> Often quite a number of developers are all
> at work, and they don't all merit the kind of trust that mod_perl
> requires.
See Phillippe Chiasson's talk @ ApacheCon. Lots of developers checking out
release controlled Apache, perl, and application. Neat stuff.
John
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, 29 Apr 2001 13:52:05 +0800
Gunther Birznieks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I completely agree with the assertion that applications sell the
underlying technology. History teaches us that to be indisputable.
Also while applications should be an overall part of the vision, it may
not have to
On Sun, Apr 29, 2001 at 01:37:52PM +0800, Gunther Birznieks wrote:
> At 09:06 AM 4/28/01 -0400, barries wrote:
>
> >Not sure either, except that this would be more targeted towards
> >specific research projects, as opposed to the build a venue and they
> >will come SourceXchange model.
>
> I gue
I would like to restate that while I think these engines are cool and
useful, that they are not the things that bring the masses to your
platform. This was the point I was making. I am not naysaying projects
like Enhydra, but just stated that they are not as directly useful for
bringing the m
At 09:14 AM 4/28/01 +0100, Matt Sergeant wrote:
>On Sat, 28 Apr 2001, Gunther Birznieks wrote:
>
> > As I think I mentioned, it's great that the people like you on this list
> > have a passion for delivering cool software.
> >
>[snipped]
> >
> > People rarely look at toolkits like payment gateways
At 09:06 AM 4/28/01 -0400, barries wrote:
> > But then this gets into the Collabnet SourceXChange model which Collabnet
> > just shut down due to lack of capability of making money (I guess). So
> I am
> > not sure if this would bode well for this type of model on mod_perl.
>
>Not sure either, e
barries wrote:
> > Anyway, this seems promising. Where I know we wouldn't pay money to fund an
> > entire year of Stas developing mod_perl solely, I certainly know that there
> > are probably features I would seriously consider sponsoring.
>
> Any others out there that might be interested, let's
At 14:04 28/04/2001 -0400, Drew Taylor wrote:
>I remember seeing some proofs done by Robin Berjon (I'm sure I'm not
>spelling it right!) long ago that I really liked. But they were never used
>AFAIK. I also registered modperlnews.(org|com) a while back with the
>intention of doing something use
On Sat, 28 Apr 2001 09:14:10 +0100 (BST)
Matt Sergeant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Amen to that and there is Enhydra on the Java side. To get the
functionality of these two frameworks I'd have to integrate many many CPAN
modules, keep track of various versions, make sure each is active etc etc.
A
At 10:41 PM 4/27/01 -0400, barries wrote:
>On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 11:44:49PM +0800, Stas Bekman wrote:
> >
> > Since mod_perl is an open source, it's a tough quest. Basically what I
> > want is get some company that will benefit from me working on open source
> > project full time and pay me a sa
On Sat, Apr 28, 2001 at 12:16:18PM +0800, Gunther Birznieks wrote:
>
> If the person being sponsored by grants is a foreigner to the US, but
> wishes to be in the US
Agreed, but I don't think that's a roadblock, just a situation to be
dealt with. mod_perl infrastructure seems to be the kind of
As I think I mentioned, it's great that the people like you on this list
have a passion for delivering cool software.
I may have missed the intent of these two posts (micropayment and messaging
engines), but unfortunately, I don't really consider either of these items
to be application-level i
I think this is a fantastic idea.
The only downside is that such a fund may be difficult to manage so one of
the companies could give management/people time to the grant process in
lieu of money I imagine. So if we take Stas' case, Stas would have to
market himself and get several companies to
On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 11:44:49PM +0800, Stas Bekman wrote:
>
> Since mod_perl is an open source, it's a tough quest. Basically what I
> want is get some company that will benefit from me working on open source
> project full time and pay me a salary. Of course it's probably hard to get
> a full
Well, hopefully the mod_perl community isn't so small that etoys counted as a
sizable fraction :)
I'm ex etoys Europe and have set up a mod_perl webdev company in London
assembling high traffic web sites, so I guess you can count me in as one of them
freed up mod_perl people. I was tempted to emai
Well, you know how I feel. :) But the others don't so...
I believe the most crucial and missing approach is to put resources into
making ready-made applications that work on mod_perl rather than core
mod_perl itself. This is also a problem on Linux, but that's another story.
A quantity of appl
On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 10:01:39AM -0700, Michael Lazzaro wrote:
> At 12:00 PM 4/27/01 -0400, JR Mayberry wrote:
> >there will be more dreams jobs like you described.. simple fact is, I
> >couldn't name more then 3 companies in my area who use it, and I never
> >expect to do work with it again.
>
At 12:00 PM 4/27/01 -0400, JR Mayberry wrote:
>there will be more dreams jobs like you described.. simple fact is, I
>couldn't name more then 3 companies in my area who use it, and I never
>expect to do work with it again.
... on the other hand, even as recently as one year ago, it was almost
im
that idea though..
- Original Message -
From: "Stas Bekman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "mod_perl list" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, April 27, 2001 11:44 AM
Subject: an unusual [job request] + taking mod_perl to the commercial world
>
> Well,
Well, I've talked to a few mod_perl guys over the last conference and by
email lately and we have have all agreed that we are quite sick of
generating forms and parsing them, no matter what cool toolkit and hype
words we are using to do that. So we all are looking at doing core
mod_perl, i.e. we
20 matches
Mail list logo