Re: ApacheCon report

2000-10-30 Thread Perrin Harkins
On Tue, 31 Oct 2000, Les Mikesell wrote: > > Ultimately, I don't see any way around the fact that proxying from one > > server to another ties up two processes for that time rather than one, so > > if your bottleneck is the number of processes you can run before running > > out of RAM, this is not

Re: ApacheCon report

2000-10-30 Thread Les Mikesell
- Original Message - From: "Perrin Harkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Here's what I recall Theo saying (relative to mod_perl): > > - Don't use a proxy server for doling out bytes to slow clients; just set > the buffer on your sockets high enough to allow the server to dump the > page and

Re: how to really bang on a script?

2000-10-30 Thread Ask Bjoern Hansen
On Sat, 28 Oct 2000, Christopher L. Everett wrote: [...] > OK, I confess: I've written (probably yet another) mod_perl banner > exchange. I need to know that when we serve 100K banners to 40K Hi Christopher, if anyone doubts that perl and mod_perl is a good solution for that, you can tell th

Re: how to really bang on a script?

2000-10-30 Thread Ask Bjoern Hansen
On Fri, 27 Oct 2000, G.W. Haywood wrote: > > I need to prove to myself and my marketing guy that my script has > > certain statistical properties, not the least of which is the > > question of whether my activity logs match what actually happened. > > You've been spending too much time with your

Re: ApacheCon report

2000-10-30 Thread Perrin Harkins
On Mon, 30 Oct 2000, Tim Sweetman wrote: > Matt Sergeant wrote: > > > > On Fri, 27 Oct 2000, Tim Sweetman wrote: > > > > > In no particular order, and splitting hairs some of the time... > > > > > > Sounded like mod_backhand was best used NOT in the same Apache as a phat > > > application serve

Re: Apache::DB and core dump

2000-10-30 Thread Perrin Harkins
On Mon, 30 Oct 2000, Marek W wrote: > Do you possibly know what could have caused this error while trying to run > this module. I use Linux RH 6.2. and mod_perl 1.23 I've had problems with Apache::DB when using Apache::Request. I have not attempted to solve them yet. - Perrin

mod_perl problems..

2000-10-30 Thread Michael J. Freeman
I am trying to get a CGI to run under mod_perl and am getting weird errors. This CGI trys to use the GD module to create dynamic png's on demand (14all.cgi for RRDtool/MRTG-2) and everytime I run it under mod_perl I get errors like this: [Mon Oct 30 13:05:08 2000] [notice] child pid 336 exit sig

Re: how to really bang on a script?

2000-10-30 Thread Christopher L. Everett
Adi wrote: > > "Christopher L. Everett" wrote: > > > > Adi wrote: > > > > > > martin langhoff wrote: > > > > > > > > Chris, > > > > > > > > i'd bet my head a few months ago someone announced an apache::bench > > > > module, that would take a log and run it as a benchmarking secuence of >

Re: Problem with Apache::ASP

2000-10-30 Thread G.W. Haywood
Hi there, On Mon, 30 Oct 2000, Matthew Byng-Maddick wrote: > You'll still need an > AddModule mod_perl.c > declaration in your httpd.conf And Apache will need to be able to find the object file - but that should have been taken care of automatically by the 'make' steps. 73, Ged.

Re: Proxy Rewrite

2000-10-30 Thread Perrin Harkins
On Mon, 30 Oct 2000, Kermit Tensmeyer wrote: > ProxyPassReverse works as described and modifies > the Location header. Is there something else that > will filter/translate included URL's? > > For example >ProxyPass /product/itemA/ >http://modperl.internal.com/root/s

Re: how to really bang on a script?

2000-10-30 Thread Perrin Harkins
On Sat, 28 Oct 2000, Matthew Byng-Maddick wrote: > On Sat, 28 Oct 2000, Matt Sergeant wrote: > > exactly the same thing (changing server logs into a benchmark tool) at > > ApacheCon, only I can't for the life of me remember who it was. > > Theo, during the mod_backhand talk, or at lunch just bef

Re: Apache Modules in General

2000-10-30 Thread G.W. Haywood
Hi there, On Tue, 31 Oct 2000, Matthew Byng-Maddick wrote: > On Mon, 30 Oct 2000, Jimi Thompson wrote: > > It is me or has anyone noticed a definite LACK of information on how to > > modify the httpd.conf for the various modules in order to get them This List tries to restrict its topics to tho

RE: Apache Modules in General

2000-10-30 Thread Kevin Huang
Title: RE: Apache Modules in General What's your problem ?! http://perl.apache.org Check the site before you say anything. Kevin Huang\\ -Original Message- From: Jimi Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, October 30, 2000 4:01 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Apa

Re: Apache Modules in General

2000-10-30 Thread Eric Strovink
You need an Apache book (www.oreilly.com), the Guide (perl.apache.org/guide), and a Valium, not necessarily in that order ;-) Jimi Thompson wrote: > > I think it's all a hoax

Re: Apache Modules in General

2000-10-30 Thread Dana C. Chandler III
There is an excellent book from O'Reilly called "Writing Apache Modules with Perl and C". I refer to it often. There may be a "freer" way but it's always beneficial to have a good book to refer to when frustrated... DCCIII - Original Message - From: "Jimi Thompson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: Apache Modules in General

2000-10-30 Thread Matthew Byng-Maddick
On Mon, 30 Oct 2000, Jimi Thompson wrote: > It is me or has anyone noticed a definite LACK of information on how to > modify the httpd.conf for the various modules in order to get them > working??? Why is it that no one has ever posted an actual working copy > of an httpd.conf file for mod_perl in

Apache Modules in General

2000-10-30 Thread Jimi Thompson
It is me or has anyone noticed a definite LACK of information on how to modify the httpd.conf for the various modules in order to get them working??? Why is it that no one has ever posted an actual working copy of an httpd.conf file for mod_perl in its various incarnations? Could it be because one

Re: Problem with Apache::ASP

2000-10-30 Thread Matthew Byng-Maddick
On Mon, 30 Oct 2000, Fabio Albertin wrote: > There's one thing I forgot to mention: I'm running a statically compiled > version of Papche, as recommended in the Apache::ASP README, so I don't > think my httpd.conf needs to load any modules, or does it? > I checked my log file for the status messag

Re: Problem with Apache::ASP

2000-10-30 Thread Fabio Albertin
Hello, There's one thing I forgot to mention: I'm running a statically compiled version of Papche, as recommended in the Apache::ASP README, so I don't think my httpd.conf needs to load any modules, or does it? I checked my log file for the status message and it didn't mention mod_perl... Do I ha

Apache::ASP question: undefined subroutines

2000-10-30 Thread Carl Lipo
Does anyone know what causes these kinds of errors? The 'subroutine' that the output is referring to is the name of the page (in this case search.htm) that is being loaded and that sits in the content directory -- there are no real missing subroutines...Maddeningly, if I hit reload enough times t

Mod_Perl installation -- make test

2000-10-30 Thread Shane Reid
Was wanting to add mod_perl so that I could run Apache::ASP, but ran into a problem with it.   I am configuring it with the Apache 1.3.14, and am running into this error:   modules/src.Use of uninitialized value at modules/src.t line 27.FAILED tests 3-5    Failed 3/6 tests, 50.00

Re: Problem with Apache::ASP

2000-10-30 Thread G.W. Haywood
Hi there, On Mon, 30 Oct 2000, Fabio Albertin wrote: > I try to access the /site/eg/ directory of the Apache::ASP distribution, > the browser gives me a 500 error and my log says: > [alert] [client 127.0.0.1] > /usr/local/apache/htdocs/site/eg/.htaccess: Invalid command 'PerlSetVar', > perhaps m

Problem with Apache::ASP

2000-10-30 Thread Fabio Albertin
Hello, I recentlu installed Apache::ASP on my server (i686, RH 6.2, Apache 1.3.12 + mod_perl, Perl 5, PHP 4) but I can't seem to get it working. When I try to access the /site/eg/ directory of the Apache::ASP distribution, the browser gives me a 500 error and my log says: [alert] [client 127.0.0.

Re: how to really bang on a script?

2000-10-30 Thread Adi
"Christopher L. Everett" wrote: > > Adi wrote: > > > > martin langhoff wrote: > > > > > > Chris, > > > > > > i'd bet my head a few months ago someone announced an apache::bench > > > module, that would take a log and run it as a benchmarking secuence of > > > HTTP requests. just get to th

RE: Probably a really stupid question

2000-10-30 Thread Geoffrey Young
> -Original Message- > From: Jimi Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, October 30, 2000 3:13 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Probably a really stupid question > > > Problem - all files ending in the .pl extension display > source code rather than > being executed.

Probably a really stupid question

2000-10-30 Thread Jimi Thompson
Problem - all files ending in the .pl extension display source code rather than being executed. In addition to not seeing the .pl's as executable I get this message when I try to start apache - callmaster% apachectl start Syntax error on line 793 of /usr/local/apache/conf/httpd.conf: Invalid comm

ApacheCon presentation available

2000-10-30 Thread Matt Sergeant
http://axkit.org/docs/presentations/apachecon2k.sdd The presentation is in Star Office (open office) format. -- /||** Director and CTO ** //||** AxKit.com Ltd ** ** XML Application Serving ** // ||** http://axkit.org ** ** XSLT, XPathScript, XSP ** // \\| // **

Re: mod_perl and CGI.pm not working

2000-10-30 Thread G.W. Haywood
Hi there, On Mon, 30 Oct 2000, Boehmann, Brant wrote: > I am running Apache version 1.3.9 and mod_perl version 1.21. I am > trying to use CGI.pm version 2.74, but have also tried 2.68 and get > the same problem. I don't know if it's likely to be the cause of the problem, but you're using a fai

Re: [ ANNOUNCE ] Apache::SessionManager-0.07

2000-10-30 Thread Dave Rolsky
On Mon, 30 Oct 2000, Greg Cope wrote: > I agree but apache has regex.h ... a regex libary - hence these should > be possible - or am I missing the point ? My point was simply that while Perl makes easy things easy, C makes all things hard ;) Frankly, I prefer it as a Perl module since I can see

Re: [OT][ ANNOUNCE ] Apache::SessionManager-0.07

2000-10-30 Thread G.W. Haywood
Hi Gerald, On Mon, 30 Oct 2000, Gerald Richter wrote: > Also there are a lot of nice libraries around, programming in C will > always take much more time (I would say 2 to 10 times), then writing > the same in Perl. Good to have confirmation of my suspicions! 73, Ged.

Re: [OT][ ANNOUNCE ] Apache::SessionManager-0.07

2000-10-30 Thread G.W. Haywood
Hi Greg, On Mon, 30 Oct 2000, Greg Cope wrote: > I agree but apache has regex.h ... a regex libary - hence these should > be possible - or am I missing the point ? Actually regex.h is just a header file which contains the definitions (functions, data structures etc) for the library. There are

Re: Connection Pooling / TP Monitor

2000-10-30 Thread Leslie Mikesell
According to Gunther Birznieks: > I guess part of the question is what is meant by "balanced" with regard to > the non-apache back-end servers that was mentioned? I'd be very happy with either a weighted round-robin or a least-connections choice. When the numbers get to the point where it matt

Re: [ ANNOUNCE ] Apache::SessionManager-0.07

2000-10-30 Thread Gerald Richter
> > > > I think you're forgetting about little things like regexes and such. Yes, > > Perl and C share a lot of syntax, but there are many things you can do > > easily in Perl that are brutal in C. > > I agree but apache has regex.h ... a regex libary - hence these should > be possible - or am I m

Re: [OT] [ ANNOUNCE ] Apache::SessionManager-0.07

2000-10-30 Thread G.W. Haywood
Hi Dave, On Mon, 30 Oct 2000, Dave Rolsky wrote: > On Mon, 30 Oct 2000, G.W. Haywood wrote: > > If you can write Perl you can write C, there are onlya couple of dozen > > keywords. > > I think you're forgetting about little things like regexes and such. Maybe glossing over, not forgetting - tha

Re: [ ANNOUNCE ] Apache::SessionManager-0.07

2000-10-30 Thread Greg Cope
Dave Rolsky wrote: > > On Mon, 30 Oct 2000, G.W. Haywood wrote: > > > If you can write Perl you can write C, there are onlya couple of dozen > > keywords. It's just that you're not so mollycoddled in C, you're much > > closer to the machine, and you have to plan further ahead (instead of > > wa

[JOB] mod_perl/Embperl job in Germany

2000-10-30 Thread Gerald Richter
We are searching a mod_perl/Embperl programmer (or somebody who wants to become one) for a job in Germany (near Mainz) If you are interessted please view details at http://www.ecos.de/x/index.htm/jobs/r_jobs.htm or send me a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gerald

mod_perl + mod_ssl __eprintf failure and fix

2000-10-30 Thread karl
Dear mod_perl and mod_ssl folks, (I'd like to send this to apache folks too but www.apache.org seems to be down and I can't find an email address for bug reports.) I recently had occasion to try to build an apache with mod_perl statically linked, and mod_ssl (and all other modules) dynamically

Job Opportunity - Atlanta

2000-10-30 Thread Andrew Dunstan
Hello, mod_perlers. AnyDevice ( http://www.anydevice.com ) has one or two opportunities for hot perl programmers in Atlanta, GA. If you've got substantial mod_perl experience you might well suit us. Info on the position(s) is below. You can submit your resume to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] cheers

Problem with Apache 1.3.14, mod_perl, ActiveState Perl on Win2000

2000-10-30 Thread Fred Lovine
Hi, Though I'm no Apache pro (yet) it seems that there is a problem with the mod_perl for Win32 ActiveState Perl. I'm using Apache 1.3.14 and am getting server errors when running the sample code for Apache::ASP. The problem seems to be when a .htaccess file is involved. When the settings in .ht

[JOB OP] Perl progammer(s) - Atlanta, GA, USA

2000-10-30 Thread Andrew Dunstan
Hello, mod_perlers. AnyDevice ( http://www.anydevice.com ) has one or two opportunities for hot perl programmers in Atlanta, GA. If you've got substantial mod_perl experience you might well suit us. Info on the position(s) is below. You can submit your resume to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] cheers

CGI.pm and mod_perl

2000-10-30 Thread Boehmann, Brant
I am running Apache version 1.3.9 and mod_perl version 1.21. I am trying to use CGI.pm version 2.74, but have also tried 2.68 and get the same problem. If I use this script: #!/usr/bin/perl use strict; use CGI qw(:standard); print "Content-type: text/html\n\n"; print ""; print "Date: ", scalar

Re: [ ANNOUNCE ] Apache::SessionManager-0.07

2000-10-30 Thread Dave Rolsky
On Mon, 30 Oct 2000, G.W. Haywood wrote: > If you can write Perl you can write C, there are onlya couple of dozen > keywords. It's just that you're not so mollycoddled in C, you're much > closer to the machine, and you have to plan further ahead (instead of > waiting for the bang:). I prefer it

mod_perl and CGI.pm not working

2000-10-30 Thread Boehmann, Brant
I am running Apache version 1.3.9 and mod_perl version 1.21. I am trying to use CGI.pm version 2.74, but have also tried 2.68 and get the same problem. If I use this script: #!/usr/bin/perl use strict; use CGI qw(:standard); print "Content-type: text/html\n\n"; print ""; print "Date: ", scalar

Re: Apache trouble reading in large cookie contents

2000-10-30 Thread Ask Bjoern Hansen
On Fri, 20 Oct 2000, Billy Donahue wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Sun, 22 Oct 2000, Gunther Birznieks wrote: > > > Caveat: even if you modify apache to do larger cookies, it's possible that > > there will be a set of browsers that won't support it. > > Yeah, I

Re: [OT] Will a cookie traverse ports in the same domain?

2000-10-30 Thread Ask Bjoern Hansen
On Thu, 19 Oct 2000, martin langhoff wrote: > All my cookies have stopped working as soon as I've set my mod_perl > apache on a high port with a proxying apache in port 80 [ see thread > "AARRRGH! The Apache Proxy is not transparent wrt cookies!" ] are you sure that you are setting the co

Can't start DSO mod_perl

2000-10-30 Thread Ziying Sherwin
Dear Mod_Perl mailing list, We installed Apache 1.3.12 on our Sun Solaris 2.6 with gcc 2.95.2 compiler. Then we installed mod_perl 1.24 as a DSO to the Apache server. When we were installing mo_perl with apxs, everything looks fine. However, httpd.conf file seems to be untouched. We added the

Re: [ RFC ] New Module Apache::SessionManager

2000-10-30 Thread Gerald Richter
> >Hence is it worth a CPAN entry ? (I've not got an account ) > > Imho, a perl module that could be of use to the community should be placed on > CPAN. Yes!! Gerald

Re: [ RFC ] New Module Apache::SessionManager

2000-10-30 Thread James G Smith
Greg Cope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Hence is it worth a CPAN entry ? (I've not got an account ) Imho, a perl module that could be of use to the community should be placed on CPAN. It is easy to get an account -- email the perl module list with the idea for your module and an account will

Re: [ ANNOUNCE ] Apache::SessionManager-0.07

2000-10-30 Thread Bill Moseley
At 10:07 AM 10/30/00 +, Greg Cope wrote: >Gunther Birznieks wrote: >> This is an issue if your index.html requires the session id. So if you >> direct to / you'll lose it. It's not bad if index.html is static, but it >> could be generated via a handler or perhaps it's an index.cgi > >This shou

RE: Proxy Rewrite

2000-10-30 Thread Christian Gilmore
Perhaps Apache::ProxyStuff will do the trick for you. Regards, Christian > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, October 30, 2000 9:00 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Proxy Rewrite > > > Problem: When using the Light & Heavy Serv

RE: maximum (practical) size of $r->notes

2000-10-30 Thread G.W. Haywood
Hi Geoff, On Mon, 30 Oct 2000, Geoffrey Young wrote: > > Ged mumbled: > > Won't Perl then just keep that memory until the child dies...? > > that is my understanding... I guess that my point was that if you > are going to have the data in perl somewhere the memory is going to > be taken (for exa

Apache::RegistryFilter problem

2000-10-30 Thread Brian Wheeler
I'm trying to use Apache::RegistryFilter to pipe the output of perl scripts into AxKit for processing. However, when I try to do this, I get this error: [Mon Oct 30 10:18:10 2000] [error] Can't locate object method "dir_config" via package "Apache::RegistryFilter" at /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_p

RE: maximum (practical) size of $r->notes

2000-10-30 Thread Matt Sergeant
On Mon, 30 Oct 2000, Geoffrey Young wrote: > that is my understanding... I guess that my point was that if you are going > to have the data in perl somewhere the memory is going to be taken (for > example, putting it in a tempfile but then local $/ and slurp). pnotes > allows for passing by refe

RE: maximum (practical) size of $r->notes

2000-10-30 Thread Geoffrey Young
> -Original Message- > From: G.W. Haywood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, October 30, 2000 10:06 AM > To: Geoffrey Young > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: maximum (practical) size of $r->notes > > > Hi all, > > On Mon, 30 Oct 2000, Geoffrey Young wrote: > > > > From:

Re: Proxy Rewrite

2000-10-30 Thread Balazs Rauznitz
On Mon, 30 Oct 2000, Kermit Tensmeyer wrote: > Problem: When using the Light & Heavy Server methods > of processing web delivery, there are several methods of > proxying reques to multiple backend servers (squid, > mod_rewrite, mod_proxy) can be used. And these > seem to work well, but on

RE: maximum (practical) size of $r->notes

2000-10-30 Thread G.W. Haywood
Hi all, On Mon, 30 Oct 2000, Geoffrey Young wrote: > > From: G.W. Haywood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > If it's a huge amount of data and you don't want to bloat your > > processes, why not pass a tempfile name/pointer/handle in $r->notes > > or (easier) just place a reference to a variable co

Proxy Rewrite

2000-10-30 Thread Kermit Tensmeyer
Problem: When using the Light & Heavy Server methods of processing web delivery, there are several methods of proxying reques to multiple backend servers (squid, mod_rewrite, mod_proxy) can be used. And these seem to work well, but one small issue still crops up. ProxyPassReverse works as

RE: maximum (practical) size of $r->notes

2000-10-30 Thread Geoffrey Young
> -Original Message- > From: G.W. Haywood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, October 30, 2000 7:29 AM > To: Matthew Byng-Maddick > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: maximum (practical) size of $r->notes > > > Hi all, > > On Mon, 30 Oct 2000, Matthew Byng-Maddick wrote: > >

[DIGEST] mod_perl digest 10/22/2000

2000-10-30 Thread Geoffrey Young
-- mod_perl digest October 22, 2000 - October 28, 2000 -- Recent happenings in the mod_perl world... Features o

RE: Connection Pooling / TP Monitor

2000-10-30 Thread Geoffrey Young
> -Original Message- > From: G.W. Haywood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Sunday, October 29, 2000 6:37 AM > To: Gunther Birznieks > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Connection Pooling / TP Monitor > > > Hi guys, > > On Mon, 30 Oct 2000, Gunther Birznieks wrote: > > At 09:24 AM

Re: [ ANNOUNCE ] Apache::SessionManager-0.07

2000-10-30 Thread Greg Cope
"G.W. Haywood" wrote: > > Hi there, > > On Mon, 30 Oct 2000, Greg Cope wrote: > > > In theory there is no reason why this should not be translateable to C, > > it is quite small (in perl). > > However: > > a) I cannot do C (and translating this is beyond me as a learning > > exercise at the mo)

Re: maximum (practical) size of $r->notes

2000-10-30 Thread G.W. Haywood
Hi all, On Mon, 30 Oct 2000, Matthew Byng-Maddick wrote: > On Mon, 30 Oct 2000, Matt Sergeant wrote: > > On Mon, 30 Oct 2000, Todd Finney wrote: > > AxKit uses the notes table to store interim strings for template > > processing. I've not yet heard a bug related to it, but then I'm not > > deliv

Re: [ ANNOUNCE ] Apache::SessionManager-0.07

2000-10-30 Thread G.W. Haywood
Hi there, On Mon, 30 Oct 2000, Greg Cope wrote: > In theory there is no reason why this should not be translateable to C, > it is quite small (in perl). > However: > a) I cannot do C (and translating this is beyond me as a learning > exercise at the mo). > b) Also waiting is a good idea till all

Re: Apache::GzipChain

2000-10-30 Thread G.W. Haywood
Hi there, On Mon, 30 Oct 2000, Matt Sergeant wrote: > On Sat, 28 Oct 2000, Jerrad Pierce wrote: > > Is there some known means of verifying that it is in fact working properly? > lwp-request -H 'Accept-Encoding: gzip' -e -d > Or ommit the -d and check for gobbledegook. But it tends to stuff up y

Re: Apache::DB and core dump

2000-10-30 Thread G.W. Haywood
Hi there, On Mon, 30 Oct 2000, Marek W wrote: > Do you possibly know what could have caused this error while trying to run > this module. I use Linux RH 6.2. and mod_perl 1.23 Read SUPPORT. 73, Ged.

Re: [ ANNOUNCE ] Apache::SessionManager-0.07

2000-10-30 Thread Greg Cope
Gunther Birznieks wrote: > > At 01:31 AM 10/30/2000 +, Greg Cope wrote: > >[...snip...] > > > > > > And don't forget about the use of DirectoryIndex: > > > GET /index.html http/1.0 > > > > > > HTTP/1.1 302 Found <<== here's your redirect > > > > > > Now this gets through: > > > GET / http/1.

Re: maximum (practical) size of $r->notes

2000-10-30 Thread Matthew Byng-Maddick
On Mon, 30 Oct 2000, Matt Sergeant wrote: > On Mon, 30 Oct 2000, Todd Finney wrote: > > I'm concerned about putting large amounts of data into > > $r->notes. Some of our script output can be pretty > > heavy. If $r->notes can only take simple strings, how > > large of a simple string is it sa

Re: ApacheCon report

2000-10-30 Thread Tim Sweetman
Matt Sergeant wrote: > > On Fri, 27 Oct 2000, Tim Sweetman wrote: > > > In no particular order, and splitting hairs some of the time... > > > > Sounded like mod_backhand was best used NOT in the same Apache as a phat > > application server (eg. mod_perl), because you don't want memory-heavy > >

Re: maximum (practical) size of $r->notes

2000-10-30 Thread Matt Sergeant
On Mon, 30 Oct 2000, Todd Finney wrote: > I'm concerned about putting large amounts of data into > $r->notes. Some of our script output can be pretty > heavy. If $r->notes can only take simple strings, how > large of a simple string is it safe to put in it? Is there > a better way to do th

Re: Apache::GzipChain

2000-10-30 Thread Matt Sergeant
On Sat, 28 Oct 2000, Jerrad Pierce wrote: > Is anybody using GzipChain? Not in itself, but I'm using AxKit which also does gzip compression. > Is there some known means of verifying that it is in fact working properly? Yes, use: lwp-request -H 'Accept-Encoding: gzip' -e -d Or ommit the -d a