cvs commit: modperl-2.0/xs/tables/current/ModPerl FunctionTable.pm

2003-01-21 Thread stas
stas2003/01/21 19:19:43 Modified:.Changes src/modules/perl modperl_io.c modperl_io.h t/modperl .cvsignore todo api.txt xs/Apache/RequestIO Apache__RequestIO.h xs/maps modperl_functions.map

cvs commit: modperl-2.0/t/error push_handlers.t

2003-01-21 Thread stas
stas2003/01/21 23:00:29 Modified:t/error push_handlers.t Log: use the new under_construction test to print a descriptive skip reason Revision ChangesPath 1.3 +1 -1 modperl-2.0/t/error/push_handlers.t Index: push_handlers.t

cvs commit: modperl-2.0 Changes

2003-01-21 Thread stas
stas2003/01/21 23:02:14 Modified:.Changes Log: log the recent changes Revision ChangesPath 1.109 +5 -0 modperl-2.0/Changes Index: Changes === RCS file:

Error message: setup_inherited_listeners ?

2003-01-21 Thread Lee Goddard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: MD5 Hello, I hope this is going to the users list Apache/1.3.14 (Win32) mod_perl/1.27.01-dev running... [crit] (109)The pipe has been ended: setup_inherited_listeners: Unable to read socket data from parent. Could someone please help me understand

[OT] MLDBM Size Limit??

2003-01-21 Thread Jim Morrison [Mailinglists]
Guys, Sorry this is a little off topic... Is there a size limit on DBM's? (Or Linux files for that matter.. ) I've thrown some details of my box/code below.. Thing is I'm getting a write error and it seems to always happen when the DBM gets to 2.0Gb .. (you may think I'm mad for trying to make

Re: Error message: setup_inherited_listeners ?

2003-01-21 Thread Lee Goddard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: MD5 For the record My problem, below, came about because of some small runtime erros. It was not caught by the usual means documented in the Guide (etc), and I have been unable to find any reference to the error message outside of the httpd source

Re: [OT] MLDBM Size Limit??

2003-01-21 Thread Ged Haywood
Hi there, On Tue, 21 Jan 2003, Jim Morrison [Mailinglists] wrote: Sorry this is a little off topic... Is there a size limit on DBM's? (Or Linux files for that matter.. ) [snip] Thing is I'm getting a write error and it seems to always happen when the DBM gets to 2.0Gb .. [snip] Linux

Re: [mp2] e-Commerce

2003-01-21 Thread Eric Frazier
Hi, You know I was all ready on my dev box to start messing around with apache2, when we had a major evil thing happen on our fancy server. So my dev box had to become our server. And because I have not had any personal experence with apache 2, I converted everthing back to 1.x on the dev box.

Re: [OT] MLDBM Size Limit??

2003-01-21 Thread Robert Landrum
On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 02:37:02PM +, Ged Haywood wrote: Hi there, On Tue, 21 Jan 2003, Jim Morrison [Mailinglists] wrote: Sorry this is a little off topic... Is there a size limit on DBM's? (Or Linux files for that matter.. ) [snip] Thing is I'm getting a write error and it

Re: [mp2]make test fails

2003-01-21 Thread Steve Glaus
On Tue, 21 Jan 2003 16:05:05 +1100 Stas Bekman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Steve Glaus wrote: On Mon, 20 Jan 2003 11:29:01 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I'm trying to build mod_perl2 with threads enabled. I recompiled apache with the worker mpm, built mod_perl which seemd to

Re: [mp2] e-Commerce

2003-01-21 Thread Nick Tonkin
On Tue, 21 Jan 2003, Perrin Harkins wrote: Eric Frazier wrote: On that note, how about just using Apache2 for the proxy front end, and mod_perl /apache 1.x for the back end? I have wanted to try to avoid the thttpd stuff for images and from what I have heard about apache2 it can handle

Re: [mp2] e-Commerce

2003-01-21 Thread Perrin Harkins
Nick Tonkin wrote: Hmm, I think it all depends on the application. It's true that hardware costs have declined since The Days, but you still don't have unlimited RAM. True, there is an upper limit on per-machine scalability with a multi-process server and thttpd would do better there if the

[DIGEST] mod_perl digest 2002/12/30

2003-01-21 Thread jgsmith
-- mod_perl digest December 30, 2002 - January 19, 2003 -- Recent happenings in the mod_perl world... Features

Re: [mp2] e-Commerce

2003-01-21 Thread Perrin Harkins
Stas Bekman wrote: Where did you see the benchmarks showing that Apache 2.0 has a better performance than 1.3? All over! Joshua's numbers from this list: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=apache-modperlm=103238123915307w=2 Some good graphs, including thttpd:

ANNOUNCE: Loggerithim 6.1.4

2003-01-21 Thread Cory 'G' Watson
http://loggerithim.sourceforge.net Loggerithim is monitoring package for Linux and Solaris (with early support for OS X and Win32). It allows you to collect metrics from your hosts and analyze them with graphs and whatnot. You can also set thresholds for proactively spotting problems.

Testing

2003-01-21 Thread Michael Hyman
Hi there, I am new to this list and new to mod_perl in general, so I hope the more experienced folks will be able to help me. :) We are starting to test our perl code running under mod_perl. We did go through the porting guide and did everything that was receommended. I am interested in how

[mp2] Apache::RequestRec, IPC::Open[23] problem

2003-01-21 Thread Ville Skyttä
Hi, The script below under mod_perl 1.99_08 (ModPerl::Registry), gives me this: Can't locate object method FILENO via package Apache::RequestRec at /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.0/IPC/Open3.pm line 196. A real world example of a script that has these problems is the W3C Markup Validator,

Re: Testing

2003-01-21 Thread Perrin Harkins
Michael Hyman wrote: I am interested in how people setup their Apache 1.3.x servers to run mod_perl'able code. Not, how to get mod_perl to run something, we do that with rewrite rules. I am more interested in config settings that control for performance and stability. There is lots of

Re: [mp2]make test fails

2003-01-21 Thread Stas Bekman
Steve Glaus wrote: [...] Ok, I know we're probably going of topic here, but I'll ask anyways.. You can't run mod_perl, so it's pretty ontopic. I did what you said...the symbol wasn't there in lipperl.so. So. I rebuilt my perl, rebuilt the library, rebuilt my perl again.. I only have one perl

Re: [mp2] e-Commerce

2003-01-21 Thread Stas Bekman
Perrin Harkins wrote: Stas Bekman wrote: Where did you see the benchmarks showing that Apache 2.0 has a better performance than 1.3? All over! Thanks Perrin. [...] Some good graphs, including thttpd: http://www.zeuscat.com/andrew/work/aprbench/ It shows that threaded mpm's throughput

Re: ANNOUNCE: Loggerithim 6.1.4

2003-01-21 Thread Stas Bekman
Cory 'G' Watson wrote: http://loggerithim.sourceforge.net Loggerithim is monitoring package for Linux and Solaris (with early [...] It will be added to http://perl.apache.org/products/products.html on the next update. p.s. If you have written useful apps running under mod_perl and they aren't

Re: [Slightly OT] [mp2] e-Commerce

2003-01-21 Thread Andrew Ho
Hey Stas, PHSome good graphs, including thttpd: PHhttp://www.zeuscat.com/andrew/work/aprbench/ SBIt shows that threaded mpm's throughput is worse than preforked, which SBsounds dubious unless things were broken (blocking mutexes). Hopefully SBsomeone can run a benchmark on more updated versions

Re: [mp1] Partial success working on Tru64/DSO

2003-01-21 Thread Marcin Kasperski
(... revisiting old thread about my problems with compiling apache/mod_perl as DSO on Tru64 unix) My problem is still not solved but I get it up to the point where it probably lies in some customary modules (which does not behave correctly when unloaded/reloaded) and is not directly related to

name space problem

2003-01-21 Thread eric
Okay, So I may be a fool for asking this question, but I hope you will all forgive me. I am fairly new to Perl and really really new to mod_perl. I am working to convert my site to use mod_perl and am having problems with two require statements that exist in most of my scripts. Basically,

Re: the perl Script called from perlTranshandler seems to be synchronized

2003-01-21 Thread Db-Doc SP
Hello All, I am having a peculiar problem it seems that only one request can be serviced at a time while using mod_perl (perlTransHandler). we are using Apache 1.3.26 mod_perl It seems as though when I use mod_perl apache can handle only one request at a time. If the first request

Re: the perl Script called from perlTranshandler seems to besynchronized

2003-01-21 Thread Randy Kobes
On Wed, 22 Jan 2003, Db-Doc SP wrote: Hello All, I am having a peculiar problem it seems that only one request can be serviced at a time while using mod_perl (perlTransHandler). we are using Apache 1.3.26 mod_perl It seems as though when I use mod_perl apache can handle

Re: name space problem

2003-01-21 Thread Stas Bekman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Okay, So I may be a fool for asking this question, but I hope you will all forgive me. I am fairly new to Perl and really really new to mod_perl. I am working to convert my site to use mod_perl and am having problems with two require statements that exist in most of

[win32] upgrading to Apache 2.0.44

2003-01-21 Thread Randy Kobes
Sorry for the (slightly) off-topic post, but if you're a Win32 user and are looking to upgrade to Apache 2.0.44 due to some security fixes, some people have reported problems on Win98 with the upgrade. The Apache people have identified the problem, and most likely a fix will be released shortly.

stability of apache 2.0 implications on mod_perl?

2003-01-21 Thread Vivek Khera
The announcement of Apache 2.0.44 includes this: The 2.0.44 release marks a change in the Apache release process and a new level of stability in the 2.0 series. Beginning with this release, we will make every effort to retain forward compatibility in the configuration and module API, so that

Re: [mp2] Apache::RequestRec, IPC::Open[23] problem

2003-01-21 Thread Stas Bekman
Ville Skyttä wrote: Hi, The script below under mod_perl 1.99_08 (ModPerl::Registry), gives me this: Can't locate object method FILENO via package Apache::RequestRec at /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.0/IPC/Open3.pm line 196. A real world example of a script that has these problems is the W3C Markup

Re: stability of apache 2.0 implications on mod_perl?

2003-01-21 Thread Stas Bekman
Vivek Khera wrote: The announcement of Apache 2.0.44 includes this: The 2.0.44 release marks a change in the Apache release process and a new level of stability in the 2.0 series. Beginning with this release, we will make every effort to retain forward compatibility in the configuration and