On Sun, 29 Apr 2001 13:52:05 +0800
Gunther Birznieks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I completely agree with the assertion that applications sell the
underlying technology. History teaches us that to be indisputable.
Also while applications should be an overall part of the vision, it may
not have to
Often quite a number of developers are all
at work, and they don't all merit the kind of trust that mod_perl
requires.
See Phillippe Chiasson's talk @ ApacheCon. Lots of developers checking out
release controlled Apache, perl, and application. Neat stuff.
John
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, Apr 29, 2001 at 01:37:52PM +0800, Gunther Birznieks wrote:
At 09:06 AM 4/28/01 -0400, barries wrote:
Not sure either, except that this would be more targeted towards
specific research projects, as opposed to the build a venue and they
will come SourceXchange model.
I guess my
On Sat, Apr 28, 2001 at 12:16:18PM +0800, Gunther Birznieks wrote:
If the person being sponsored by grants is a foreigner to the US, but
wishes to be in the US
Agreed, but I don't think that's a roadblock, just a situation to be
dealt with. mod_perl infrastructure seems to be the kind of
At 10:41 PM 4/27/01 -0400, barries wrote:
On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 11:44:49PM +0800, Stas Bekman wrote:
Since mod_perl is an open source, it's a tough quest. Basically what I
want is get some company that will benefit from me working on open source
project full time and pay me a salary. Of
On Sat, 28 Apr 2001 09:14:10 +0100 (BST)
Matt Sergeant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Amen to that and there is Enhydra on the Java side. To get the
functionality of these two frameworks I'd have to integrate many many CPAN
modules, keep track of various versions, make sure each is active etc etc.
A
At 14:04 28/04/2001 -0400, Drew Taylor wrote:
I remember seeing some proofs done by Robin Berjon (I'm sure I'm not
spelling it right!) long ago that I really liked. But they were never used
AFAIK. I also registered modperlnews.(org|com) a while back with the
intention of doing something useful
barries wrote:
Anyway, this seems promising. Where I know we wouldn't pay money to fund an
entire year of Stas developing mod_perl solely, I certainly know that there
are probably features I would seriously consider sponsoring.
Any others out there that might be interested, let's hear
At 09:06 AM 4/28/01 -0400, barries wrote:
But then this gets into the Collabnet SourceXChange model which Collabnet
just shut down due to lack of capability of making money (I guess). So
I am
not sure if this would bode well for this type of model on mod_perl.
Not sure either, except
At 09:14 AM 4/28/01 +0100, Matt Sergeant wrote:
On Sat, 28 Apr 2001, Gunther Birznieks wrote:
As I think I mentioned, it's great that the people like you on this list
have a passion for delivering cool software.
[snipped]
People rarely look at toolkits like payment gateways and
I would like to restate that while I think these engines are cool and
useful, that they are not the things that bring the masses to your
platform. This was the point I was making. I am not naysaying projects
like Enhydra, but just stated that they are not as directly useful for
bringing the
Well, I've talked to a few mod_perl guys over the last conference and by
email lately and we have have all agreed that we are quite sick of
generating forms and parsing them, no matter what cool toolkit and hype
words we are using to do that. So we all are looking at doing core
mod_perl, i.e. we
though..
- Original Message -
From: Stas Bekman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: mod_perl list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 27, 2001 11:44 AM
Subject: an unusual [job request] + taking mod_perl to the commercial world
Well, I've talked to a few mod_perl guys over the last conference
At 12:00 PM 4/27/01 -0400, JR Mayberry wrote:
there will be more dreams jobs like you described.. simple fact is, I
couldn't name more then 3 companies in my area who use it, and I never
expect to do work with it again.
... on the other hand, even as recently as one year ago, it was almost
On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 10:01:39AM -0700, Michael Lazzaro wrote:
At 12:00 PM 4/27/01 -0400, JR Mayberry wrote:
there will be more dreams jobs like you described.. simple fact is, I
couldn't name more then 3 companies in my area who use it, and I never
expect to do work with it again.
...
Well, you know how I feel. :) But the others don't so...
I believe the most crucial and missing approach is to put resources into
making ready-made applications that work on mod_perl rather than core
mod_perl itself. This is also a problem on Linux, but that's another story.
A quantity of
Well, hopefully the mod_perl community isn't so small that etoys counted as a
sizable fraction :)
I'm ex etoys Europe and have set up a mod_perl webdev company in London
assembling high traffic web sites, so I guess you can count me in as one of them
freed up mod_perl people. I was tempted to
On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 11:44:49PM +0800, Stas Bekman wrote:
Since mod_perl is an open source, it's a tough quest. Basically what I
want is get some company that will benefit from me working on open source
project full time and pay me a salary. Of course it's probably hard to get
a full
18 matches
Mail list logo
