hello.
i am using Tie::IxHash within my Apache::ASP page and
have noticed that the size of my processes are
balooning in size (as told by 'top').
do i need to explicitly untie and undef my tie
variables? or are they automatically freed when my
page exits?
thank you,
remi
__
On Sat, 8 Jul 2000, Greg Leidreiter wrote:
> Config:
> mod_perl-1.24
> perl v5.6.0
> apache 1.3.12
> RedHat linux 6.1, kernel 2.2.12
>
> Using:
>
> [/usr/local/apahce/build/mod_perl-1.24]# perl Makefile.PL \
> EVERYTHING=1 \
> APACHE_PREFIX=/usr/local/apache
>
> everything se
Config:
mod_perl-1.24
perl v5.6.0
apache 1.3.12
RedHat linux 6.1, kernel 2.2.12
Using:
[/usr/local/apahce/build/mod_perl-1.24]# perl Makefile.PL \
EVERYTHING=1 \
APACHE_PREFIX=/usr/local/apache
everything seems to look ok (to me) for both this and 'make'
but when I run '
whats the best encryption module for use with mod perl?
i want to encrypt passwords store in a db and then be able to check
what a users inputs against it
Le Fri, Jul 07, 2000 at 02:18:29PM +0200, heddy Boubaker a dit:
> to do. I'm just looking for a simple but complete html generator (instead of
> hard coding all html tags in my code), does such a beast exists or have I to
> write my own?
I'm not sure what you mean by complete, but CGI::FastTem
Dmitry Beransky wrote:
> Hmm, I don't think I ever mentioned that ASP post-POST redirects just all
> of a sudden stopped working for me. A browser would send a POST request
> and never get anything back. The logs showed that the request was
> processed to the point of $Response->Redirect, but
The issue has less to do with the cost of the whole thing, then with
Strong hold having horrible support as well as a laundry list of other
problems.
Our as we convert our code base into completely mod_perl
modules, the stronghold 2.4.2 has to be replaced by either 3.x or
going to some othe
In the process of optimizing a mod_perl setup (removing useless system
calls), I just spent a very boring couple hours trying to figure out
just why, when I gave Apache a request for a file that didn't exist, it
would first (as expected) stat() each path component, and then do it
again, skipping t
> Forgive me for the obvious and probably stupid questions, (especially
> since I didn't see the earlier posts in which you probably answered
> them =o) but just for the record --
No problem. I appreciate your trying to help!
> Could you be misspelling "PerlAuthzHandler"? I note you said
> "Pe
The problem is cost. If licensing were cheap, Stronghold, Raven, and
others would have a somewhat hard time staying in business (an issue
they'll all have to address soon enough). The SSL vendors have an OEM
license of some sort and so what you pay for a right-to-use license is a
much smalle
> "GK" == Gerd Knops <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
GK> includes a RSA license, you could just put it into a corner and use
GK> mod_ssl. But I am not sure if that kind of 'license transfer' is really
GK> legal.
Buying a licensed RSA implementation doesn't give you a license to use
RSA, it g
> "SA" == Scott Alexander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
SA> So if i didn't want to wait, how would I go about getting an RSA
SA> liscense? to have a mod_ssl server before then.
You don't get a license from RSA cheaply. This is why you buy
Stronghold or Raven or some equivalent. The cost of
> "PS" == Pramod Sokke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
PS> Has anybody used stronghold? I'm considering using stronghold for SSL
PS> support since ours is a commercial application. Would mod_perl and all
PS> related modules work as fine with Stronghold as with plain Apache?
Yes. There's even a
Scott Alexander wrote:
> So if i didn't want to wait, how would I go about getting an RSA
> liscense? to have a mod_ssl server before then.
>
> Also, are the CA's willing to sign for this time of server?
>
When I checked into this Raven SSL seemed to be the solution. It is
basically mod_ssl wi
So if i didn't want to wait, how would I go about getting an RSA
liscense? to have a mod_ssl server before then.
Also, are the CA's willing to sign for this time of server?
Scott
On 7 Jul 2000, at 11:34, Rob Tanner wrote:
> If you can patiently wait till September 21 when the RSA patents expi
Hello, again.
Here's a quick summary of the problem: upon clearing the stack of handlers
(with set_handlers(PerlAuthzHandlers => undef)) the server appears to not
recognize when it has found a DirectoryIndex file and returns the contents
of a directory instead of the index file.
Since last writi
On Fri, 7 Jul 2000, Paul wrote:
> Stronghold would give you professional tech support, but if all you
> want is SSL, check out Ralph Engelschall's mod_ssl (www.modssl.org)
> based on the OpenSSL protocol (www.openssl.org). It works well with
> vanilla Apache, and it's *free* -- thanks again, Ra
Stronghold would give you professional tech support, but if all you
want is SSL, check out Ralph Engelschall's mod_ssl (www.modssl.org)
based on the OpenSSL protocol (www.openssl.org). It works well with
vanilla Apache, and it's *free* -- thanks again, Ralph. =o)
--- Pramod Sokke <[EMAIL PROTEC
--On Friday, July 07, 2000 11:09 AM -0700 Alan Sparks
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can't speak much to Stronghold, got a copy and ultimately put it on the
> shelf. I rather like Raven (covalent.com), works like a peach with
> mod_perl etc.
> Just wish Apache didn't have to be patched to insta
We use stronghold here and its great. Our configuration handles like this :
Stronghold : Handles Port 80 and 443 requests. It then Reverse
Proxies dynamic content back to the mod perl servers.
I've used stronghold in 3 or 4 high demand apps and its a fantastic
low cost solution. However, we ar
Can't speak much to Stronghold, got a copy and ultimately put it on the
shelf. I rather like Raven (covalent.com), works like a peach with mod_perl
etc.
Just wish Apache didn't have to be patched to install the damn stuff...
-Alan
-Original Message-
From: Pramod Sokke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Has anybody used stronghold? I'm considering using stronghold for SSL
support since ours is a commercial application. Would mod_perl and all
related modules work as fine with Stronghold as with plain Apache?
Thanks,
Pramod
At 10:24 AM 7/7/00 -0400, Vivek Khera wrote:
>> "PS" == Pramod Sokke
> -Original Message-
> From: Joshua Chamas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, July 07, 2000 12:46 PM
> To: Dmitry Beransky
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Ken Williams
> Subject: Re: Apache::ASP and post-POST redirect
>
>
>
> I bet its an ASP->Apache::Filter issue, because in general
Perrin-
> modifying Apache::Session to support both interfaces and sending Jeffrey
> the patch.
This is a good suggestion. I'll try modifying Apache::Session first and
sending Jeff the patch. If he doesn't want to integrate it I'll package
it as a separate module.
-Nate
Dmitry Beransky wrote:
>
> Uh, I found what it was!
>
> After receiving Joshua's email, I experimented some more and while trying
> to get the simplest possible configuration disabled the 'Filter' flag
> (which I had turned on because I used Apache::SSI in conjunction with
> ASP). And this did
Uh, I found what it was!
After receiving Joshua's email, I experimented some more and while trying
to get the simplest possible configuration disabled the 'Filter' flag
(which I had turned on because I used Apache::SSI in conjunction with
ASP). And this did the trick. As soon as filtering w
> "heddy" == heddy Boubaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I liked the CGI functions to generate HTML ... it seems there is no
>> simple way to tell CGI module not to eat POST data. HTML::StickyForms
>> could be an option for forms ... the others (Template, Mason) are not
>> for what I'm try
On Fri, 7 Jul 2000, Robin Berjon wrote:
> No need to apologize, we've all got a lot to do. Is it
> just a matter of committing the cvs or is there more to
> be done ? I have a little bit of time between now and
> the middle of the month, I can help if need be.
jim took a snapshot of a subset of
I just meant, if you build/rebuild your modperl httpd,
make sure you copy it to your normal httpd place, like
/usr/local/apache/bin or something. People often forget
this step so that even when they build it and passes all the
tests, they still get the PerlSetVar not defined error from
apache,
Tatiana Tarassenko wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> we're running Apache1.3.12 on linux, both mod_perl and mod_3rdparty are
> compiled as DSOs and are working fine while being loaded separately.
>
> on the attempt of loading them altogether server produces a message that
> httpd started while there's no si
We are not sure why but it appears that the time problem may end up being
specific to a DSO enabled, debian distribution of apache. When we
recompiled a static version, the time that the ASP processes reported
remained the same as the system clock (no changes from PDT to GMT). It
looks like this
>
Vivek Khera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "PS" == Pramod Sokke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> PS> We are running Netscape Enterprise server with cgis written in perl and C.
> PS> I'm looking at moving over to Apache and start using mod_perl. How
> [ .. ]
> PS> over to Apache/mod_perl g
Hi,
we're running Apache1.3.12 on linux, both mod_perl and mod_3rdparty are
compiled as DSOs and are working fine while being loaded separately.
on the attempt of loading them altogether server produces a message that
httpd started while there's no sign httpd.pid. error_log is clear as
well.
it
> "PS" == Pramod Sokke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
PS> We are running Netscape Enterprise server with cgis written in perl and C.
PS> I'm looking at moving over to Apache and start using mod_perl. How
[ .. ]
PS> over to Apache/mod_perl going to be a simple plug-in or would it involve
PS> re-
> "JC" == Joshua Chamas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
JC> It may be possible that the time calculation is based
JC> on some TZ* environment variable that is not consistent,
It has been my experience that the first time any of the system
date/time routines are called and TZ is set, that becomes
Well, the site's old, but the mod_perl bit of it is brand spanking
new. Thanks to sterling work by Ged Haywood and a little bit of
tweaking by me:
http://www.bargainholidays.com/
Is now mod_perl. Well, the most important script on the site it.
Response times are now roughly ten times better th
<> "Darren" == darren chamberlain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Darren> But using CGI's methods invoke CGI's self_or_default meethod, which
Darren> will either use the object passed in or create one internally ($Q)
Darren> and use that to perform its output. So, even though you are not
Darren
On Thu, Jul 06, 2000 at 07:08:03PM -0500, John Marquart wrote:
> Environment:
> AIX 4.3.3
> xlc
> apache 1.3.12
> mod_perl 1.22
> perl 5.00503 (compiled w/ INSTALL patch, details below)
>
> I have had various difficulties trying to get mod_perl to compile
> successfully using perl 5.6.0, also
heddy Boubaker ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said something to this effect:
>
> <> "Darren" == darren chamberlain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Darren> Apache::Request retrieves the POSTed content, so if you try to get
> Darren> it, the server will hang, waiting for input. With Apache::Request,
> Da
In addition, you can read the CGI.pm documentation on the use of
Perl/CGI.pm with FastCGI and you'll be good to go with that get next
request technique.
At 08:14 AM 7/7/00 +0100, David Hodgkinson wrote:
>Dana Powers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > FastCGI with perl may or may not be that fas
<> "Darren" == darren chamberlain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Darren> Apache::Request retrieves the POSTed content, so if you try to get
Darren> it, the server will hang, waiting for input. With Apache::Request,
Darren> just call the
Darren> $r->param method to fetch the data, and don't try
James G Smith wrote:
>
> I would start with `man h2xs' (only a start), and get _Programming Perl_,
> which talks about it some, as does _The Perl Cookbook_, I believe. Then
Advanced Perl programming talks about it also.
--
- frankie -
Dana Powers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> FastCGI with perl may or may not be that fast. I could be totally wrong here
> but I believe that FastCGI will be able to cache the perl runtime, but perl
> will still have to reload and recompile any scripts during every hit.
Not true.
You put some co
43 matches
Mail list logo
