On 07/10/2011 06:28 AM, Tosh Cooey wrote:
Looks there like they have a Perl stack available, which is super for
the world but not so for me since the stack requires you use PSGI which
is a great approach but since I don't require portability I never went
that route, oh woe is me...
PSGI isn't
I saw Miyagawa at YAPC::NA and it looks like DotCloud is serious about
their Perl support.
The situation seems pretty good to me. We have DotCloud, for people
who want to try something simple very quickly with minimal startup
costs. We have cheap virtual servers (e.g. Linode) running linux with
From: Perrin Harkins per...@elem.com
I saw Miyagawa at YAPC::NA and it looks like DotCloud is serious about
their Perl support.
The situation seems pretty good to me. We have DotCloud, for people
who want to try something simple very quickly with minimal startup
costs.
I have tried, or
Mr. Hodgkinson was awesome enough to point out the existence of
DotCloud: https://docs.dotcloud.com/#perl.html
Looks there like they have a Perl stack available, which is super for
the world but not so for me since the stack requires you use PSGI which
is a great approach but since I don't
Also, I believe DotCloud has Miyagawa on board which is a big win IMHO.
Legend has it he had perl support shipped two days after joining. Or
something.
I'm about to put a Catalyst app on it so we'll see how that flies.
On 10 Jul 2011, at 11:28, Tosh Cooey wrote:
Mr. Hodgkinson was awesome
On 7/4/11 11:26 PM, Dave Hodgkinson wrote:
I'm not happy, hence the complaining about the AMI from 2009. But I'm glad you
changed the subject from your first one, which is that I should build my own
stack.
So basically you are saying (and only you, not a community voice) that in order
to
On 5 Jul 2011, at 08:53, Tosh Cooey wrote:
On 7/4/11 11:26 PM, Dave Hodgkinson wrote:
I'm not happy, hence the complaining about the AMI from 2009. But I'm glad
you changed the subject from your first one, which is that I should build
my own stack.
So basically you are saying (and
Dave Hodgkinson wrote:
On 5 Jul 2011, at 08:53, Tosh Cooey wrote:
On 7/4/11 11:26 PM, Dave Hodgkinson wrote:
I'm not happy, hence the complaining about the AMI from 2009. But I'm glad you
changed the subject from your first one, which is that I should build my own
stack.
So basically you
On 5 Jul 2011, at 10:53, André Warnier wrote:
Personally, I must say that statements like I just spent six months helping
a company do exactly[0] this make me dream. I must be in the wrong
triangle...
It was an interesting dynamic. Ownership of the Apache stack moved to the
developers,
Le lundi 04 juillet 2011 à 23:00 +0200, Tosh Cooey a écrit :
On 7/4/11 12:33 PM, Dave Hodgkinson wrote:
Is there a reason for the lack of plug'n'play mod_perl LAMP cloud service
providers? Or are there a ton that I just don't know about?
Because you really should build your own perl,
The only public AMI for EC2 setup with mod_perl I can easily find is an
OpenSuse one from 2009.
Services like Bitnami are a really nice platform for launching LAMP
stacks, unfortunately the P is anything but Perl :(
Is there a reason for the lack of plug'n'play mod_perl LAMP cloud
service
On 4 Jul 2011, at 11:03, Tosh Cooey wrote:
The only public AMI for EC2 setup with mod_perl I can easily find is an
OpenSuse one from 2009.
Services like Bitnami are a really nice platform for launching LAMP stacks,
unfortunately the P is anything but Perl :(
Is there a reason for the
Dave Hodgkinson wrote:
On 4 Jul 2011, at 11:03, Tosh Cooey wrote:
The only public AMI for EC2 setup with mod_perl I can easily find is an
OpenSuse one from 2009.
Services like Bitnami are a really nice platform for launching LAMP stacks,
unfortunately the P is anything but Perl :(
Is there
Am Mo, 4.07.2011, 12:03 schrieb Tosh Cooey:
The only public AMI for EC2 setup with mod_perl I can easily find is an
OpenSuse one from 2009.
Services like Bitnami are a really nice platform for launching LAMP
stacks, unfortunately the P is anything but Perl :(
Is there a reason for the lack
On 4 Jul 2011, at 11:03, Tosh Cooey wrote:
The only public AMI for EC2 setup with mod_perl I can easily find is an
OpenSuse one from 2009.
Services like Bitnami are a really nice platform for launching LAMP stacks,
unfortunately the P is anything but Perl :(
Is there a reason for the
On 7/4/11 7:54 PM, Dave Hodgkinson wrote:
On 4 Jul 2011, at 11:03, Tosh Cooey wrote:
The only public AMI for EC2 setup with mod_perl I can easily find is an
OpenSuse one from 2009.
Services like Bitnami are a really nice platform for launching LAMP stacks,
unfortunately the P is anything
On 7/4/11 12:33 PM, Dave Hodgkinson wrote:
On 4 Jul 2011, at 11:03, Tosh Cooey wrote:
The only public AMI for EC2 setup with mod_perl I can easily find is an
OpenSuse one from 2009.
Services like Bitnami are a really nice platform for launching LAMP stacks,
unfortunately the P is anything
On 4 Jul 2011, at 21:56, Tosh Cooey wrote:
On 7/4/11 7:54 PM, Dave Hodgkinson wrote:
On 4 Jul 2011, at 11:03, Tosh Cooey wrote:
The only public AMI for EC2 setup with mod_perl I can easily find is an
OpenSuse one from 2009.
Services like Bitnami are a really nice platform for
18 matches
Mail list logo
