Re: Apache 1.3.26 and mod_ssl

2002-06-18 Thread Cliff Woolley
, attached is a patch (totally untested!) which *should* replace the missing part of the mod_ssl patch. So after you've run ./configure --force, apply this patch by going to the apache_1.3.26/ directory and running patch -p0 modssl-2.8.8-1.3.26-fixup.patch. Let me know if it works or breaks

Re: mod_ssl maintainership

2002-06-18 Thread Cliff Woolley
On Wed, 19 Jun 2002, Tim Tassonis wrote: It seem like due to his various other commitments, RSE is not really active on mod_ssl anymore. Is there a plan to transfer maintainership of mod_ssl to somebody else? For 2.0, it's already been transferred to the ASF. 1.3 is maintenance mode only

Re: Apache 1.3.26 and mod_ssl

2002-06-18 Thread James Bromberger
, 18 Jun 2002, Matthew Ruzicka wrote: Pardon my possible ignorance here, but has anyone come up with any good work arounds for getting mod_ssl to work with the (patched) Apache 1.3.26 since 2.8.8-1.3.24 only wants to work with 1.3.24? I'm looking

Re: installing with apache 2 and mod_ssl

2002-06-15 Thread Zac Hillier
Hillier [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 11:21 PM Subject: Re: installing with apache 2 and mod_ssl On Fri, 14 Jun 2002, Zac Hillier wrote: Can you help? I'm trying to install apache 2.0.36 with mod_ssl and having real trouble I have re-installed a couple

Re: installing with apache 2 and mod_ssl

2002-06-15 Thread Cliff Woolley
__ Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager[EMAIL PROTECTED]

installing with apache 2 and mod_ssl

2002-06-14 Thread Zac Hillier
Hi All, Can you help? I'm trying to install apache 2.0.36 with mod_ssl and having real trouble I have re-installed a couple of times now once specifically with --enable-ssl=shared and once with --enable-shared=all each time the mod_ssl does not appear to compile into the modules dir

Re: installing with apache 2 and mod_ssl

2002-06-14 Thread Cliff Woolley
On Fri, 14 Jun 2002, Zac Hillier wrote: Can you help? I'm trying to install apache 2.0.36 with mod_ssl and having real trouble I have re-installed a couple of times now once specifically with --enable-ssl=shared and once with --enable-shared=all each time the mod_ssl does not appear

Apache 2.0.37-dev +mod_ssl win32 binaries

2002-06-11 Thread Michael . Straessle
for testing purposes, i have compiled a 2.0.37-dev snapshot on NT. as there doesn't seem to be any apache 2 binaries with mod_ssl around, i have put them in the modssl user contribution area. they are not intended to be used in a production environment, of course ;-) regards michael

Apache 2.0.37-dev +mod_ssl win32 binaries

2002-06-11 Thread Michael Straessle
for testing purposes, i have compiled a 2.0.37-dev snapshot on NT. as there doesn't seem to be any apache 2 binaries with mod_ssl around, i have put them in the modssl user contribution area. they are not intended to be used in a production environment, of course ;-) regards michael

Re: [BugDB] Error Starting Apache when trying to use mod_ssl(PR#712)

2002-06-07 Thread Prachait Saxena
I also have excatly same problem... Prachait Saxena -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2002 04:39:06 +0200 (MET DST) Subject: [BugDB] Error Starting Apache when trying to use mod_ssl (PR#712) Full_Name: Luke Whitford Version: 2.8.8 OS

RE: [BugDB] Error Starting Apache when trying to use mod_ssl(PR#712)

2002-06-07 Thread John Wagner
It looks like you are installing on a Windows platform. I had the same problem. Then I remembered that I had not overwritten my Apache files with the one that came as a part of the mod_ssl distribution for Windows. Check the Apache+SSL Win32 HOWTO.html document, section 4. jw John Wagner

Mod_ssl on Windows Operating system (NT or 2000)

2002-06-07 Thread Ikonne, Ike
Hi all, I am a new memeber to this group. I have a question which someone might have asked in the past, so forgive me if my questions had already been asked before. Here is the deal, I maintain apache webservers on Microsoft operating systems (NT, 2000, XP). I would like to install mod_ssl

[Fwd: Re: Problem with: Apache/2.0.36 (Unix) mod_ssl/2.0.36 OpenSSL/0.9.6d]

2002-06-06 Thread Thomas Gagné
Original Message Subject: Re: Problem with: Apache/2.0.36 (Unix) mod_ssl/2.0.36 OpenSSL/0.9.6d Date: Tue, 04 Jun 2002 15:48:36 -0400 From: Thomas Gagné [EMAIL PROTECTED] Organization: http://extra.newsguy.com Newsgroups: comp.infosystems.www.servers.unix References

mod_ssl for 2.0.x (Win)

2002-06-03 Thread Andre Steffens
I'm searching for mod_ssl.so (binary) for Apache 2.0.36 on Win2k. Could someone help me? cu. Andre __ Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org User Support Mailing List [EMAIL

mod_ssl-2.8.8-1.3.24

2002-06-03 Thread Ekkehard Ellmann LRT1
tell me the correct cure? (linux-2.2.17, apache-1.3.24, mod_ssl-2.8.8-1.3.24, openssl-0.9.7-beta1) Please mail me direct. Thanks a lot. Ekk. static const struct { char *name; int nid; } ssl_var_lookup_ssl_cert_dn_rec[] = { { C, NID_countryName}, { ST

Re: mod_ssl-2.8.8-1.3.24

2002-06-03 Thread Cliff Woolley
On Mon, 3 Jun 2002, Ekkehard Ellmann LRT1 wrote: Running make in apache 1.3.24 gave a compile-error in apache_1.3.24/src/modules/ssl/ssl_engine_vars.c The compiler pointed at the line: { UID, NID_uniqueIdentifier }, (linux-2.2.17, apache-1.3.24, mod_ssl-2.8.8-1.3.24, openssl

Re: mod_ssl-2.8.8-1.3.24

2002-06-03 Thread Geoff Thorpe
-2.2.17, apache-1.3.24, mod_ssl-2.8.8-1.3.24, openssl-0.9.7-beta1) Many changes have occurred between OpenSSL 0.9.6 and 0.9.7. mod_ssl is unlikely to work with 0.9.7 at the moment, even if this were fixed. Stick with 0.9.6 for now. Ummm ... I had generally been using 0.9.7-dev CVS

Re: mod_ssl-2.8.8-1.3.24

2002-06-03 Thread Cliff Woolley
On Mon, 3 Jun 2002, Geoff Thorpe wrote: Ummm ... I had generally been using 0.9.7-dev CVS with mod_ssl without any great grief for some time. Hm. Okay, well, you're luckier than the httpd committer who tried it. :) At least with Apache 2.0, many things have been rumored to break under

Re: Performance Tuning on Apache 1.3.24 with mod_ssl 2.8.8

2002-06-01 Thread Geoff Thorpe
but the same zealots and the same attrocities. __ Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager

RE: Performance Tuning on Apache 1.3.24 with mod_ssl 2.8.8

2002-05-31 Thread John . Airey
-Original Message- From: Cliff Woolley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 30 May 2002 23:59 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Performance Tuning on Apache 1.3.24 with mod_ssl 2.8.8 On Thu, 30 May 2002, Patrick Dionisio wrote: Currently, I have a client script that generates n

RE: Performance Tuning on Apache 1.3.24 with mod_ssl 2.8.8

2002-05-31 Thread R. DuFresne
! __ Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Performance Tuning on Apache 1.3.24 with mod_ssl 2.8.8

2002-05-31 Thread Courtin Bert
Courtin -Original Message- From: Patrick Dionisio [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 10:38 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Performance Tuning on Apache 1.3.24 with mod_ssl 2.8.8 Hi, I'd like to know what kind of tricks I can apply to improve the performance of my

Re: Performance Tuning on Apache 1.3.24 with mod_ssl 2.8.8

2002-05-31 Thread Geoff Thorpe
used) modules and options. Then you move onto the ssl-specific stuff ... disabling the COMPAT stuff in mod_ssl is a good idea - last time I checked, the code that populates environment variables with https-specifics was completely ass-about-face. I measured something ridiculous like 20,000 strcmp

Re: Performance Tuning on Apache 1.3.24 with mod_ssl 2.8.8

2002-05-31 Thread Cliff Woolley
://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=apache-modsslm=99717585106420w=2 This was fixed in 2.0 as of 2.0.25 but is not yet fixed in 1.3's modssl. --Cliff __ Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org User Support Mailing List

Performance Tuning on Apache 1.3.24 with mod_ssl 2.8.8

2002-05-30 Thread Patrick Dionisio
Hi, I'd like to know what kind of tricks I can apply to improve the performance of my apache server which uses mod_ssl. The OS I'm using is Linux 7.2. Currently, I have a client script that generates n number of requests to the apache server. The page it requests is a static page. With SSL

Re: Performance Tuning on Apache 1.3.24 with mod_ssl 2.8.8

2002-05-30 Thread Cliff Woolley
and then come back to looking at SSL tuning. --Cliff __ Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager

Bug Report mod_ssl 2.8.8 for Apache 1.3.24 with openssl-0.9.6.d

2002-05-28 Thread Courtin Bert
Hi there, using openssl-0.9.6.d with Apache/1.3.24 (Unix) mod_perl/1.26 PHP/4.2.0 mod_ssl/2.8.8 seems to lead to the following error on solaris 2.8: Apaches error-log: [error] mod_ssl: Init: Failed to generate temporary 512 bit RSA private key which prevents apache from starting. Openssl

Re: Apache + MOD_SSL Win32 crash

2002-05-24 Thread Peter Viertel
That sounds like the ssl mutex mechanism not working properly. Not sure whether anyones got it working on win32 and mod_ssl on win32 is still listed as an alpha release. I too would choose to ditch windows, but if you do need it, then you should try apache 2 at least the asf say its

Re: Apache + MOD_SSL Win32 crash

2002-05-24 Thread Enrico Demarin
This (again) sounds like the keep-alive bug : see http://www.mail-archive.com/modssl-users@modssl.org/msg12969.html - Enrico - Original Message - From: Mike Campbell To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2002 10:48 PM Subject: Apache + MOD_SSL Win32

Re: Apache + MOD_SSL Win32 crash

2002-05-24 Thread Mike Campbell
Wow, thanks! That solved the problem. Wasn't expecting such an easy fix. :) Mike - Original Message - From: Enrico Demarin To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 12:46 AM Subject: Re: Apache + MOD_SSL Win32 crash This (again) sounds like the keep

Re: Apache + MOD_SSL Win32 crash

2002-05-24 Thread Aryeh Katz
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 12:46 AM Subject: Re: Apache + MOD_SSL Win32 crash This (again) sounds like the keep-alive bug : see http://www.mail-archive.com/modssl-users@modssl.org/msg12969.html - Enrico - Original Message - From: Mike Campbell

Apache + MOD_SSL Win32 crash

2002-05-23 Thread Mike Campbell
Hello,I'm running Apache 1.3.24 with MOD_SSL 2.8.8 on a Windows 2000 server. I've installed and configured according to the "Apache + SSL on Win32 Howto" http://tud.at/programm/apache-ssl-win32-howto.php3 and I've gotten a certificate from Thawte. I can and always have been abl

Re: Apache + MOD_SSL Win32 crash

2002-05-23 Thread R. DuFresne
with MOD_SSL 2.8.8 on a Windows 2000 server. I've installed and configured according to the Apache + SSL on Win32 Howto http://tud.at/programm/apache-ssl-win32-howto.php3 and I've gotten a certificate from Thawte. I can and always have been able to make an (unsecure) http hit on the server. I

how to install mod_ssl at openunix 8.0.0 (caldera)?

2002-05-22 Thread ch
i tried to install mod_ssl-2.8.8-1.3.24 at openunix 8.0.0. but failed. the reason was apache_1.3.24 could not install at openunix 8.0.0. only httpd-2.0.36 can. how can i fix the problem? any suggestion for me. thanks for your help. Best Regardsvincent lin

RE: how to install mod_ssl at openunix 8.0.0 (caldera)?

2002-05-22 Thread Han, Donghoon
] will be available until the end of March, 2002 ) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of ch Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 3:54 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: how to install mod_ssl at openunix 8.0.0 (caldera)? i tried to install mod_ssl

Re: how to install mod_ssl at openunix 8.0.0 (caldera)?

2002-05-22 Thread Owen Boyle
ch wrote: i tried to install mod_ssl-2.8.8-1.3.24 at openunix 8.0.0. but failed. the reason was apache_1.3.24 could not install at openunix 8.0.0. only httpd-2.0.36 can. I don't understand this message at all... - Do you have apache already installed? Which version? - Do you know you

httpd in single instance with mod_ssl

2002-05-20 Thread Boex,Matthew W.
how do i start up httpd in single instance with mod_ssl. i can run this fine using apachectl startssl. here is the error i am getting at my feeble attempt... [root@rootabega bin]# ./httpd -X -DSSL -d /usr/local/apache [1] 29274 [root@rootabega bin]# Apache/1.3.24 mod_ssl/2.8.8 (Pass Phrase

apache +mod_ssl

2002-05-16 Thread MARIOCQ
Hello all: We are getting the next errors in the error log of our apache server. [Tue May 14 13:59:57 2002] [error] mod_ssl: SSL error on reading data (OpenSSL library error follows) [Tue May 14 13:59:57 2002] [error] OpenSSL: error:140940E5:SSL routines:SSL3_READ_BYTES:ssl

RE: prng seeding in mod_ssl 2.8.6

2002-05-14 Thread Noel O'Kelly
Title: RE: prng seeding in mod_ssl 2.8.6 Thanks Joe Noel O'Kelly -Original Message- From: Joe Orton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 10 May 2002 22:29 To: Noel O'Kelly Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: prng seeding in mod_ssl 2.8.6 On Fri, May 10, 2002 at 05:51:04PM

prng seeding in mod_ssl 2.8.6

2002-05-10 Thread Noel O'Kelly
Title: prng seeding in mod_ssl 2.8.6 We have a report of a problem from 2.8.6 onwards due to a change in the seeding of the PRNG which halves the performance of SSL requests. Any update on this ??? Regards Noel O'Kelly Accelerated Encryption Processing Ltd. Bray Business Park

Re: prng seeding in mod_ssl 2.8.6

2002-05-10 Thread Joe Orton
[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- mod_ssl/pkg.sslmod/ssl_engine_rand.c +++ mod_ssl/pkg.sslmod/ssl_engine_rand.c @@ -156,6 +156,9 @@ */ if (ap_scoreboard_image != NULL SCOREBOARD_SIZE 16) { m = ((SCOREBOARD_SIZE / 2) - 1); +if (m 1024

Re: prng seeding in mod_ssl 2.8.6

2002-05-10 Thread Cliff Woolley
using... Submitted by: Nalin Dahyabhai [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- mod_ssl/pkg.sslmod/ssl_engine_rand.c +++ mod_ssl/pkg.sslmod/ssl_engine_rand.c @@ -156,6 +156,9 @@ */ if (ap_scoreboard_image != NULL SCOREBOARD_SIZE 16) { m

Re: (OpenSSL library error follows) - in Apache 2.0.35 with mod_ssl

2002-05-07 Thread Cliff Woolley
On Mon, 6 May 2002, MegaZone wrote: (Wisdom I relearned today - use explicit paths. You never know when someone else has left an old install laying around earlier in your build path. Like, say, a non-shared openssl which makes a shared apache+mod_ssl sad... Not that I wasted a lot of time

OpenSSL with mod_ssl in Apache 2.0.35

2002-05-07 Thread MegaZone
nonsense now and then, is relished by the wisest men 781-788-0130 URL:http://www.megazone.org/ URL:http://www.eyrie-productions.com/Eris __ Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org User Support Mailing List

Re: OpenSSL with mod_ssl in Apache 2.0.35

2002-05-07 Thread MegaZone
__ Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager[EMAIL PROTECTED]

(OpenSSL library error follows) - in Apache 2.0.35 with mod_ssl

2002-05-06 Thread MegaZone
__ Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: (OpenSSL library error follows) - in Apache 2.0.35 with mod_ssl

2002-05-06 Thread Cliff Woolley
(released today) and use that. SHMCB is now fixed. --Cliff -- Cliff Woolley [EMAIL PROTECTED] Charlottesville, VA __ Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl

Re: (OpenSSL library error follows) - in Apache 2.0.35 with mod_ssl

2002-05-06 Thread MegaZone
paths. You never know when someone else has left an old install laying around earlier in your build path. Like, say, a non-shared openssl which makes a shared apache+mod_ssl sad... Not that I wasted a lot of time on that...) -MZ, CISSP #3762, RHCE #806199299900541 -- URL:mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED

Apache 2.0.36 with mod_ssl and working SSL-ProxyPass for Windows (NT or 2000) ???

2002-05-02 Thread Johannes Artur Bertscheit
Hi all, I still look for a working Apache 2.0.x with the following properties: - for Windows (NT or 2000) - pre-compiled binary or compilable with VC++ 6.0 - mod_ssl enabled - the right openssl inclulded - working SSL-ProxyPass (https http mapping to map internet SSL to intranet non-SSL

Re: Apache 2.0.36 with mod_ssl and working SSL-ProxyPass for Windows(NT or 2000) ???

2002-05-02 Thread Cliff Woolley
binaries from apache.org don't include mod_ssl due to ongoing questions of export restrictions. You can compile it yourself with VC6. ProxyPass https-http has been fixed. --Cliff __ Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl

Re: Apache 2.0.36 with mod_ssl and working SSL-ProxyPass for Windows(NT or 2000) ???

2002-05-02 Thread Cliff Woolley
-- Cliff Woolley [EMAIL PROTECTED] Charlottesville, VA __ Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org User Support Mailing List

Re: Apache 2.0.36 with mod_ssl and working SSL-ProxyPass for Windows(NT or 2000) ???

2002-05-02 Thread Dwayne Miller
. BUT: official binaries from apache.org don't include mod_ssl due to ongoing questions of export restrictions. You can compile it yourself with VC6. ProxyPass https-http has been fixed. --Cliff __ Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl

Re: mod_ssl, Apache 2.0.35 and ProxyPass

2002-04-30 Thread Patrick Herborn
. __ Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager[EMAIL PROTECTED]

mod_ssl problem

2002-04-27 Thread manjeet
Dear Sir, PLease tell me solution about mod_ssl Starting service httpd[Fri Apr 26 22:16:27 2002] [info] mod_ssl:Compat: MAPPED 'SSLEnable' = 'SSLEngine on' [Fri Apr 26 22:44:59 2002] [notice] Apache/1.3.12 (Unix) (SuSE/Linux) mod_fastcgi/2.2.2 DAV/0.9.14 mod_perl/1.21 PHP/4.0b4pl1 mod_ssl

Re: 2.0.35 and mod_ssl hangs

2002-04-27 Thread John P. Dodge
. __ Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager[EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon aéroglisseur est plein

[BugDB] mod_ssl on HP-UX 11.00 (PR#699)

2002-04-27 Thread modssl-bugdb
to build neither openssl nor mod_ssl for apache 1.3.23. Do you have some suggestions? My machine is # uname -a HP-UX a500 B.11.00 U 9000/800 1517720548 unlimited-user license Apache 1.3.23 with mod_ssl is now up and running, I can compile Apache 2.0.35 without mod_ssl. Thanks in advance for your

mod_ssl, Apache 2.0.35 and ProxyPass

2002-04-27 Thread Guan Yang
times out. Can anyone help me? __ Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager[EMAIL

Re: mod_ssl problem

2002-04-27 Thread Mads Toftum
On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 08:06:54PM +0530, manjeet wrote: Dear Sir, PLease tell me solution about mod_ssl Starting service httpd[Fri Apr 26 22:16:27 2002] [info] mod_ssl:Compat: MAPPED 'SSLEnable' = 'SSLEngine on' [Fri Apr 26 22:44:59 2002] [notice] Apache/1.3.12 (Unix) (SuSE/Linux

Re: mod_ssl, Apache 2.0.35 and ProxyPass

2002-04-27 Thread Mads Toftum
(mod_ssl) www.modssl.org User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: 2.0.35 and mod_ssl hangs

2002-04-26 Thread Owen Boyle
. __ Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager[EMAIL PROTECTED]

2.0.35 and mod_ssl hangs

2002-04-25 Thread John P. Dodge
on? Thanks Mon aéroglisseur est plein d'anguilles John P. Dodge Boeing Shared Services __ Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org User Support Mailing List

Possible fix for long domain names and mod_ssl

2002-04-22 Thread kwills
I have encountered the same problem as Bernard L du Breuil dealing with with long domain names and mod_ssl. This change to mod_ssl.c in Apache 2.0.35 is from looking at a ssl_engine_ext.c in mod_ssl version 2.8.8. Kevin [EMAIL PROTECTED] *** mod_ssl.c0 Tue Apr 2 08:30:08 2002 --- mod_ssl.c

searching for Windows NT binary of Apache 2.0.35 with mod_ssl

2002-04-18 Thread Johannes Artur Bertscheit
Hi all, has anyone out there successfully build a Apache 2.0.35 with mod_ssl openssl for windows NT? please give me a URL for such a binary. Currently there is only a non-ssl-version: apache_2.0.35-win32-x86-no_ssl.msi http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/binaries/win32/#stable

searching for Windows NT binary of Apache 2.0.35 with mod_ssl

2002-04-18 Thread Johannes Artur Bertscheit
Hi all, has anyone out there successfully build a Apache 2.0.35 with mod_ssl openssl for windows NT? please give me a URL for such a binary. Currently there is only a non-ssl-version: apache_2.0.35-win32-x86-no_ssl.msi http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/binaries/win32/#stable

Re: searching for Windows NT binary of Apache 2.0.35 with mod_ssl

2002-04-18 Thread Andrew Lietzow
level versions, but IMO, the new 2.0.35 is very easy to install with mod_ssl enabled, on a platform where it will plug-n-play.So, if you get tired with Win NT, for about 80-160 bucks you can come back from the dark side... The porters can help you, because they are very patient souls who want

Re: searching for Windows NT binary of Apache 2.0.35 with mod_ssl

2002-04-18 Thread Cliff Woolley
for tips. --Cliff __ Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org User Support Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: searching for Windows NT binary of Apache 2.0.35 with mod_ssl

2002-04-18 Thread Johannes Artur Bertscheit
the dark side... I have no choice - I must use windows NT - because of the customer / the project. I would appreciate to work on LINUX but I CAN NOT ! 001a01c1e6f8$779c62a0$[EMAIL PROTECTED]"> The porters can help you, because they are very patient souls who want

Re: searching for Windows NT binary of Apache 2.0.35 with mod_ssl

2002-04-18 Thread Dwayne Miller
running windows is a not so tiny market for a apache running on windows. I do know that it compiled quite nicely on SuSE 7.3 Linux with only two tries. I have pulled a little hair out in the past, with some lower level versions, but IMO, the new 2.0.35 is very easy to install with mod_ssl enabled

Re: Problems building Apache 2.0.35 with mod_ssl enabled

2002-04-15 Thread Issac Goldstand
It's fixed in Apache's CVS version. See bugzilla bug 7802 (http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7802) Issac __ Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org User Support Mailing List

mod_ssl-2.0.35 + mod_proxy

2002-04-15 Thread Issac Goldstand
I've just upgraded my front-end server to Apache 2.0.35/mod_ssl/openssl-0.9.6b When I try to connect to an https virtualhost, however, the connection just seems to hang there. Now, the backend is NOT running mod_ssl (under Apache 1.3, it didn't have to). Does it have to, now

Re: mod_ssl-2.0.35 + mod_proxy

2002-04-15 Thread Mads Toftum
On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 11:48:33AM +0300, Issac Goldstand wrote: I've just upgraded my front-end server to Apache 2.0.35/mod_ssl/openssl-0.9.6b When I try to connect to an https virtualhost, however, the connection just seems to hang there. Now, the backend is NOT running mod_ssl (under

Re: Problem with Compiling Mod_ssl

2002-04-13 Thread Server Admin
At 02:45 PM 4.12.2002 +0200, you wrote: Server Admin wrote: Owen: I run FBSD 4.5-stable and have tried 5-6 times to install apache+mod_ssl-1.3.24+2.8.8 directly from ports that does all the work, where I simply use make install clean but I'm getting the same (or similar) error message

Re: Problem with Compiling Mod_ssl

2002-04-13 Thread R. DuFresne
in the tree. Thanks, Ron DuFresne On Sat, 13 Apr 2002, Server Admin wrote: At 02:45 PM 4.12.2002 +0200, you wrote: Server Admin wrote: Owen: I run FBSD 4.5-stable and have tried 5-6 times to install apache+mod_ssl-1.3.24+2.8.8 directly from ports that does all the work, where I simply

Problem with Compiling Mod_ssl

2002-04-12 Thread Mohamed Alwakeel
I keep on getting an error when I do a ./configure --with-apxs=/usr/local/apachenew/bin/apxs --with-apache=/root/moh/apache_1.3.22 Error:- Configuring mod_ssl/2.7.1 for Apache/1.3.14 /configure:Error: Installed Apache doesn't contain Extended API (EAPI) I am getting very similar error when

Re: Problem with Compiling Mod_ssl

2002-04-12 Thread Owen Boyle
Mohamed Alwakeel wrote: I keep on getting an error when I do a ./configure --with-apxs=/usr/local/apachenew/bin/apxs --with-apache=/root/moh/apache_1.3.22 Error:- Configuring mod_ssl/2.7.1 for Apache/1.3.14 /configure:Error: Installed Apache doesn't contain Extended API (EAPI) I am

Re: Problem with Compiling Mod_ssl

2002-04-12 Thread Server Admin
At 11:41 AM 4.12.2002 +0200, Owen Boyle wrote: Mohamed Alwakeel wrote: I keep on getting an error when I do a ./configure --with-apxs=/usr/local/apachenew/bin/apxs --with-apache=/root/moh/apache_1.3.22 Error:- Configuring mod_ssl/2.7.1 for Apache/1.3.14 /configure:Error: Installed

Re: Problem with Compiling Mod_ssl

2002-04-12 Thread Owen Boyle
Server Admin wrote: Owen: I run FBSD 4.5-stable and have tried 5-6 times to install apache+mod_ssl-1.3.24+2.8.8 directly from ports that does all the work, where I simply use make install clean but I'm getting the same (or similar) error message, but don't have a clue as to how to do

Problems building Apache 2.0.35 with mod_ssl enabled

2002-04-12 Thread Ray Hillman
Hi, Having built OpenSSL 0.9.7, I have attempted a build of Apache 2.0.35 twice now with mod_ssl enabled and have hit the following error, where conflicting types are declared in mod_ssl.h and ssl_engine_kernel.c: . . . Making all in ssl /bin/sh /export/home/rkh/httpd-2.0.35/srclib/apr/libtool

apache 1.3.12 with newer mod_ssl

2002-04-11 Thread jbuchana
What are the issues with using a newer mod_ssl with an older apache? I need to use Apache 1.3.12 for a project and am wondering if I can use the newer mod_ssl releases? Are there bugs or vulnerabilities with the mod_ssl for Apache 1.3.12 or is it safe to use the older mod_ssl

Re: apache 1.3.12 with newer mod_ssl

2002-04-11 Thread Jeff
http://www.modssl.org/docs/2.8/ssl_faq.html#ToC5 quote: And this also means you only can apply this mod_ssl version to exactly this Apache version Regards Jeff - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:21 AM Subject: apache

Re: apache 1.3.12 with newer mod_ssl

2002-04-11 Thread Owen Boyle
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What are the issues with using a newer mod_ssl with an older apache? I need to use Apache 1.3.12 for a project and am wondering if I can use the newer mod_ssl releases? Are there bugs or vulnerabilities with the mod_ssl for Apache 1.3.12 or is it safe to use

Apache 2.0 and mod_ssl compile problem.

2002-04-11 Thread Neil Marjoram
I have had a few problems when compiling Apache 2.0.35 with mod_ssl. My first error was no yacc - I found the line in the modules/ssl/Makefile and changed it for bison, I have tried options --fixed-outout-files and --yacc, but it seems the y.tab.h file is not produced. However I have also

Re: apache 1.3.12 with newer mod_ssl

2002-04-11 Thread Cliff Woolley
On Wed, 10 Apr 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What are the issues with using a newer mod_ssl with an older apache? First of all, it would be difficult to get the patches to apply without heavy manual assistance. I need to use Apache 1.3.12 for a project and am wondering if I can use

mod_ssl compatibility with custom module

2002-04-09 Thread Robert Flicker
the fd_in: Some pseudo code to clarify terms... //loop to read post data... ap_get_client_block(...); // write data to fd_in write(fd_in,...); //rewind it // swap fd_in ap_bpushfd(r-connection-client,fd_in,r-connection-client-fd_in); Again: normal apache: works fine apache + mod_ssl

Re: mod_ssl compatibility with custom module

2002-04-09 Thread Sergi Mayordomo
: normal apache: works fine apache + mod_ssl + unencrypted conns: works fine apache + mod_ssl + encrypted conns: dumps data to file and onnection seems to timeout... Any clue? Thx in advance .-rf Does your module need any start configuration at httpd.conf? if it does, the lines Perl

Re: mod_ssl compatibility with custom module

2002-04-09 Thread Robert Flicker
to my file? Thx for your time :) .-rf _ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com __ Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl

Need mod_ssl to install with existing Apache

2002-04-09 Thread Server Admin
I am running FBSD 4.5-stable with Apache-1.3.23 with numerous mods and other dependents all set, configured running okay. BUT, now need SSL and must install just the mod_ssl without any other changes, except OpenSSH that I (believe?) I can activate from the base system. Being this is my first

Re: Need mod_ssl to install with existing Apache

2002-04-09 Thread Aryeh Katz
Jack, I am running FBSD 4.5-stable with Apache-1.3.23 with numerous mods and other dependents all set, configured running okay. BUT, now need SSL and must install just the mod_ssl without any other changes, except OpenSSH that I (believe?) I can activate from the base system. Being

Problem starting apache with ssl mod_ssl

2002-04-08 Thread support
greetings to everyone i have the following problem and it will be very nice of you if you could help me out with this! in one redhat7.2 i have installed apache/php/ssl/mod_ssl as it can be seen at the end of my mail In the httpd.conf i have put the following: ***httpd.conf

Problem starting apache with ssl mod_ssl

2002-04-08 Thread support
Sory with the first attempt samthing went wrong greetings to everyone i have the following problem and it will be very nice of you if you could help me out with this! in one redhat7.2 i have installed apache/php/ssl/mod_ssl as it can be seen at the end of my mail In the httpd.conf i have put

Re: Problem starting apache with ssl mod_ssl

2002-04-08 Thread Sergi Mayordomo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió: greetings to everyone i have the following problem and it will be very nice of you if you could help me out with this! in one redhat7.2 i have installed apache/php/ssl/mod_ssl as it can be seen at the end of my mail In the httpd.conf i have put the following

problem starting apache with ssl-mod_ssl

2002-04-08 Thread support
greetings to everyone i have the following problem and it will be very nice of you if you could help me out with this! in one redhat7.2 i have installed apache/php/ssl/mod_ssl as it can be seen at the end of my mail In the httpd.conf i have put the following: ***httpd.conf

apache 1.3.24 + mod_ssl 2.8.8 for Windows (2000)

2002-04-03 Thread Danalien
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I need some help, i patch, complie, and everything according to: http://www.modssl.org/source/exp/mod_ssl/pkg.mod_ssl/INSTALL.Win32 all goes fine fine, only get a few warnings (during the apache complie) I then go to the httpd.conf

RE: apache 1.3.24 + mod_ssl 2.8.8 for Windows (2000)

2002-04-03 Thread Ladner, Eric (Eric.Ladner)
PROTECTED] Subject: apache 1.3.24 + mod_ssl 2.8.8 for Windows (2000) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I need some help, i patch, complie, and everything according to: http://www.modssl.org/source/exp/mod_ssl/pkg.mod_ssl/INSTALL.Win32 all goes fine fine, only get a few

RE: RE: apache 1.3.24 + mod_ssl 2.8.8 for Windows (2000)

2002-04-03 Thread Danalien
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 8:52 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: apache 1.3.24 + mod_ssl 2.8.8 for Windows (2000) Hi, I need some help, i patch, complie, and everything according to: http://www.modssl.org/source/exp/mod_ssl/pkg.mod_ssl/INSTALL.Win32 all

RE: RE: apache 1.3.24 + mod_ssl 2.8.8 for Windows (2000)

2002-04-03 Thread Jay Burgess
: apache 1.3.24 + mod_ssl 2.8.8 for Windows (2000) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Japp, allready put it here. Can you go to c:/program files/apache_ssl/modules and see the mod_ssl.so file? Your second test seems logical since the module wasn't loaded

Re: apache 1.3.24 + mod_ssl 2.8.8 for Windows (2000)

2002-04-03 Thread Kristijan Cafuta RIP
- From: Danalien [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 4:51 PM Subject: apache 1.3.24 + mod_ssl 2.8.8 for Windows (2000) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I need some help, i patch, complie, and everything according to: http

RE: RE: apache 1.3.24 + mod_ssl 2.8.8 for Windows (2000)

2002-04-03 Thread Danalien
]] Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 9:18 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: RE: apache 1.3.24 + mod_ssl 2.8.8 for Windows (2000) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Japp, allready put it here. Can you go to c:/program files/apache_ssl/modules and see

Re: apache 1.3.24 + mod_ssl 2.8.8 for Windows (2000)

2002-04-03 Thread Danalien
to WINNT\System32 did you do it? - Original Message - From: Danalien [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 4:51 PM Subject: apache 1.3.24 + mod_ssl 2.8.8 for Windows (2000) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I need some help, i patch

WebLogic 5.1 sp11 mod_wl_ssl.so for Apache 1.3.12/mod_ssl 2.6.6 breaks SSL

2002-04-03 Thread Sean Staats
with mod_ssl 2.6.6 WebLogic servers: WL 5.1 service pack 11 [03/Apr/2002 16:58:42 04816] [info] Server: Apache/1.3.12, Interface: mod_ssl/2.6.6, Library: OpenSSL/0.9.6c [03/Apr/2002 16:58:42 04816] [info] Init: 1st startup round (still not detached) [03/Apr/2002 16:58:42 04816] [info] Init

<    2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   >