On Sat, Aug 12, 2000, David Rees wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 12, 2000 at 06:08:09PM +0200, Mads Toftum wrote:
> > There's always the changes file:
> > http://www.modssl.org/source/exp/mod_ssl/pkg.mod_ssl/CHANGES
>
> Yes, but I wasn't sure if it was up to date or not. It looks like all the
> major iss
On Sat, Aug 12, 2000, David Rees wrote:
> > Sorry, but mod_ssl 2.6.6 will be delayed a few more days. Those who need the
> > fixed version can use the latest snapshot (the fixes are already contained)
> > - or stick with 2.6.4. But I was not able to release the stuff today, because
> > I've trou
On Sat, Aug 12, 2000 at 01:19:31PM -0700, David Rees wrote:
>
> Yes, but I wasn't sure if it was up to date or not. It looks like all the
> major issues have made it in, I was just wondering if any other little
> tidbits made it in, too...
>
Well, there's always the changes file in CVS:
http://
On Sat, Aug 12, 2000 at 06:08:09PM +0200, Mads Toftum wrote:
> There's always the changes file:
> http://www.modssl.org/source/exp/mod_ssl/pkg.mod_ssl/CHANGES
Yes, but I wasn't sure if it was up to date or not. It looks like all the
major issues have made it in, I was just wondering if any othe
On Sat, Aug 12, 2000 at 08:33:15AM -0700, David Rees wrote:
>
> Do you have a list of changes for 2.6.6 so we can anticipate whether or
> not we'll need to upgrade?
>
There's always the changes file:
http://www.modssl.org/source/exp/mod_ssl/pkg.mod_ssl/CHANGES
vh
Mads Toftum
--
`Darn it, who
On Sat, Aug 12, 2000 at 05:29:22PM +0200, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
>
> Sorry, but mod_ssl 2.6.6 will be delayed a few more days. Those who need the
> fixed version can use the latest snapshot (the fixes are already contained)
> - or stick with 2.6.4. But I was not able to release the stuff tod
On Wed, Jul 19, 2000 at 04:53:02PM +0100, Edward Thomas wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> I have a site which utilises two Apache servers one one machine. One handes
> port 80 and supplies runs most of the site, the other is built with mod_ssl
> and handles port 443, performingnall the checkout operations.
On Wed, Jul 19, 2000 at 12:24:01PM +0100, Edward Thomas wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> I am running a site based around mod_ssl 2.6.5, open ssl 0.9.5a and Apache
> 1.3.12 using a Thawte "Super Certificate" (designed to allow new browsers to
> use 128 bit encryption outside the USA).
>
> The problem is t
Did you have a mysql-shared RPM installed ?
If so remove it and test again...
- Speciale Audiard - Tonton Flingueurs -
"Mais y connait pas Raoul ce mec. Y va avoir un reveil penible.
J'ai voulu etre diplomate a cause de vous tous, eviter qu'le sang coule mais
maint'nant c'est fini !
Je vais l't
Oleg Makarenko wrote:
>
> Apache core dumps only when AddModule mod_ssl.c comes before AddModule
> mod_php4.c... that is probably a mod_php issue so I'll also try mod_php list.
I have found nothing useful on php site :(
The other workaround I have found is to use LD_PRELOAD=libpthread.so httpd
I had good results using this guide
http://www.jasons.org/modssl.php for setting up on RH
6.2
But you may also try this devshed article to help you
(I havent used it)
http://www.devshed.com/Server_Side/PHP/SoothinglySeamless/
Luis
--- Florin Andrei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lynn Winebarger wrote:
>(1) clean out the previous installation of apache entirely, build with
> mod_ssl first (don't use the "--with-eapi-only" option).
>
I build from scratch every time... actually I use rpm -bc so I am sure the
source is clean. And I don't have --with-eapi-only in rpm's s
On Thu, 13 Jul 2000, Oleg Makarenko wrote:
> I am trying to build apache1.3.12+mod_ssl+php as shared modules. A lot
> of php extensions are also build as so (gd.so, mysql.so, oci8.so, xml.so
> etc etc). When I start apache with mod_ssl disabled everything works
> fine but if I enable it apche cor
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Since the doc still has reference to php3 , I'm curious as to the steps to
> configure the subject line's configuration. I tried running mod_ssl first,
> then php4, then compilation of apache, but that didn't work. Any Ideas?
Try first to install apache and
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Since the doc still has reference to php3 , I'm curious as to the steps to
> configure the subject line's configuration.
As usual, you need to make sure that your PHP i compiled with EAPI
support.
If you use Red Hat Linux, then you may just grab the latest
apache-mod_ss
On Wed, Jul 12, 2000 at 12:41:38AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Since the doc still has reference to php3 , I'm curious as to the steps to
> configure the subject line's configuration. I tried running mod_ssl first,
> then php4, then compilation of apache, but that didn't work. Any Ideas?
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Since the doc still has reference to php3 , I'm curious as to the steps to
> configure the subject line's configuration. I tried running mod_ssl first,
> then php4, then compilation of apache, but that didn't work. Any Ideas?
>
> --Ron
http://www.devshed.com/Serve
On Wed, Jul 12, 2000 at 12:41:38AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Since the doc still has reference to php3 , I'm curious as to the steps to
> configure the subject line's configuration. I tried running mod_ssl first,
> then php4, then compilation of apache, but that didn't work. Any Ideas?
W
t;.
Maybe this would help
Guillaume
> -Original Message-
> From: Oleg Makarenko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 04, 2000 4:32 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: mod_ssl | Netscape 4.7 works, but not IE 5.xx!?
>
>
> Florin Andrei
Florin Andrei wrote:
> Oleg Makarenko wrote:
> >
> > but no page loaded in the browser. (as you can see, it does establish a v2
> >
> > can you try https://www.platina.ru with your browser?
>
> Yes, it works fine!
>
> You can check my access in the logs knowing that my pro
Oleg Makarenko wrote:
>
> but no page loaded in the browser. (as you can see, it does establish a v2
>
> can you try https://www.platina.ru with your browser?
Yes, it works fine!
You can check my access in the logs knowing that my proxy address is
193.226.136.2 (mail.rd
but no page loaded in the browser. (as you can see, it does establish a v2
can you try https://www.platina.ru with your browser?
Oleg
__
Apache Interface to OpenSSL (mod_ssl) www.modssl.org
User Suppo
Seb Bacon wrote:
>
> there are ways round this problem. i know this because, for example,
> https://ssl128.co.uk uses the exact same cert type as me (verisign 128-bit
> 'global id') with more or less the same server (stronghold which AFAIK is
> apache + mod_ssl) and it works with them. i hope i
see my post "international IE5: info for FAQ?", 30 June + florin's posts
in short:
1) ignore the MS error, that's just their stupid generic oops page
2) you *CAN* blame MS in part: there are tons of errors in their
implementation of SSL.
3) i'm been researching this for days and still haven't fou
On Sat, Jun 24, 2000 at 12:23:33AM +0200, Leonardo Modeo wrote:
> Hi Hi,
>
> My web server (Apache 1.3.12) has SSL client authentication enabled to allow
> access to a directory only to a restricted group of users. Users
> authentication works fine. User certificate have been signed by a CA tha
Glen,
Try looking at the Verisign web site for one thing! When you've done that and
figured that the cost seems a lot if all you want is a certificate
and nothing else, then you might want to consider www.globalsign.net or
www.equifaxsecure.com/ebusinessid as an alternative. I might add that I
GOMEZ Henri wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Did there is work for mod_ssl to support mod_jserv or mod_jk.
> I wish to use an apache+mod_ssl+mod_jserv and tomcat.
>
> Thanks.
>
yes. All ssl implementations (ben's, mod_ssl, raven, ..) work
perfectly with mod_jserv.
you can forward any env var to JServ's (o
On Tue, Jun 13, 2000, Gek Low wrote:
> Hi all. I'm trying to port mod_ssl to a 64-bit Linux and I would like to
> know if this is currently in the works. One major problem I have is that
> ints are 32 bits wide while pointers are 64 bits wide (longs are 64 bits
> wide) and there are several secti
Thursday, June 08, 2000 08:18
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Mod_SSL+Tomcat
Okay, definite problems here. First, your Include line
Include /usr/local/jakarta/jakarta-tomcat/conf/tomcat.conf
comes outside of the section. That would be
okay, except that tomcat.conf contains lines that you
Okay, definite problems here. First, your Include line
Include
/usr/local/jakarta/jakarta-tomcat/conf/tomcat.conf
comes outside of the section.
That would be okay, except that tomcat.conf contains lines that you want
specific to a particular vhost. In particular:
ApJServMount def
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
Behalf Of Cliff Woolley
Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2000 16:08
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Mod_SSL+Tomcat
Cliff Woolley
Central Systems Software Administrator
Washington and Lee University
http://www.wlu.edu/~jwoolley/
Work: (540) 463-8089
Pager: (540) 4
Cliff WoolleyCentral Systems Software AdministratorWashington and
Lee Universityhttp://www.wlu.edu/~jwoolley/
Work: (540) 463-8089Pager: (540) 462-2303>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
06/06/00 03:54AM Include the mod_jserv/tomcat stuff in
httpd.conf >in the SSL block ...>(ie between and )
Err
>I am working with Apache, mod_ssl, and Tomcat on Debian Linux.
> I am trying
>to make sure all references to Tomcat are secure. Is there a
>way to tell
>Apache or Mod_SSL to keep Tomcat behind https?
Sure,
Include the mod_jserv/tomcat stuff in httpd.conf
in the SSL block ...
(ie between a
Define the for the servlets/jsps within the virtual host which
requires SSL.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tim Willis
> Sent: Monday, June 05, 2000 4:48 PM
> To: Mod_SSL List
> Subject: Mod_SSL+Tomcat
>
>
> I am working with Apach
On Tue, May 16, 2000 at 05:36:05PM -0500, Tim Willis wrote:
> I have one more question before I go away however. I seem to be having some
> config problems with OpenSSL. (I hope this isn't too off-topic). When I try
> to create a CSR, openSSL tries to uses this:
> d:/openssl/d:/openssl/ssl/opens
I have successfully installed mod_ssl and have accessed it via
https://localhost. Thanks to all for your advice and ideas.
I have one more question before I go away however. I seem to be having some
config problems with OpenSSL. (I hope this isn't too off-topic). When I try
to create a CSR, op
On Tue, May 16, 2000 at 10:10:39AM -0500, Tim Willis wrote:
> My listen directives are as follows:
>
> Port 80
>
>
> Listen 80
> Listen 443
>
>
Those look allright.
> Also, as per your other email, I connected to :443 using openSSL, this
> seemed to work, however, I still got a "Method Not I
s
and keys.
Tim Willis
IS Technician
Code Rite
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mads Toftum
> Sent: Monday, May 15, 2000 15:02
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: R
Hi Tim,
Try writing a Perl script to print out the environment variables and run it
in both http and https to check where the document root for each is pointed
to. In my case, I had to same symthoms... to correct my problem, I
recompile mod_ssl with "--prefix=/path/to/apache".
Luke
[EMAIL PROTE
On Mon, May 15, 2000 at 11:53:27AM -0500, Tim Willis wrote:
> ..but where?
>
> I'm able to start apache with mod_ssl, and the ssl_engine log verifies that
> it has started, but when I go to https://localhost:443, it's not there.
> Interestingly enough however, if I go to http://localhost:443, I g
While I have been completely unable to track down a cause. Or a solutions that I feel
is completely acceptable, I have found a
solution that does at least make the problem go away...
Simple turn of keepalive off
KeepAlive Off
in your httpd.conf file
This is the only thing I have found that act
On Fri, Mar 24, 2000, folivas wrote:
> I was wondering if mod_ssl can handle the proxy svr as a client to a
> backend web server. In other words, when the proxy svr passes a browser
> request to a backend web server, the backend web server requires a
> client certificate as well as passing the pr
You could find apache-mod_ssl RPM for at least two years at
http://www.modssl.org/contrib/
There was two versions one for RH 5.2 and one
for RH6.x.
I used to build RH 5.2 version from the SRPMS and have
worked with Magnus Stenman to have a PLUG-IN REPLACEMENT
of standard Redhat Apache RPM.
RPM
On Wed, 15 Mar 2000, tim wrote:
> hello ...
>
> well, here's yet another good reason not to use rpms.
>
> sorry, I'm not a fan of them ... and I'm not a macho do everything yourself type.
>
> I've done installs on Red Hat 5.2 and 6.1, works out of the box.
>
> tim
In the defense of RPM.. th
hello ...
well, here's yet another good reason not to use rpms.
sorry, I'm not a fan of them ... and I'm not a macho do everything yourself type.
I've done installs on Red Hat 5.2 and 6.1, works out of the box.
tim
On Tue, Mar 14, 2000 at 10:26:57PM +0200, tomi luhtala wrote:
> Hi
>
> Is
[Jason Terry]
> I have yet to find any solution other than totaly dis-ableing the
> keepalive. And, for the time being... the fact that Are you sure
> that disableing everything except SSLv2 always works. When I
> experience this problem I could find no pattern to what would cause
> it to crash a
07, 2000 1:48 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: mod_ssl problems with MSIE
On Tue, Mar 07, 2000, Terje Malmedal wrote:
> [...]
> Is it possible to make the server only force MSIE users to use SSLv2?
Unfortunately no, because the browser type can only be recognized
through the HTTP h
AIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2000 10:01 AM
Subject: Re: mod_ssl problems with MSIE
>
> [Terje Malmedal]
> > [Jason Terry]
> >> I am running
> >> Apache/1.3.11 (Unix) mo
On Tue, Mar 07, 2000, Terje Malmedal wrote:
> [...]
> Is it possible to make the server only force MSIE users to use SSLv2?
Unfortunately no, because the browser type can only be recognized
through the HTTP header field User-Agent and this is available _after_
the SSL handshake (where the ciphe
[Terje Malmedal]
> [Jason Terry]
>> I am running
>> Apache/1.3.11 (Unix) mod_perl/1.21 PHP/3.0.14 mod_ssl/2.5.0 OpenSSL/0.9.4
>> I have this line in my http.conf
>> SetEnvIf User-Agent ".*MSIE.*" nokeepalive ssl-unclean-shutdown
>> However my mod_ssl server still has problems connecting with
>>
Gsandtner Michael wrote:
> How I can control on proxy , whether the connected SSL server (in the
> example server.intern) is trusted or not ?
Well, you might want to try:
o SSLProxyVerify on|off
(whether to verify the remote certificate)
o SSLProxyVerifyDepth
[Jason Terry]
> I am running
> Apache/1.3.11 (Unix) mod_perl/1.21 PHP/3.0.14 mod_ssl/2.5.0 OpenSSL/0.9.4
> I have this line in my http.conf
> SetEnvIf User-Agent ".*MSIE.*" nokeepalive ssl-unclean-shutdown
> However my mod_ssl server still has problems connecting with
> MSIE and I can find abso
On Mon, Mar 06, 2000, Gsandtner Michael wrote:
> My situation:
> browser <-https-> proxy <-https-> SSL Server
>
> A RewriteRule on proxy (mod_ssl+mod_proxy):
> RewriteRule ^/(.*) https://server.intern/$1 [P]
>
> mod_proxy/mod_ssl acts as a SSL client.
> How I can control on proxy , w
Check if there isn't so pthread libs dependencies
in libphp4.so
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED] (. .)
PGP KEY : 4912D659...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP Fingerprint : 8CAD0D50356DA7E45C540B010FFE39E8
___
On Tue, Feb 22, 2000, Stefan Marx wrote:
> I've encountered the following error when trying to start my newly compiled
> apache(apache 1.3.11, mod_ssl, mod_php3(3.0.14), mod_perl):
>
> mod_ssl: Init: Private key not found
> OpenSSL: error 0D09B08F:asn1 encoding routines:d2i_PrivatKey:unknown pub
Thanks Henri.
Unfortunately I have a few more options to deal with. I am running
apache 1.3.9, rsa_ref, mod_perl-1.21, mod_ssl-2.4.9-1.3.9,
mod_php3-3.0.14 (with imap, mck, AND ORACLE support).
I did get everything working using apxs EXCEPT mod_perl. I can run
with mod_perl or mod_php, but I
I send RPMs for php 3.0.14 for mod_ssl.
http://www.modssl.org/contrib/mod_php3-3.0.14-2.i386.rpm
http://www.modssl.org/contrib/mod_php3-3.0.14-2.src.rpm
Notice you'll need also two others RPM:
imap >= 4.6-3 and imap-devel >= 4.6-3 (in all good mirrors)
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
You could grab a copy on any redhat contrib mirror.
There are the same as Redhat but with a shared
libimap.so
Regards
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED] (. .)
PGP KEY : 4912D659...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP Fingerprint : 8CAD0D50356DA7
On Thu, Feb 03, 2000, Blair Lowe wrote:
> I am having problems compiling imap support in php-3.0.14 (I tried 12
> first with the same results).
>
> Here is the failed compile area:
>
> ...
> checking for mod_charset compatibility option... no
> checking for fhttpd module support... no
> checki
(nothing whatsoever to do with mod-ssl)
Hah! Just hit that a few days ago.
I'm running RH6.1 which does not have an imap-devel rpm.
My steps were..
get the php-imap SRPM and install it.
run the rpm -bp (prep) phase on it.
run make inside the imap-4.5 subdirectory
.. this is important, else
1-Feb-00 13:11 you wrote:
> I saw some discussions about configuration of "lightweight"
> mod_proxy+mod_ssl server and mod_perl server.
> But, sorry, I can't call mod_proxy+mod_ssl "light" server. Mod_ssl adds a 1
> Meg to size of process.
Who cares ? 1MiB or 20MiBs - no matter. It's just shared
>
> B> mod_ssl is not a light thing, and I need encrypt mod_perl'd script
results
> B> only, therefore I think that mod_ssl should be in back-end server. Am I
> B> right ? Does mod_proxy pass ssl encrypted data?
>
> mod_proxy allows CONNECT method for SSL protocol support. I didn't try
> it, thoug
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, January 29, 2000 11:50 AM
Subject: Re: mod_ssl errors
> Hi -
>
> Does anyone on this list know what could be used to encrypt/decrypt
> streaming files on the fly? I un
Hi -
Does anyone on this list know what could be used to encrypt/decrypt
streaming files on the fly? I understand that public key encryption could
probably be used for encrypting a small key that would unlock the larger
file.
Regards, Jeff
On Sat, 29 Jan 2000, Eckard Wille wrote:
> jay wrote:
jay wrote:
>
> [28/Jan/2000 15:54:06 12886] [error] OpenSSL: error:140890C7:SSL
>routines:SSL3_GET_CLIENT_CERTIFICATE:peer did not return a certificate [Hint: No CAs
>known to server for verification?]
Your browser does not present a client cert (at least no cert issued
by a CA your server know
Darko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have apache 1.3.9 under red hat 6.1
My advise:
Remove your existing Apache packages (after having backed up content and
configuration files, of course) and install Magnus Stenman/Henri Gomez'
nice apache-modssl package in stead:
http://www.modssl.org/contrib
There is RPMs for Redhat 6.1 on http://www.modssl.org
There go to contrib tab
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED] (. .)
PGP KEY : 4912D659...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP Fingerprint : 8CAD0D50356DA7E45C540B010FFE39E8
__
http://www.modssl.org
Is a good place to start.
Keith Vance
West Coast Administrator/Network Analyst
(206) 215-9844
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 12/29/99 03:53PM >>>
Hello,
I have apache 1.3.9 under red hat 6.1 Also I got OpenSSL installed. I
guess I need mod_ssl as well for an inte
http://www.modssl.org/docs/
If you create a new mod_ssl/apache installation directory, then mod_ssl is
pre-configured into the httpd.conf file.
- Original Message -
From: "Darko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 1999 4:53 PM
Subject: mod_ssl
> H
On 22-Dec-1999 Cliff Woolley wrote:
> Sounds like maybe a broken vendor DBM library. Are you getting
> coredumps (check the error_log for "exit signal Segmentation Fault")?
Nope, it would have been too easy !
No core file, no seg fault in the logs.
Maybe because of perl, but don't think so : it
>>> Emmanuel Anne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 12/22/99 04:35AM >>>
>All this worked perfectly well for 3 weeks, and last
>week I had this problem : Suddenly the server
>stopped from processing https requests. The http
>requests were still answered, but when you tried
>https you got "Contacting, waiting fo
On Tue, Dec 21, 1999, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> [...]
> Server app-fallback.propertygate.de:443 (RSA)
> Enter pass phrase:
>
> Ok: Pass Phrase Dialog successful.
> ./apachectl startssl: httpd started
>
>
>--
On Tue, Dec 21, 1999, Thomas G. Peroulas wrote:
> I must enable my Apache server with SSL capability. I am considering
> Apache-SSL and mod_ssl.
> I am running an Apache web server using Perl CGI (OpenSSL 0.9.4 and
> Net::Crypt-SSLeay.pm) to pass https applications. Of course I can't pass
> htt
"Ralf S. Engelschall" wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 17, 1999, GOMEZ Henri wrote:
>
> > Did there is a way to get some of mod_ssl env vars (like SSL_PROTOCOL)
> > from a servlet running on tomcat and using jserv compiled with -DEAPI ?
>
> I don't know tomcat or jserv, but if your servlet operates not t
On Fri, Dec 17, 1999, GOMEZ Henri wrote:
> Did there is a way to get some of mod_ssl env vars (like SSL_PROTOCOL)
> from a servlet running on tomcat and using jserv compiled with -DEAPI ?
I don't know tomcat or jserv, but if your servlet operates not too early in
the Apache request processing, y
On Tue, Dec 07, 1999, Dan Tshin wrote:
> I'm awaiting for the OpenBSD 2.6 CD to ship to me - and I just read that it
> includes "Apache 1.3.9 + Mod_ssl 2.4.5 + OpenSSL 0.9.4". Very sweet.
> However, Mod_ssl is at 2.4.9.
>
> For those that are running OpenBSD with the latest Apache+Mod_ssl+Open
This has been one of my cautions for ages:
the software on a CD is outdated on the day the CD ships. If you use
CD'ed SW, make sure you go out and look on the net for updates and patchs
ASAP!
I do not know how many redhat 5.x installs I see that are open gaping
gates that say; comprimise my s
> Hey All,
> This might be a stupid question, I'm not sure. Can you
> drop a mod_ssl
> on an already compiled and running Apache server. As in I
> have RH6.1 with
> Apache 1.3.9 with mod_php. Can I use the mod_ssl.rpm to throw
> on top of
> apache
no
> or do I need to compile apache wit
On Tue, Nov 30, 1999, Sagar Gattapally wrote:
> I hav installed the mod_ssl on the WinNT. At my DOS prompt i am able to
> see the apache mod_ssl running but when i am trying to connect from the
> browser i am unable to connect to the server pl help me
If you're actually able to see already from
On Thu, Nov 25, 1999, Cyberdog wrote:
> I have finished with the install i use apachectl startssl it ask me
> for de phrase i write it. works.
>
> But when i want to enter my URL with prefix https it does not enter, but if
> i use http it enters.
>
> What is happening?
> How could i fix it?
So
On Thu, Oct 14, 1999, Anil A . Pal wrote:
> We were able to follow the instructions in README.GlobalID and get
> step-up encryption with our own certificate authority.
>
> Now, with the actual VeriSign certificate, we are seeing some
> browsers accept the certificate and step-up correctly, where
On Tue, Oct 12, 1999, Alex Muc wrote:
> I'm running apache 1.3.9 and mod_ssl 2.4.2 on NT. I am wondering if
> someone can take a look at the following section of my modssl
> 'engine.log' file. Can anyone tell me if these entries in the log file
> look like a normal startup for apache and modssl
"Ralf S. Engelschall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Sep 30, 1999, EKR wrote:
>
> > [..]
> > > mod_ssl.c(207) : error C2078: too many initializers
> > > NMAKE : fatal error U1077: 'cl.exe' : return code '0x2'
> > > Stop.
> > > NMAKE : fatal error U1077: '"C:\Programme\Microsoft Visual
> >
Uhm functional problem = functional program below :)
Alwyn Schoeman wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I must admit that I've never build apache+mod_ssl + X + Y + Z myself.
> What troubles me is that it appears to be a very complex process that
> nearly obliterates the chance of packaging a functional apache + mod
On Thu, Sep 30, 1999, EKR wrote:
> [..]
> > mod_ssl.c(207) : error C2078: too many initializers
> > NMAKE : fatal error U1077: 'cl.exe' : return code '0x2'
> > Stop.
> > NMAKE : fatal error U1077: '"C:\Programme\Microsoft Visual
> > Studio\VC98\bin\NMAKE
> > .EXE"' : return code '0x2'
> > Stop.
>
On Thu, Sep 30, 1999, Daniel Reichenbach wrote:
> i tested mod_ssl 2.4.3, 2.4.4 and 2.4.5 Snapshot on Win32. Its totally
> broken. 2.4.3 and 2.4.4 cause a page fault in OpenSSL, each time a
> connection is established.
Why is mod_ssl broken if you get a page fault inside OpenSSL? Instead I woul
On Fri, Oct 01, 1999, Alwyn Schoeman wrote:
> [...]
> Apache does have a
> gazillion options you know (:
Sure, that's the price of flexibility...
For hints to packaging look at the various RPM specs flying around which
install Apache+mod_ssl+X+Y+Z..
Ralf S
"Daniel Reichenbach" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> i tested mod_ssl 2.4.3, 2.4.4 and 2.4.5 Snapshot on Win32. Its totally
> broken. 2.4.3 and 2.4.4 cause a page fault in OpenSSL, each time a
> connection is established.
>
> mod_ssl 2.4.5 doesn`t even compile. It produces the following output,
> us
On Mon, Sep 20, 1999, Tim Niemueller wrote:
> I want to use mod_ssl. But I also want to use mod_php and mod_perl.
> These modules (php and perl) and Apache are already installed from an
> RPM. Is it now possible to compile and install mod_ssl _without_
> installing a complete new Apache?
No.
>
On an old thread about Oracle and Apache;
I have just received Oracle application server 4.0.8 and it is now
certified against Apache 1.3.6.
MIkey.
Ben Laurie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 03/08/99 15:36:37
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:(bcc: Mike Innes/Virgin Direct/GB)
Subjec
-Original Message-
From: Cliff Woolley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, 13 September, 1999 18:56
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: mod_ssl, namevirthosts, mod_ssl and network errors
Oh, darn. I just noticed this part of your message:
<<< &qu
Oh, darn. I just noticed this part of your message:
<<< "Martin List-Petersen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 9/13 11:32a >>>
> Apache/1.3.9 (Unix) mod_perl/1.21 PHP/3.0.12 >mod_ssl/2.4.2
OpenSSL/0.9.3a
mod_ssl 2.4.2 is supposed to be built against OpenSSL 0.9.4, not 0.9.3a.
You should start over as I s
<<< "Martin List-Petersen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 9/13 9:09a >>>
>Jep.. I first tried to compile with internal >SDBM source of mod_ssl
and afterwards to disable >it completely...
I'm a Slackware user myself, and the only time I've ever seen mine
segfault was when I tried to use the slackware gdbm
>>> "Martin List-Petersen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 09/12/99 11:35AM
>>>
>[Sun Sep 12 14:37:41 1999] [notice] child pid 17102 exit signal
>Segmentation fault (11)
Just to verify, you *did* try using a non-DBM session cache, right?
Like either shared memory (SHM) session cache or no session cache at
a
On Sun, 12 Sep 1999, Martin List-Petersen wrote:
> I get log entries in the access file of the virtual ssl server, i get no error log
>entries in the error log file of the virtual ssl server
> I get the following log entries in the global error log file:
> [Sun Sep 12 14:37:41 1999] [notice] c
On Fri, 10 Sep 1999, Mike wrote:
> Hi everyone
>
> Please forgive a beginners' possibly ignorant question... My first attempt
> at this...
>
> I have a server with several name based virtual hosts on it. As I
> discovered, mod_ssl won't work with name based virtual hosts, for
> reasons discusse
This is a repost of my answer to this question from when someone else
asked it a few days ago:
--
1. unpack, configure, build, and install MM and OpenSSL
2. unpack Apache
3. unpack and configure mod_ssl (thereby applying it to the Apache
source tree)
4. unpack, configure, and install mo
On Thu, Sep 02, 1999, John Kennedy wrote:
> We are trying to set up a server with mod_ssl, mod_perl, and PHP3. In
> reading the install guide I'm not sure if I need to configure all the
> modules before compiling apache or compile apache after each module?.?
> I know this is probably a fairly ig
On Tue, Aug 31, 1999, Graham Leggett wrote:
> I have just completed an installation of Apache v1.3.9 + mod_ssl v2.4.1
> under Redhat v6.0.
>
> Enabling the module caused Apache to segfault at startup. Nothing is
> logged, no output to stdout, no core file.
>
> Is there a way of telling Apache
Your applet itself would have to speak HTTPS. A socket connection opened
from an applet does not go through the browser, it's a direct connection
from the applet to some other communications endpoint. There is no
tunneling in this case.
Dave Neuer
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Franke
301 - 400 of 545 matches
Mail list logo
