Re: xxxterm and firefox35 May 11 snapshot

2011-05-18 Thread Ariane van der Steldt
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 05:24:46PM -0500, Amit Kulkarni wrote: > Then I removed the vmmap diff and compiled kernel & a reboot later, > firefox crashes are gone. Ofcourse, only a few days from now, this won't work anymore. May 20 is the planned vmmap day. Starting then, you won't be able to back ou

Re: xxxterm and firefox35 May 11 snapshot

2011-05-17 Thread Amit Kulkarni
On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 7:27 AM, Tomas Bodzar wrote: > gmail interface in xxxterm causes browser to crash. If I'm quick > enough and switch to basic (html) interface then it's running, but > sooner or later some page will bring browser down. > > in ff4(or any other ff available in packages) brow

Re: xxxterm and firefox35 May 11 snapshot

2011-05-16 Thread Ted Unangst
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 2:22 PM, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2011/05/16 12:42, Ted Unangst wrote: >> Returning to point 1 above, how does one update packages as a complete set? > > You're not supposed to do upgrade just one package, the packages > should be updated as a set, pkg_add -u from a mir

Re: xxxterm and firefox35 May 11 snapshot

2011-05-16 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2011/05/16 12:42, Ted Unangst wrote: > On May 16, 2011, at 2:21 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > > On 2011/05/15 18:22, Ted Unangst wrote: > >> On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 4:42 AM, Stuart Henderson > >> wrote: > In one week, libpng is updated to version X+1 and firefox is updated > to v

Re: xxxterm and firefox35 May 11 snapshot

2011-05-16 Thread Ahlsen-Girard, Edward F CTR USAF AFSOC AFSOC/A6OK
On 2011-05-16 16:42:22, Ted Unangst wrote: > > On May 16, 2011, at 2:21 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > > On 2011/05/15 18:22, Ted Unangst wrote: > >> On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 4:42 AM, Stuart Henderson > wrote: > In one week, libpng is updated to version X+1 and firefox is updated > to

Re: xxxterm and firefox35 May 11 snapshot

2011-05-16 Thread Ted Unangst
On May 16, 2011, at 2:21 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2011/05/15 18:22, Ted Unangst wrote: >> On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 4:42 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote: In one week, libpng is updated to version X+1 and firefox is updated to version Z+1. You update. The gtk version has not changed,

Re: xxxterm and firefox35 May 11 snapshot

2011-05-15 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2011/05/15 18:22, Ted Unangst wrote: > On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 4:42 AM, Stuart Henderson > wrote: > >> In one week, libpng is updated to version X+1 and firefox is updated > >> to version Z+1. You update. The gtk version has not changed, it will > >> not be upgraded. Now firefox is linked t

Re: xxxterm and firefox35 May 11 snapshot

2011-05-15 Thread Otto Moerbeek
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 10:00:59PM -0500, Ed Ahlsen-Girard wrote: > On Sun, 15 May 2011 06:47:54 +0200 > "Timo Schoeler" wrote: > > > > > > > -- Urspr. Mitt. -- > > Betreff: Re: xxxterm and firefox35 May 11 snapshot > > Von: Tomas Bodzar &g

Re: xxxterm and firefox35 May 11 snapshot

2011-05-15 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 4:24 PM, Martin Pelikan wrote: > 2011/5/15 Ted Unangst : >> On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 4:05 PM, Amit Kulkarni wrote: >> Determining which package needs rebuilding is really hard. B It's much >> easier to install a complete matched set. > > I believe some Linuxes do something

Re: xxxterm and firefox35 May 11 snapshot

2011-05-15 Thread Ed Ahlsen-Girard
On Sun, 15 May 2011 06:47:54 +0200 "Timo Schoeler" wrote: > > > -- Urspr. Mitt. -- > Betreff: Re: xxxterm and firefox35 May 11 snapshot > Von: Tomas Bodzar > Datum: 15.05.2011 01:38 > > On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 1:16 AM, Ed Ahlsen-Girard > wrote: > >

Re: xxxterm and firefox35 May 11 snapshot

2011-05-15 Thread Ted Unangst
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 4:24 PM, Martin Pelikan wrote: > 2011/5/15 Ted Unangst : >> On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 4:05 PM, Amit Kulkarni wrote: >> Determining which package needs rebuilding is really hard. It's much >> easier to install a complete matched set. > > I believe some Linuxes do something l

Re: xxxterm and firefox35 May 11 snapshot

2011-05-15 Thread Ted Unangst
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 4:42 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote: >> In one week, libpng is updated to version X+1 and firefox is updated >> to version Z+1. You update. The gtk version has not changed, it will >> not be upgraded. Now firefox is linked to png X+1 and X (via gtk). >> Hilarity ensues. A n

Re: xxxterm and firefox35 May 11 snapshot

2011-05-15 Thread Martin Pelikan
2011/5/15 Ted Unangst : > On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 4:05 PM, Amit Kulkarni wrote: > Determining which package needs rebuilding is really hard. B It's much > easier to install a complete matched set. I believe some Linuxes do something like 'find /usr/local/lib -name lib*.so* -exec ldd {} ";" > stuf

Re: xxxterm and firefox35 May 11 snapshot

2011-05-15 Thread Mihai Popescu
Regarding the other personal post, xxxterm is crashing too, ending with segmentation fault later, on gmail page.

Re: xxxterm and firefox35 May 11 snapshot

2011-05-15 Thread Mihai Popescu
Hello, Same kind of behaviour here, see details below. I'm on snapshots from 13-May. All was fine using the snaphost before this. Mozilla-firefox is crashing, on most sites. Chrome is ok, xxxterm is ok (tried it for the first time). Also gnome-mplayer ends with segmentation fault, always. Here is

Re: xxxterm and firefox35 May 11 snapshot

2011-05-15 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2011-05-15, Ted Unangst wrote: > On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 4:05 PM, Amit Kulkarni wrote: >>> Delete all packages, reinstall them. This happens when firefox and >>> gtk are built on separate days. The pkg system does a good job >>> tracking version numbers, but the contents of a pkg can depend

Re: xxxterm and firefox35 May 11 snapshot

2011-05-14 Thread Ed Ahlsen-Girard
On Sun, 15 May 2011 01:35:49 +0200 Tomas Bodzar wrote: > On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 1:16 AM, Ed Ahlsen-Girard > wrote: > > On Sat, 14 May 2011 11:15:43 -0400 > > Ted Unangst wrote: > > > >> On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 11:32 PM, Ed Ahlsen-Girard > >> wrote: > >> > xxxterm closes when attempting to ope

Re: xxxterm and firefox35 May 11 snapshot

2011-05-14 Thread Ted Unangst
On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 4:05 PM, Amit Kulkarni wrote: >> Delete all packages, reinstall them. This happens when firefox and >> gtk are built on separate days. The pkg system does a good job >> tracking version numbers, but the contents of a pkg can depend in >> subtle ways on what else is instal

Re: xxxterm and firefox35 May 11 snapshot

2011-05-14 Thread Chris Bennett
Okay, I have to admit I screwed up and forgot to CVS up before duilding dconf. Figured that out a few minutes after I drove away from internet access. Fixed that todqay and went dconf-0.7.4p0->dconf-0.7.5. Now both FF4 and xxterm are running okay. I do build a few ports, often so I can see the so

Re: xxxterm and firefox35 May 11 snapshot

2011-05-14 Thread Tomas Bodzar
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 1:16 AM, Ed Ahlsen-Girard wrote: > On Sat, 14 May 2011 11:15:43 -0400 > Ted Unangst wrote: > >> On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 11:32 PM, Ed Ahlsen-Girard >> wrote: >> > xxxterm closes when attempting to open any page other than :fav >> > >> > Firefox opens momentarily is started

Re: xxxterm and firefox35 May 11 snapshot

2011-05-14 Thread Ed Ahlsen-Girard
On Sat, 14 May 2011 11:15:43 -0400 Ted Unangst wrote: > On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 11:32 PM, Ed Ahlsen-Girard > wrote: > > xxxterm closes when attempting to open any page other than :fav > > > > Firefox opens momentarily is started in safe mode, but closes almost > > immediately. > > Delete all pa

Re: xxxterm and firefox35 May 11 snapshot

2011-05-14 Thread Kevin Chadwick
On Sat, 14 May 2011 15:05:50 -0500 Amit Kulkarni wrote: > > Delete all packages, reinstall them. This happens when firefox and > > gtk are built on separate days. The pkg system does a good job > > tracking version numbers, but the contents of a pkg can depend in > > subtle ways on what else is

Re: xxxterm and firefox35 May 11 snapshot

2011-05-14 Thread Amit Kulkarni
> Delete all packages, reinstall them. This happens when firefox and > gtk are built on separate days. The pkg system does a good job > tracking version numbers, but the contents of a pkg can depend in > subtle ways on what else is installed and that's not reflected in the > version number. Cont

Re: xxxterm and firefox35 May 11 snapshot

2011-05-14 Thread Tomas Bodzar
On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 8:43 PM, Otto Moerbeek wrote: > On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 07:51:42PM +0200, Tomas Bodzar wrote: > >> On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 7:43 PM, Nicholas Schmidt >> wrote: >> > Likewise here on amd64 -current. No problems on any of the sites outlined >> in >> > this thread >> >> After

Re: xxxterm and firefox35 May 11 snapshot

2011-05-14 Thread Otto Moerbeek
On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 07:51:42PM +0200, Tomas Bodzar wrote: > On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 7:43 PM, Nicholas Schmidt > wrote: > > Likewise here on amd64 -current. No problems on any of the sites outlined > in > > this thread > > After removing ALL packages and installing them again is everything >

Re: xxxterm and firefox35 May 11 snapshot

2011-05-14 Thread Marco Peereboom
read tedu's post On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 07:51:42PM +0200, Tomas Bodzar wrote: > On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 7:43 PM, Nicholas Schmidt > wrote: > > Likewise here on amd64 -current. No problems on any of the sites outlined > in > > this thread > > After removing ALL packages and installing them again

Re: xxxterm and firefox35 May 11 snapshot

2011-05-14 Thread Tomas Bodzar
On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 7:43 PM, Nicholas Schmidt wrote: > Likewise here on amd64 -current. No problems on any of the sites outlined in > this thread After removing ALL packages and installing them again is everything fine. Was not ok after removing only ff packages. Anyway it's quite strange bec

Re: xxxterm and firefox35 May 11 snapshot

2011-05-14 Thread Nicholas Schmidt
Likewise here on amd64 -current. No problems on any of the sites outlined in this thread On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 11:18, Otto Moerbeek wrote: > On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 02:27:26PM +0200, Tomas Bodzar wrote: > > > gmail interface in xxxterm causes browser to crash. If I'm quick > > enough and swit

Re: xxxterm and firefox35 May 11 snapshot

2011-05-14 Thread Tomas Bodzar
On 5/14/11, Ted Unangst wrote: > On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 11:32 PM, Ed Ahlsen-Girard wrote: >> xxxterm closes when attempting to open any page other than :fav >> >> Firefox opens momentarily is started in safe mode, but closes almost >> immediately. > > Delete all packages, reinstall them. This h

Re: xxxterm and firefox35 May 11 snapshot

2011-05-14 Thread Otto Moerbeek
On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 02:27:26PM +0200, Tomas Bodzar wrote: > gmail interface in xxxterm causes browser to crash. If I'm quick > enough and switch to basic (html) interface then it's running, but > sooner or later some page will bring browser down. > > in ff4(or any other ff available in pack

Re: xxxterm and firefox35 May 11 snapshot

2011-05-14 Thread Ted Unangst
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 11:32 PM, Ed Ahlsen-Girard wrote: > xxxterm closes when attempting to open any page other than :fav > > Firefox opens momentarily is started in safe mode, but closes almost > immediately. Delete all packages, reinstall them. This happens when firefox and gtk are built on

Re: xxxterm and firefox35 May 11 snapshot

2011-05-14 Thread Paolo Aglialoro
Same here for gmail. Every page more complex than a simple google.com makes ff4 crash even the simple tattoodle.com xxxterm is a bit more resilient but at the 3rd-4th page (opening random results from google) it crashes and generates core file. Should I send it to someone? Il giorno 14/mag/2011 1

Re: xxxterm and firefox35 May 11 snapshot

2011-05-14 Thread Tomas Bodzar
gmail interface in xxxterm causes browser to crash. If I'm quick enough and switch to basic (html) interface then it's running, but sooner or later some page will bring browser down. in ff4(or any other ff available in packages) browser crashes immediately when I'm trying to log in gmail and pag

Re: xxxterm and firefox35 May 11 snapshot

2011-05-14 Thread Otto Moerbeek
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 03:31:03PM -0500, Chris Bennett wrote: > On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 10:08:18PM +0200, Antoine Jacoutot wrote: > > > > Update devel/dconf to the very latest revision. > > > > > I tried that first a few days ago and just now (no update). > I just updated FF4 and FF35 and I n

Re: xxxterm and firefox35 May 11 snapshot

2011-05-14 Thread Otto Moerbeek
On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 10:30:22AM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote: > On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 02:49:40PM -0500, Chris Bennett wrote: > > > one page is www.financialarmageddon.com/ > > There are some others which I can report after I finally get some bad ones > > closed out so that xxxterm will stay

Re: xxxterm and firefox35 May 11 snapshot

2011-05-14 Thread Otto Moerbeek
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 02:49:40PM -0500, Chris Bennett wrote: > one page is www.financialarmageddon.com/ > There are some others which I can report after I finally get some bad ones > closed out so that xxxterm will stay running. > This page fails for both FF4 and xxxterm, not in Konqueror. >

Re: xxxterm and firefox35 May 11 snapshot

2011-05-13 Thread Marco Peereboom
On May 13, 2011, at 17:01, Chris Bennett wrote: > On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 04:32:33PM -0500, Marco Peereboom wrote: Too much conspiracy for the kernel! >>> >>> People keep telling me that these browsers are working fine, but I just don't see it! >>> :) >> >> Aha! this is where I get to

Re: xxxterm and firefox35 May 11 snapshot

2011-05-13 Thread Chris Bennett
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 04:32:33PM -0500, Marco Peereboom wrote: > > > Too much conspiracy for the kernel! > > > > > > > People keep telling me that these browsers are working fine, but I just > > don't see it! > > :) > > Aha! this is where I get to say: "works for me!" > > OpenBSD 4.9-curren

Re: xxxterm and firefox35 May 11 snapshot

2011-05-13 Thread Marco Peereboom
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 04:24:46PM -0500, Chris Bennett wrote: > On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 04:13:29PM -0500, Marco Peereboom wrote: > > Too much conspiracy for the kernel! > > > > People keep telling me that these browsers are working fine, but I just don't > see it! > :) Aha! this is where I ge

Re: xxxterm and firefox35 May 11 snapshot

2011-05-13 Thread Chris Bennett
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 04:13:29PM -0500, Marco Peereboom wrote: > Too much conspiracy for the kernel! > People keep telling me that these browsers are working fine, but I just don't see it! :)

Re: xxxterm and firefox35 May 11 snapshot

2011-05-13 Thread Marco Peereboom
Too much conspiracy for the kernel! On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 02:49:40PM -0500, Chris Bennett wrote: > one page is www.financialarmageddon.com/ > There are some others which I can report after I finally get some bad ones > closed out so that xxxterm will stay running. > This page fails for both FF

Re: xxxterm and firefox35 May 11 snapshot

2011-05-13 Thread Chris Bennett
I built latest version of dconf. Still get same xxxterm.core and firefoxen problem. Chris Bennett

Re: xxxterm and firefox35 May 11 snapshot

2011-05-13 Thread Chris Bennett
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 10:08:18PM +0200, Antoine Jacoutot wrote: > > Update devel/dconf to the very latest revision. > I tried that first a few days ago and just now (no update). I just updated FF4 and FF35 and I now get: $ /usr/local/bin/firefox /usr/local/lib/firefox-4.0.1/firefox-bin:/us

Re: xxxterm and firefox35 May 11 snapshot

2011-05-13 Thread Antoine Jacoutot
On Fri, 13 May 2011, Chris Bennett wrote: > At that website, xxxterm seg faults with following from gdb (not compiled > with debugging) > > (gdb) backtrace > #0 0x030f6061 in ?? () from /usr/local/lib/gio/modules/libdconfsettings.so > #1 0x0ebb758c in _thread_kern_sig_undefer () > at /usr/

Re: xxxterm and firefox35 May 11 snapshot

2011-05-13 Thread David Vincent
> Message du 13/05/11 C 21h59 > De : "Chris Bennett" > A : misc@openbsd.org > Copie C : > Objet : Re: xxxterm and firefox35 May 11 snapshot > > > At that website, xxxterm seg faults with following from gdb (not compiled with debugging) > > (gdb) backt

Re: xxxterm and firefox35 May 11 snapshot

2011-05-13 Thread Chris Bennett
At that website, xxxterm seg faults with following from gdb (not compiled with debugging) (gdb) backtrace #0 0x030f6061 in ?? () from /usr/local/lib/gio/modules/libdconfsettings.so #1 0x0ebb758c in _thread_kern_sig_undefer () at /usr/src/lib/libpthread/uthread/uthread_kern.c:1008 #2 0x030f

Re: xxxterm and firefox35 May 11 snapshot

2011-05-13 Thread Chris Bennett
one page is www.financialarmageddon.com/ There are some others which I can report after I finally get some bad ones closed out so that xxxterm will stay running. This page fails for both FF4 and xxxterm, not in Konqueror. dmesg OpenBSD 4.9-current (GENERIC) #69: Tue May 3 14:59:18 MDT 2011

Re: xxxterm and firefox35 May 11 snapshot

2011-05-13 Thread Otto Moerbeek
To everybody reporting browser misery: I'm spending more time dragging details out of people than actually testing. Please read http://www.openbsd.org/report.html and act accordingly. We need details, including dmesg and steps to reproduce the problem. -Otto

Re: xxxterm and firefox35 May 11 snapshot

2011-05-13 Thread Otto Moerbeek
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 08:30:04AM -0500, Chris Bennett wrote: > Same here, except that only certain pages trigger crash. Plain pages seem to > run just fine. > Is repeatable. > I was assuming that it was a few packages I hadn't yet upgraded due to poor > internet right now. > Glad to see it isn

Re: xxxterm and firefox35 May 11 snapshot

2011-05-13 Thread Chris Bennett
I have now tested konqueror and it is NOT crashing on the sites that caused xxxterm and ff4 to crash. BUt I only did a quick test. My Dad used konqueror ok yesterday without problems. Chris Bennett

Re: xxxterm and firefox35 May 11 snapshot

2011-05-13 Thread Chris Bennett
Same here, except that only certain pages trigger crash. Plain pages seem to run just fine. Is repeatable. I was assuming that it was a few packages I hadn't yet upgraded due to poor internet right now. Glad to see it isn't just here. Chris Bennett

Re: xxxterm and firefox35 May 11 snapshot

2011-05-13 Thread Tomas Bodzar
Same is true for me. See http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=130527268126141&w=2 (don't count that working word as it's not true :-)). Even after update to current via compilation still same results for all graphical browsers. Something really bad is going here. On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 9:41 AM, Pa

Re: xxxterm and firefox35 May 11 snapshot

2011-05-13 Thread Paolo Aglialoro
Same happens here with 4.9-current, totally different machine (i386 P3 700MHz 256MB) and: -firefox 4 (shuts down after trying to navigate somewhere; btw after update from 3.6 to 4.0 it jas never been stable) -xxxterm (after a while kinda 3 or 4 pages crashes abrouptly) -opera (window does not open

xxxterm and firefox35 May 11 snapshot

2011-05-12 Thread Ed Ahlsen-Girard
I installed the May 11 snapshot, and now: Acroread complains that a plugin is missing. xxxterm closes when attempting to open any page other than :fav Firefox opens momentarily is started in safe mode, but closes almost immediately. Anybody who can tell me where the logs woul be (nothing in var