
I try to achieve!
If ISPs have a fixed pool of static IP addresses then what happens if we
'spend' all the existing ones and nothing is left for the newcomers?
On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 01:29:01PM +, Patsy wrote:
>
Maybe the team should consider this for the OpenBSD 4.0 artwork.
Maybe with a tagline like "The Admin who could not read" or "Annie get
your Glasses".
OR, (in light of so many users who expect list members to hold their
hands) it could say something about the value of man pages.
I'm sure any new
Hi!
On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 02:11:13PM +, Robert Jacobs wrote:
>>Therefore, after 3.9, that default for the install script question is
>>being changed to "no".
>I am sure this will at least double the number of "I installed OpenBSD
>and X11 won't work" questions on this mailing list. But it s
>Therefore, after 3.9, that default for the install script question is
>being changed to "no".
I am sure this will at least double the number of "I installed OpenBSD
and X11 won't work" questions on this mailing list. But it sounds like
a good change in the interest of security.
Thanks,
Robert
Forgot "nat" (which is obvious) ... in previous post.
Or for example for different http servers, something like this:
(use pf + rdr + nat)
Server 1 : 10.1.1.1 http port 80 -> router ADSL -> 86.x.x.1 http port
80
Server 2 : 10.1.1.2 http port 8080 -> router ADSL -> 86.x.x.1 http port
8080
Server
Hello,
Do you really require multiple external ip addresses?
If the internals servers have different services you can use something
like:
(pf + rdr)
Server 1 : 10.1.1.1:smtp --> router ADSL---> 86.x.x.x1:smtp (public
static IP!)
Server 2 : 10.1.1.2:www --> router ADSL---> 86.x.x.x1:www
Server 3
but isn't a way to route and translate connections via a existing
static IP address? To have 'internal' IPs acting as static in their
own right? How do ISPs 'create' their own static IPs?
You don't 'create' an IP address; the address is assigned. Basically,
from the IANA to the Regional Inter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello.
I have a question about BGPD.
It's my bgpd.conf
group "peering AS" {
remote-as
neighbor $peer1 {
descr "Principal"
announce all
local-address $local1
dep
On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 02:20:15PM +0100, FTP wrote:
> but isn't a way to route and translate connections via a existing static IP
> address? To have 'internal' IPs acting as static in their own right?
> How do ISPs 'create' their own static IPs?
Gee - we are talking about a huge area of topics
On 14/03/06, Constantine A. Murenin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 13/03/06, Ramiro Aceves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Why do you say that? Gnumeric works nicely under Linux. No problem at all.
>
> If something is broken, it is broken. Period. Just because it seems to
> work on Linux every time
Hi,
I wrote an inofficial front-end for the installation of ports
and packages under OpenBSD. It is Gtk+-2 based (you need v. 2.6
or newer).
You can install local ports, local packages (e.g. mounted CD-ROM)
and packages from FTP. It also supports "universe" package mirrors
that can include inoffi
On 13/03/06, Ramiro Aceves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why do you say that? Gnumeric works nicely under Linux. No problem at all.
If something is broken, it is broken. Period. Just because it seems to
work on Linux every time you try it, doesn't mean that they have no
programming mistakes in the
but isn't a way to route and translate connections via a existing static IP
address? To have 'internal' IPs acting as static in their own right?
How do ISPs 'create' their own static IPs?
Thanks
On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 01:08:22PM +, Patsy wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 14 Mar 2006, FTP wrote:
>
>
On Tue, 14 Mar 2006, Edd Barrett wrote:
> Hello people,
>
> I wish to query the usefullness (if thats not a made up word) of
> electricfence on OpenBSD. I have a program which works great when not linked
> against -lefence, but gives a bus error otherwise (not as a result of my
> code, but in lib
Roberto Pereyra wrote:
>
> I have better luck using pkgsrc (www.pkgsrc.org) than OpenBSD ports.
>
> There are more easy to upgrade.
>
As someone once said
USER:
"Your software does not suit my needs, I am going elsewhere."
DEVELOPER:
"Promise?"
[demime 1.01d removed an attachment of ty
On Tue, 14 Mar 2006, FTP wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> my question isn't really OBSD related but I would like to ask if the
> following scenario can be implemented by using a two NICs OBSD box!
>
> If I get a static IP from my provider, is it possible to 'multiple' this and
> create my own static IPs w
Hi Theo,
On 2006.03.14, at 9:41 PM, Theo de Raadt wrote:
Well, recently we have changed our minds, because we still feel that
the aperture is too dangerous. And the vendors keep finding creative
ways to squeeze more and more evil into their video cards!
Please be aware that other operating sy
Hello people,
I wish to query the usefullness (if thats not a made up word) of
electricfence on OpenBSD. I have a program which works great when not linked
against -lefence, but gives a bus error otherwise (not as a result of my
code, but in libpq according to a stack trace :O ).
A google search
Hi there,
my question isn't really OBSD related but I would like to ask if the following
scenario can be implemented by using a two NICs OBSD box!
If I get a static IP from my provider, is it possible to 'multiple' this and
create my own static IPs which are accessible via the Internet? If the
Hello,
You may want to use this nice tutorial:
http://www.pingwales.co.uk/2005/06/03/OpenBSD-mail-server-config.html
Regards
Didier
-Original Message-
From: Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 12, 2006 18:21
To: misc
Subject: Email serving on oBSD 3.8
Hi all.
Sorry for
On Sunday 12 March 2006 18:11, Wijnand Wiersma wrote:
> I have a problem with gnome and the gnome guys should just fix it.
> Switching is NOT the solution.
Neither the openbsd developers, nor the gnome ones are your subordinates:
you're not paying for their time and skills!
So just shut up, go f
Hi
I have better luck using pkgsrc (www.pkgsrc.org) than OpenBSD ports.
There are more easy to upgrade.
roberto
2006/3/12, Ramiro Aceves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Hello dear OpenBSD fans.
>
>
> After "playing" during some time with OpenBSD 3.8 and understanding
> how it works, I wanted to give
On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 12:10:53AM +0100, Ramiro Aceves wrote:
> Why do you insult to the GNU people? aren't you using their compiler?.
> I do not understand why you say such things.
>
> Peace, please.
*I* can insult the GNU people. I've spent enough time working around
their over-engineered code
I would like to educate people of something which many are not aware
of -- how X works on a modern machine.
Some of our architectures use a tricky and horrid thing to allow X to
run. This is due to modern PC video card architecture containing a
large quantity of PURE EVIL. To get around this evi
1 - 100 of 102 matches
Mail list logo
