On 10 May 2000, Stephen Zander wrote:
"Perrin" == Perrin Harkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Perrin I think every RDBMS I've seen, includig MySQL, guarantees
Perrin atomicity at this level.
Look, Mummy, the funny man said MySQL and RDBMS in the same sentence :)
Please don't start
Hi,
I have in every script
my $user_language = library::language($user, $dbh) ;
# is it finnish, english or swedish
my %output = library::load_language($user_language) ;
# ties %output to a dbm
%output holds all the different outputs needed for each language
then for my subs which are in a
Dear modperlers!
I have found that Apache::Autoindex dos not like filenames with
special characters (like space or ?). Such a name should be
uri-escaped. See patch below.
Best wishes,
Alexei.
(12:05:45) $ diff -u AutoIndex.pm AutoIndex.pm-orig
--- AutoIndex.pmThu May 11
Hi there,
On Wed, 10 May 2000, Louis-David Mitterrand wrote:
I am trying an internal_redirect from a POST with Mason and Apache just
hangs:
Have a look at the Guide, "Caching POSTed Data".
73,
Ged.
Hi there,
Our Apache::Registry CGIs need access to a dozen or so core modules - is
there an elegant solution to loading these without seeing a dozen or so use
statements at the head of the script? (We have over 100 different CGIs that
share a common structure - it would be a nightmare
Checkout Apache::RegistryLoader.
--Jeff
At 02:23 PM 5/11/00, Martin Wood wrote:
Hi there,
Our Apache::Registry CGIs need access to a dozen or so core modules - is
there an elegant solution to loading these without seeing a dozen or so use
statements at the head of the script? (We have over 100
"MW" == Martin Wood [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
MW Our Apache::Registry CGIs need access to a dozen or so core modules - is
MW there an elegant solution to loading these without seeing a dozen or so use
MW statements at the head of the script? (We have over 100 different CGIs that
The "use"
Thanks for the replies so far all - things are already becoming clearer.
If you add a "standard" module to your set, how will it affect
existing apps if they don't directly need it or call it? Why have the
"use" statement at all if that particular module is not being used?
So pre-load all
-Original Message-
From: Martin Wood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2000 10:38 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Best approach for loading several modules
Thanks for the replies so far all - things are already
becoming clearer.
If you add a
Hi,
At my company we're developing a project using mod_perl and
Apache::Registry. The project consists of one main script, which
"require"s a couple of other scripts and calls functions contained in
them. In order to provide a "private" development environment to each of
our developers, we
Ken Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Alexei V. Barantsev) wrote:
Dear modperlers!
I have found that Apache::Autoindex dos not like filenames with
special characters (like space or ?). Such a name should be
uri-escaped. See patch below.
This patch is
but code isn't duplicated if you pre-load your modules:
http://perl.apache.org/guide/performance.html#Preload_Perl_Modules_at_Server
_S
I realise the actual code isn't duplicated - but the script itself still
needs the list of "use" directives regardless of whether you pre-load them
and
According to Mark Imbriaco:
"Perrin" == Perrin Harkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Perrin I think every RDBMS I've seen, includig MySQL, guarantees
Perrin atomicity at this level.
Look, Mummy, the funny man said MySQL and RDBMS in the same sentence :)
Please don't start on
I am trying to build apache 1.3.12 with mod_perl
1.23, and perl 5.6 on solaris 2.7
everytime I run the modperl build it changes my
apache config to require socks. I have been disabling it. but it is getting to
be a PITA. Where can I get a socks library for solaris???
Steve Bauer
Hi there,
On Thu, 11 May 2000, Uri Bernstein wrote:
Hi,
In order to provide a "private" development environment to each of
our developers, we defined a virtual server per developer. Each virtual
server has its root aliased to a different directory
[snip]
This seems to work fine most of
-Original Message-
From: Ged Haywood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2000 12:26 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Virtual servers mixing up "require"d scripts
Hi there,
On Thu, 11 May 2000, Uri Bernstein wrote:
Hi,
In order to provide a
On Thu, 11 May 2000, Martin Wood wrote:
Our Apache::Registry CGIs need access to a dozen or so core modules - is
there an elegant solution to loading these without seeing a dozen or so use
statements at the head of the script?
Yes. As Vivek pointed out, you can move them all into a
Martin Wood wrote:
Thanks for the replies so far all - things are already becoming clearer.
If you add a "standard" module to your set, how will it affect
existing apps if they don't directly need it or call it? Why have the
"use" statement at all if that particular module is not
On Thu, 11 May 2000, Leslie Mikesell wrote:
According to Mark Imbriaco:
"Perrin" == Perrin Harkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Perrin I think every RDBMS I've seen, includig MySQL, guarantees
Perrin atomicity at this level.
Look, Mummy, the funny man said MySQL and RDBMS
On Thu, 11 May 2000, Martin Wood wrote:
but code isn't duplicated if you pre-load your modules:
http://perl.apache.org/guide/performance.html#Preload_Perl_Modules_at_Server
_S
I realise the actual code isn't duplicated - but the script itself still
needs the list of "use" directives
Please read the sections posted by Geoff and others. The *already* posted
link:
http://perl.apache.org/guide/config.html#The_Confusion_with_use_at_the_
answers your question.
Damn mod_perl guide, much too comprehensive for its own good! :)
Please invest some time into reading before crying
For all those who favor chocolate cookies (mostly related to the latest
discussion about the sessions):
IE hole exposes Web surfers' private data: Microsoft is working on a
patch that will prevent its Internet Explorer browser from inadvertently
letting Web sites peer into any visitor's cookie
On Fri, 12 May 2000, Stas Bekman wrote:
For all those who favor chocolate cookies (mostly related to the latest
discussion about the sessions):
IE hole exposes Web surfers' private data: Microsoft is working on a
patch that will prevent its Internet Explorer browser from inadvertently
On Thu, 11 May 2000, Marc Slemko wrote:
In reality, IE's recently publicized hole (which I reported to them, in a
slightly modified form, months ago but they didn't see fit to release a
patch...) doesn't change much.
Hotmail? Yahoo mail? amazon.com? etc. Your cookies for all those
"Alexei V. Barantsev" wrote:
w trillich [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
speaking of autoindex issues-- i can't get apache to
display the HEADER or README files (above and
below the tabular file listing), and when i posted
my most recent question, someone else piped up and
said they've
Bri Carey wrote:
When I display an .iphtml page in Netscape, everything seems to be fine.
When I display it in IE (4.72), I get a plain text output of the source
code, including html tags.
Why this discrepancy?
I've tried setting the default type to text/html in the
For those not on the axkit mailing list, I thought you might like a
quickie AxKit update:
First an introduction: AxKit is a standards based XML templating system,
and much more. Ultimately it's an application server, but there's more
work to do to reach that level, IMHO. Right now it can deliver
27 matches
Mail list logo
