cvs commit: modperl/eg makepl_args.mod_perl

2000-09-26 Thread dougm
dougm 00/09/26 10:03:06 Modified:.Changes eg makepl_args.mod_perl Log: eg/makepl_args.mod_perl updated Revision ChangesPath 1.519 +3 -0 modperl/Changes Index: Changes

Re: .makepl_args.mod_perl

2000-02-05 Thread wookie
At 12:39 PM 2/4/00 -0500, you wrote: Also I noted that in the guide most paramters are listed in the blue boxes as PERL-* instead of PERL_*. This could be confusing to newcomers. Excuse me? There is no a single PERL- in there. I am not sure what is going on here. You are right! In

RE: .makepl_args.mod_perl

2000-02-04 Thread Eric Cholet
A newbie question. Though I have successfully built mod_perl from command line parameters I decided to try the .makepl_args.mod_perl file method from the Eagle book. I had EVERYTHING=1 as the first line in this file but when I run I get... It's makepl_args.mod_perl, not .makepl_args.mod_perl

Re: .makepl_args.mod_perl

2000-02-04 Thread Stas Bekman
A newbie question. Though I have successfully built mod_perl from command line parameters I decided to try the .makepl_args.mod_perl file method from the Eagle book. I had EVERYTHING=1 as the first line in this file but when I run I get... PerlDispatchHandler.disabled (enable

Re: .makepl_args.mod_perl

2000-02-04 Thread Bakki Kudva
Thank you, Eric. Looks like the Eagle book has an error then. Is there an errata for it some where? I don't see it on their home page. bakki A newbie question. Though I have successfully built mod_perl from command line parameters I decided to try the .makepl_args.mod_perl file method from

Re: .makepl_args.mod_perl

2000-02-04 Thread Stas Bekman
successfully built mod_perl from command line parameters I decided to try the .makepl_args.mod_perl file method from the Eagle book. I had EVERYTHING=1 as the first line in this file but when I run I get... It's makepl_args.mod_perl, not .makepl_args.mod_perl (no leading dot) -- Eric

Re: .makepl_args.mod_perl

2000-02-04 Thread David McCabe
From: Bakki Kudva [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2000 11:52:43 -0500 Subject: Re: .makepl_args.mod_perl To: modperl-list [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thank you, Eric. Looks like the Eagle book has an error then. Is there an errata for it some where? I don't see it on their home page. It's

Re: .makepl_args.mod_perl

2000-02-04 Thread Bakki Kudva
Also I noted that in the guide most paramters are listed in the blue boxes as PERL-* instead of PERL_*. This could be confusing to newcomers. Excuse me? There is no a single PERL- in there. I am not sure what is going on here. You are right! In Netscape it appears correctly as

Re: .makepl_args.mod_perl

2000-02-04 Thread Bakki Kudva
A big THANK YOU to all for clarifying the usage of this file. bakki So both work, depending on where the file is. I use the .makepl... form, in my $HOME dir, so that I don't have to edit a new one for every new version. :) David McCabe Unix SysAdmin/Peon

Re: .makepl_args.mod_perl

2000-02-04 Thread G.W. Haywood
Hi there, It looks like you have all your questions answered now, but I have one or two. On Fri, 4 Feb 2000, Bakki Kudva wrote: I read the guide and there is no mention of this. Also I noted that in the guide most paramters are listed in the blue boxes as PERL-* instead of PERL_*. Stas is

Re: .makepl_args.mod_perl

2000-02-04 Thread G.W. Haywood
Hi there, More topical: Well I think we've done that one. It seems that if not actually an error the documents conspire to confuse. Certainly one for the errata even if it's not really wrong. I have a couple of dozen other notes about the Eagle Book, is there a CVS snapshot of the errata

Re: .makepl_args.mod_perl

2000-02-04 Thread Stas Bekman
On Fri, 4 Feb 2000, G.W. Haywood wrote: Hi there, More topical: Well I think we've done that one. It seems that if not actually an error the documents conspire to confuse. Certainly one for the errata even if it's not really wrong. I have a couple of dozen other notes about the