Re: [mp2 Patch] BUG with mod_deflate and $|=1 (20014:Error string not specified)

2003-08-14 Thread Stas Bekman
Bill Marrs wrote: Please report to the list the bug id so we can document this issue for those who have the same problem with older httpds. Thanks. OK, I've posted it. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22259 Thanks for the fix! For the archives: This bug has been fixed

Re: [mp2 Patch] BUG with mod_deflate and $|=1 (20014:Error string not specified)

2003-08-14 Thread Bill Marrs
Try this patch: [...] Feel free to submit this bug report and the fix to httpd-dev. Please let me know if you do that, so I won't duplicate it. But I'd prefer that you do it so you can make sure that it gets fixed in the next release, since you need it working. I've just verified that your

Re: [mp2 Patch] BUG with mod_deflate and $|=1 (20014:Error string not specified)

2003-08-14 Thread Bill Marrs
Please report to the list the bug id so we can document this issue for those who have the same problem with older httpds. Thanks. OK, I've posted it. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22259 Thanks for the fix! -bill

Re: [mp2 Patch] BUG with mod_deflate and $|=1 (20014:Error string not specified)

2003-08-14 Thread Stas Bekman
Bill Marrs wrote: Try this patch: [...] Feel free to submit this bug report and the fix to httpd-dev. Please let me know if you do that, so I won't duplicate it. But I'd prefer that you do it so you can make sure that it gets fixed in the next release, since you need it working. I've just

Re: [mp2 Patch] BUG with mod_deflate and $|=1 (20014:Error string not specified)

2003-08-07 Thread Stas Bekman
, this is a bug in mod_deflate. You don't see it in mod_cgi, because mod_cgi doesn't really handle buffering and flushing, since it just reads the data from the pipe to the process. mod_deflate didn't follow the deflate() spec, saying that the caller shouldn't call deflate, when there is no data

Apache::ProxyRewrite possible bug with port numbers on ProxyRewrite

2003-08-01 Thread Dwayne Turley
I've been kicking around a proxy server here and found your Apache-ProxyRewrite most useful but I have this quirk perhaps you can help with. I'm using version 0.17. I've read in the ChangeLog that one of the more recent fixes (v0.16) may have been to address the problem I'm encountering.

Re: [mp2 Patch] BUG with mod_deflate and $|=1 (20014:Error string not specified)

2003-07-21 Thread Bill Marrs
I can measure it myself if you can provide me with URLs to your resources and identify them in terms of which one is mod_CGI and which is mod_perl. This is the mod_cgi one that works fine, no errors: http://shevek.kenyonhill.com/cgi/test.pl This is the mod_perl one (same script) that generates

Re: [mp2 Patch] BUG with mod_deflate and $|=1 (20014:Error string not specified)

2003-07-21 Thread Slava Bizyayev
- From: Bill Marrs [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Slava Bizyayev [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Stas Bekman [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Philippe M. Chiasson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 6:49 AM Subject: Re: [mp2 Patch] BUG with mod_deflate and $|=1 (20014:Error string not specified) I can

Re: [mp2 Patch] BUG with mod_deflate and $|=1 (20014:Error string not specified)

2003-07-21 Thread Bill Marrs
and check its size when flushing... I may not be understanding the output you sent or what you're saying, but I still don't follow why this would be a mod_deflate bug if mod_cgi with the same script has no problem.

Re: [mp2 Patch] BUG with mod_deflate and $|=1 (20014:Error string not specified)

2003-07-21 Thread Slava Bizyayev
Well, the problem is that I get this error in my error_log: [Mon Jul 21 14:18:55 2003] [error] 4297: ModPerl::RegistryBB: 20014:Error string not specified yet at /var/www/perl/test.pl line 6. Also, more important, the script seems to be terminating and/or any output following the 'print '

Re: [mp2 Patch] BUG with mod_deflate and $|=1 (20014:Error string not specified)

2003-07-20 Thread Slava Bizyayev
Marrs [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Slava Bizyayev [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Stas Bekman [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Philippe M. Chiasson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, July 20, 2003 6:22 PM Subject: Re: [mp2 Patch] BUG with mod_deflate and $|=1 (20014:Error string not specified) At 11:07 AM 7/19/2003

Re: clones and parents (bug report)

2003-07-19 Thread Stas Bekman
Randy Kobes wrote: [..] Just to verify, I also get this with ActivePerl 806, Apache/2.0.47, and the current mod_perl cvs version. Here's some partial debug information: PERL58! 28083490() PERL58! 280648b5() and what are these two perl

Re: [mp2 Patch] BUG with mod_deflate and $|=1 (20014:Error string not specified)

2003-07-19 Thread Slava Bizyayev
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, July 19, 2003 7:01 AM Subject: Re: [mp2 Patch] BUG with mod_deflate and $|=1 (20014:Error string not specified) At 07:16 PM 7/18/2003, Slava Bizyayev wrote: In my understanding _it is_ a problem of mod_deflate. The error does not occur if I run the same test

RE: clones and parents (bug report)

2003-07-18 Thread Marc M. Adkins
-8-- Start Bug Report 8-- 1. Problem Description: # Problem: When I add PerlOptions +Parent I get a segfault. # # Breaks with: # Windows 2000 SP2 # Apache 2.0.46 # ActiveState Perl 5.8.0 (build 804) # mod_perl 1.99.10dev

RE: clones and parents (bug report)

2003-07-18 Thread Randy Kobes
On Fri, 18 Jul 2003, Marc M. Adkins wrote: -8-- Start Bug Report 8-- 1. Problem Description: # Problem: When I add PerlOptions +Parent I get a segfault. # # Breaks with: # Windows 2000 SP2 # Apache 2.0.46 # ActiveState Perl

Re: [mp2 Patch] BUG with mod_deflate and $|=1 (20014:Error stringnot specified)

2003-07-15 Thread Stas Bekman
Philippe M. Chiasson wrote: On Thu, 2003-07-03 at 01:24, Bill Marrs wrote: This fixed the bug for me. Great! Will commit it in the near future. (Can't seem to access the cvs server right now, crappy internet cafe) -1, this is a wrong solution. print ; should flush just like it did in mod_perl

Re: [MP2 - BUG ?] Issue handing Apache config. error messages

2003-07-15 Thread Stas Bekman
Issac Goldstand wrote: Right. Could you possibly clarify the difference between SetHandler perl-script and SetHandler modperl? I'm still not sure I've got the straight of it yet... You must be kidding ;) Have you read the sections at the URL posted below? Stas Bekman wrote: Sreeji K Das

Re: [MP2 - BUG ?] Issue handing Apache config. error messages

2003-07-15 Thread Issac Goldstand
- Original Message - From: Stas Bekman [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Issac Goldstand [EMAIL PROTECTED] Issac Goldstand wrote: Looking at it now, I tend to agree... I just have a vague recollection of my first mod_perl 2 handler (Written only 2 weeks ago, though I dabbled with the C API

Re: [MP2 - BUG ?] Issue handing Apache config. error messages

2003-07-15 Thread Stas Bekman
Issac Goldstand wrote: [...] (Starting with mor_perl 2)... I'm toying with the idea of starting the porting tutorial, but I want to make sure it's written well for clueless people (which I probably still at least half count as :-)) and with accurate content. porting or starting? We already have

Re: [mp2 Patch] BUG with mod_deflate and $|=1 (20014:Error string not specified)

2003-07-15 Thread Bill Marrs
At 04:24 AM 7/15/2003, Stas Bekman wrote: Philippe M. Chiasson wrote: On Thu, 2003-07-03 at 01:24, Bill Marrs wrote: This fixed the bug for me. Great! Will commit it in the near future. (Can't seem to access the cvs server right now, crappy internet cafe) -1, this is a wrong solution. print

Re: [mp2 Patch] BUG with mod_deflate and $|=1 (20014:Error stringnot specified)

2003-07-15 Thread Stas Bekman
Bill Marrs wrote: At 04:24 AM 7/15/2003, Stas Bekman wrote: Philippe M. Chiasson wrote: On Thu, 2003-07-03 at 01:24, Bill Marrs wrote: This fixed the bug for me. Great! Will commit it in the near future. (Can't seem to access the cvs server right now, crappy internet cafe) -1

Re: [mp2 Patch] BUG with mod_deflate and $|=1 (20014:Error string not specified)

2003-07-15 Thread Bill Marrs
#addoutputfilterbytype Ah, I misunderstood the mod_deflate docs. I think at the time, it didn't seem to work with just one of them in-place, so I added the other. *SHRUG* I can't say I'm a pro at Apache config files, I just tinker until it works. I assume this is irrelevant to the bug, though. I'm

Re: [MP2 - BUG ?] Issue handing Apache config. error messages

2003-07-14 Thread Issac Goldstand
Right. Could you possibly clarify the difference between SetHandler perl-script and SetHandler modperl? I'm still not sure I've got the straight of it yet... Issac Stas Bekman wrote: Sreeji K Das wrote: [...] You need to use 'SetHandler perl-script' for that, see:

[MP2 - BUG ?] Issue handing Apache config. error messages

2003-07-09 Thread Sreeji K Das
Following demonstrates the problem: $ cat /tmp/test.conf Perl @Include = /tmp/test1.conf; /Perl Listen 43499 $ cat /tmp/test1.conf Perl $Port = 42480; /Perl $ httpd -X -f /tmp/test.conf Syntax error on line 7 of /tmp/test.conf: Use of uninitialized value in subroutine entry at

RE: Possible bug using NTLMv2 across trusted domains.

2003-07-08 Thread Paulo Meireles
) and that's another reason why nobody answered. 3 - Even if it was on topic, you're testing with *very* old service packs. If you, absolutely, must use an old service pack, then please tell us why; The question is, maybe it's not a bug on the NTLM2 module - but a bug on Windows NT itself

[MP2 BUG] PerlPassEnv issues

2003-07-07 Thread Sreeji K Das
Looks like PerlSetEnv's are not propagated as expected. I've pasted my original mail to the list. However, after going through the code, it looks like scfg-PassEnv is not synced with Perl's %ENV structure. Following is a simpler example: $ cat /tmp/test.conf Perl ; /Perl PerlPassEnv MY_TEST_VAR

Re: [mp2 Patch] BUG with mod_deflate and $|=1 (20014:Error string not specified)

2003-07-04 Thread Philippe M. Chiasson
On Thu, 2003-07-03 at 01:24, Bill Marrs wrote: This fixed the bug for me. Great! Will commit it in the near future. (Can't seem to access the cvs server right now, crappy internet cafe) One thing that could help is if someone could take the time to write a test for this bug. Gozer out. At 10

[mp2] BUG with mod_deflate and $|=1 (20014:Error string not specified)

2003-07-02 Thread Bill Marrs
When I use Apache 2.0.46, mod_deflate with mod_perl-1.99_09 (or the latest mod_perl-2.0 CVS), perl buffering is off ($|=1), and my perl script prints nothing (e.g. 'print ;'), I get the following error: [Wed Jul 02 10:10:00 2003] [error] 19513: ModPerl::RegistryBB: 20014:Error string not

[mp2 Patch] BUG with mod_deflate and $|=1 (20014:Error string not specified)

2003-07-02 Thread Philippe M. Chiasson
Seems to be a problem with calling IoFLUSH() on an already flushed handle. This patch seems to fix it for me. Index: xs/Apache/RequestIO/Apache__RequestIO.h === RCS file:

Re: [mp2 Patch] BUG with mod_deflate and $|=1 (20014:Error string not specified)

2003-07-02 Thread Bill Marrs
This fixed the bug for me. At 10:48 AM 7/2/2003, you wrote: #define mpxs_output_flush(r, rcfg) \ /* if ($|) */ \ -if (IoFLUSH(PL_defoutgv)) { \ +if (bytes 0 IoFLUSH(PL_defoutgv)) { \ MP_FAILURE_CROAK(modperl_wbucket_flush(rcfg-wbucket, TRUE)); \ }

[mp2] UN-bug!

2003-05-31 Thread Beau E. Cox
Hi Stas and guys - As of Sat May 31 08:38:30 UTC 2003 1) I have the following installed and tested: Server Version: Apache/2.0.46 (Unix) mod_perl/1.99_10-dev (CVS) Perl/v5.8.0 mod_ssl/2.0.46 OpenSSL/0.9.7b 2) Everything is looking good! 3) GOOD JOB FOLKS... Aloha = Beau;

BUG [in docs] mailing list subscription does not actually indicatelist post address

2003-04-04 Thread Matthew Wickline
http://perl.apache.org/maillist/email-etiquette.html Posting to the list is just sending a message to the address which you will be given after you subscribe. The above should either be updated, or the welcome message should be updated. I've just subscribed to the digest version, and the

BUG [in docs] semicolon-separated param pairs fail w/ MSIE in metaredirect tags

2003-04-03 Thread m-list-subscribe-modperl-digest
Stas wrote: Matthew, can you please repost it to the mod_perl list? There are many more people who can followup on this. Thanks. I won't be subscribed long enough to read any replies to this mesg, but am posting here at Stas' suggestion. Hopefully someone here will be able to update the docs

Bug: system()-Call: CmdLine more than 128 Chars

2003-03-05 Thread Mark Plomer
repeat this MaxThreads-times, Apache does not respond any more. But: - When I run the Perl-Script as CGI with Perl 5.8 it works fine. - And also if I run ActivePerl-5.6.1.635 it works fine with mod_perl. It seems to be a Bug in either mod_perl or Perl itself, (Or a forgotton Workaround on a Windows-Bug

Fwd: Re: [MP2] Apache::Reload date bug

2003-03-01 Thread Ron Savage
--- Original Message --- From: Stas Bekman [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Ron Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Sent: Sat, 01 Mar 2003 12:47:39 +1100 Subject: Re: [MP2] Apache::Reload date bug Ron Savage wrote: On Tue, 25 Feb 2003 09:40:05 +1100, Stas Bekman wrote: Hi Stas Output when run as /perl/main.cgi

Re: [MP2] Apache::Reload date bug

2003-02-27 Thread Ron Savage
On Wed, 26 Feb 2003 22:30:51 -0600 (CST), Randy Kobes wrote: On Thu, 27 Feb 2003, Ron Savage wrote: On Wed, 26 Feb 2003 09:23:39 +1100, Stas Bekman wrote: HI Randy The mod_perl 2 ppm package (for ActivePerl 8xx) at http://theoryx5.uwinnipeg.ca/ppms/ is updated periodically with a cvs build - as

Re: [MP2] Apache::Reload date bug

2003-02-26 Thread Ron Savage
On Wed, 26 Feb 2003 09:23:39 +1100, Stas Bekman wrote: Hi Stas Have you tried the current mod_perl cvs? No. Being usually a Windows (shudder) user, I wait for Randy to issue a build. Today I spent 4 hours failing to install Red Hat 6, Red Hat 8 and Mandrake 9 on a brand new Dell with a

Re: [MP2] Apache::Reload date bug

2003-02-26 Thread Randy Kobes
On Thu, 27 Feb 2003, Ron Savage wrote: On Wed, 26 Feb 2003 09:23:39 +1100, Stas Bekman wrote: Hi Stas Have you tried the current mod_perl cvs? No. Being usually a Windows (shudder) user, I wait for Randy to issue a build. The mod_perl 2 ppm package (for ActivePerl 8xx) at

Re: [MP2] Apache::Reload date bug

2003-02-25 Thread Stas Bekman
Ron Savage wrote: On Tue, 25 Feb 2003 09:40:05 +1100, Stas Bekman wrote: And what your error_log says? Nothing is output to the error_log. Have you tried the current mod_perl cvs? __ Stas BekmanJAm_pH -- Just

Re: [MP2] Apache::Reload date bug

2003-02-24 Thread Ron Savage
in the server error log. -- -- Apache/2.0.43 Server at 127.0.0.1 Port 80 -8- The part of httpd.conf controlling /perl/. Note Dummy is not included here, but the original module, which revealed the original bug, is: 8

Re: [MP2] Apache::Reload date bug

2003-02-24 Thread Stas Bekman
Ron Savage wrote: On Wed, 19 Feb 2003 10:04:02 +1100, Stas Bekman wrote: Ron Savage wrote: On Tue, 18 Feb 2003 12:56:38 +1100, Stas Bekman wrote: Hi Folks In endeavouring to reproduce this problem, I've encountered another: main.cgi: -8- #!/usr/bin/perl use strict; use warnings; use

Re: [MP2] Apache::Reload date bug

2003-02-24 Thread Ron Savage
On Tue, 25 Feb 2003 09:40:05 +1100, Stas Bekman wrote: And what your error_log says? Nothing is output to the error_log. -- Cheers Ron Savage, [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 25/02/2003 http://savage.net.au/index.html

Re: [MP2] Apache::Reload date bug

2003-02-18 Thread Stas Bekman
Ron Savage wrote: On Tue, 18 Feb 2003 12:56:38 +1100, Stas Bekman wrote: perl -le 'warn(foo\n)' You got the quotes wrong for MS Windows, so I ran it twice: C:\Backupperl -le warn(qq|foo\n|) foo C:\Backupperl -le 'warn(foo\n)' well, you've got the idea, right. Perhaps someone on win32

Re: [MP2] Apache::Reload date bug

2003-02-18 Thread Randy Kobes
On Wed, 19 Feb 2003, Stas Bekman wrote: Ron Savage wrote: On Tue, 18 Feb 2003 12:56:38 +1100, Stas Bekman wrote: perl -le 'warn(foo\n)' You got the quotes wrong for MS Windows, so I ran it twice: C:\Backupperl -le warn(qq|foo\n|) foo C:\Backupperl -le 'warn(foo\n)'

Re: [MP2] Apache::Reload date bug

2003-02-18 Thread Stas Bekman
Randy Kobes wrote: On Wed, 19 Feb 2003, Stas Bekman wrote: Ron Savage wrote: On Tue, 18 Feb 2003 12:56:38 +1100, Stas Bekman wrote: perl -le 'warn(foo\n)' You got the quotes wrong for MS Windows, so I ran it twice: C:\Backupperl -le warn(qq|foo\n|) foo C:\Backupperl -le 'warn(foo\n)'

[MP2] Apache::Reload date bug

2003-02-16 Thread Ron Savage
Folks I don't know if this an Apache problem, or a mod_perl problem. Apache::Reload outputs a UTC date rather than a local date, when it encounters an error. Here's an excerpt from my log. Notice how the dates go Sun, Mon, ..., Sun. [Sun Feb 16 18:31:25 2003] [error] [client 127.0.0.1]

[mp2] Bug : Weird failures

2003-02-13 Thread Lee Goddard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: MD5 Just for the record, in case it helps someone, I'm getting weird failures, unpredictably -- there's not one thing that seems to set it off: sometimes they happen, sometimes they don't. [Thu Feb 13 10:12:28 2003] [notice] Parent: child process exited

Re: Registry return codes handling (was Re: Possible bug with a 206Partial Response)

2003-02-11 Thread Geoffrey Young
The only thing that puzzles me about this thread is that it seems to be leaning towards the position that says; If the developer just does straight out weird stuff and messes with $r-status in a cgi-script and expects it to work with Apache::Registry (which as far as I understand is a cgi

Re: Registry return codes handling (was Re: Possible bug with a 206Partial Response)

2003-02-11 Thread Geoffrey Young
received a bug report, where the script wasn't doing the right thing. I can't remember whether you modeled Cooker after PerlRun or RegistryNG. the current logic in RegistryNG represents a recent change and is my fault http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=apache-modperl-devm=101240123609773w=2

Re: Registry return codes handling (was Re: Possible bug with a 206Partial Response)

2003-02-11 Thread Stas Bekman
this approach we immediately received a bug report, where the script wasn't doing the right thing. I can't remember whether you modeled Cooker after PerlRun or RegistryNG. the current logic in RegistryNG represents a recent change and is my fault http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=apache-modperl-devm

Re: Registry return codes handling (was Re: Possible bug with a 206Partial Response)

2003-02-10 Thread Geoffrey Young
The logic here is simpler: 1. store the new status code (just in case the script has changed it) 2. reset the status code to the one before the script execution 3. if the script has attempted to change the status by itself and the execution status is Apache::OK return that new status.

Re: Registry return codes handling (was Re: Possible bug with a 206Partial Response)

2003-02-10 Thread Stas Bekman
. That's the approach that is taken by Apache::Registry and it seems that most people are happy with it. PerlRun does return the execution status, but when I first made the Cooker use this approach we immediately received a bug report, where the script wasn't doing the right thing

Re: Registry return codes handling (was Re: Possible bug with a 206Partial Response)

2003-02-10 Thread David Dick
if it was changed by the script. That's the approach that is taken by Apache::Registry and it seems that most people are happy with it. PerlRun does return the execution status, but when I first made the Cooker use this approach we immediately received a bug report, where the script wasn't doing

Re: Registry return codes handling (was Re: Possible bug with a 206Partial Response)

2003-02-10 Thread Stas Bekman
David Dick wrote: [...] The only thing that messed me up was when running a script with mod_cgi, you can return your own status codes and apache will happily go along with it. However, when you run the same script under mod_perl's Apache::Registry, you suddenly get Apache::Registry second

Re: Possible bug with a 206 Partial Response

2003-02-04 Thread David Dick
alrightly, back again. The problem is that Apache::Registry will return a 206, which will trigger the error message. In case there is anyone out there as daft as me :), the crude delegation-type module below can solve this problem. Maniacs who see a need to return 204's, etc can probably

Re: Possible bug with a 206 Partial Response

2003-02-04 Thread Stas Bekman
David Dick wrote: alrightly, back again. The problem is that Apache::Registry will return a 206, which will trigger the error message. In case there is anyone out there as daft as me :), the crude delegation-type module below can solve this problem. Maniacs who see a need to return 204's,

Re: Possible bug with a 206 Partial Response

2003-02-04 Thread David Dick
If I'm correct both Apache::PerlRun and Apache::Registry will have problems in certain situations if we agree that ModPerl::Registry has the correct logic for handling the execution status. If you can tell otherwise please give me a test script that doesn't work under ModPerl::Registry. But in

Re: Possible bug with a 206 Partial Response

2003-02-02 Thread Ged Haywood
Hi there, On Sun, 2 Feb 2003, David Dick wrote: Got a bit of a weird set of behaviour with a mod_perl Apache::Registry type script. [snip] More information about this error may be available in the server error log.P [snip] Anyone got any ideas? What does it say in the error_log? 73, Ged.

Re: Possible bug with a 206 Partial Response

2003-02-02 Thread David Dick
Good Point. Forgot to mention that the error log is completely empty. :) Ged Haywood wrote: Hi there, On Sun, 2 Feb 2003, David Dick wrote: Got a bit of a weird set of behaviour with a mod_perl Apache::Registry type script. [snip] More information about this error may be

Re: Possible bug with a 206 Partial Response

2003-02-02 Thread Ged Haywood
Hi there, On Sun, 2 Feb 2003, David Dick wrote: Forgot to mention that the error log is completely empty. :) Are you getting core dumps? 73, Ged.

Re: Possible bug with a 206 Partial Response

2003-02-02 Thread David Dick
not even getting a broken connection. So somehow mod_perl doesn't _really_ think it's an error. Ged Haywood wrote: Hi there, On Sun, 2 Feb 2003, David Dick wrote: Forgot to mention that the error log is completely empty. :) Are you getting core dumps? 73, Ged.

Re: Possible bug with a 206 Partial Response

2003-02-02 Thread Ged Haywood
Hi again, On Mon, 3 Feb 2003, David Dick wrote: not even getting a broken connection. So somehow mod_perl doesn't _really_ think it's an error. Check out DEBUGGING in 'perldoc Apache::Registry'. Apache::Registry won't always return what you'd think it should. This has snookered more than

Possible bug with a 206 Partial Response

2003-02-01 Thread David Dick
G'day all, Got a bit of a weird set of behaviour with a mod_perl Apache::Registry type script. HISTORY: I've been using MD5 digests of the html sent from my scripts as ETags, hence saving an important bit of bandwidth. Got a little bit carried away with the success of this project and

Re: [MP2] bug report startup and XML::LibXML

2003-01-31 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
as address: 0xabababab, as you have traced it. So it could be a bug in the ActiveState's perl or is it a standard one? it is perl 58 cpan source I have rebuilt all myself debug but the bug also happens with asperl 58 here is more precicion, I have followed the trace starting

Re: [MP2] bug report startup and XML::LibXML

2003-01-31 Thread Stas Bekman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi ! and as suggested : LIBXML2.DLL VERSION 2.4.26 XML::LibXML version 1.52 I've tested with libxml2-2.4.23 and XML::LibXML 1.53 on linux and it works just fine. I tested it with libxml2-2.4.23 and XML::LibXML 1.52 and it still segfaults. I can't reproduce

[MP2] bug report startup and XML::LibXML

2003-01-30 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi here is a revised complete report bug Hi on SERVER_SOFTWARE: Apache/2.0.44 (Win32) mod_perl/1.99_08-dev Perl/v5.8.0 and as suggested : LIBXML2.DLL VERSION 2.4.26 XML::LibXML version 1.52 everything rebuild debug test code --- use

Re: [MP2] bug report startup and XML::LibXML

2003-01-30 Thread Stas Bekman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi here is a revised complete report bug and as suggested : LIBXML2.DLL VERSION 2.4.26 XML::LibXML version 1.52 I've tested with libxml2-2.4.23 and XML::LibXML 1.53 on linux and it works just fine. [...] output ok but apache segfault --- here

Internal redirect to method handler bug?

2003-01-03 Thread Dave Rolsky
of the internal redirect. I tried to make a bare bones config that duplicated the problem, but my really simple config worked just fine. Does this bug ring any bells? -dave /*=== House Absolute Consulting www.houseabsolute.com ===*/

Re: Internal redirect to method handler bug?

2003-01-03 Thread Dave Rolsky
without a package name (just $r) because of the internal redirect. I tried to make a bare bones config that duplicated the problem, but my really simple config worked just fine. Does this bug ring any bells? Aha! I just found this in the archives (which I looked at before posting

[mp1.0] DESTROY doesn't honor read-only flag (possible bug).

2002-12-16 Thread Jesse Williamson
Hello, We began to encounter some odd segfaults, and after poking through mod_perl believed that we have found the problem. The DESTROY() function in Table.xs is not honoring the read only flag in self, which would seem to be a bug. For reasons we are still trying to discover (;), it's being

Re: Suspected Apache::AuthenNTLM Bug

2002-11-11 Thread Gerald Richter
With ColdFusion you can call the same page eg the line_main2.cfm can be called from the line_main2.cfm with different parameters. Unfortunately the client PC does not seem to pass the NTLM/Basic Authorization Header the second time the page is called. Maybe this is handled via a subrequest.

Re: [BUG] Losing GET/POST-data

2002-11-11 Thread Stas Bekman
[...] Basically we are losing data sent to a mod_perl program. We request the page page.fxml?name=aladress=swedenproblem=huge. When our program receives this request it will only be page.fxml without any of the arguments sent. [...] I haven't followed the original thread, so I apologize if I

Re: [mp 2] Bug report - mod-perl install process.

2002-11-11 Thread Stas Bekman
Ian Stuart wrote: Server Version: Apache/2.0.39 (Unix) mod_perl/1.99_07-dev Perl/v5.6.1 I believe that the install process does not test for the presence (or lack of..) of the apache_server_root/modules directory. This causes a problem during the mod_perl installation as the pseudo-command cp

BUG in $r-uri ?

2002-11-08 Thread Lee Goddard
I know I shouldn't, but I have a URI that goes: a_silly_clients_filename 2 . jpg And when I try: $r-log_error ( $r-uri ); the result is: [Fri Nov 08 09:59:37 2002] [error] a_silly_clients_filename 2.jpg Is this real, or is it me? Thanks, lee Lee Goddard

Suspected Apache::AuthenNTLM Bug

2002-11-07 Thread Brett Hales
I believe that there is a bug in the Apache::AuthenNTLM module. Configuration: I have an Apache server with ColdFusion MX 6 installed, there is a requirement for NTLM authentication with the server. I implemented the PerlAuthenHandler Apache::AuthenNTLM to solve this problem. Problem

Re: Suspected Apache::AuthenNTLM Bug

2002-11-07 Thread Ged Haywood
Hi there, On 8 Nov 2002, Brett Hales wrote: I believe that there is a bug in the Apache::AuthenNTLM module. Did you see this? 73, Ged. -- Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2002 17:46:15 -0600 (CST) From: Gerald Combs [EMAIL PROTECTED

Minor bug in AuthCookieDBI ?

2002-10-21 Thread George Valpak
Hi - I am wondering if there is a bug in AuthCookieDBI.pm? There is function group which is called to verify the user's group when there is a Require group directive. It starts like this: sub group($$\) { my( $self, $r, groups ) = _; When more than one group is specified

Re: [BUG] Losing GET/POST-data

2002-10-18 Thread Hakan Nilsson
Hello. I have posted a note here before, and want to thank those that took time to try to solve this strange problem, but unfortunately none of the suggestions have helped us so far, except for helping us ruling out things that could have been incorrect. Now I have received some more information

[mp 2] Bug report - mod-perl install process.

2002-10-09 Thread Ian Stuart
Server Version: Apache/2.0.39 (Unix) mod_perl/1.99_07-dev Perl/v5.6.1 I believe that the install process does not test for the presence (or lack of..) of the apache_server_root/modules directory. This causes a problem during the mod_perl installation as the pseudo-command cp $SOURCE/mod_perl.so

(bug report) SIGALRM problem in mod-perl causes stuck Apache processes.

2002-10-04 Thread Charles Jardine
I have recently seen a number of stuck processes on an Apache server I run. The problem is associated with events which appear to be attacks by the Slapper worm. The server's OpenSSL has been upgraded, so actual penetration by Slapper does not occur. However the stuck processes are inconvenient,

Re: [BUG] Losing GET/POST-data

2002-10-03 Thread Hakan Nilsson
module. SNIP Recently we switched from using the standard Apache request-object to using the Apache::Request one, for the added functionality, but this has not had any effect at all as far as we can tell, and the bug keeps happening... I ran into a problem that the param parts of a request

Re: [BUG] Losing GET/POST-data

2002-10-03 Thread Nigel Hamilton
not had any effect at all as far as we can tell, and the bug keeps happening... I ran into a problem that the param parts of a request were flushed when read for the first time... so if you lose them (don't store them) then you cannot access them again. Yep, noticed this myself when re

[BUG] Losing GET/POST-data

2002-10-02 Thread Hakan Nilsson
, but this doesn't completely solve the problem either. We have encountered the bug on several versions of both apache and mod_perl, on different os's: Solaris/mod_perl 1.25/apache 1.3.19 Debian/mod_perl 1.26/apache 1.3.23 We have also seen it both in the compiled versions and in the standard

Re: [BUG] Losing GET/POST-data

2002-10-02 Thread Wes Cravens
the standard Apache request-object to using the Apache::Request one, for the added functionality, but this has not had any effect at all as far as we can tell, and the bug keeps happening... I ran into a problem that the param parts of a request were flushed when read for the first time... so

bug with IO::Scalar IO::String Text::Iconv and XML

2002-10-01 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi here is a program that shows something wrong when using Text::Iconv with IO::Scalar or IO::String read a sample xml file, with an accented character, after xml parsing (which translates to utf-8), translate back to iso- 8859-1. also prepare a simple utf-8 string with text::iconv problem

installation bug with Apache v2.0.42

2002-09-25 Thread Eugene Eric Kim
I found a minor installation bug in both modperl v1.99-5. (The same bug also seems to be in the latest modperl-2.0 CVS tree.) The bug occurs when you try to install modperl 2 with the latest version of Apache (2.0.42). For whatever reason, the Apache folks changed the format of the macros

Re: installation bug with Apache v2.0.42

2002-09-25 Thread Andreas Hasenack
Em Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 10:40:53AM -0700, Eugene Eric Kim escreveu: format of the macros in include/ap_release.h between 2.0.40 and 2.0.42. AP_SERVER_BASEREVISION is now: #define AP_SERVER_BASEREVISION AP_SERVER_MINORREVISION . AP_SERVER_PATCHLEVEL instead of simply: #define

Re: BUG: Apache::Cookie v1.0

2002-09-23 Thread darren chamberlain
* Michael McLagan [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-09-21 11:45]: There is a bug in Apache::Cookie. It doesn't handle a cookie with zero bytes in it! This is because Apache::Cookie is implemented in C, and C uses NULL as the end of string terminator. This is probably something that needs to be done

BUG: Apache::Cookie v1.0

2002-09-21 Thread Michael McLagan
Hello, There is a bug in Apache::Cookie. It doesn't handle a cookie with zero bytes in it! $value = ABCD . chr(0) . EFGH; $cookie = Apache::Cookie-new($request, -name= 'oatmeal', -value= $value, -domain=$ENV{'SERVER_NAME'}, -path=/); print $cookie-as_string; The output looks like

Re: BUG: Apache::Cookie v1.0

2002-09-21 Thread Michael McLagan
Once upon a time, I wrote: There is a bug in Apache::Cookie. It doesn't handle a cookie with zero bytes in it! A clarification, it's not a zero length cookie that is mishandled, it's a cookie with an embedded NUL (zero) character. Michael

Re: Morning bug w/out using Apache::DBI?

2002-09-11 Thread Perrin Harkins
Your problem doesn't sound like something that Apache::DBI would cause. Deadlock problems are caused by conflicting updates, which could only be coming from your code. I'm not positive but maybe it seemed like there were stale handlers lying around that weren't being closed If you put

RE: weird bug in Apache::Filter with UTF-8

2002-09-10 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
) the same thing printed to a file and to STDOUT (tied by Apache::Filter), is in first case normal, in 2d case all UTF-8. this was with activestate build 631 the bug disappeared with activestate build 633 Pascal Accédez au courrier électronique de La Poste : www.laposte.net

Morning bug w/out using Apache::DBI?

2002-09-10 Thread Keith Watanabe
Hi! I recently made an attempt to upgrade other web software to mod_perl 1.26 (compiled statically, running on Solaris 2.6). We're using Sybase 11.9.2 for this application as the db backend. When I initially converted the site over to mod_perl, I started off using Apache::DBI by placing it

weird bug in Apache::Filter with UTF-8

2002-09-09 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi under perl561/modperl 1 I have 2 modules in an apache filter context perlhandler module1 module2 module1 prints some text partly hardcoded normal (but accented) text partly from an XML::XPath instruction (UTF-8 codeset but inside the ascii 127) - if module1 is alone the output is ok -

Re: (browser bug) Internet Explorer AuthCookie and others

2002-06-23 Thread Richard Clarke
I am an idiot. Please ignore the previous post. Richard :( - Original Message - From: Richard Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 2:00 AM Subject: (browser bug) Internet Explorer AuthCookie and others List, I just wanted to post to see

Re: Thread bug in 5.8RC1 Win32

2002-06-15 Thread Alessandro Forghieri
Greetings. On Fri, Jun 14, 2002 at 12:44:50PM +0200, Alessandro Forghieri wrote: Running NT4SP6, 5.8RC1 compiled debug. The following session: D:\Apache2perl -d -e 42 DB1 ;{use threads;my $var=1;threads-create(sub{$var++})-join();} Crashes the intepreter, in perl.c: [...] Sorry to

Re: Thread bug in 5.8RC1 Win32

2002-06-15 Thread Jarkko Hietaniemi
In UNIX platforms your test made Perl enter a 100% CPU loop consisting of SEGVs on top of SEGVs on top of SEGVS... the below hopefully fixes: Change 17250 by jhi@alpha on 2002/06/15 15:34:51 Possible cure for Subject: Re: Thread bug in 5.8RC1 Win32 From

Thread bug in 5.8RC1 Win32

2002-06-14 Thread Alessandro Forghieri
Greetings. Running NT4SP6, 5.8RC1 compiled debug. The following session: D:\Apache2perl -d -e 42 Loading DB routines from perl5db.pl version 1.19 Editor support available. Enter h or `h h' for help, or `perldoc perldebug' for more help. main::(-e:1): 42 DB1 ;{use threads;my

Re: DBI Bug

2002-06-05 Thread Udlei Nattis
hi this problem is very very very persistent httpd.conf PerlModule DBI # THIS IS THE PROBLEM PerlModule Apache::Registry Location /perl SetHandler perl-script PerlHandler Apache::Registry Options ExecCGI allow from all PerlSendHeader On /Location i try all rebuild modperl witch modperl

Re: DBI Bug

2002-06-05 Thread wsheldah
/Lexmark) Subject: Re: DBI Bug i using last version of DBI bye nattis

  1   2   3   4   5   >